CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6

- ---
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-92
SOME BRIEF NOTES ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF RESEARCH INTO HUMAN
PARANORMAL CAPABILITIES IN GUANGDONG
GUANGDONG KAIZHAN RENTI TEYIGONGNENG YANJIU JIANJJI
BY :
The Guangdong Somatic Sciences Research Committee
In March
of 1979,
after the "Sichuan Daily" published the news that
Tang Yu could recognize
characters with
his ears,
research into somatic
sciences
was
launched
successively
in
Beijing,
Shanghai, Chengdu and
Kunming.
In the Spring of 1981, the Editor-in-Chief He Zongyan and editor Zhu
Runlong of "Nature Magazine" came to Guangdong for a conference. Taking
advantage of this excellent opportunity, the Guangzhou Academy of Chinese
Medicine
first
invited Editor-in-chief
He
to make a report on the
situation of research into paranormal abilities in all of China.
Then the
Provincial Department of Health Scientific Research Office also invited
him to make a similar report at the provincial science hall.
In May of
the same year, with the support of "Nature Magazine", Guangdong sent Liu
Ruchen, Deng Suhua, Chen Jingruan, and Li Kunhua
to go to Chongqing to
attend
the second discussion conference on human paranormal abilities.
Director of
the Guangdong Academy of Chinese Medicine, Liu Ruchen, was
also selected to be the Guangdong member of the all-China Somatic Sciences
Research Commission (preparatory). After they returned to Guangdong, they
made a report at the provincial peoples committee hall. After that, the
Guangzhou Academy of Chinese
Medicine,
the South China Engineering
College, the Guangzhou Academy
of Medicine, and the Guangzhou Municipal
Bureau of
Public
Health all established
human paranormal capability
research groups. Doctor Li Kunhua of the Yuexiu District Zhenggu Hospital
and the Guangzhou Academy of Chinese Medicine Qigong Office all organized
personnel
to
go
to
local
elementary schools to make a survey of any
abilities of children
there
to recognize characters with their ears.
Comrade Deng Suhua
went
to the Zhongda attached elementary school to
survey there. With the assistance of principal Zhang Yanlan, he surveyed
the entire school, discovering over 100 people with paranormal abilities.
He organized three demonstrations.
The teachers and employees of the
Guangzhou
College
Guangzhou
Medical
College
attached
School,
the
"Guangzhou Sanitation" Press and
the Sun
Yatsen University observed the
demonstrations.
The
South
China Engineering College
established
a
research team with assistant director Shi Dan as its advisor and Peng Hua
as the team leader.
Through
surveys of local elementary schools, they
came up with eight elementary
schools whose abilities were relatively
strong .
They were put through two years of training, and not only could
all of them recognize characters through non visual means, some were even
able to move objects, move the hands on watches and cause flowers to open.
Chen Jingruan, Guo Zuorao and Tan Xiqi of the Guangzhou Municipal
Sanitation Bureau organized a Guangzhou Municipal Cooperation Group the
Xinqiao Elementary School on Haizhu Road to train the seven member team of
persons with
fairly strong capabilities.
They could recognize characters
1
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-92
through non visual means, see through solid objects, make flowers open up
by will, move the hands of watches, and could move objects over short
distances. The performed demonstrations before a number of units and
instructors who came to Guangzhou, having a fairly great effect on them.
At that time, the "Yangcheng Evening News" reported on
the situation
developing in Guangzhou City.
There are always setbacks in any sort of development. In September
of 1981, the "Wenhuibao" published the speech by Comrade Yu Guangyuan,
thus beginning
the controversy
stage in the development of research into
human paranormal abilities.
At this time, there
were
number of people
who labeled research into human paranormal capabilities as being "contrary
to Marxism", "idealism", "feudal superstition", and "all kinds of people
doing research". They felt that human paranormal capabilities was "magic"
and "trickery". Because the human paranormal capability
teams of several
units in Guangzhou City had difficulties meeting expenses or had other
difficulties, they were dissolved.
However, because
of
the objective
existence
of
the truth of
human
paranormal capabilities, a number of
scientific research workers persisted with their research.
The Chinese
research
committee
( preparatory) for somatic science held their second
plenum meeting in Shanghai
from 09 to 12 September of 1981 during the
heated controversy.
From Guangdong, Comrade
Liu Ruchen sent Comrade Li
Zequan to attend. After he returned, he immediately made a report on the
conference
to
all
those engaged
or interested in
this research in
Guangzhou.
He steadfastly maintained that
human paranormal capabilities
existed objectively.
He also maintained that research should be launched
into the mechanisms of these capabilities.
He requested that the State
Science Commission arrange for both
sides of the controversy conduct
scientific demonstrations and continue to publish their articles in
"Nature Magazine"
and "Human Paranormal Capabilities Bulletin" to report
the results of their scientific research.
From 16 to 20 October of 1982, the Chinese Somatic
Science Research
Committee held its third plenum (enlarged) in Beijing.
Comrade Liu Ruchen
again sent Comrade Li Zequan as a representative for Guangdong.
After he
returned to Guangdong, he passed on the directives of the Leading Comrades
of the Party Central Committee and the notification from the Central
Committee Propaganda
Department as well as the spirit of the conference.
He also told of how happy the people at the meeting were over the talk by
Comrade Qian Xuelin.
In
the Spring of 1983
an all China human paranormal abilities
conference was held in Kunming in Yunnan.
In September
of
1983, the
fourth plenum of the Chinese Somatic Sciences Research Committee was held
in Huhehaote in Neimengu.
Guangdong
was
represented by Comrades Liu
Ruchen and Li Zequan. After they returned to Guangdong, they reported on
the conference and
told about
the
exciting test
where Comrade Zhang
Yusheng moved objects with his mind.
On 11 March of 1984, the fifth anniversary of somatic science research
2
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
in China, the researchers
in
somatic
sciences
in
Guangzhou and those
interested assembled
at the
Guangzhou College of Chinese Medicine where
they convened a symposium.
At
the
symposium it
was advocated that
Guangdong establish a Somatic Sciences Research Committee and it selected
Li Zequan, Guo Zuorao, Xie Fan, Lai Sanghong, Fang 'Naili and He Zhuoyuan
to form
the preparatory
team. After a number of meetings to draw up the
plans,
a
charter was drafted, outstanding personnel
were selected,
contacts were made with the appropriate government agencies, and the first
compilation of research papers of somatic science research in Guangdong
was printed. Also, after a thorough investigation, it was discovered that
Comrade Professor Liang Ronglin of Jinan University's Physics Department
had conducted research on somatic science for many years. Because of
this, he was nominated to be committee chairman. With the support of the
Provincial Natural Sciences Dialectics Research Committee and the Province
Qigong Sciences Research Association, on 20 October of 1984 the "Guangdong
Somatic Science Research Committee" was formally established at Guangzhou
Medical College.
After the Provincial Research Committee was established, it carried
out numerous
operations.
For example, in early 1985 it went to Huidong
County to investigate the ability of incantations to make a knife cut and
fire burn.
The
Guangzhou Medical
College went to Panfu Road elementary
schools for six different surveys.
The association organized testing
activities. Non visual sight occurred at a rate of 30 percent. Professor
Liang of Jinan University and teacher Zhang Zuqi organized close
to ten
tests.
In October of 1985 they participated in organizing the first all-
Guangdong Qigong and Somatic Science Research Paper Exchange Conference.
In October of 1985 they sent Li Zequan, Lai Sanghong and He Zhuoyuan to
the ancient testing of paranormal abilities discussion conference held in
Wuhan .
After the conference they invited Wang Weisheng and her daughter
to come to Guangdong for testing of seeing through objects and non visual
sight activities.
They invited old teacher Huang Minggao from Guangxi to
come to the committee to take part in a study conference on the "Book of
Changes".
In
November
of 1985,
Comrade Liu Ruchen resigned because of his
advancing age and recommended
that Professor
Liang Ronglin be made the
Guangdong delegate to the
All-China Somatic Sciences Research Conference
( preparatory) .
The Guangzhou College of Chinese Medicine Qigong Research Lab and the
Guangzhou University Qigong
Research Lab
took
part
in
the
Beijing
Aerospace Medicine Institute's Somatic Science Research Group.
At the present time, our committee is in contact with the dean of the
Institute of Applied Sciences at Princeton University, Robert G. Jabn, and
is making preparations to engage in a protocol for international exchange.
March 03, 1986
3
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-92
THE MECHANISMS OF HUMAN PARANORMAL ABILITIES AND QIGONG
QIGONG JI RENTI TEYIGONGNENGDE JILI
BY :
Liang Ronglin of the Guangdong Somatic Sciences Research Committee
ABSTRACT:
This article
uses
the
principle of
"the
theory of
incompleteness"
proposed
by
the
author
to
explore
Qigong
and human
paranormal abilities.
FORWARD
The
phenomenon of
Qigong
and human paranormal abilities has been
around since ancient times in China and in other countries.
It is only
that no
one has yet been able to explain these phenomena. The author of
this article has researched
the mechanics of these phenomena and has
reached the end of one stage. He reports his findings to the readers and
hopes that this
article
will encourage more
and
better research and
articles.
I.
THE
SPECIAL
CHARACTERISTICS
OF QIGONG
AND HUMAN PARANORMAL
ABILITIES.
Qigong, human paranormal
abilities
and
other
paranormal phenomena
have
common
special characteristics.
These
are that these phenomena
seldom occur and they
have
poor
repeatability.
Although
there are
somewhat greater opportunities for the occurrence of the Qigong phenomenon
than for the human paranormal ability phenomenon, and the repeatability is
also somewhat better, but for the vast majority of people, the phenomenon
can still be considered as very rare, and
the
repeatability is still
considered as poor.
It is just these special characteristics
that lead many people to
either ignore these phenomena or to believe
" they
are just not real".
Actually, many people still have not seen the miracles of Qigong and even
more have not seen the unbelievable demonstrations of the so-called "human
paranormal abilities".
Further, people have been taught in metaphysics
for a along time, and
doubt
that one divides into
two, denying the
dialectical principle
that
"if there is a normal, there must be a
paranormal". Some people even believe that "since the normal abilities of
the human body have not yet been completely defined, it is ridiculous to
talk about paranormal abilities."
There are many confused view points.
On another hand, it is just because these phenomena are so rare and
have poor repeatability that many people relate them to ghosts and demons.
There are quite a few superstitious ideas such as "demonic possession".
4
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
-
-
The two types of views on Qigong and human paranormal abilities above
are
both metaphysical, they are counter to dialectics. However, how
should we view Qigong and human paranormal abilities from the dialectical
point of view?
In other words, how should we prove: Qigong and human
paranormal ability phenomena are the antitheses to the law of uniformity?
Below is our proof of this topic. The method of proof is to start from
the "science"
of the West which
is so popular today because in today's
China, most people know what science is and many people have studied the
rudimentary contents of science.
II. THE PRINCIPLE OF "THE THEORY OF INCOMPLETENESS" AND SOME EXAMPLES
China has a population
of more than one billion. A great many of
these are science and technology workers. Anyone who has enjoyed training
in
science
and technology should know the statements that "science is
strict" and "you can't trick anyone with science".
Therefore, in their
science and
technological operations, the theoretical portions have to be
strict and the practice must be conscientious.
However, in theoretical thought, can we be completely strict in our
theoretical train of thought?
The answer to this question
is:
"This
theoretical idea not only
is not strict, furthermore, it
might be
considered by some to be a tremendous mistake!"
This is the so-called
"principle of the theory of incompleteness" proposed to use to study
paranormal phenomena.
This principle can be proven by the readers.
The
proof is as easy as pie. Furthermore, the person proving it need not have
any fancy
degree.
However,
let ús first make a demonstration. For
example:
(I). FAILURE OF NEWTONS'S LAW OF UNIVERSAL GRAVITATION
World famous scientist Newton came up with a law called the law of
"universal gravitation" which states that the mutual attraction between
two "mass points" of two bodies mi and ma is directly proportional
to the
mass of
these two "mass points" and inversely proportional to the square
of the distance between these two "mass points", or:
+
r}
However ,
this
law is invalidated
by
the
"mass
points" he
hypothesizes.
Because everyone knows
that
the
"point" of the "mass
points" comes from the point concept of geometry which is a hypothetical
object, or in other words, no one
has yet
been able to pick up a
"geometric point" and show it to anyone. To insist that "geometric points
actually exist" is a type of sophistry because "geometric points" cannot
be picked up and shown to someone, other people have the right to believe
that "geometric points" do not exist!", and they cannot be said to be
5
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-92
wrong, and no matter how much they fight over it, the question cannot be
decided.
The only way the sophist could
succeed would be to kill off
everyone but himself, and that type of demonstration would be stupid.
Let us return to the question of Newton's law of gravity.
We take
Newton's law of gravity as a very serious theory and call it a "complete
theory". However, as we have stated above, this type of "complete theory"
is opposed by one type of reasoning which makes it fail completely. This
type of reasoning is the "geometric points do not exist" we described
above.
Since the "mass points" do not exist, therefore this leads to the
m1
and
in
the
law of universal
gravitation
to be meaningless.
Furthermore,
the
distance (r) in
the
formula becomes completely
meaningless,
and
the entire universal law of gravity thus becomes
nonsense.
Therefore, this reasoning that "geometric points do not exist!"
is called "the theory of incompleteness". The term "incompleteness" comes
from its
meaning which is the opposite of "complete" or "incomplete" (not
strict) .
Therefore, if there are "complete theories" there naturally must
be the opposite "theory of incompleteness". These two must both exist or
neither exist.
principle of the "theory of incompleteness"
which he
have proposed.
It
is
a
principle which is universally
applicable.
Because
of
the extremes
of
thought, people either stress
the
"complete theory" part and ignore the "theory of incompleteness"
part or
stress
the "theory
of
incompleteness" part and ignore the
"complete theory part".
Obviously, Newton raised the "complete theory"
part of
the law of universal gravitation to occupy the absolute superior
position and pushed the "theory of incompleteness" part (which is that
"geometric points do not exist") to an inferior position. This is what
made Newton famous. He was good at taking advantage of this tendency of
extreme thought.
Actually, it was like this. Man long ago accepted many
"complete theories".
These theories became link after
link
in an
"extremely hard chain of ideas" which restricted our thoughts.
Let us now raise two more examples.
( II).
THE FAILURE OF ABSOLUTELY ACCURATE MEASUREMENTS
There
are
no absolutely accurate
measurements
in this
world.
Everyone knows this.
However, at first there must have been people who
believed that "there are absolutely accurate measurements in this world",
other wise why would we have refuted this statement?
If we call this
theory a "complete theory" ( that is "that there are absolutely precise
values in this world"), then there must be a "theory of incompleteness" in
opposition to it.
This "theory of incompleteness" is "absolute only has
meaning in comparison
to relative".
Therefore, "absolute" is also
relative.
Actually, any
measurement must
have some error, this is a
reflection of the "theory of incompleteness".
Let us raise another example.
6
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
IN957-04
(III). FAILURE OF THE IDEA THAT "EVERY MEASURED VALUE IS OBJECTIVE"
Everyone knows that when measuring length that every measured value
may be taken as existing objectively, that it is an objective value.
However, when taking this theory as a "complete theory", there must be a
"theory of incompleteness" in opposition to it which states that for every
measured value, the smallest unit is an estimate, and "estimates" must be
ideas or conceptions, otherwise they would not be called "estimates", and
this is the opposition of the "theory of incompleteness" to the "theory of
completeness".
In summary,
there are endless examples in science to raise of the
principles of the "theory of incompleteness",
and we need not raise any
more examples.
It would be better to raise an example of reducing the
principle to its basics and look at the result.
If a principle is reduced to its basics, then the "theory of
incompleteness" in opposition to that principle would immediately appear
causing the failure of that "theory of completeness.
"When the principle
of the 'theory of incompleteness'" fails, then it is not that "theory of
incompleteness" which
stands
in
opposition
to
the "theory of
completeness", and since there is no "theory of incompleteness" but only
the "theory of completeness",
then we are dreaming.
Facts demonstrate
that this is the case.
Actually, this universally applicable principle of "the theory of
incompleteness" is in reality the manifestation of the law of the unity of
opposites in
theoretical thought. This theoretical thought is not really
limited to the ideas
of
scientists and technical personnel, but also
includes the thought of all people. If a person has thoughts, then they
must conform to this principle. Also, thoughts, ideas or concepts consist
of
knowledge
of the world.
Therefore, it is better to say that this
principle allows us to have knowledge of the world than to say that this
principle exists in all knowledge.
However, how are we
to explain that the world we know seems only to
contain
the
"theory
of
completeness"
and
not
the
"theory of
incompleteness" and
that
metaphysical ideas are often used to explain
things?
Please look at the proof in the next section.
III. THE EXTREMES OF THOUGHT, STABILITY AND INSTABILITY
In order to explain why we often take the "theory of completeness"
for everything in the world and ignore the "theory of incompleteness", it
is necessary to discuss the tendency to extremes of human thought and the
reasons for this.
The
reason
human
thought
easily runs to extremes is because as
ourselves as "individual" "people". This
peopiApproved For Release 2060/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
7

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-92
is a "reality"
that
exists
because of
the unity of opposites in the
conceptual idea of real and unreal. Therefore, as a person, ones thoughts
very early ran to extremes, and later thoughts habitually ran to extremes
and had a tendency to extremes.
It is only by ideas going to extremes that there is stability in the
thinking of problems.
For example, a person is stable about the view of
being an "individual" person and of doing what a person should be doing.
Through
the application
of the "principle of the
' theory of
incompleteness ' "
to this
stability of thought we can immediately learn
that there is a "theory of incompleteness" which
stands in
opposition to
the "theory of completeness", that is in opposition to this "stability of
thought", which is that thought is not stable.
Now let us look at something important, which is when
"the theory of
completeness"
is
viewed
as "existing objectively", then the "theory of
incompleteness" is something conceptual .
For example, the "geometric
points" and the "estimated" final units described in the previous section.
We should take note
that "thought
is not stable" is also a conceptual
idea, because as explained before, it is "theory of incompleteness".
That
is
to say, any
manifestation of
"the
theory of incompleteness" is
conceptual, and that it rarely occurs and it has poor repeatability.
This explains that
when "the theory of completeness" is taken as
"objective reality" and as "normal", then "the theory of incompleteness"
is taken to be "conceptual ideas" and .as "abnormal" phenomena which occur
rarely and have poor repeatability.
IV.
THE MECHANISMS OF THE QIGONG AND HUMAN PARANORMAL ABILITIES
Now let us apply "The principle of 'the theory of incompleteness'" in
explaining Qigong and human paranormal abilities.
( I ).
EXPLAINING "RECOGNIZING CHARACTERS WITH THE EARS"
"Recognizing characters with the ears" is also called "recognizing
characters with the mind" because it cannot only be done with the ears,
but also with the nose, armpits, etc. Furthermore, after the characters
are written, if the paper is folded up or torn into shreds, the characters
can still be recognized in this manner. Obviously, this type of character
recognition cannot be taken to be a "visual" ability.
Using the principle of "the theory of incompleteness," it is very
easy to come up with an explanation of this "recognizing characters with
the ears", because the mechanism of visual character recognition is a type
of theoretical concept, and if it is taken to be a "complete theory", then
there must be a "theory of incompleteness" standing in opposition to it
causing this "complete theory" to fail.
Actually this is just the case.
There
are
a
people
number
of
who
have attempted to criticize the
8
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
phenomenon
of
"recognizing
characters with
the ears"
by using many
principles
of
Western
medicine and physiology concerning
how people
recognize characters, feeling that this can prove that characters cannot
be recognized without using the eyes. However, they are a long way from
being able to convince everyone because to properly explain the function
of character recognition it is not only necessary
to explain about
"people", but is also necessary to explain the world, and for a complete
explanation it is necessary to use the concept of unity
of opposites to
explain
it.
Obviously,
they
are
a
long way away
from
a
proper
explanation.
When the "theory of
incompleteness"
appears in opposition to the
"theory of completeness", the "theory of completeness" fails. Then, if a
certain character recognition capability
theory taken
to be
"a complete
theory" fails,
then other character
recognition
abilities
appear.
However, as we have said before, this is tied in with the mind, and since
it is
a conceptual idea, this sort of mental character recognition
phenomenon should seldom occur and have
poor repeatability.
This is
exactly as it is.
(II). EXPLAINING "LONG DISTANCE VISION"
"Long
distance
vision"
can
actually also be called mental long
distance vision.
With normal abilities, it is impossible to see over long
distances
such
as
several
thousand kilometers or over ten thousand
kilometers. This is not only because the distance is too great to make
out the objects, but there also buildings, trees and mountains in the way.
However, with the "mental
long distance vision" capability
this type of
unimaginable phenomenon actually exists and has attracted the attention of
people in China and other countries.
( III ) .
"MENTALLY REMOVING OBJECTS FROM A SOLID CONTAINER"
Using the mind to remove solid
objects from
container is
what this ability refers to. However, why should such a phenomenon which
is in violation of common knowledge occur?
Objects "passing through
spacial barriers"
without damaging
the sealed
container or damaging its
seal is impossible with normal abilities. However,
this type of "mental
removal"
can
be
explained
using
the
principle of "theory of
incompleteness".
When
such
theories such
as
"Newton's
law
of
motion"
and
"impenetrability of
matter" are taken to be "theories of completeness",
then there must be "theories of incompleteness" in opposition to them and
causing
them
to
fail, and
objects
can
move in
accordance with the
principles of the "theories of incompleteness".
The reason people find this explanation difficult to accept is mostly
due to the restrictions of the original "theories of completeness" such as
"do you mean to say there are problems with Newton's laws of motion"? "Is
9
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-92
there any doubt about the impenetrability of matter", and so on. There is
another viewpoint that "If you don't recognize Newton's laws of motion
then go ahead, but that object should stay in the container and not move.
Since it was not moving in the first place, it should not move."
We ask
the reader to try to find the fault in this statement.
As
for
the "mentally removing
objects
from a
sealed container"
phenomenon, most of the subjects tested said that
the object
removed was
like a "ball of fire" or "surrounded by fire".
Just
like
the
other
abilities described above, "mentally removing
objects from a sealed container" is mental, and the phenomenon is rare and
has poor repeatability.
(IV). "MENTAL RESTORATION OF BROKEN OBJECTS"
This is an example of which no foreign reports have been seen but of
which there have been quite a few demonstrations in China.
An object is broken by someone, and after it is broken, the pieces
are given
to the person being tested. The person being tested uses his
mental will to restore the object to its original state
before being
broken.
This cannot be explained using any kind of "science".
This type
of phenomenon can only be explained using the principle of "the theory of
incompleteness".
When the principle that "when something
is broken it can never be
restored perfectly to its original condition" is taken
as a "complete
theory", then
there must be an opposing "theory of incompleteness" which
makes it fail. Naturally,
this
is mental,
ant
the
phenomenon occurs
rarely and has poor repeatability.
(V). "MENTALLY USING A CALCULATOR"
Take an electronic calculator and allow the subject to learn how to
use it, and then take away
the calculator, or even remove the batteries
from the calculator. Let the person conducting the test or anyone present
come up with a problem and allow the subject use his mind
to operate the
calculator and come up with the answer.
There may be some people who deny that this is actually happening,
believing that it is a trick and saying that the problem to be calculated
can be done in the mind of the subject. However, we have seen where the
subjects did not have this ability and not even know how to solve the
problems.
Also, in the process, the numbers of the answers came out one
at a time, and at times the numbers in the
answers would
be in reversed
order.
This phenomenon can only be explained using our principle of "the
theory of incompleteness".
If we take the ability to use a calculator to
10
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
IN753-09
solve problems as
a
"complete
theory" that there must be an opposing
"theory of incompleteness" for coming up with the answer without directly
operating the calculator. It was a lot of fun coming up with this "theory
of incompleteness", but due to space limitations
we will
talk
no more
about it here.
4
To summarize what we
have already said, the "principle of 'the theory
of incompleteness'" does a very good job of explaining this type of human
paranormal abilities. On the other hand, if we do not use this principle,
it is impossible to explain this phenomena.
This is especially true of
concentrating on using the "theory of completeness" as the only method of
explaining the world;
it either
fails to provide an answer or a
conclusion which is in direct violation to logic comes up. This is just
the reason why people cannot explain
this paranormal phenomena using
science.
v.
THE QUESTION OF THE MECHANISM OF QIGONG
The
principle of "the
theory
of
incompleteness" not only is the
theory of human paranormal abilities, but is also the theoretical basis of
Qigong -
The
principle
of
"the
theory of incompleteness" undoubtedly
points out that human abilities
can be divided into the
two opposing
extremes
of
"normal
human
abilities" (based on "the theory
of
completeness") and "human paranormal
abilities (based on "the theory of
incompleteness" ) .
However, using the principles described above to form a new "theory of
completeness", we can then immediately come
up
with
the "theory of
incompleteness" standing in opposition to this
"theory of completeness"
which explains that
abilities
which
are
in opposition
to "normal
abilities"
and "paranormal
abilities" exist.
These abilities can be
called "intermediate abilities" or "Qigong". We can see that "Qigong" is
a necessary result of the principle of "the theory of incompleteness". In
other words, Qigong was arranged by the principle of unity of opposition
or Qigong was a necessary result of this dialectical world of ours.
Viewing "Qigong" as something between normal abilities and paranormal
abilities, it is possible to predict the direction in which a practitioner
of Qigong will progress.
That is to say that when the practitioner of
Qigong moves toward the direction of "normal abilities", this actual means
that his
art is not very deep and it often
becomes ordinary exercise.
However, when the practitioner moves in the direction of the "paranormal",
this practitioner will necessarily have paranormal abilities occur.
It is
actually like this in reality.
It is possible to use "Qigong" methods to
train "persons with paranormal
abilities".
The reason for this is just
that "Qigong" is located between normal and paranormal abilities.
---
The world is different for people with different abilities.
In the
"Qigong" or "intermediate abilities"
described above, there is the world
which corresponds to
"intermediate
abilities".
This
world is "Qi"
11
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6

. .. ..
.. . . . .....
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-92
( "internal Qi"
and "external
Qi").
Therefore, "Qi" is not a "normal
ability" or a "paranormal ability". However, when the practitioner veers
from the middle course,
this "Qi" can become a "normal ability" physical
force such as light or heat. However, the "Qi" can also tend towards the
"paranormal ability" direction
and become what those with paranormal
abilities sense as such things as "ball of fire" .or "mist". Therefore,
the "Qi" of "Qigong" is often mystifying because people often force it
into metaphysical forms and methods.
By the application of the principle of "theory of incompleteness" we
can
also obtain
several major phenomena of "Qigong" and its "Qi".
However, due to the limitations of the scope of this article, we will not
discuss these here but will address them in detail in another article.
VI. THE BASIC NATURE OF THE PRINCIPLE OF THE "THEORY OF INCOMPLETENESS.
The basic nature of the "theory of incompleteness" is one type of
expression of the law of unity of opposites. It is one avenue for the use
of the law of the unity of opposites to explain paranormal abilities.
Whenever
the
"theory
of
completeness"
and the "theory of
incompleteness" exist
in the minds of
men, they exist together through
their mutual
opposition to each other.
It is only when ideas go to the
extreme that a one-sided "theory" appears.
At such a time, the opposite
side of this "theory" is hidden.
The manifestation of the principles of the "theory of incompleteness"
is very obvious
science.
We can very easily
find opposite and
irreconcilable antitheses
to the
theories, definitions and concepts of
science illustrating the basic metaphysical nature of science.
CONCLUSION
The "theory of incompleteness"
is an expression of
the law of the
unity of opposites. Furthermore, the law of the unity of opposites is at
the center of the Western Hege'er ( phonetic) philosophy.
It
is also the
philosophical theory the wise ancient Chinese philosophers came up with to
summarize their knowledge of the world.
The Chinese have always paid a
great deal of attention to this important law and freed it from philosophy
and directly applied it to reality.
The theory of Yin and Yang, Chinese
Medicine, Qigong and human paranormal abilities are treasures of China.
This article only uses modern terminology to discuss the application
of the law the unity of opposites. If it allow our readers to understand
that "Qigong and human paranormal abilities are both manifestations of the
law of the unity of opposites",
then the purpose for which this article
was written has been achieved.
12
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
..

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-92
"HYPER TIME AND SPACE FLIGHT" OF OBJECTS THROUGH
HUMAN PARANORMAL ABILITY
RENTI TEYIGONGNENG SHIJIANZHONG WUTIDE
"CHAOSHIKONG FEIXING" YANJIU
BY :
Liang Ronglin of the Guangdong Provincial
Somatic Sciences Research Committee
ABSTRACT
The human paranormal ability phenomenon of objects making "hyper time
and space flight" has drawn
more
and more
attention.
This article
outlines the basic knowledge concerning this area and recent experiments
by the author.
-
The "hyper time and space flight" of objects is not the same as
ordinary flight.
However it can have similar beginings and endings as
ordinary
flights, which is that the object can "fly" from one point to
another.
When objects make "hyper time and space flight", it is characterized
by this flight necessarily having direct relationship with human thought
(or consciousness) .
Actually,
human thought
is of the nature of hyper
time and space, and
when objects
make "hyper
time and space flights",.
they are of the nature of hyper time and space. For example, when objects
make "hyper time and space flight", solid objects can be placed between
the point the object occupies prior to hyper time and space flight and the
point the object occupies
following the hyper time and space flight.
Therefore, the "flight" of "hyper time and space flight" can "penetrate"
spacial obstacles without damaging the obstacles.
As for hyper time, this type of "flight", because of its hyper time
nature, objects in "flight" have no so-called actual flight time. In
"hyper time and space flight", real flight time has no meaning.
Therefore, it is the same as "breaking through spacial barriers", objects
effectively "break through the time barrier."
Does this type of "hyper time and space
flight" actually exist?
If
this
""flight" is proven to exist, than
stories that had been called
fantasies in the past will not be far from
the truth.
Research into
"unidentified flying objects" (UFOs) has provided a type of indirect data.
From the large numbers of reported materials we can
see
a number of
reports of abnormal circumstances surrounding UFO flights. For example,
no matter how factual they are, reports such as the almost simultaneous
occurrence of UFOs over China's Xizang and California in the United States
can easily remind us of the "hyper time and space flight" mentioned above.
Is such "hyper time and space flight" preposterous.
The
author and
13
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-92
his coworkers have seen hundreds of this type of demonstrations of objects
making "hyper time and space flight"
and have personally conducted this
type of experiment. Furthermore, we have been forced to conduct research
into how
to establish a theory on this phenomenon and to consider its
applications.
However, this is far from being enough to persuade other
people that this is real. Actually, most people who have not seen this
type of "flight" phenomenon must
believe
that this type of report is
absolutely preposterous.
This is the only way
to conform with the
dialectical
manifestations
of this world.
Those who agree are in an
extremely small minority, and most people only have specific and abstract
knowledge of normal flight. If they said they were to say that this type
of flight which violated common knowledge was certain to exist, they would
be preposterous, because they only have an abstract acceptance and have
never actually observed it. On the other hand, it can also be believed
that merely having seen the specific phenomenon and not having a conscious
abstract knowledge is similarly insufficient, and is a type of incomplete
knowledge.
One can deny under certain conditions that "seeing is
believing" and feel that
it is possibly one's own illusion or a trick.
Therefore, in order to prove whether or not "hyper time and space flight"
is a hoax, in addition to specific aspects it is also necessary to have
abstract proofs and the
later are difficult. For this type of proof it
would be better and easier to prove that "ordinary flight" is a hoax. The
reason
this type of reduction to absurdity can obtain strict proof is
because the world does not have any evidence
to the contrary.
If we
obtain proof that "ordinary flight" is also absurd, then the absurd "hyper
time and space flight" may also
exist.
Therefore, the center of our
research should
be
shifted
toward
whether or not "normal flight" is
absurd.
.
Just as we thought, even though
"ordinary flight" (just like "hyper
time and space flight") has been specifically determined to exist, but in
abstract thought this type of flight is actually absurd.
Therefore, we
cannot use abstract thought to directly prove that this type of flight is
real. Furthermore, the "geometric points", "orbits' and "moments" in the
description of "ordinary flight" do not actually exist in the world of
flight. Here, we are not especially making fun of a number of theoretic
scholars asking them to pick up a "geometric point" or "orbit" and let us
see it, but we want to remind those who do not agree with us not to
stubbornly believe that your own ideas must necessarily be the reality of
this world. "Geometric points", "orbits", "moments" and "speeds" are
merely a certain convenient convention of thought or a type of convenient
idea ( imagination )
and nothing
more.
If we do not bring forward such
conventions, it would be impossible to describe ordinary flight in
theoretical ideas.
That is to say that
"ordinary flight" has its own
absurdity.
Since this is the case, then the theoretical ideas of "hyper
time and space flight" may use another set of "geometric points", "orbits"
"moments" and "times".
Research into the "hyper time and space flight" of objects not only
is research of the physical studies of flight, but is also a philosophical
14
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-92
topic.
Because only
those people who acknowledge the world is of a
dialectical nature can understand why in addition to the "normal flight"
of objects of the
world there
also exists
an opposing "hyper space and
time flight".
After we have clarified the necessity of the existence of "hyper time
and
space flight",
the next thing is research into human thought (or
consciousness), which is the question of why "hyper time and space flight"
is always closely related to human thought or consciousness.
In observing the "hyper
time and space flight" of objects we always
have someone use his will or thoughts to carry it out.
Therefore, the
"drive" of
"hyper time and
space flight" seems to come from thought.
Naturally this is
absolutely
absurd
as far
as
ordinary knowledge is
concerned.
Because as far as ordinary knowledge is concerned, thought (or
world. Even if thought had a dynamic role, this type of dynamic role
consciousness) is only a "mirror" with which man
reflects the objective
could not move objects, even an extremely small grain of dust. Therefore,
for thought or consciousness to move objects is very absurd.
Now, "hyper
space and time flight" being able to "penetrate solid walls" is even more
absurd than thought being able to move objects.
When we acknowledge the
reality of "hyper time and space flight", we must find out what the
thoughts (or consciousness) concerned are or must find out "just what is
thought" and "why does this phenomenon
occur?"
This is something we
should
look
into
because up until
now, no
one
has been
able
to
satisfactorily explain it.
.
When scholars
who are
accustomed to physical methods are faced with
this type of phenomenon, they very naturally mention that the phenomenon
of moving objects by thought may be because the brain emits a certain type
of particle group or
field, and
often call
this "thought particles" or
"thought field".
They
feel
that these particles or field causes the
object to move and that the reason
that
the
"thought movement" breaks
through spacial
barriers
is
that
these
particles
or field
first
disassemble the object and then it
is passed
through the
spaces between
the atoms
of the obstacles and then the disassembled object is once more
reassembled into its original structure to constitute "hyper time and
space flight" which "breaks through spacial barriers". These particles or
field are naturally not normal particles or fields. They have the special
characteristics of transmitting thoughts.
The disassembly and reassembly
are totally the conscious effect of these particles or field.
Otherwise,
science becomes a children's fantasy tale.
Truthfully,
we would
be very
happy
if the explanation above for
"thought particles" or "thought field"
for
"moving objects by thought"
proves
to
be
true,
because
this
type
of
explanation
is simple.
Furthermore, it could retain physics and would not require a revolution in
physics.
If one proposes the new particles "thought particles", then its
field "thought field" and its mesons exist.
However, this
type of easy
way out
does not work because
for an object to be affected by thought
15
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-92
( "thought particles" or "thought
field"), the object must
have its own
consciousness. We know that in order for higher classes can control lower
classes, and for lower classes can obey the orders of higher classes, the
higher and lower classes must have consciousness or thoughts. Therefore,
if one believes that ordinary objects also have conscious thought, then
the special thought "thought particles" or "consciousness" fields actually
become meaningless.
In other words,
this type of explanation actually
believes that
the "world is composed of thought". Therefore, it would be
impossible to maintain the science of physics which has nothing at all to
do
with
thought and
it would be in direct opposition to the original
purpose.
The reason we do not like
to
use
"thought particles" or "thought
fields' is because these concepts come from the concepts of the particles
and fields of physics and that they are objects of thought or conceptually
abstract.
Actually, should we discover that "hyper time and space flight"
are related to thought, and that the physics concepts of "particles and
fields"
are actually related
to thought,
we
will feel that it is
unnecessary and a waste of time to use "particles and fields" to tour the
world.
In other
words, when
we try to find the reasons for "hyper time
and space flight", we must determine exactly what thought is. However, we
must not use the
limited manifestations (physical) of thought to explain
what thought is.
Present day physics is only a type of convention, a
limited convention.
-
It cannot completely explain thought. For example:
"A bowl cannot tell the bowl maker what
it would
like
to
be used to
contain."
( This quote was taken from "Ande Book of Martyrs"). Then, why
must we take this winding route in our research?
Therefore, when we do research into "hyper time and space flight", we
are
wasting
our time and effort if we attempt to use modern science.
Actually, we explored many different directions, for example, modern
electromagnetic theory, quantum mechanics,
the theory of relativity and
the theory of gravity all of
which were of no use in
explaining "hyper
time
and space
flight".
Furthermore,
through this research, we were
deeply convinced that the
world described
by modern
science, especially
physics, is far from what the real world actually is.
However, there will of
necessity be a great deal of difficulties in
ridding oneself of the restrictions of the contents of the book shelves to
try to find out exactly what "hyper time and space flight" actually is.
Most of the difficulties will be those interpersonal difficulties.
This
is because on the one hand, people with this type of ability do not think
in the same way or have the same thought habits as normal people.
On the
other hand,
"the rarer something is the more valuable it is". Certain
people use this as a marketable commodity or simply perpetrate fraud. The
second difficulty will be like we mentioned above, the reason we cannot
use today's most advanced electronic instruments to explain "hyper time
and space
is because electronic instruments were designed to
measure "ordinary" flight according to a certain conventions ( physics,
etc) of
thought.
Naturally, all of the difficulties mentioned above are
16
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
-

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
IN757-09
caused by the rejection by our world of "ordinary flight" of that world of
"hyper time and space flight".
Because of this rejection, and because those who have the ability of
"hyper time and space flight" are weak, this ability is very easily lost
or
weakened.
For example, say there was a certain person with this
ability who relied on what we consider fantasy thoughts to maintain this
"hyper time
and space flight.
However, if we force her to study our
curriculum, especially such subjects that train abstract thoughts such as
mathematics,
we
would discover"
"that her abilities would quickly become
weaker.
Also, there is the adverse affect on this ability of the excess
search for ideals by young people during their transitional period. This
is because the vast
majority of the time they live among us people of
ordinary abilities.
This is the so-called two worlds mutual rejection
effect. The result is that one can have one or the other, but not both.
Because of this, in order to maintain this type or research, we must
continually have replacements of new personnel
or do research on how to
restore the original powers to these people.
There are also a very small number of persons who have this type
of ability into middle
However, because they are in an
abnormal ideological state, they can only provide researchers with limited
data.
They often
seem to be odd when compared to ordinary people and
cause our researchers to lose hope because of the difficulties in working
with them.
Even though "hyper time and space flight" may be the guiding light to
the revealing of the secrets of nature of human life, the author is not
very optimistic about the outlook for this research.
However if it is
once accepted that this type of flight exists,
it will
be of great
significance.
It will indicate that man's knowledge of the world is still
in a state of ignorance.
17
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-92
THE INOBJECTIVITY OF THE THEORY OF ELECTROMAGNETICS
DIANCE LILUNDE FEKEGUANXING
BY: Liang Ronglin of the Jinan University Department of Physics
ABSTRACT
This
article
discusses
the
inobjectivity
of
the
theory of
electromagnetics, pointing out
the
type
of mental
acceptance of this
theory
and
where
it
came
from.
It provides materials useful for the
direct demonstration of the
mechanism
of Qigong
and human paranormal
abilities.
I.
WHY BRING UP THE INOBJECTIVITY OF THE THEORY OF ELECTROMAGNETICS
Man discovered
the phenomenon of electromagnetism a long time ago,
but the theoretical explanation of these phenomena was not begun until the
18th Century from research by Coulomb and others.
However, all research
must be related to the world of that researcher.
There has never been a
scientific theory that transcended the world view.
Otherwise, there would
be no way to propose the theory.
Man's knowledge of the world is boundless. Seventeenth century man's
world outlook was not necessarily twentieth century man's world outlook.
One person's world outlook might not be the same as another person's world
outlook.
To say
that they were necessarily absolutely the same would be
ridiculous.
However,
it
should
be pointed out
that today's more developed
science's theory
of electromagnetics
is the old 18th century thing. In
other words, this type of electromagnetic theory is almost not even part
of our world view.
This is a strange phenomenon we have come into contact
with in science.
Furthermore, for not a few phenomena, especially those which touch
upon the phenomenon of thought or on phenomena of life, to be explained
using today's theory of electromagnetism is actually
a monumental task
which often has a negative result. Because of the reasons above, we are
forced to reveal the mysteries within, and the inobjectivity of today's
electromagnetic theory is the primary subject of this article.
II.
THE RELATIONSHIP AMONG ACTUAL FORCE, ELECTROMAGNETIC FORCE AND
GRAVITATIONAL FORCE
Research on the phenomenon of electromagnetism
from the 18th to the
19th Century
was based on one hypothesis, that was that the phenomenon of
electromagnetism created a kind
of force called
electromagnetic force
(including the so-called electrostatic
force and magnetostatic force in
18
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-97
the phenomenon of electrostatic
£
magnetism), that this type of force is
completely different
from magnetism.
Furthermore, the actual force that
occurs in electromagnetic phenomenon is the result of
the superimposition
of electromagnetic force and gravity, that is
¥
1
f
actual force = f electromagnetic force
+
f
gravitational force
It
should
be pointed out
that in electromagnetic phenomena, only
actual
force
can
be detected,
and
that
the gravitational force is
estimated, and
it seams
that it should be determined by the distribution
of the gravitational
mass
when
the electromagnetic phenomenon occurs.
Thus,
the
so-called electromagnetic force
should
be defined as the
difference between these two forces, or
7
f electromagnetic force = f actual force - f
-
gravitational force
We are very disappointed to see that gravitational force is a type of
force which can not be actually measured empirically but is a force which
can only be estimated. This causes us to have some great doubts about
this so-called "electromagnetic force".
Because this electromagnetic
force actually cannot be measured, therefore the "field", "potential" and
"charge" that it theoretically generates can not be measured. However
today's electromagnetic theory believes that all the things involved in
electromagnetic force are very real.
This is very odd.
That type of
getting by under false pretenses actually makes one feel like
it must be
revealed.
This type of "method" in general
is to use the measurement science
term "not noted". How is the term "not noted" used in magnetic theory to
legitimize electromagnetic force?
Concerning the relationship among
the three forces described above,
one need only concede that the
actual
force is much greater than the
gravitational force, then
f actual force
> >
f gravitational force
Then we can see
that the
electromagnetic force is close to that of
the actual force,
-
f electromagnetic force = f actual force
-
>
and the magnetic force would be elevated
to
a
measurable force.
However, this method has a problem in principle, as we will see in later
analysis.
19
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-92
III.
CONCERNING OVERLOOKED PROBLEMS IN THE GRAVITATIONAL FORCE
CATEGORY
It is normally believed that the gravitational force item is smaller
than the
actual force by several tens of orders of magnitudes, so it is
completely possible to ignore the gravitational force item, and then
f actual force = f electromagnetic force
In this manner, we can believe
that the
actual measured
force (for
example,
the
force Coulomb
used
his
scale
to
measure)
is
the
electromagnetic force (or the electrostatic force) .
However, it must be noted that when we use the term "ignored" in the
problems above,
we
actually are requiring that the gravitational force
being approximately zero as
one of
the conditions of the calculations,
then
f gravitational force = 0
(1)
Then on
the other hand, if
the gravitational
force is zero, then we
can believe that
the phenomenon
being
measured
does not
contain any
gravitational mass, and we have the result
f gravitational force = 0
(2)
The two different definitions of gravitational forces as zero in the two
problems above are that in formula (1) and (2) have "0" on the right side.
This has caused a great deal of trouble.
If
the
zero on
the
right side of formula (1) can be felt to be
reasonable from the viewpoint of measurement science, then the zero on the
right side of formula (2) is not reasonable.
Because formula (2) takes
the object of research ( for example frequently the so-called "charge")
not to
contain any mass, and
then how
could a "charge" which does not
contain any mass demonstrate the effect of its
force?
Unless there was
really a ghost with his hand in it.
Actually,
£
today's electromagnetic
theories
all use the number (2
formula) equality symbol and not
the
formula
(1)
approximation symbol.
This must be the recognition of the existence of the "spirit world".
Can formula
(1)
be
used
to
In order to remove any
intrusion of the "spirit
world", it
is necessary
to reduce formula (1) to its original form which
was
7
actual force = f electromagnetic force
+
universal gravitational force
and not haphazardly use the approximation symbol to establish the theory.
20
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
as
the
basis
to establish
an
electromagnetic theory?

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
I N757-07
Naturally, we should allow other people to hypothesize that the universal
magnetism to be much smaller than the actual
force, but we should not
allow the universal magnetism to be set at zero.
If
we
can
use
this relationship
to establish a theory of
electromagnetism, then we should believe that
"electromagnetic force" is
real !
However, the analysis that follows is very disappointing, because
from this original convention of the force we
were unable to extract
today's so-called "intensity of electric field", "potential" or "charge".
Please see the analysis of the following section.
IV. PROBLEMS IN DEFINING INTENSITY OF ELECTRIC FIELD E
If we are to keep the intensity of electric field
-
from becoming
nothing
more
than object of our imagination, but try to use so-called
objective objects for our definition of the intensity of electric field,
we are wasting our time. This is because the actual force any real object
receives in the electromagnetic phenomenon is not electrical magnetism or
electromagnetic force.
Under normal conditions, the actual fore is
limited, and furthermore, even where electromagnetic phenomena have been
arranged, the actual force is not zero, because there is still universal
magnetism. Using static electricity for an example. If this actual force
is divided by qo and qo approaches zero, then this value immediately
becomes infinitely large. That is when qo approaches zero,
Factual force
qo
approaching infinity
Therefore, if we do not ignore this so-called small fractional universal
magnetism item, and try to use the real object of the so-called
experimental charge of the electromagnetism theory
to investigate the
intensity of electric field, we are wasting our time.
Therefore, whether or not we ignore the universal magnetism item, it
is impossible to objectively define the intensity of electric field.
Also, when we ignore it, just as we have said before, we introduce the
"spirit world", and when we do not ignore it, the intensity of electric
field it induces is meaningless.
Therefore, because
the convention of using zero for the universal
magnetism item, today's theories of electromagnetism is a door between the
"humans" and "the spirit world" and is something on the "spirit world"
side, because it is normally considered that universal magnetism belong's
to the "human world", and belongs to the other side of this door.
Naturally,
if accept both universal magnetism and electromagnetic
force, this requires that we accept the "human
world" and the "spirit
world".
If the
former has objectivity, then the latter must not have
21
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-92
objectivity, and any electromagnetic force must lack objectivity.
This is
the problem this article has tried to point out.
v.
THE SOURCE OF THE LACK OF OBJECTIVITY OF THE ELECTROMAGNETIC THEORY
It
is
better
to
say
that
the
lack
of objectivity of the
electromagnetic theory
comes
from
the
Newton
convention of universal
gravitational
force
than
to
say
the electromagnetic force of Coulomb,
Maxwell and Lorentz.
The human world seems
to have
something like
universal gravitational
force which attracts objects.
This
concept is solidly rooted.
It has
lasted for more than three centuries.
However,
the
laws of universal
gravity established by Newton and others in the 17th Century view see this
as a type of force, and it is
still viewed
as a
type of basic force to
this day.
The metaphysical nature of this type of force which only
attracts and does not repel baffles
people
to this
day.
Furthermore,
today
we
believe
that anything metaphysical represents
something
inconceivable and the appearance of "the spirit world".
If
mankind will
believe that
this metaphysics was science, then the "spirit world" would
appear among men.
The exposure of the spirit nature of the
theory of electromagnetism
is an extremely good example of this viewpoint.
22
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-92
DO NOT ALLOW TODAY'S ELECTROMAGNETIC THEORY TO POLLUTE HUMAN
PARANORMAL ABILITY RESEARCH
BUYAO RANG JINTIANDE DIANCELILUN WURAN RENTI TEYIGONGNENGDE YANJIU
BY :
Liang Ronglin of Jinan University Physics Department
ABSTRACT:
This article
reminds those conducting research into Qigong and human
paranormal abilities:
Do not allow the polluting nature of the theory of
electromagnetism which
has lasted up to the present time to be part of or
to
exist
n research
into
thought concerned with Qigong and Human
paranormal ability phenomena.
The term "pollution" has recently often been used in industry. Things
which are polluted are
either difficult to get clean or are completely
changed .
Pollution is directly injurious t
to human
health.
If it were
believed that "science" also had
a polluting
effect
on
the
study of
things, it would have been mentioned long ago.
This
article
points
out
that the spiritualistic
theory of
electromagnetism which began as a 17th and 18th century concept c
of force
and has developed and has been passed on to today without its true nature
having been revealed should not be used in research into thought.
Otherwise, knowledge of thought will continue to be bogged down in the
morass of metaphysics.
In order to demonstrate this problem, let
us
take the
trouble to
describe
the
nature
of
spiritual
£
doctrines of today's electromagnetic
theories.
As I pointed out in my previous article,
"The Inobjectivity of the
Theory of Electromagnetism", there is no actual definition or "objective"
definition
of
any
of
electromagnetic forces
in today's
theory of
electromagnetism.
Because we first accepted universal gravitation and
then
proposed
electromagnetic force, therefore,
we
see
universal
gravitation as
an objective reality and electromagnetic force as not an
objective reality.
The reason is very simple.
Because
we cannot
eliminate this universal gravitation and define electromagnetism. Because
of this, do not believe the descriptions in the electromagnetism
texts
these
it is
held
that it is possible to use an experimental thing
In
called "point charge" to find
the existence of
an
electric field.
Actually, this experimental thing called a
"point charge" is a part of
what we originally believed was the world of
universal gravitation.
Its
behavior can also not be divorced
from the reality of this world of
universal gravitation.
Furthermore, the
force acting
on this "point
charge" is only actual force and not electromagnetic force.
23
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-92
Today's theories of
electromagnetism cannot fail to admit that the
force
in electromagnetism
is actual: force, and they
often
use the
following relationships which use the principle of superimposition in an
attempt to extract an electromagnetic force.
->
force
៛
actual force = f electromagnetic force +
f universal gravitational
(1)
Today's theory of electromagnetism believes that the actual force is
much
greater (several
ten of
orders of magnitude! )
than universal
gravitation, so there is the following omitting method:
-
f actual force = f electromagnetic force
(2)
We do not
oppose
the hypothesis of
this approximation,
but our
predecessors haphazardly wrote the formula in the following manner,
f actual force = force electromagnetic force
(3)
which changes the approximation symbol into an equals symbol.
This is an
error
of principle, because if formula (2) illustrates an omission in
measurement, then if it is reasonable
within certain permissible error
parameters, then this formula takes universal
gravitational force to
approximate zero, such as
f universal gravitational force
0
(4)
But this formula basically still accepts the existence of the universal
gravitational force.
However,
formula (3)
sets universal gravitational
force at zero, such as
f universal gravitational force = 0
(5)
On the surface, the difference between formulas (4)
and (5)
is only that
the approximation symbol has been changed to the equal sign. However,
formula (5) which
uses
the equal sign, denies the existence of the
universal gravitational
force, and therefore, using the equal sign denies
the existence of the originally accepted world of universal gravitational
force.
Therefore,
today's theories of electromagnetism, Maxwell's
equation doers not contain any universal gravitational force factor. All
the theories developed on electromagnetism including the "narrow sense"
theory of relativity are only applicable when no gravitational field
exists.
This
type of results, which
are
a clear extreme departure from
reality, should have
caught people's attention a long
time
ago, but
science has rid itself of the effects of human social consciousness, and
today's education and intelligence
tests
still
use
these traditional
theories, and in addition,
these bizarre results form a system with the
24
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
1 4957-97
original structure of science, so it is not possible to take one item at a
time to
expose their
fallacies or spiritualistic nature. It is only by
making basic checks that we discovered that all electromagnetic forces in
this theory of electromagnetism are baseless, and are only a concept of
thought. If we were to believe that in reality there was such a thing as
"point charge" and "current
element" which could actually point out the
existence of electrical fields and magnetic fields, this would be an error
of carelessness.
This is
because if we actually hypothesized the actual existence of
electrical fields, and also accepted that electromagnetic force were real,
then
the definition of electromagnetic force through the actual force
which occurs in electromagnetic phenomena would necessarily be
-7
(6)
f electromagnetic force = f actual force - f universal gravitational force
Then by dividing the entire formula by the test charge qo, we get
7
(7)
f electromagnetic force = f actual force - f universal gravitational force
qo
qo
When go approaches
zero (just
as it
does
in
today's
theory of
electromagnetism), then
because universal
gravitational force is a force
of limited size, therefore
-
-
7
7
E = F ELECTROMAGNETIC FORCE = F ACTUAL FORCE = infinity
qo
qo
and E is the so-called strength of electrical
field which
is believed to
objectively exist.
It is a limited vector, thus
7
f actual force
= E + infinity = infinity
7
qo
This is a very absurd result. The omission in the formula above has
retained an unlimited large vector 1 whcih is the actual
force acting on
the experimental
charge and its proportional value to the charge qo when
qo approaches zero is infinite.
This illustrates that it
is not
what is
described in
the theory of electromagnetism. Although they believe that
by using actual force and experimental electric charge
it is possible to
define
the electrical
field.
To the contrary, it illustrates that no
electrical (magnetic) force can be measured. This is nothing more than
"first define then ignore", and it has tremendously different results than
the "first ignore then define" methods mentioned earlier. Is this really
science?
We
often hear certain protectors of "traditional" theories
25
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
-- ---- - ---- ---....

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-92
strongly opposing research into
Qigong
and human paranormal abilities,
believing that they have no scientific
basis, that they are refuted by
science.
However, who thought that this science would have such a flaw in
it.
This also
illustrates that
the "existence" we are aware of, such as
electrons, the electron
model
atom
and extending from
this
to basic
molecules and
physical structure, in actuality have concealed within them
thought factors just like the theory of electromagnetism.
There is no
reason for us blindly to only recognize only one convention of thought and
the theory established on this convention and not recognize that since one
convention of thought can be recognized, then also a second, a third, an
infinite
number
of
conventions.
Furthermore, the multiplicity and
expansiveness of this convention is characteristic of thought. Therefore,
it is absurd to attempt to use one of an infinite number of conventions on
thought to frame the laws and characteristics of thought.
Actually,
there have already
been a
great many examples
which
illustrate that today's theory of electromagnetism are of
no use in
explaining the phenomena of Qigong and human paranormal abilities. Here
we would like to quote the famous
Psi
scholar Joseph Banks
Rhine who
stated in his book "The Reach of the Mind" which was published in 1947:
"Certain scientists are interested in strange abilities.
It is because
they erroneously
believe
that these abilities can be ascribed
to
electromagnetic theory of the natural world. However, when they discover
that the
results transcend the principles of physics that they drop this
research subject like a hot potato."
-
We feel that this is correct.
If
that scientist
did not drop this
research
subject
immediately,
then he would have been rebuked by the
"protectors" and beneficiaries of
traditional theory
or that
he himself
was a beneficiary and was not willing to take such a social risk.
Rhine accurately reported the fears the scholars of that time had of
Psi.
He
also reported the problems apparent in the electromagnetic
theory .
However as a parapsychologist, he was not able
to reveal how
predecessors had been able to use thought to establish their own science
or to reveal the subtle relationship between thought and science. He was
even less able to see how scientists had used zero to achieve magical and
unintentional fallacious result.
This is very regrettable. Actually, the
difference between the two following two equations is only a single dot
universal gravitational force = 0
f
universal gravitational force = 0
(10)
and
it
is
just
because
of
the problem in principle of equating this
approximation symbol and the equal sign was too hidden that
his academic
ideas were
not universally noted but were to the contrary was looked down
26
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
! 41757-97
upon .
Today, the Chinese are facing and developing research
in their own
country on Qigong and human paranormal abilities which have existed since
ancient times in China and in other countries. However, if we continue to
follow the theory of electromagnetism which comes from the metaphysical
Western scientific thought, it will pollute our research.
Just
as we
pointed out at the beginning of this article, pollution can cause the
original content of things to change and
can
turn
them
into something
completely different and unrecognizable.
CONCLUSION
I.
From the viewpoint of universal gravity or mass and matter, all
of the electromagnetic forces in today's theory of electromagnetism are
objective.
They
can only be taken to be adsorbed in matter, but are
really objects of thought.
This is just
the same as spiritualistic
suppositions.
Therefore, to oppose the existence of a spiritual world is
to oppose the hypothesis of this type of electromagnetic force.
II. The nature of a convention of
thought of today's theories of
electromagnetism illustrates
that electromagnetic force and universal
gravitational force form a unity of opposites, but have no other "unity".
III.
Today's theory of electromagnetism is only one of an infinite
number of conventions of thought. Therefore it cannot be used to explain
the phenomenon of thought. It must not be arbitrarily applied to such
phenomena of thought as Qigong and human paranormal abilities.
IV.
If a
more reasonable explanation is
to be made of real
phenomena, it will be necessary to abandon the metaphysical hypothesis of
universal
gravitational
force in order
to
avoid
a recurrence of the
spiritualistic theory of electromagnetism.
V.
New theories must be dialectic.
It is possible to
obtain from
their metaphysical aspects today's universal gravitational
force and
electromagnetic force forms. Also, because the new theories will
not be
based on
universal gravitational force, it will permit new definitions of
mass. It will get rid of the laws of mass in the old theories and the
necessity of "impenetrability".
It will
also release the definition of
matter from the restrictions of "mass".
27
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000290440062-6
THE LOGIC OF THE DEFINITION OF FORCE AND THIN
LI DINGYI LUOJI YU SIWEI JIQI
BY :
Liang Ronglin of Jinan University Physics Department
ABSTRACT
This
article
makes
new
inquiries into
the understanding of past
definitions of force, shows the impreciseness of the understanding of the
past definitions
of force and the
important logical relationships among
the mutual
demonstrable definitions of
force.
Finally,
new
understanding
and modern thinking machine
theory.
it
makes a
connection
between
the
FOREWORD
It would seem that
today, in the eighties
of the
20th Century, we
should not have any doubts about the past definitions of force, because it
is due to this understanding that science and
technology has advanced so
rapidly.
However, there are a number of thought phenomena that force us
to take a new look at our understanding of the definitions of
force, and
not pay any attention to whether or not these definitions of force have
made any contributions in any certain areas.
These phenomena of thought
have mostly occurred in medicine, psychology, human behavioral abilities
and thinking machines ( artificial intelligence) .
In
addition,
the re-
examination of the past definitions of force will help in advancing our
knowledge of the world.
Therefore,
this
topic
is an important basic
theoretical
research
related
to philosophy, physics
and
all related
mechanics and engineering.
This article first reveals the impreciseness of the understanding of
the meaning of force and then presents a new way of defining force and
discusses this new understanding and its close relationship
with today's
research into electronic computers or artificial intelligence.
I.
THE PAST UNDERSTANDING OF THE DEFINITION OF FORCE AND EXISTING
PROBLEMS THEREIN
Force is a very
important concept
in physics.
The
result of the
search for "what is
force" or "how is
force defined" can determine the
path of the development of physics and the key links in its development.
Here, let us discuss the problem "what is force"
at
the ordinary
middle school or college level as the beginning of our discussion.
28
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
Then, what is force?
This is a common answer :
"Force is the effect of interaction between bodies."
Clearly,
this
answer
is not
perfect,
the
question of what this
"effect" is in not addressed.
"Changes occur in
the
form
of
bodies" is shortened
£
to
"body
distortion" and "changes in
the state of motion of bodies" often is used
to supplement the definition
of
"effect"
in the definition
of force.
Sometimes it is simply felt that the following express the definitions of
force:
"Force is the cause of changes in bodies."
Or, "force is the cause of bodies being in a state of motion."
In this manner, the effect in the definition
seems
to be clearly
treated, and the statements that
it is
the "distortion occurring in
bodies" or "changes occurring in the state of
motion of
bodies" are very
specific, and the definition of force seems to have a final statement.
However, this way of thinking is worth looking into, because this way
of thinking usually understands force to be something "specific" and not a
"conceptual abstract", and the students often miss the point. Today's
college and middle school students and even graduate students
have an
understanding of "definition of force" which stops at this level.
It is
worthwhile for educators and experts concerned to study this.
Actually, it is "abstract" is not "specific".
Although
the
definition of force presents
the two phrases "distortion" and "change in
the state of motion", these two
phrases are also "conceptual abstracts".
Therefore, the definition of force or "force"
remains
a conceptual
abstract and not something "specific".
The
belief
that
because force
induces "distortion" or "changes in the
state of motion", it becomes a
specific object, can meet with insurmountable difficulties.
Here, let us
discuss this further.
( I). PROBLEMS WITH INDUCING "DISTORTION"
If one believes that "force is the cause of changes in the shape of
objects"
is the
definition of force,
and
that
it
is the specific
manifestation of force and not a conceptual abstract (also
called
conceptual in nature), then there are two inherent basic problems.
The first is that the "cause" in the definition is not precise, and
up to the present day, it is still a type of guess which, of force and the
distortion of objects, is the cause and which is the
result.
No one has
29
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
. ...
:
-
.
=

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-92
been able
to
make a determination or proof of this cause and result
problem.
If it should be that this cause and effect relationship does not
exist,
then
"force"
and "the distortion of objects" describe the same
thing, and neither could be used to define the other.
The second is the "distortion" in the definition of force can easily
be confused.
Here let us discuss this problem.
It looks like "the distortion of bodies" is a specific thing outside
the definition of force, and it impresses people as being
something very
specific.
For example, they believe that:
if one wants to find if there
has been any distortion of an object, it can be determined by specific
observation.
However, the occurrence
of
object distortion and human
thought or whether or not humans are willing
to observe
are completely
unrelated.
However, when we realistically and conscientiously explore this
problem, especially when we study the difference between "abstract" and
"specific", we discover that the "distortion occurring in objects" in the
definition of force remains a conceptual abstraction.
This is
because since we can propose that
"force is
the cause of
distortion occurring in objects", then we must permit others to ask "under
what conditions can force act on objects without distortion?"
Or they
might ask "where can objects which are in their original form not having
undergone distortion of having undergone distortion have returned to their
original state prior to distortion be found?"
If these questions cannot
be answered, then the statement
"force is the cause
of distortion in
objects" is not specific
or
is not real,
and
is
simply a type of
conceptual abstraction.
It is reasonable to raise these questions, because "specific" refers
to something
we can attain in practice and
"conceptual abstraction" is
something we cannot put our hands on in practice and
remains a conceptual
hypothesis, inference or just a guess.
Therefore,
when it is believed
that the force in the definition of force
is something specific, then it
is necessary to be able to find in practice comparative aspects which can
be distinguished. This comparative aspect should be the state where there
is a lack of force in "when no force acts on an object no distortion will
occur".
Unfortunately, in practice in this real world of ours, objects which
"have no
force acting on them and do not undergo distortion" cannot be
found .
The above problem can only be "solved" by a type of subjective
guess.
This would be to imagine a completely empty world an infinite
distance from this real world of ours, and if the object studied could be
isolated
there, and if we also hypothesize that objects an infinite
distance away would not have any effect on this object, then we could
believe that there is no effect of force acting on this object and in this
empty world it would reveal its original and undistorted appearance.
30
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
:
1
:

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
IN253-92
This cannot be realized in the our objective world, and
because of
this this guess in conceptual in nature.
( II).
PROBLEMS WITH INDUCING "A STATE OF MOTION"
If we believe that
"force is
the cause for changes in the state of
motion of an object" is the definition
of
force and that force
is a
specific thing,
than there are problems
just like
those with the (when
inducing "distortion") stated above.
Here we would like to primarily discuss
the
basic
nature
of this
conceptual abstraction "state of motion".
Here,
let
us
directly state that because
"inertial
movement"
basically does not exist in the practical world,
the comparative aspect
(or the opposite) of "change occurring in the state of motion of an object
cannot be practically utilized, so "force is the cause of changes in the
state of
motion of
objects" is a type of conceptual abstraction, or is a
conceptual statement.
We are surprised to see that as of today, physics is still
unable to
come up with an answer to this question. Although in the past and today,
physics has always prompted the development of science and technology.
In mathematical
practice, a confusing explanation to this question
often appears.
For example, the belief that this problem can be probed by
using continuous practice. However, people point out: Because nothing in
actual
practice can be distinguished by using "inertial motion", this
problem
cannot be overcome by
increasing
the
number
the
of
times
experiments
are performed.
Another example
is the belief that it is
possible
to use objects
at
a
"relatively
far
distance"
and use
approximation or
"extrapolation"
to prove
the
existence of "inertial
motion".
However,
we feel
that
these
ideas
are actually
stuck at
inference or guessing and cannot really prove its existence in practice.
Similarly, to assume that there is a "completely void world which is
at an infinite distance from our practical world", and that if objects
could independently move in that world, and hypothesize that objects at an
infinite distance would not have any effect on this object, then one could
image
that
this object would be in "inertial
motion".
However,
unfortunately, the "empty world" idea is,
after all,
a
guess
and not
actual.
In summary of the arguments above, the introduction of "distortion"
or "change in the state of motion" into the definition
of force cannot
make "force" something other than a conceptual abstraction, but actually
it remains a conceptual abstraction. This is
the important
phenomena we
have noted.
31
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-92
II.
THE CONNECTION BETWEEN CONCEPTUAL ABSTRACTION AND ACTUAL
PRACTICE, MATTER LINKS
The previous
section has already argued
that force
is still a type of
conceptual
abstract and that conceptual
abstracts
are
not
specific
reality.
However, in practice, this type of conceptual abstract is often
used with predictable practical results.
We can
see that
there
is a
certain connection
between conceptual thought and actual practice.
But
what is this connection?
Where is it manifest?
In other words,
if
we
use subjectivity to represent conceptual
abstractions and objectivity to represent actual
practice, then how are
this subjective and objective connected? Without this knowledge, there is
really no way to understand force or the definition of force. Now let us
explore this problem.
First, if it is believed that conceptual abstraction is specific in
actual
practice,
then
this idea will
not work.
For example, on the
problem of the definition of force, we were not able to find a single
"completely void world an
infinite distance
from our practical world in
actual practice so this idea is clearly unacceptable.
Another idea is the belief that
the "distortion" or "change in the
state of motion"
in the
definition of force have specific contents in
reality, and thus the definition of force is related to reality. However,
where in between do these specific contents of reality lie? The results
of our analysis is that we believe even though there are real contents of
"distortion" and "change in the state of motion", they do not exist within
"distortion" and "change
in the
state
of motion", so they are both
conceptual abstractions.
For example, they come from such conceptual
abstractions as geometric points, lines, planes and spacial
points and
orbits. Therefore, the real specific contents of "distortion" and "change
in the state of motion" occur between "change" and "no change".
In other
words, they appear between the discernable "real" and "unreal". However,
it must be noted that the specific contents of practice are not "changing"
or "unchanging" or "real" and "unreal" themselves, because they are all
conceptual abstract terms.
Therefore, we can believe that all conceptual abstract terms such as
the definition of force reflect specific contents which can be applied in
actual practice. This content then is a law of objects that can be paired
and set
in opposition.
This rule is the philosophical "law of the unity
of opposites" or the often made statement that "one divides into two" or
"everything has its opposite.
In actual practice, we can encounter very many of these problems of
"real" and "unreal". Furthermore, we can see that there are actually many
"real" and "unreal"
links in the definition of force. We call this
important "link" a "matter link" because
they are "conceptual
abstractions" or "specific
reality", they are produced because of the
32
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
I N253-92
existence of matter.
Therefore, the proper understanding
of
a
definition
requires the
acceptance of the conceptual abstraction of this definition.
Furthermore,
it requires
the acceptance of the specific reality
of this definition.
Furthermore, the
later is concealed
within
the definition, and it is
called the law of the unity of opposites.
However, why do we not simply
express
this
objective practical
content of the definition of force?
This cannot be done, because a definition can include a great many of
this type of "matter links", but the
important thing
is language and
literature always represent concepts.
Therefore,
a more complete method of expressing the definition of
force is to only define the mutually demonstrable forms, such as:
"force is the cause of distortion occurring in objects";
"the reason distortion does not
occur in objects is
because the
object is not subjected to force".
At
first glance, it appears that
if we
only take half of
this
definition (such as "force is the " cause of
distortion in objects", that
the other half ( "the lack of distortion in objects is due to a lack of
force acting upon the object") is also being expressed. Actually, this is
not the
case.
This is because the first half and the second half are not
equal. This is easily demonstrated:
"We know that A
B,
but from known conditions we cannot
get the
result that B = A unless
A = A or B = B can be applied.
Otherwise they
are independent qualities.
There are often people who feel
that
the
above
definition can
basically not define what force is. This is because it has a "logic loop"
However, we would like to point out that
the above definition is only
mutually demonstrative, and is not a "logic loop".
If we were to actually
have a logic link, it would be written:
Because A = B, therefore B = A.
Here it is not necessary to use the "negation of negation".
What is reality like in the basic theories of physics and relevant
mechanics?
We are very happy to point out that a practical definition of
force is faced with just this type of definition problem which seems like
a "logic loop".
Furthermore, by not clearly seeing the conceptual
abstraction of force and attempting to directly and practically specify
the equal sign, one encounters unsurmountable problems (because in actual
33
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-92
practice there is no way to find objects which "are not distorted" and are
in "inertial motion". )
III.
THE CONNECTION BETWEEN THOUGHT LOGIC MACHINES AND THE LOGIC OF
THE DEFINITION OF FORCE
The mutually demonstrative definition
of
force
can
be called the
logical
relationship of
the
definitions
of
force.
This relationship
allows the statements of
the definition
of force
to have
the following
forms:
"Force is the cause of distortion in objects".
"The reason for no distortion in objects is because there is no force
present".
Or,
"Force is the cause of changes in the state of motion of objects."
"The reason the state of motion of objects does not change is because
there is no force present."
Or this "state of motion" is changed to "inertia motion" and we have:
"Force is the reason
for the
failure of
the inertia motion of
objects."
"Inertial motion of objects is motion with no
force acting upon it"
and other similar mutually demonstrative forms.
This is expressed symbolically as a unified relationship force as:
A = B;
B = A.
Because of this simple
form of
definition of force, we would first
point out that this form of definition of force is the final form unifying
the various definitions of
force.
It is the source of all force.
Also,
this explanation, because the first
half
and
the
second
half
are not
equal,
it is very easy to demonstrate this"
We know
that A = B,
but from known conditions
we cannot find the
result B
= A.
Unless
A = A or
B =
B, they
are mutually independent
qualities.
There are often people who feel
that the above definitions cannot
define what force is because they have a "logic loop". However, we would
point out here that the above definitions are only mutually demonstrative
34
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
₦753-92
and are not a "logic loop". To really be a logic loop they
would have to
be expressed as:
Because A = B, therefore B = A.
Here the "negation of negation" need not be applied.
Where is the practical in the basic theories of physics and relevant
mechanics? We are very happy to point out that a practical definition of
force is
faced with just this type of definition problem which seems like
a "logic
loop".
Furthermore, by not clearly seeing
the conceptual
abstraction of force and attempting to directly and specifically apply the
equal sign, one encounters
insurmountable problems
( because in actual
practice there is no way to find objects which are "not distorted" or "in
inertial motion".
This definition of force logic directly illustrates
the
unity of
opposites for objects. We need only use the dialectic viewpoint on force
to be able to properly understand what force is.
We would also point out that at times there have been coincidences in
the development of science.
In 1854, Boole established a type of strict
method that replaced Aristotle's
which could,
under a
set of proper
conditions achieve truth.
Furthermore, since this Boolean algebra was
first applied to the telephone switching circuits in this century (1938) ,
it has always been an important basis for research into thinking machines.
In Boolean algebra, with A = B, then from A = A
or B = B,
then it
necessarily
follows that
A
B
and
in thinking machines, it is only
necessary to find the opposites on either side of the equal sign of A = B,
and the logical relationship is established.
Therefore, the relationship
{A=B
(B=A
is an expression of
the unity of opposites and A and B either both exist
or neither exist.
Therefore, one is the logic of the definition
of force which comes
from physics and the other comes from logic mathematics ( Boolean algebra) .
That these
two have the same
thought
logic
is a coincidence.
It
illustrates that in all
the fields of science, there is a commonality of
thought among these fields.
However, awareness of the above phenomenon is not the same
as saying
there is a firm grasp of the laws of this phenomenon and that it can be
applied in every field.
The situation is just the opposite.
Physics is
following another route to learn about the world. Along this route, the
difficulties generated by its previous understanding of the definition of
force has only been 'briefly described or simply ignored.
Furthermore,
research into thinking machines is more realistic, because
these machines
must have some contact with the practical world.
They must use the law of
35
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-92
the unity of opposites even thought current
machine
theories
have not
stressed this.
However, objective laws are inexorable. No matter whether it is the
definition of force or theory of thinking machines or some
other fields,
they must unite under the law
of the unity of opposites.
At the same
time, the development of physics will be promoted by thinking machine
theory, and the development of thinking machines will be promoted by new
developments in physics. In the progress of practice, we stress the role
of thinking machines, because they quickly and accurately provide us with
desired data.
IV.
CHANGING THE ACADEMIC OPINIONS TOWARD THE DEFINITION OF FORCE
The previous understandings of the definition of force are reflected
in the physics course materials of various colleges and middle schools.
Among these, not only are they unable to stress the importance of mutual
demonstrability of the definitions of force, but contrarily use extremely
obstinate explanations for the reality of the proof. For example, it was
pointed out in section (I) above that believing there is a "completely
void world which is an infinite distance from our practical
world", that
"we can send our objects
of
research to this void world" and "we can
believe that at this infinite distance, objects will not have any "force"
effect on this object isolated in this void world." etc.
In this way, it causes
students of physics
to head toward a
mysterious forum which is established on the basis of a guess. Actually,
objects
in
the practical
can
world
all
be described by a practical
objective law. This law is the "law of the unity of opposites". The
mutual demonstrable phenomenon of the definition of force which has always
been believed to be incomprehensible is
a
manifestation
of
this law.
Therefore, the practicality and objectivity or nature of matter of the
definition of force is not revealed in the loop after
loop of "matter
loops" or "real or unreal loops. These loops all objectively exist in the
unity of opposites.
It is only through the proper grasping and application of this
important
law of the unity of opposites
that we can understand the
practical world and need not rely on guessing. Therefore, this problem is
directly involved with knowledge of the world.
It is
also only by the
proper grasping and application of the
important law that will
allow
mankind to complete thinking machines
capable of thought and not depend on man to command or program them.
In addition, the effect of force is directly related to the various
abilities of
the human body.
Therefore, the understanding
of the
definition of
force is also an understanding of human abilities. We can
see from this that the proper understanding of the definition of force has
an important connection and is an important contribution to the fields of
36
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
IN757-09
medicine and physiology.
As for psychology, what about academic psychology and parapsychology.
If we use the mutual demonstrability nature of the definition of force in
these fields, because "force" has universal implications
which are not
restricted to the definition of force in physics. It will flower and bear
fruit in these areas, and there is no way to predict its future.
CONCLUSION
This article discusses previous understandings of the definition of
force and difficulties they have encountered. It points out that mutual
demonstrability is the only complete method of defining the definition of
force.
From this we can discover the relationship between the conceptual
abstraction and specific reality of the definition of force.
In addition,
this article also obtains from this a unified form of the definition of
force. It also conforms with the rules of calculations of Boolean algebra
which replaces two value logic. This type of coincidence illustrates the
commonality of man's thought in physics and mathematical
research.
This
article points
out
that if
physics does not change its
previous
understanding of the definition of force, it will
affect the knowledge
that physics has of the real world. It will also directly affect research
on thinking machines.
It is question which is well worth noting.
Finally, this article generally discusses the important effect which
the
understanding of the definition of force might have on various
scientific disciplines and their futures.
.
37
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-92
"UNITY OF MAN AND NATURE" AND ITS UNSCIENTIFIC NATURE
"TIAN REN HEYI" JI QI FANKEXUE XINGZHI
BY :
Liang Ronglin of the Guangdong Provincial
Somatic Sciences Research Committee
FORWARD :
The 21st Century is almost upon us, but in china there are still some
people who are studying the culture
left
to them by their ancestors,
especially a type of ancient Chinese view of the world which is called the
"unity of man and nature" view.
This is a far cry
from the "information"
wave which Westerners predict is about to arrive.
These methods these
Chinese use is really a question worth looking into.
This article attempts to perform a preliminary examination of this
type of "unity of man and nature" view. to see whether or not it is really
worth researching.
In order to provide a description to the reader, this article will
use the language and statements of modern men familiar with this concept
and not the records of ancient texts as the beginning of our discussion.
For the
latter method, the reader may avail himself of the works of other
authors.
I.
WHAT IS "SCIENCE"
In ancient China, people used the "unity of man and nature" view of
the world.
It was only because of Western influences that after the "May
Fourth" movement that some intellectuals began to propose that the Chinese
should also study foreign things.
At that time, democracy and science
were brought into China from abroad. But just what does the
term science
mean.
But the term "science" which even foreigners are not too sure of
the exact meaning was translated into "kexue" by the Chinese. Although up
to the present time no one has been able to provide an exact description
of this thing called "kexue", but this translation is very good because it
allows all Chinese to understand. Therefore, "kexue" actually represents
"dividing the world into many different fields for study" It is a type of
contraction for a way of thinking,
and aside from this it has no other
implications. Actually, if we page
through the various dictionaries to
the definitions of "kexue",
either the definitions are in error or they
are filled with other terms which cannot be used to define "science".
The Western world has used this type of "science" to achieve a number
of
benefits, so China's enlightened persons boldly advanced, and as a
result, China also achieved benefits. For example, the "electronic age",
"nuclear energy age", "electronic computer age" of the Westerners and the
"information age" which they predict is about to arrive has either already
38
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-97
arrived in China or is about to arrive, revealing the rapid advancement of
science and technology in China and its beautiful future.
Thus in China, it seems that "science" is much better and provided
greater benefits
than the ancient Chinese "unity of man and nature" view.
Naturally, people developed a new concept
of
"science",
which
is that
anything that was "scientific" was good.
Or any method that was good for
studying problems was "scientific".
Furthermore,
this concept has
developed to where today it is believed that scientific means correct,
that it means truth. A large number of slogans have also been generated
such as "be scientific, do not be superstitious", and so on. There are
also a number of phrases which adulate science such as "science is exact",
"science cannot be fooled" and "scientists are honest people".
However, we believe that it is wrong to go to such extremes.
The
present stage of development of "science" should be thoroughly examined.
First, "science" can only represent one way of
thinking.
As stated
before, it only represents
the method of "dividing
the world into many
different fields for study".
The special characteristic
of this
is the
term "divide".
These
fields
formed
from
this "division"
currently
include
philosophy, social science fields and natural science fields.
The natural
science field is further broken down into mathematics, physics, chemistry,
biology and geography.
However, there are many
different types
of human thought, they are
limitless.
There
is not
just one
way
of
thinking.
This type of
"scientific" way of thinking is only one of limitless ways
of thinking in
human thought.
Second, today's "science" must pass through the state machinery to be
instilled into the minds of the people.
Otherwise, the people will not
naturally
independently generate
in
their
minds
what
is
modern day
"science".
Furthermore,
it requires
teaching
to
attain knowledge of
"science", so there is an obvious subjectivity manifest in "science".
Third, "science" is not truth. Even people who worship "science" do
not dare believe that "science" is truth, but only say that "science" is
"relative" truth.
Actually, there are many questions which "science"
cannot answer. Furthermore, there are many things which are in violation
of common
scientific knowledge.
"Science" is not the same thing as the
"true world". The more advanced science becomes, the more challenges the
"true world" presents to "science".
The
source
of the problems
above
are
the
result of "science"
"dividing" the world up into fields of study
and
They cannot be resolved
by "science".
We must clearly recognize this divisional characteristic of
"science"
39
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-92
II.
WHAT IS "UNSCIENTIFIC"
The opposite of "scientific" is "unscientific".
"Unscientific" then represents "not dividing
the
world up into
different fields for study".
Therefore,
"unscientific" is a type of
realistic way of thinking in human thought.
Many people, because they do not understand the meaning of "science",
often
believe
that
"scientific"
represents
being
correct
and
"unscientific" represents
being incorrect.
This
is
a
type of
misconception of
the meaning of scientific.
It is naturally a distortion
of the meaning of "unscientific".
For example, there are people who believe that "science is a creative
method of action, and that its mission is to learn the objective laws of
matter in space and
time."
Here, the definition of "science" is wrong
because there is no clarification of the "division of the world" which is
a characteristic of "science". Also, it further muddies the situation by
introducing such terms which have not yet been precisely defined such as
"matter", "space and time" and "objective reality", and so on.
It should
be pointed out here that this type of so-called "scientific definition"
can easily cause people to miss the point if they are not careful.
People who have
this type of definition of
"scientific"
will
necessarily
and
clearly
be
mistaken
in
their
understanding
of
"unscientific". This is
because this
definition of "scientific" forces
the belief
that
"unscientific"
is
a
method
of
action
which
lacks
creativity."
This is obviously hogwash.
Because
of
this,
it
is necessary
to
correct our
knowledge of
"unscientific".
We cannot
believe that "unscientific" represents bad or
erroneous aspects.
"Unscientific" refers to a way
of thinking
which is
the opposite
of "scientific'
This way of thinking is characterized by
"not dividing up the world", and
it is a view called "unity
of man and
nature.
Now is
the time we should
re-examine the term "unscientific".
In
order to do this, we must discuss what "superstition" is.
Whether
or not
it is an inherent quality of or synonym for "unscientific".
III.
WHAT IS "SUPERSTITION"
There is a popular concept in society that holds that "if one does
not
believe
in science he is
superstitious".
It
seems
as
if
"superstition" is "unscientific" or "counter scientific".
However,
this
type of concept is in error because "unscientific"
represents "not dividing the world into different field for study".
This
40
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-92
"Hypotheses" are
"minor principles".
Without
"hypotheses"
no
scientific theory could be established. Therefore, even
though "science"
itself does not have any "superstitious" implications, but it introduces
"minor superstitions" from specific
methods which make "science" partner
to "minor superstitions".
Many "minor superstitions" by necessity form a "major superstition".
This is the reason why "science"
' joins with superstition and does not
reject
"superstition".
The
slogan
"be scientific, do not
be
superstitious", actually calls on people "have minor superstitions, do not
have major
superstitions".
This
will not completely get rid of
"superstitions". A great many social
phenomena in
this "scientific age"
demonstrate this conclusion.
IV. THE WAY TO COMPLETELY GET RID OF "SUPERSTITION"
To get rid of superstition it seems to be necessary to get rid of the
"law of cause and effect" which is
the source
of "superstition", and
further to deny the existence of any "arranger of the laws". However,
this cannot be done. We need only mention "arranger"
, and people will
think of the opposing sides of "exist" and "not exist", and will only have
"not exist" and not have any concept of "exist".
Therefore, the only feasible method of getting rid of "superstition"
is to view the world through the use of the law of the unity of opposites
and let them see
that the "theory of laws" which produced the
"law of
cause and effect" cannot really represent the real world.
However, who was it that arranged the law of the unity of opposites.
Was it the will of "god"? We must note that the theories based on the law
of the unity of opposites serve to oppose (or negate) their functions, and
any dialectics once written down must be a type of metaphysics.
The law of the unity of opposites holds that there are laws
in the
world
but
that
there are also no laws, that the world is a world of
"confusion", that among the patterns there are lacks of patterns.
Because
of
this,
there
is
no so-called unknown
world or spirit
world, or
"arrangers of laws".
From a detailed analysis of things which are today believed to follow
certain laws, we
can see
these do not really follow laws.
same.
No single
phenomenon can be repeated, at least the time will not be the
No
two leaves
on
a
will
be absolutely the same, at least they will
tree
occupy different space. Therefore, where is there any absolute
in these
laws?
However, there is a pattern in things which do not seem to have a
pattern.
The world seems to really be rotating around the sun.
When day
is over,
night comes. Therefore, with such a perfect unity of opposites,
why must we describe this beautiful world as being a land of
demons and
spirits.
42
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN753-07
If one believes this
law of the unity of opposites, then he will no
longer be "superstitious". This is because the law of the unity of
opposites
is not
an ultimate "general principle", and it also has
functions which oppose itself. Therefore it cannot be an "ultimate". It
is different from ultimate "general principles".
To use one form of "superstition" to oppose "superstition" will never
work. It would be better never to oppose it in the first place. People
who criticize other people for kneeling before a clay "Buddha" praying for
him to protect them feel they are very smart, but actually, if they do not
have any knowledge of the law of the unity of opposites, then they also
must be "superstitious". People who are not aware that
the law
of the
unity of opposites always serves to be in opposition to itself easily fall
into the trap of "superstition" because they see the law of the unity of
opposites as the ultimate general principle of "god" or "the will of god".
Therefore, to really get rid of "superstition", it is necessary for
mankind to have a firm grasp of the dialectic nature of the world in which
he lives, and if he only concerns himself with form, he will not be able
to solve the problem.
Is it possible today to have everyone have a firm grasp of the
dialectics, or in other words, to have everyone see things which they "do
not understand" or "cannot imagine" as the proper way of the world?
For
example, is it possible for everyone to be able to accept human paranormal
abilities?
It
looks
like
we are a long way from getting rid of
"superstition". Most people still do not know that there is such a thing
as human paranormal abilities. Some who have heard such a rumor consider
it to be metaphysical.
Without any doubt, the attitude towards these
"mysteries of nature"
are the best litmus test for checking whether
someone is "superstitious".
V. WHAT IS THE VIEW OF "UNITY OF MAN AND NATURE"
If we accept that the world is dialectic, then we must hold that the
view of "unity of man and nature" (which is an "unscientific" or "counter
scientific" view) to be realistic, to be reasonable, and believe that this
viewpoint coexists with science in the unity of opposites.
"Scientific" cannot be separated
from "unscientific" any more than
"is" can be separated from "is not".
Since
the "unity of man and nature" view is the opposite of
"science", therefore, it is not part of what is currently proposed as
"borderline
fields" or "transfields" because these fields are based on
"science".
How then, does one see the world through the view of the "unity of
man and nature"? What specific differences does it have with "science".
We should raise an example here as an illustration. For example, when a
43
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-92
person with paranormal abilities uses his thoughts to move an object which
had been at rest. From the viewpoint of "science" or physics,
they would
do their best to divide the world up to consider this question. As for
"thought' and "object", they could not be united
into an indivisible one
and not "divided up".
Science cannot admit that "idea is matter" or
"matter is idea" because this concept violates the principle of "division"
in the definition of "science".
While
we are here, let us point out that physics was long ago
imbedded with a basic principle. This principle is:
No matter what ideas
were generated by the people present,
there is
no shift in the laws of
physics by these thoughts.
If this were
the case,
the object which had
been at rest would remain at rest under the various different thoughts of
the people present, and absolutely would not break the laws concerning the
motion of objects because a certain thought was produced. Otherwise, the
laws of physics would, since they
are changed by thought, become non
objective statements which depended on the individual. And this type of
statement is no longer a "law".
Therefore,
the laws of "science" (or
physics) (and not "science" itself) cannot
accept or explain "moving
objects through thought". Otherwise, physics
would
become
a
field of
study with no laws and no longer be today's physics.
In addition, as we stated before, the view of the "unity of man and
nature" does not and cannot (divide) the world
into thought and object.
Therefore, it cannot reach the conclusion that thought can move objects or
that it cannot move objects.
In other words, as for the view of the
"unity of man and nature", it is not significant whether thought can move
objects is correct or whether thought cannot move objects is correct.
However, when these opposing natures of "scientific" and "unity of
man and nature" are combined, strange things occur right in front of us in
the real world. This is just how it is, where some
people are gathered,
thought cannot move objects.
However,
where
some
other people are
gathered, thought can move objects.
We can know from
this that
science cannot
be used to explain so-
called "parapsychology" phenomena.
"Parapsychology" phenomena demand more
than other phenomena a combination
of
science
and "unity of man and
nature" to explain.
Actually, "science" is one of the infinite ways of
thinking of the minds of man.
We
cannot put thought into "science" to
study it.
If
thought questions come to a standstill,
and we only use
thought
as a
mirror
to
look
at ,
this will only be a simple and
"inflexible" treatment of the problem.
The result will not be completely
the same as the real world.
VI.
£
WERE THE ANCIENT CHINESE PRACTICING "MYSTICISM"
The ancient Chinese who stressed
the
view
of
"unity
of
man and
nature"
were
actually also practicing "science", and because these two
ways of thinking
are completely opposite,
they
either
both
exist or
44
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6

LN253-92
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
neither exist as unity of opposites.
Certain
Westerners believe
that ancient China's intellectuals were
"Oriental Mystics". These Westerners have poor powers of observation and
their level of knowledge is confused.
Actually, ancient
Chinese society was a "superstitious" religious
society. In this society, the intellectuals were unable eliminate this
"superstition".
However, during the time of "superstition", the opposing
ways of thinking of the view of the "unity of man
and
nature" and
"science" were used.
It is only that these ways of thinking of studying
the world were covered with a
layer of religious coloring.
What they
practiced actually was not "mysticism", because except for
this bit of
"superstition", they were using their natural ways of thinking which were
"scientific" and "unscientific" ways of thinking to investigate the world.
And as we stated earlier, "unscientific" ways of thinking which are also
called the view of the "unity of man and nature" are not "mysticism" but
are the necessary result of thought.
Most Western
scholars use metaphysical methods to approach ancient
Chinese civilization.
Therefore,
they cannot understand Chinese research
and its achievements.
It was Einstein who said, "the developments of
Western science are based on the results of two major achievements.
Those
were the Greek philosophers developed form logic system (in Euclidean
geometry) and through systematic experimentation, the discovery that it
was possible
to find
out the cause-effect relationship (during the
Cultural Renaissance). As I see it, China's sages did not take these two
steps, and that should be no surprise.
What is surprising is that these
discoveries (in China) were made in their entirety." (see "The Collected
Works of Einstein" Volume one, page 574."
This statement by Einstein two years before his death is
very worthy
of note.
In
China, many people like
the broad mindedness of Einstein.
But many appreciate his narrow
sense
theory
of relativity,
his light
quantum hypothesis, his broad
sense theory of relativity and his unified
field theory. The unfortunate thing is that
they do not study
the talk
above which is directly concerned with the Chinese people. Furthermore,
as for this talk, they are
guilty of the past bad habit which was once
popular in China of "it is
not good unless foreigners say it is good".
This is very regrettable.
Actually, when the ancient Chinese were
studying the world through
the view of the "unity of man and nature", it is not possible that they
did not have the "scientific" way of thinking characterized by "dissecting
the world" and long ago completely worked through
those things that we
have thought so glorious in the Western world.
Einstein undoubtedly has given the Chinese who have shamed their
ancestors a slap in the face. At the same time, he raised the question of
"why" about his own work.
Unfortunately, Einstein
raised this question
45
1
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-92
too late.
Two years later, he died.
VII.
IS IT "SCIENCE" OR "COUNTER SCIENCE" THAT CAN EXPLAIN THE WORLD
Neither "science" or "counter science" can independently explain the
world we live in.
This is the nature of the imperfect theories of
"science" and
"counter science".
Furthermore, the only way to have an
absolutely perfect theory is to use the law of unity of opposites.
That
is to
say, it is only by using both "science" and "counter science" in
conjunction that we can know the reality of the world.
This is how it is. This is why we study the reasons for the human
paranormal abilities phenomena, UFO phenomena, the Qigong phenomena and
all the so-called "mysteries of nature".
This type of
phenomena has
occurred in ancient times,
today, in China and in foreign Countries. As
long as man exists, they will appear.
It
is unjust to criticize
us for being
concerned
about those
phenomena which can only be explained using a combination of the "unity of
man and nature" ( the counter science viewpoint) view to explain.
It is
also wrong
to believe that "unscientific" or "counter
science"
is
"superstition" or "a wild goose chase". As for ourselves, there are some
of us who fly into a rage because they have been criticized as being
"counter scientific". This is also wrong. It is also unnecessary
to do
ones best to explain that all of dnes actions are "scientific" in order to
gain the sympathy or acceptance of
others.
All
of
these muddled
viewpoints all
come
the same
which
is the
from
source,
lack of a
conscientious attitude toward things, especially not studying the problems
with people's language and definitions or not studying one's own "thought"
problems when considering problems.
CONCLUSION
This article discusses the view of "unity of man and nature" and its
counter scientific nature. It points out that this type of view point is
extremely important in studying the world.
However, its importance can
only be seen when its counter scientific nature is revealed.
46
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6

Approved For Release 2000/08/1/253-92
10: CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
REPORT OF TESTING OF HUMAN PARANORMAL ABILITIES
RENTI TEYIGONGNENG CESHI BAOGAO
BY :
Liang Ronglin and Zhang Zuqi of the Guangdong
Somatic Science Research Committee
Recently (February and March of 1985), we conducted a test of human
paranormal abilities and the results of this test are summarized below.
I.
THE OBJECTIVE OF THE TEST
This test had a very precise objective which
was to
observe through
the random selection of children aged four to twelve whether or not all of
them possessed paranormal abilities and demonstrate whether each child was
capable of showing paranormal capabilities under certain conditions.
The
testing was difficult because it was possible that the children
would not
demonstrate paranormal abilities at the preset testing period.
II.
SIGNIFICANCE OF THE TEST
The conducting of this
test was in line with our research into the
mechanism
of paranormal abilities and directly provided proof
of the
practical aspects of "human paranormal capabilities are universal during
childhood". Also, it eliminated the superstitious belief of most people
that only "odd people" or "other people" have these human paranormal
abilities or that it is "possession".
III.
METHOD OF SELECTION OF THE CHILDREN
The children were selected randomly, that is that
it was not known
beforehand
whether
these children had
ever demonstrated paranormal
abilities, and with
the consent of the parents, five children were
selected.
These children were Little Ran (12 years old), Little Zhou (12
years old), Little Du (ten years old), Little Xiu (girl, six years old) ,
and little Quan ( four years old) .
These five children were all in a good
state of health.
IV.
SITE OF THE TESTING
The testing
site
was
the
Jinan University
teachers and workers
dormitory.
v.
DATES OF THE TESTING
Tests were conducted on a total of nine dates, February 13th, 14th,
25th, 26th, March 10th, 17th, 21st and 24th.
48
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-92
IV.
THE PROCEDURE AND RESULTS OF THE TESTS
The children were tested through recognizing
"flash cards" (February
13th to 14th, three days (sic) ) .
Obvious instances of card recognition were:
Little
Ran (accurately recognized
that
a
card
was of a spotted
horse) .
Little Du (accurately recognized that a card was of a duck) .
Little Xiu (accurately recognized red and green cards, and accurately
recognized that a card was of a flower) .
Later, we had the children to hold a ball of paper in their hand and
recognize the character on the paper. (February 17th).
The obvious correct calls were:
Little Xiu ( the character for "ten").
Little Ran ( the characters for ( "three" and "six" ) .
At the same time we used a middle aged woman,
Mrs Liang,
in our
testing, but she did not show any paranormal ability to recognize the
characters on the paper.
Later (March 21st)
Little Quan (accurately recognized a design and color ) .
(17 March)
Little Zhou (accurately recognized
the
character
for
the surname
"Kuang").
(10 March)
Little Ran (accurately recognized the character for "dirt".
VII.
DISCUSSION
From
this
it
is possible to believe
that the five children all
separately showed paranormal ability to recognize characters. Many of the
procedures were
failures. At times not one of the children would be able
to demonstrate the paranormal ability to recognize
a character for an
entire afternoon.
Therefore, we cannot believe that these children would
49
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
never again demonstrate paranormal
abilities again because of
this.
We
must recognize the major characteristic of human paranormal ability that
it is very seldom demonstrated, and that it has poor repeatability.
SOME CASES OVER THE PAST 200 YEARS OF "EYELESS SIGHT"
IN FOREIGN COUNTRIES
JIN ERBAINIANLAI GUOWAI YOUGUAN "FEIYANSHIJUE" DI YIXIE SHILI
BY :
Zhang Zuqi (of the South China Normal College) .
In 1921 the book "Eyeless Sight" was published
in France.
It was
written
by
the
famous
man of
letters and scientist, M. Jules Romains
(1885-1972) .
The book contained descriptions of tests on "eyeless sight"
conducted by Romains.
This
is
a fairly thorough scientific work on
observation and experimentation of "eyeless sight".
However, for more
than half a century it did not receive the attention it deserved. The
book was recently republished in the United States. L. Sheppard wrote the
introduction to this new
edition.
In
the
introduction, the author
accumulated actual cases of "eyeless sight"
which
occurred in various
places over
the almost 200 years since the
17th Century.
This book is
worth reading.
Here I would like to present some of this material.
In the 17th Century, the British Scientist R. Boyle received a report
from a doctor that stated:
"there is
a blind
person called Fengmalin
( phonetic) who can tell colors from touch. He need only place a silk tie
between his thumb and forefinger and he can tell you what color it is.
When I asked him what he felt for the different colors, he said that the
colors were all different. When he touched them, he could feel different
degrees of roughness or smoothness. Black felt like the tip of
a needle,
and red felt very smooth."
In 1726, J. Swift reported that there had been a professor at Lujiate
( phonetic) University who had
been blind
from birth who led a group of
students to mix colors for artists and taught them how to differentiate
colors from touch and smell.
In 1840 Italian Doctor Augonova reported a 14 year old girl who could
"see" behind her back.
She was blindfolded and could "see" the words in a
book. In 1880 three British doctors recorded a bed
ridden woman who had
been totally blind for ten years who had "sensual transmission" from her
fingers and palms of her hands.
In 1887, British professor Fontan talked about a
22 year
old seaman
who had
wakened from
a coma
with the
ability of
read some letters and
differentiate different colors of thread with his eyes covered.
In 1893, two American doctors S. F. Speur and R. Ormiston reported
that there was a blind woman named Fanqie'er (phonetic) who could use the
top of her head to "see" objects.
By feeling
printed matter
with her
50
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-92
fingers, she could read it in the light or in the dark.
In 1898, Russian Scientist
Doctor Chowrin reported a female patient
suffering from a nervous breakdown who could seen objects through several
layers of paper.
In 1930, Brazilian M. Chaves tested 400 blind persons and discovered
that
12
of
them
had skin
visual
abilities.
Three of
them could
differentiate red and green.
In 1934, several noted Doctors and a physics
instructor in London
conducted "eyeless sight" experiment on K. Bux from
Kashmir.
They used
balls of raw cotton to completely cover Bux's eyes and then placed metal
discs, bandages and gauze. He was still able to easily read
a book the
tester was holding. In 1938 in Montreal, Canada, he made a similar test.
In September of 1937 in Liverpool, he walked along the peak of a 200 foot
high roof with both eyes blindfolded.
In
1945 in the United states he
rode a bicycle through the hallways of the New York Times with
both eyes
blindfolded, amazing everyone.
In 1963, the Soviet Scientist I. M. Golgberg reported tests on Luosha
Kuliesuowa ( phonetic). Between
1960 and 1961, while
she was
leading a
troupe of blind people, she taught herself to type Braille.
Later her
senses in her fingers were enhanced
through the differentiating of the
letters and this type of long periods of objective training developed her
sensory abilities at the ends of her fingers.
Goldberg
demonstrated in
his tests that without using her eyes to see the fingers in her right hand
could read ordinary printed books.
Columbia University
psychology professor
Pyoutz
has
discovered a
woman named
Sitanne
( phonetic )
who could differentiate colors with the
tips of her fingers. He also stated that he
tested all
of the
women at
the university, and about ten percent of them
would have the beginning
forms of this ability around 20 hours of training.
In 1965, some reported that Doctor Vichit had used hypnosis to cause
blind people to see objects.
he discovered
that if blind people could
concentrate very strongly in thinking "see with my forehead", the nerves
in
this area would have
the sense
of "sight" before long and would
transmit these impulses to the brain where they
would be turned into
visual images.
Vichit said in his report that certain blind persons can
use their forehead to "read" newspapers. He opened an agency for training
blind children in Thailand, and discovered instruction of blind children
between the ages of nine and fourteen was most effective.
Vichit showed a
photograph which showed a blind
seven
year old boy "seeing" with his
forehead and also threading a needle.
Beginning in 1966, led by Doctor
Dublessis of France, a number of
researchers at the 'illumination
technology
center began research into
"eyeless sight". They
trained
blind
people
to
"see"
objects
from a
51
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-92
Six tests were conducted in each lab, and Little Feng was always able
to determine direction and point out south according to the changes in the
brightness or dimness of the point of light in her mind.
II.
CHANGING THE STATIC MAGNETIC
FIELD
IN
THE
SPACE OCCUPIED BY
LITTLE FENG
BY ADDING AN EXTERNAL MAGNETIC FIELD AND HAVING HER DETERMINE
DIRECTIONS
In order to test whether or not this ability of Little Feng's was
related to her own body sensing the earth's magnetism, we used an external
magnetic field to alter the static magnetic field in the space occupied by
Little Feng and conducted the test.
£
At
the Beijing University Physics
Building Testing Lab, we used a pair of Helmholtz coils one meter diameter
They can produce a magnetic charge of
the
same level and opposite
direction as the earth's magnetic field.
These coils were facing north
and south, and during the testing Little Feng was placed outside the
coils. A compass and a Gauss
instrument
were used to determine the
direction and size of the magnetic field at the subject's head and torso.
·
We ran 80, 160 and 900 milliamps and 14 amp currents through the
coils so that the space occupied by Little Feng had a magnetic field level
from very weak to the level of the earth's magnetism at that place and in
the opposite direction of the earth's magnetic field as well as eight to
100 times the level of the earth's magnetism.
On 08 April and the evening of 13 April
of 1980,
we conducted 33
experiments under the conditions stated above.
Prior
to each group of
experiments, we ran one control experiment (no additional magnetic field) .
The results were that Little Feng was able to determine south just as
she had before.1'
THE
AFFECT OF
THE
HEAD
BEING
ON DIFFERENT POSITIONS ON
III.
DETERMINING DIRECTION
When Little Feng was determining direction, even if she did not move
her body and only moved her
head, her subjective point of light would
change in brightness or dimness. Therefore, we hypothesize it is possible
her head receives certain dynamic factors from the outside world causing
it to be the part of the body causing changed in the subjective point of
light. If she were to lie down, changing the position of the head, what
would happen.
We designed a small revolving bed, and in
the afternoon of 28 May
53
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6

was tested on the bed while in four different positions.
Inese PUHA.
were ly Approved For Release 2600/08/10
ving on the right side, lying on her back
and lying on her stomach.
TWO
&CIA:RDR96-00792R0002004400
ach position.
Little feng was able to determine south in each test.
According
000229 Little
Feng, when she lay on her back and
stomach determining directions, the
point of light in her mind moved somewhat higher than it was while
standing or lying on her side.
IV. AFFECTS OF DIFFERENT LATITUDE REGIONS ON DETERMINING DIRECTION
After a great deal of testing at Beijing University, from 23 July to
16 August of 1980 we took Little Feng to Wuhan and Guangzhou for testing.
We conducted ten tests at three locations at Wuhan University and 19 tests
as six different sites at Guangzhou's Sun Yatsen University. The results
were that at Beijing (116 degrees 20 minutes East Longitude and 39 minutes
and 56 seconds North Latitude), Wuhan (114 degrees 20 minutes East
Longitude, 30 degrees 40 minutes North Latitude), and Guangzhou (113
degrees 20 minutes East Longitude, 23 degrees 10 minutes North Latitude)
Little
Feng
able
direction
through paranormal
abilities.2/
was
to
determine
£
V.
DETERMINING DIRECTION IN AN ELECTRIC POWER SWINGING CAPSULE
The above tests were all conducted while Little Feng was in a normal
physiological state. If there were certain changes to her physiological
state, what would it affect certain mechanisms of her vestibule system?
Would it have any effect on her ability to determine directions?
On the
afternoons of 15 and 21 January of 1982, at the electric swing capsule at
a certain research institute in Beijing we conducted some tests of Little
Feng -
Inside the laboratory there was a electric swing with a dark capsule.
Inside the capsule there was a swivel chair which could be rotated in a
clockwise or counter clockwise direction at different speeds. The swing
was six meters long, and when it
was
started
it could swing the dark
capsule left and right.
We conducted tests under three different conditions:
1.
Little Feng sat in the dark capsule with her eyes blindfolded,
the swivel chair rotation was controlled, and stopped
facing an arbitrary
direction.
Little Feng was to determine the directions.
2.
Little Feng was blindfolded in the capsule, the chair was turned
and after it was stopped, the swing was begun, and Little Feng
was to
determine directions during the swinging.
54
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-92
3.
Little Feng was blindfolded in the capsules, the chair was turned
while the swing was swinging, and the chair was stopped from turning while
the swing was still swinging. Little feng was to determine the directions
while the swing was still swinging.
We conducted nine tests under these conditions.
We took a control
test for each test which was a standing test outside the capsule. Little
feng was still able to determine directions and point out south through
paranormal abilities.
People have known for a long time that many animals are capable of
telling directions, and have done a great deal of observation and testing
of the direction telling and navigation of some fishes, sea turtles, bees,
migratory birds, pigeons, and other animals.
it is generally held that
this type of direction determining ability
in animals is related to the
animal's smell of a familiar odor, observation of the natural environment,
observation of the sun, position of the stars and the ability to sense the
earth's magnetism. We conducted two years of testing on Little Feng, and
Little Feng determined directions during the day time, at night, on clear
days, rainy days and when it was snowing.
She
did it when an external
magnetic
field
altered
the earth's magnetism in the space she was
occupying.
None of
this affected her ability
to determine directions.
Just was are the similarities between Little Feng's paranormal abilities
and other animal's abilities to determine directions?
And what are the
differences?
Also,
what
factors and influences in the external world
cause the subjectively produced point of light to become brighter and
dimmer when Little Feng is determining directions?
This is really
something worth researching.
FOOTNOTES
1/.
Zhang Zuqi etal, "Nature Magazine", Vol 3, (1980), pp 741.
2/. Zhang Zuqi etal, "Nature Magazine", Vol 4, (1980), pp 292.
55
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-92
A REPORT ON SCHEDULED TESTING FOR ALMOST TWO YEARS OF A YOUNG
PERSON WITH PARANORMAL ABILITIES
DUI YIGE JUYOU TEYIGONGNENGDE SHAONIAN DINGQI
CESHI JINLIANGNIANDE QINGKUANG BAOGAO
BY :
Zhang Zuqi of the South China Normal University
Wang Chu of Beijing University
In the process of conducting tests on young people and children with
paranormal
abilities,
we discovered that at different ages and at
different
physiological
states, there were great changes in their
paranormal abilities.1/2/ In order to clarify certain relationships of
these changes, beginning in February of 1982 we began almost two years of
scheduled testing of a young person.
The results of the
testing are
summarized below:
Little Feng, female, was born in 1968. On November of 1979 it was
discovered that she could, without using her eyes,
use
her hands to
distinguish the color and content of cards. Later, through repeated
testing, it was discovered that her abilities remained fairly stable, and
that she was correct a relatively high percentage of the time.
Beginning on 07 February of 1982, we conducted regularly scheduled
testing of her abilities (we also recorded her menstrual cycles during the
same period of time). We performed a total of 40 tests, ending on 31 July
of 1983.
The primary methods of testing were allowing Little Feng to
stick both hands into a dark colored cloth sleeve, and then placing a card
with a colored figure on it into the sleeve.
£
Little Feng felt the card
and attempted to tell what the figure was. Each test consisted of four to
five cards, and then the results were recorded and analyzed.
Our analysis was to divide the results for the diagrams and colors.
Using a four card test as an example, if she were correct on all for
cards, the accuracy would be 100 percent. If she were correct on some of
the cards, then we would look at the number right and the number wrong,
and calculate the accuracy rate as 80 percent or 75 percent, and so on.
56
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6

TABLE ONE:
THE 40 TESIS
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 . CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
1时 间
1982年
82.2.7
2.14
3,7
3.21
田辨图册
95
63
33
33
0
50
83
40
ゆ辨色%
95
38
33
.50
75
58
63
40
1时 间
4.18
5.2.
5.30
6.6
6.11
6.20
7.11.
7.26
日拼图%
50
30
50
100
100
100
33
50
辨色%
75
30
50
100
100
100
50
50
1时 间
7.28
7.31
8.7
8.19
- 8.21
8.29
9.5
9.12
3辨图%
100
50 ..
.88
63
63
38
0
17
1辨色%
75
88
63
63
100
100 .
17
.83
の时 间
9.19
9.26
10.2
10.10
10.17
10:24
10.31
11.7
11.21
4辨图%
4辨色%
50-
38
63
50 -
13
50
0
0
0
67
175
38
25-
13
50
25
25
75
0时 间
11.28
12.12
1983
3.20
4.17
5.15
6.4
7.31
四拼图%
50
17
25
63
38
0
0
25
申辨色%
63
0
25
25
0
0
38
25
1.
Date.
2.
January of 1982.
3.
Percentage of right answers for
figures.
4.
Percentage or right answers for colors.
TABLE TWO:
MENSTRUAL CYCLE DURING TESTING
1ST MENSTRUATION:
2-10 February, 1982
2ND :
2/27 - 3/5
3rd:
4/5 -4/10
4th:
4/27 - 5/1
5th:
5/30 - 6/7
6th:
8/5 - 8/10
7th:
9/6 - 9/10
8th:
11/5 - 11/12
9th:
12/3 - 12/9
10th:
1/6 - 1/12, 1983
11th:
2/2 - 2/8
12th: 3/9 - 3/16
13th:
4/10 - 4/16
14th:
5/25 - 5/30
15th:
6/290 - 7/5
16th: 8/6 - 8-12
57
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
3.6

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
ATTACHED CHART:
TESTING FROM FEBRUARY TO NOVEMBER OF 1982
.
mil
.
3
-
2
.
27
O = percentage of right answers on figures
+ = percentage or right answers on colors
xxxx = menstruating
We can initially see from these observations and tests:
1.
Little Feng's paranormal abilities remained relatively constant
during the period from 1979 to early 1982.
However,
after
her first
menstruation,
there
was
a
drop in her ability,
followed
by large
fluctuations.
However, the
overall trend was a gradual reduction.
We
have observed similar situations in other girls.
Childhood and puberty is a major stage of human development. During
this stage, there are many
changes in physiological, psychological and
intellectual development.
Children
with paranormal
abilities may
experience certain effects
on
their ability
to use these paranormal
abilities. Thorough and systematic research is required to determine what
these influencing
factors
are.
Our regular continuous testing and
observation of Little Feng during
this period merely presents a topic
which is worth researching.
2.
During this period, Little Feng's ability
to distinguish figures
and colors overall could be called consistent, which was a strong ability
to distinguish figures and her ability to distinguish
colors was also
fairly good.
However, there
was one inconsistency. During the test
conducted on 29 August of 1982, her percentage correct for
figures was 38
percent, while her color recognition rate was 100 percent.
3. In addition to the example of Little Feng which we have presented
58
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-92
above, we have
conducted
surveys
of
a
great many young people with
paranormal abilities and have
discovered that in general when they were
between ten and 13 years old,
their abilities were fairly strong and
fairly stable.
After the age
of 15, there was often a drop in ability.
Naturally, there have been a number
of young people who have maintained
this type of ability until
they were somewhat older. Why do so many
children with paranormal abilities experience this loss of ability as they
grow older?
And why does this ability not decrease in some people? Are
there some methods by which young people can retain this ability? These
questions all require our research and investigation.
1/. Chen Shouliang etal, "Nature Magazine", 3, (1980), pp 334.
2/.
He Tianyan etal, "Nature Magazine", 3 (1980), pp 683.
4
59
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
A REPORT ON PARANORMAL ABILITY TESTING OF DU PING IN GUANGZHOU
DU PING ZAI GUANGHZHOUDE TEYIGONGNENG CESHI BAOGAO
BY :
The Guangdong Somatic Sciences Committee
Lai Sanghong, Liang Ronglin,
Zhang Zuqi, Xie Fan, Deng Suhua
Fang Naili, He Zhuoyuan, and Guo Zuorao
ABSTRACT :
This article reports on 17 tests of Du Ping's paranormal ability to
recognize characters and figures with non visual organs conducted between
05 January and 06 February of 1986. The testing methods were to exchange
the cards in a sleeve. Du Ping recognized a total of 232 characters, 14
postage stamps and even figures and foreign languages, all correctly. For
88 characters, the average time she took to recognize it was 37.5 seconds.
Finally, we discuss the question of a genetic relationship to paranormal
abilities.
This type of testing for recognition of characters and figures using
non visual organs has been conduced in many places in China. 1 , 2,3, 4,5/
On
the basis of previous work, we in Guangzhou recently invited Wuhan's Du
Ping to come here fore some testing. The goal was to use the testing to
further demonstrate the reality of paranormal abilities. At the same time
we wanted
to know what changes
there were in the abilities of children
with paranormal abilities after they became young adults.
Between 05 January and 06 February of 1986, we conducted 12 public
tests and five private tests at the Guangdong Somatic Sciences Research
Committee,
the Guangzhou Chinese College of Chinese Medicine Qigong
Instruction and Research Lab,
the Guangzhou Medical College, the Jinan
University College of Science and Engineering,
the
Guangzhou University,
the Guangzhou Physical Education Commission,
The Guangzhou Baiyun Radio
Factory, the Baiyun Guest House, the Guangdong Qigong Literature Research
Committee,
the Guangdong and Guangzhou Old Cadre Activity Centers.
Attending the tests included the deputy secretary of
the Guangdong CPPCC
Yang Yingbin, secretary
of the Guangzhou Municipal Party Committee Xu
Shijie, Mayor Zhu Senlin,
deputy of the Provincial
Department of Public
Health Li Meilin and other provincial and municipal leading comrades as
well as teachers and researchers in such
fields
as physics, biology,
chemistry and medicine.
There were also noted personalities from the
fields of sports, news, culture and commerce as well as compatriots from
Hong Kong and Macao 'and foreign friends.
The total number of persons
viewing the tests was more than 800. The number attending each individual
test varied from 13 to 212. The results of these tests are given below.
60
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-92
THE SUBJECT AND METHODS OF THE TESTS
(1). The test subject: Du Ping, female, 17 years old from Wuhan.
In
May of 1979 it was discovered that she had paranormal
abilities.
In a
paranormal abilities
test at Wuhan University in September of 1980, she
correctly recognized
43 characters
in 18 minutes. 1'
Her abilities are
relatively strong.
(2).
Testing methods:
The
primary methods were
touching
illustrations in a sleeve. Du ping would sit sideways in front of the
person administering
the test one meter away. Both hands would be placed
into a 45 by 20 millimeter dark blue
sleeve.
Prior to each test, the
person administering
the test would check the sleeve to make certain that
no light would leak
through it.
When the test began, the person
administering the test would personally place the test objects (cards
which had characters written on them before hand or secretly written by
those attending or postage stamps). He would then have Duping touch the
objects with her fingers, and after she had recognized them, Du Ping would
leave
the
test objects in the bag and give them
to
the
person
administering the test. Du Ping would orally say what was on the card or
would
write
the characters
on a black
board.
Then
the person
administering the test would look, check and
report
the
result of the
test.
CONCLUSION:
In the 17
tests in Guangzhou, Du Ping recognized a total of 232
characters, 14 postage stamps as well as a picture torn off a soap box and
foreign words written by foreign friends. She accurately recognized all
of them.
The results of the 12 public tests are shown in the table below:
TABLE ONE: 12 PUBLIC TESTS OF DU PING'S PARANORMAL ABILITIES
TEST ONE:
PM of 1/11 at the Guangzhou Medical College. Testers: Liu
Zhengyu, Qian Yi, Cai Zhaoming and Liang Ronglin.
15
people present.
Contents of test:
CHARACTERS (STC)
RECOGNITION TIME (SEC)
RESULTS
2052 0501
60
+*
0524 0448
100
+
0342 2494
30
+
1420 1627
40
+
.
61
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
....

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-92
TEST
SEVEN:
Evening of 1/23
at
Baiyun Guest House.
Testers: Lin
Miaozhi, Pan Qiuyan,
Li
Zequan,
Liang
Ronglin.
130
people present.
Contents of test:
CHARACTERS (STC)
3348 0427
2651 0035
RECOGNITION TIME (SEC)
RESULTS
+
DTD
35
+ **
DATA BASE
160
+*
TEST EIGHT:
Evening of 1/25 at the Guangzhou Medical College.
Lin Daoping, Deng Suhua, Lai
Ronghong and
Liang
Ronglin.
13 people
present.
Contents of test:
CHARACTERS (STC)
RECOGNITION TIME (SEC)
RESULTS
1639 2639
12
+
3261 6107
32
+
7456 7459
55
+
0001 2588
120
+
TEST NINE:
Evening of 1/26
at the Provincial Qigong Literary Research
Committee.
Testers:
Liang Zhanguang,
Lai Shaoqi,
Liang Ronglin.
150
people present.
Contents of test:
CHARACTERS (STC )
RECOGNITION TIME (SEC)
RESULTS
4282 4486
45
+
2494 2588
120
TEST TEN:
PM
of 2/04
at the Guangzhou Municipal
Old Cadre Activities
Center.
Testers:
Ye Xiong, Liang Taocheng and Liang Ronglin.
40 people
present.
Contents of test:
CHARACTERS (STC)
RECOGNITION TIME (SEC)
RESULTS
5071 1626
60
+
7022 1108
56
---
6079 1102 2638
248
+
TEST ELEVEN:
Morning of 2/05 at the Guangdong Old Cadre Activity Center.
Testers: Lai Jian, Yao Zhongren
and Liang
Ronglin.
35 people present.
Contents of test:
CHARACTERS (STC)
RECOGNITION TIME (SEC)
RESULTS
0917 7185
240
+
0256 1660
60
+
6855 1776
420
+
.
63
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
....
-%- De
50
65
+
Testers:

II.
Du Ping strenuously opposes taking television or moving pictures
of her Apbroved Por Release 2000/08/10reCIA-RDP96-00792R900200440002-6 it will
affect her ability
to
recognize
the characters
or
figures.
Certain
outside interference
can affect paranormal abilities.
This has already
been reported.
Do television
cameras (outside information)
have a
psychological effect on Du Ping so that she cannot recognize the words or
figures very well? Or does it have a direct effect on certain links in
the recognition process so that her abilities can not be put to normal
use.
We are preparing to further observe and research this question.
III. It was discovered that Du Ping had paranormal
abilities in May
of 1979. From 1981 to 1983 many tests were performed. From 1984 to 1985
there was no testing or other training.
In 1986, we resumed her testing
with these
tests of ours. Although there was a hiatus of two years, the
ability was still stable and the recognition accuracy
was 100 percent.
Furthermore, it
was even more rapid.
We have learned that young people
with paranormal abilities often see their abilities decline after 15 to 16
years old.
However, Du Ping is already 17 years old and two years after
testing had stopped, her abilities were still stable.
Why is this?
£
It
paranormal
has been
said that Du Ping's maternal grandmother
has
abilities, and according to reports by Dong Zhenjun and Wu
Xizais,6/, Du
Ping's mother and younger brother both have paranormal abilities and Du
Ping's mother's side of the family has had paranormal abilities
for three
generations.
Are there genetic factors to paranormal abilities?
Is Du
Ping's current abilities related to genetic factors.
From this,
we can
get some hint that we should conduct some research on paranormal abilities
from the viewpoint of genetics. It seems that this is also one aspect of
paranormal abilities research that has been overlooked.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1.
Chen Shouliang
etal, Investigative Report on One Human Special
Sensing Ability (1) - The
Question
of
the
Reality
of
Special Sensing
Abilities, "Nature Magazine", 1979, 2 (11), pp 715.
2.
Xu Xinglao etal, Report on a Survey of the Ability to Recognize
Characters and Distinguish Colors With the Ears, "Nature Magazine", 1979,
2 (11), pp 716.
3.
Xie Hangyu etal, Preliminary
Summary of Observing Xie Chaojun
Using His Ears to Recognize Characters
and Distinguish
Colors, "Nature
Magazine", 1979, 2 (11), pp 779.
4.
Chen Shouliang etal, The Question of the Universality of Special
Sensing Mechanisms - An Investigative Report on a Type of Human Special
Sensing Mechanism (2), "Nature Magazine", 1980, 3 (5), pp 334.
5.
Dong Zhenjun, Human Paranormal Ability 'Sports Meet', "Bulletin
of Human Paranormal Abilities", December 20, 1980.
65
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
IN753-92
6.
Wu Xizai
etal,
Experiments
on Human
Paranormal
Signals on
Microorganisms,
Internal
Materials
of
the
Wuhan
University
Human
Paranormal Abilities Research Team.
7.
He Tianyan etal, Initial
Observations of
Blind Children Using
Human
Paranormal
Sensing Mechanisms
Magazine, 1981, 4 (4), pp 294.
to Distinguish Colors,
"Nature
66
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-92
INITIAL EXPLORATIONS INTO HUMAN PARANORMAL ABILITIES
RENTI TEYIGONGNENG CHUTAN
COMMEMORATING THE FIRST STEP IN EXPANDING WORK IN GUANGZHOU
JI GUANGZHOU KAIZHAN GONGZUODE DEYIBU
BY :
Guo Zuorao of the Guangzhou Municipal Public Health Bureau
Chinese Medicine Office.
INTRODUCTION:
In the Spring
of 1981,
when there
was a enthusiasm in human
paranormal ability
research in
Sichuan, Beijing, Yunnan and other areas,
Doctor Li Kunhua of the Guangzhou Honghui Hospital began testing for human
paranormal abilities at an
elementary school in the Haizhu District.
I
and Chan Xiqi of the Guangzhou Science and Technology Exchange Hall also
began research on this topic.
With the support of the Yuexiu District
Education Bureau, we selected the Hongshunan Elementary School (now called
the Xinqiao Elementary School) on Haizhu Road to begin testing of human
paranormal ability to recognize characters with
the ears.
(Later, the
elementary school on Yide West Road
was closed down shortly thereafter)
the office director of the 402 Office, Li Tiejun also joined us through
the support of the leaders at that school. The testing was done on every
Saturday afternoon. At that time we did not have any monies for expenses,
so I and comrade Chan Xiqi took some of our own money to get the work
started. When the testing of recognizing characters with the ears began,
Qigong was used to adjust the emotions and the body to get the subjects
into a proper state. As a result, the percentage of the
subjects induced
into the proper state
was
very high.
From this class there were 37
subjects taking part in the testing, and from the testing we found 36 who
had the ability to recognize characters with the ears to varying degrees.
Shortly afterwards, the Municipal Public Health Bureau Scientific Research
Office assistant director Chen Jingnuan returned from attending the All-
China Conference on Human Paranormal Ability Research.
We then launched
this work together with Chen Jingnuan in an organized fashion. Because of
the support from the leaders of the Guangzhou Municipal Public Health
Bureau we were allocated some scientific
research funds as expenses for
research into human paranormal abilities.
The bureau also assigned Zhu
Guokai from the Guangzhou Hospital of
Chinese Medicine and Ou Peigui of
the Guangzhou Public Health Propaganda and Education Hall to take part in
specific work.
At the same time, it
established the Guangzhou Somatic
Sciences Research Team composed of Chen
Jingnuan, Guo Zuorao, Chan Xiqi,
Li Kunhua, Li Tiejun, Ou Peigui, Zhu Goukai and a section chief from the
Yuexiu District Education Bureau. The research work then proceeded in an
organized
fashion.
We conducted tests every Saturday and all Summer
vacation at the Hongshunan Elementary School or the Municipal Science and
67
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-92
this ability on a number of occasions, with the whole class taking part,
only one student failed to have this ability
successively induced.
The
difference among the subjects was primarily
the time
it took to induce
this ability. The length of time it
took
to
induce
this ability was
related
to
the number
of occasions
the
subjects
were trained. For
example, this initial inducing of this
ability took
45 minutes.
On the
sixth time, it only
took 14 minutes.
On the eighth occasion it was even
faster, taking only two minutes.
If the training were discontinued for a
length of time,
the abilities
also diminished. For example, on the
fourth occasion of inducing these abilities, because it had been more than
ten days since the previous occasion, the students abilities had declined,
and it took a minimum of 55 minutes to induce these abilities.
II.
WHERE ON THE BODY THIS ABILITY OCCURS VARIES AMONG INDIVIDUALS
Looking at our testing, many of the subjects used their ears or hands
to
recognize characters or figures.
Some
used
their
foreheads to
differentiate objects.
Some used their
armpits to
see
objects inside
boxes.
Later it developed to where they could differentiate objects
through solid matter and move objects.
We can postulate
from this that
human paranormal abilities
are
not
limited to
sensing,
but have an
unlimited potential energy.
III.
HOW DID THEY SENSE THE OBJECTS?
ACCORDING TO THE SUBJECT
RESPONSES :
1.
The majority sensed images
between
their
eyebrows,
such
as a
fluorescent screen.
It
was from
this
that
the subjects sensed the
character or figure in
the test.
However ,
a few
had images
appear in
front of the forehead.
4
2.
The
image
appeared gradually
like
a scan.
If they were to
recognize a character, the character would usually appear one stroke
at a
time, but for some it would appear one dot at a time like a scan until it
formed a stroke, and then would become a character one stroke at
a time.
However, the stroke sequence would not be the same as used in writing the
character. If they were trying to recognize more than one character at a
time, the characters would appear one over top the other, and then would
slowly separate and then the subjects would recognize them in their mind.
Specifically, if a piece of paper with a character on it were rolled up
into a ball for the test, a ball of paper
would first appear to the
subjects, and then it would slowly open up, showing the characters to be
recognized. If the characters were torn up into several pieces, one piece
of paper at a time would appear, and then they would merge together and
the character would appear.
3.
The images 'appeared in such colors as red, yellow, green and
black. At times each stroke of each character would be a different color.
Just like a color television, after the images appear, they disappeared
69
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-92
to any great extent to a persons intelligence, sex, or constitution.
In
our tests, the children with relatively
strong abilities included those
with good grades and those with bad, both
boys and
girls and
those with
both strong and
weak
constitutions.
However, the abilities appeared
relatively quickly in quiet children.
VII. In the process of inducing paranormal abilities, it can lead to
certain physical reactions.
After
the
abilities were induced in the
children, there was usually such sympathetic nervous system reaction as a
rise in blood pressure, accelerated pulse, and they would feel hot all
over or their faces would get red, they would sweat and their mouth would
get dry.
We checked these reactions on two occasions, and on the first
occasion we checked seven, all of whom had elevated blood pressure and
four who had accelerated heart beats. On the second occasion we checked
16 of them, and nine had elevated blood pressure and seven had accelerated
heart beats.
However,
the elevated blood pressure was within the normal
range for all the subjects, and it was only elevated from what it had been
prior to
inducement.
Therefore, after the tests, it was necessary to
provide some nourishment to make up for what had been used up in body
energy .
VIII.
Subjective and
objective factors have a very great effect on
inducing paranormal abilities.
1.
The surrounding environment and whether the
individual was still
or active had
a
strong
relationship
with
the
inducement rate. For
example, during the first inducement,
there
was
noise
from
a nearby
factory,
and the children
said
when
the
noise
occurred
the
image
disappeared from between their eyebrows.
Later
we moved
to
a quieter
environment
for
inducement,
and
the
inducement rate was
markedly
increased. Also, mischievous children who had difficulty being still and
who
kept
looking
all
around took
a long time to have their abilities
induced.
However, while they were settling down, they were not just to
think
of nothing, but were
to concentrate
their energy on trying to
recognize the object or they would fall asleep very easily.
2.
Exhaustion, nervousness and irritability had a direct effect on
inducement.
For example during one test, the children had been in class
all day, and were tired. Also, there were a lot of people watching.
The
combination of exhaustion and nervousness caused
the inducement rate to
drop.
3.
Changes in the weather also affected
the
inducement rate,
especially when
the weather
was hot and oppressive or thundering and
raining, the children were more edgy and there could not settle down and
relax, so the inducement rate went down.
71
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6