Project Interloper

CIA STARGATE release

CIA-RDP96-00789R001900250002-3

Opens with: PROJECT SUN STREAK (U)

Warning: text for all documents has not been verified. Errors are possible. Check the original by document ID on CREST.

1 page, machine transcribed from the CIA’s released scan.

.
Approved For Release 2002/11/18 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001900250002-3
11/NOFORN - SKEET CHANNELS ONLY
PROJECT SUN STREAK (U)
ERV SESSION PROCEDURE REPORT
WARNING NOTICE:
INTELLIGENCE SOURCES AND METHODS INVOLVED
CONTROL NUMBER :
NICKNAME :
Other "A"
DATE OF SESSION: 2-6 Jun 86
TARGET COUNTRY :
Unknown
25UN 45UN
6JUN
REFERENCES :
None
SESSION NUMBER :
01, 02, 03
DATE OF REPORT:
31 Jul 86
MISSION STATUS:
Initial/complete
TECHNIQUE UTILIZED:
ERV
SOURCE IDENTIFIER:
101
SG1A
1.
V
)
TASKING: Initially the interviewer was provided a 3x5 card
on which the following tasking was typed:
"Identify the main chane features and
purpose of the structures at (coordinate)
In the
two Subsequent sessions the interviewer was provided further verbal tasking
and directions, i.e., " site is accurate but focus attention on tunnel and
rocket device, ""additional emphasis on purpose of rocket device and relation to
site." Throughout sessions the intermewer was never told the exact nature
of the site, its key facilities nor its mission. In the initial session, the
Source: was simply given the coordinates of the site, (encrypted to preclude
inadvertent geographic cueing as per Extended Remote Viewing (ERV) protocols) .
In subsequent sessions, Source was again provided the coordinates and a general
synopsis of previously reported data. No additional specific tasking emphasis or
intentional cueing was provided to Source.
2. (
)
SESSION:
During the initial session, Source took a "joyride"
to an unspecified site whose descriptive data did not coincide with the known
data on the site. Source was retargetted, (coordinates repeated) and
successfully acquired the site. In subsequent sessions Source was encourage
to initially take a "joy ride" to a site of his choosing, (later to be designated
"'Sanctuary") and from that site, at the direction of the interviewer, he was
to move to the target. This technique appeared to eliminate inadvertent
reporting on non-related targets and was enjoyable to the Source, therefore,
the use of "Sanctuary" targetting will continue on a trial basis to dtermine
its affect on the Source's success rate.
P
3. (
)
SUMMARY :
The following is comilation of the raw and unevaluated
data provided by Source during the total of three sessions conducted on this
target.
a.
(
)
A fenced complex of buildings and facilities with a feeling
of military involvement. There are numerous scientists and technicians working
at the site. Some areas of the site are above ground, (builiungs and related
facilities), while other areas are underagournd or at least partially under-
ground. Mnay of the buildings appear to be abandoned completely including one
building (next to a railroad track) which may have once been a depot. This
building Approved Por Refedse 2002hp1/48mPCIA-RDP96100789R001900250002-Bt of

Follow along

New documents and dispatches as they publish. The newsletter is the one place to keep up.