CIA STARGATE release
NSA-RDP96X00790R000100030047-4
Opens with: 1. There is a larger sample
Warning: text for all documents has not been verified. Errors are possible. Check the original by document ID on CREST.
3 pages, machine transcribed from the CIA’s released scan.
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/01 : NSA-RDP96X00790R000100030047-4
[Optional Form 10 memorandum sheet, handwritten; two hands: a cursive body and a heavy block-capital note diagonally in the upper right margin]
[top left: two short diagonal pen strokes and a long diagonal stroke, no letters]
[circled: 1] Phone Jackie 9-4935 820427 [underlined by a long diagonal stroke] [redaction box]
[circled: 2] [struck through: Tell Dr. Cole (820427)] [short horizontal line at right edge]
[upper right margin, written diagonally in heavy block capitals, each line underlined:]
PSYCHIC
DISCOVERIES
BEHIND THE IRON ["BEHIND" overwritten heavily]
CURTAIN
SHEILA
OSTRANDER [overwritten in part]
LYNN
SCHROEDER
[double underline]
Paperback : [cursive]
[at the right edge, cut-off printed fragments: "NT" and "]"]
1. There is a larger sample
but it is not necessary
for all those involved to
know who participated
2. -
3 . This information while
not comparted(?) is
not necessary to be
known by those tested
4. This is not necessary
to be known by those
tested
5 ' answer from 4
6 , "
7. "
8 "
Answer to [interlinear above: last] paragraph - S112(?)
is the Threat Assessment branch
and as such is aware of
all threat to comsec
[black smudge at lower left]
[printed, partly cut off:] ...y Buy(?) Savings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan
OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10
(REV. 7-76)
GSA FPMR (41 CFR) 101-11.6
5010-112
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/01 : NSA-RDP96X00790R000100030047-4Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/01 : NSA-RDP96X00790R000100030047-4 TOP SECRET - . (b)(1) (b)(3) UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT memorandum DATE: 13 April 1982 REPLY TO ATTN OF: S144 SJ44 SUBJECT: Project TO: Dr. Cole, Ch/S1 On 7 April 1982, we attended a briefing on Project for individuals responding to an earlier request for volunteer participants. As a result of that briefing and of our subsequent experiences, we discovered that we shared several concerns and ideas about the project. The two of us appreciate the need for strictly limited access to s existence and results. We also recognize that many of our questions and suggestions may already have been anticipated by the project coordinators. It is with this understanding that we submit these points for your consideration. 1) Were the eight or so people who attended the briefing the only ones tested? Valid results would certainly require a larger sample and, preferably, a more diverse one. In addition, the test environ- ment was not conducive to the kind of mental processes one would expect in the experiment. 2) Was the test designed properly? The test itself seemed well implemented on the computer, but not well understood by anyone present. In th's kind of experi- ment it is important to understand and account for all factors that might affect the results. 3) Is there now or has there recently been any period of research into other such experiments, particularly within the government and the intelligence community? . The CIA shares many of our security concerns and seems to have done work along these lines. Was background research done before this test, assuring efficient use of resources and the avoidance of any unintentional duplication of effort? 4) Is this exercise part of a larger ongoing project? If it is not, the results would seem to be of little value. 5) Are there any plans for parallel experiments using humans in place of or in addition to the computer as 'sender' or 'target'? If there could be a difference between animate and inanimate parti- cipants, it should be investigated. 6) Have individuals with suspected or reputed psychic abilities parti- -- TOP SECRET- Buy U.S. Savings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 (REV. 7-76) GSA FPMR (41 CFR) 101-11.6 9010-112 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/01 : NSA-RDP96X00790R000100030047-4
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/01 : NSA-RDP96X00790R000100030047-4 TOP SECRET UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT memorandum DATE: 13 April 1982 REPLY TO ATTN OF : SUBJECT: TO. cipated in this or similar experiments? A comparison of results could provide some basis for evaluation. 7) Have experts in the research and testing aspects of the field been consulted, either directly or through the literature, about the design and evaluation of this experiment or of a larger planned project? The nature of the subject matter demands rigorous testing procedures that have been perfected over many years by researchers. 8) Are any follow-up experiment's planned to test whether the ability can be developed or learned over time? This experiment tested only current innate ability. Can an individual improve his score with practice? We hope that NSA shares our feeling that the possible consequences of this kind of threat justify a serious and in-depth study of its validity. In addi- tion, it is important to know not just how we regard the liklihood of such a threat, but how our allies and adversaries view it as well. We would like to see an element of S1, which is tasked with threat assessment, actively investi- gating the possibility of a threat of this kind. At the very least, it seems that someone should maintain a current file on the subject in the event of future investigation. In any case, we would like to state for the record that we are willing and eager to be involved in any current or future effort. S144, 4935s S144, 4935s cc: Ch/S112 TOP SECRET Buy U.S. Savings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 (REV. 7-76) GSA FPMR (41 CFR) 101-11.6 5010-112 @u.s. Government Printing Offices: 1980-311-182/8373 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/01 : NSA-RDP96X00790R000100030047-4