CIA-RDP96-00789R003700340001-4

Approved For Release 2000/08/09 : CIA-RDP96-00789R003700340001-4
SEGRET
INTELLIGENCE EVALUATION SHEET
No Feedback
3 Hg
IES Control Number:
F
Source Number :
101
101
SECTION I
Collection Requirement: Conduct Utility Assessment "F" to
determine the extent of Source's remote viewing capability and
propensity to collect foreign intelligence information against a
"suspected"
SG1B
SG1B
Collection Requirement Generated By:
DIA
(DT-5)
Does the information
YES
IN PART
NO
CANNOT BE
DETERMINED
satisfy your Intelli-
gence Collection
Requirement?
มูนแพลหมู
---- -
A narrative explanation is required:
See comments entered in
SECTION IV.
Use a continuation sheet if necessary.
-SEGRET
(classification)
NOTE:
1
POSSIBLE OVERLAP
1.
WITH D MAY HAVE
LED TO ANALYTICAL
OVERLAY + DATA
REJECTION PROBLEMS
Approved For Release 2000/08/09 : CIA-RDP96-00789R003700340001-4

Approved For Release 2000/08/09 : CIA-RDP96-00789R003700340001-4
SECRET
SECTION II
This section deals exclusively with the accuracy of the
information provided, not its usefulness. Responses are scaled
from 0-3 utilizing the following explanatory criteria.
If a
source has not addressed a particular item then select UNKNOWN.
If a source describes an item which cannot be verified then
select CANNOT BE DETERMINED.
0 - Little or no correspondence with known or suspected
components of the target site.
1 - Evidence that the proper target site is being described,
however the information contains a mixture of correct and
incorrect elements.
2 - Good site correspondence with several items recognizable
or confirmatory in nature but some incorrect or irrelevant
information is reported.
3 - Good correspondence with the target with unambiguous and
unique information and relatively little known incorrect
information.
Ila -
Geographic locale
description, i.e.,
terrain, bodies of
water, mountains, etc.
0-3
UNKNOWN
CANNOT BE
DETERMINED
=
=
IIb -
Large scale manmade
objects, i.e. , cities,
rail yards, silos,
docks, etc.
IIc - Small scale manmade
structures, i.e.,
antennae, computers,
vehicles, missiles,
small buildings, etc.
IId. - General target func-
tions, i.e., research,
production, training,
storage, troop billets,
etc.
=
(classification)
Approved For Release 2000/08/09 : CIA-RDP96-00789R003700340001-4

Approved For Release 2000/08/09 : CIA-RDP96-00789R003700340001-4
SECRET
0- Little or no correspondence with known or suspected
components of the target site.
1 - Evidence that the proper target site is being described,
however the information contains a mixture of correct and
incorrect elements.
2 - Good site correspondence with several items recognizable
or confirmatory in nature but some incorrect or irrelevant
information is reported.
3 - Good correspondence with the target with unambiguous and
unique information and relatively little known incorrect
information.
Ile - Specific target func-
tions, i.e., nuclear
testing, CBR storage/
research, missile
testing etc.
0-3
UNKNOWN
CANNOT BE
DETERMINED
#
=
IIf - Personalities at
site, i.e., descrip-
tions, activities,
responsibilities,
political proclivity,
support for government.
IIg - Data of predictive
importance, i.e., plans,,,
preparations hostile
#
intentions.
Hummmmind
A narrative elaboration is requested:
(Use a continuation sheet if necessary: )
(classification)
Approved For Release 2000/08/09 : CIA-RDP96-00789R003700340001-4
F
Intimmanual
:

Approved For Release 2000/08/09 : CIA-RDP96-00789R003700340001-4
SECRET
SECTION III
Please check which best describes the intelligence value of
the information provided.
Il
VERY USEFUL
USEFUL
MARGINAL
VALUE
NO VALUE
CANNOT BE
DETERMINED
Narrative comment required. Explain how information provided
will be used (i. e. confirm other intelligence sources, targeting,
etc. ).
If information is of marginal or no value, explain why.
Su SECTION II.
(Use a continuation sheet if necessary. )
(classification)
Approved For Release 2000/08/09 : CIA-RDP96-00789R003700340001-4

Approved For Release 2000/08/09 : CIA-RDP96-00789R003700340001-4
SECRET
SECTION IV
This organization solicits your frank and informal comment on any
aspect of this project which could better aid us in providing
high quality intelligence to the consumer.
Please feel free to
use the space below or additional sheets of paper as necessary to
convey your thoughts.
Source 101's inability to access the target during the course of
two sessions was an intriguing dilemma.
Source, an experienced
viewer, appeared unable to grasp the full nature or scope of the
target.
The following comments surrounding possible explanation
for Source's apparent failure to access the target are submitted
for your consideration:
--- A "suspected target" should not be used to conduct a utility
assessment for obvious reasons.
The requirement of Utility
Assessment
should have been submitted as an operational
tasker.
In Session 01, Source 101 was tasked to identify the purpose
of two vertical objects (suspected air shafts?). There is no
apparent mention or levy of the "special target" or the "target
of intelligence interest. "
There could be several "two vertical"
objects at the suspected site.
In Session 02, Source 101 was allowed to "cruise around" prior
to accessing the "suspected" target.
This strategy could
encourage the subconscious to roam about freely .
The use of
sanctuary may have been more appropriate in this instance.
SG1J
SIGNATURE:
DATE OF EVALUATION:
13 april 1987
SEGRETI
(classification)
Approved For Release 2000/08/09 : CIA-RDP96-00789R003700340001-4