CIA-RDP96-00792R000500230003-5

4
SGApproved For Release 2000/08/10ACIAERDP96-00792R000500230003-5/3/92
In case you haven't gotten this. The technical discussion
concerning vector/solar (A, 6) potentials in both sophisticated
and correct. With regard & avramenko's claimed biscomm
potential, it bags I have an experiment done, e.g., detecting
random binary sequence forgnals from on EM-suppressed ,
(4, 4) generator- just my cup of tea, as it turns out!
Best, Had Putfall
Informational Interaction of Isolated Systems Without Energy Transfer
92A50046 Unknown city - USSR Unknown in Russian Unknown (Unknown Pub Date)
Unknown pp 341-357
[Article by R. F. Avramenko, V. I. Nikolayeva, and V. N. Pushkin
[Text]
I. Problem of the information component of biofield interactions.
A special feature of biofield interactions is the transfer of information from one biofield
structure to another. Two types of relationship can be articulated for structures of that kind
that effect the process of information transfer. One type of structure is associated with
interactions within a system, such as the brain. An example of such a biofield interaction
could be instantaneous -- in the terminology of psychology, simultaneous -- recognition. That
recognition of very familiar objects suggests the interaction of a biofield model of an
impression that comes from without and structures that were previously formed and are
models of already perceived objects. Resonant contact of that sort produces the effect of
virtually instantaneous drawing on past experience of a needed reference and can be
considered the mechanism underlying simultaneous recognition.
Processes associated with thinking and with problem solving can be placed in that category of
informational interactions between systems that are spatially isolated from each other. In the
course of mental activity, the individual is known to create for himself something new, and
that new semantic system usually enables the individual to solve a complex problem facing
him. As numerous psychological studies show, the principal language the individual uses in
his thinking is the language of systems of relationships between objects. If one approaches
that psychological reality from the standpoint of the formation and work of biofield
structures, then two components can be articulated in a system of relationships - certain
biofield equivalents of objects, and the stable field interactions of those equivalents,
interactions that are the equivalents of the interactions between the objects.
In analyzing a given problem situation, the individual constructs a model of that situation that
consists of, once again, the equivalents of the elements that make up the problem, plus the
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Approved For Release 2000/08/15 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000500230003-5

Approved For Release 2000/08/15 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000500230003-5
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
interactions between those equivalents. A good example of how the model of the situation is
constructed is the process that takes place in the head of a chess player when he is analyzing
his position on the chessboard. When he considers his position, the chess player perceives the
pieces as functional points of sorts that have given properties of movement. In
comprehending those properties of movement, he constructs a system of relationships among
the pieces that become the basis of the functioning of his game strategy.
It's not difficult to see that that process -- just like the process of instantaneous, simultaneous
recognition that we alluded to -- presumes, of necessity, the existence of biofield interactions:
the relationships constructed in the analysis of the situation absolutely must interact with the
relationships that constitute the content of the chess player's experience. Only on the basis of
the realization of past relationships can the semantic system of a new situation develop.
Thus, analysis shows that the resonance between biofield structures is also a very important
aspect in an individual's thinking. But in that context, it is not a resonance of representations
of a single specific object that takes place, but a resonance of systems that include certain
field equivalents of objects and of the relationships among them.
The exchange of information between completely isolated biological objects can be considered
another type of informational biofield interaction. An example of that sort of interaction is
telepathy; when information that is not encoded in known languages specially designed for
the transfer of information is transmitted from one individual to another.
As a great deal of the literature shows, those sorts of bioinformational interactions can
involve the transfer of the most varied of types of psychological manifestations. With
telepathy it is possible to convey an action, the image of an object, a meaningful symbolic
structure, or an emotional state. That means that in that kind of bioinformational contact,
there is an interaction of biofield systems of various levels and modalities of the brains of two
individuals who are separated from each other.
scalar
waves !
1
All those types of biofield interactions, in which information is transferred from one system
to another, are characterized first and foremost by the fact that the transfer of information
involves no direct energy expense. Of course, each of the biofield systems that are associating
with each other needs some amount of energy for its very existence. It's also probable that
the features of the information exchange between the systems -- the clarity, the efficiency,
and the so-called capacity of the exchange -- are associated with the energy characteristics of
those systems. The process itself of informational interaction, unlike known hardware
systems, does not require energy.
In that context, the problem arises of identifying the physical laws that would enable one to
undertake the analysis of the informational interaction between spatially separate systems that
does not require any expenditure of energy for its existence. Later, it will be shown that there
already exists in modern physics the theoretical and experimental data that enable us to take
up an examination of just such an energy-free transfer of information.
Approved For Release 2005/08/15ICCIA RDP96-00792R000500230003-5

Approved For Release 2000/08/15 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000500230003-5
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Here we should pause on certain aspects of biofield structures. That's all the more a good
idea because the concept itself of biological field remains essentially undefined and is far
from being completely analyzed in theoretical terms. The concept comes to biology from
physics and is a unique analogy of the remote interactions between objects that are
traditionally called fields in physics.
It is unquestionable, however, that the reality that got the name of biological field from A.
G. Gurvich has, from the very outset, certain properties that indicate that the remote
interactions between biological systems are substantially different from the physical
interactions to which the concept of field has been affixed.
The most striking property of the biofield - one that is specific and fundamentally unique --
is its dynamic systematism complicated by the property of selectivity. The cells of the cortex
of the major hemispheres, for example, which make up a certain functional system of the
brain, can detect field interactions between themselves, although they may be separated by
rather considerable amounts of space. Those cells cannot, however, have any kind of field
interactions with cells that are situated right next to them. Moreover, it is obvious that
functional structures are constantly changing as a function of the tasks of human activity.
That is why any given biofield interaction of any element of the brain may be replaced after a
given period of time by an interaction with totally different elements. Physical fields, as a
rule, are not acquainted with such selective systematism or such dynamism among elements.
The informativeness of biofield structures must also be considered a unique quality. Analysis
shows that biofields always come about and function only in the context of the processes of
generation and transfer of biological information. That link between biological fields and
bioinformational processes is a property intrinsic to those unique fields. Unlike biofields,
known physical fields can perform the function of information carrier only if some outside
influence is applied to them. It is significant that the informativeness of a physical field,
which comes about as the result of the exertion of a systematic outside influence -- the
modulation of an electromagnetic field, for example -- has no significance whatsoever for the
existence and functioning of the physical system that generates or receives such modulation.
The whole of the informativeness of the dynamics of physical fields has meaning only for the
individual who created the physical systems in question -- radio receivers and transmitters,
for example.
But with biological fields, their informativeness is directly linked to the existence, the life
process of the biological systems in which the fields function.
All those unique features of biological field interactions make them so different from the field
interactions of objects known to physics that they make the term "field" itself, as applied to
the processes of living systems, extremely arbitrary and, to a large extent, metaphorical.
Perhaps, in the future we will think about creating a new concept, one that more adequately
reflects the properties of those specific [illegible] interactions.
Approved For Release 2000/88 E CIAL USE ONLY
: CIA-RDP96-00792R000500230003-5

Approved For Release 200065195 : CfA-RDP96-00792R000500230003-5
For all their fundamental uniqueness, however, what we are now calling interactions between
biofield structures are interactions that are either physical or biophysical. And the fact that
those complex interactions are beyond the pale not only of physics, but also of all of natural
science indicates that in our picture of the world, something fundamental was left out when
the principles of natural-science inquiry were being formed.
There is reason to believe that that omission was associated with the fact that the object of
most of the study of natural sciences was matter and the processes taking place in it. Of
course, one cannot help but note that, in addition to matter, the objects filling the world also
have form, But in the system of the world, the form of an object has not been given the
significance of a fundamental factor. The category of form was made chiefly the object of
philosophical analysis. However, the actual existence of form in objects as some always
specific material structure poses the challenge of revealing its wave and field properties.
>
At present, the reality of the physical properties -- especially field properties -- of the form in
objects can be proven by many groups of facts. Among such facts are the data that point to
the existence of a charged layer around the human body. Those data also include data
indicating the effectiveness of manipulating biologically active points of the skin. As ancient
theoreticians of acupuncture assert, life-giving energy is concentrated around the human body
in the space near the skin.
Constituting another group of facts pointing to the existence of forms as wave (or field)
structures are those of (?lozokhodstva?), which was named too broadly and not entirely
adequately by the term "biophysical effect." Analysis shows that the basis of that effect may
be the interaction of the structural features of the external field (aura) of an operator and the
external fields (form) of the sought-for object.
x:is this
Jame. as
Afield.
reality ?
There is reason to believe that the properties of biofield structures that are responsible for the
informational interaction of those structures are linked to specific features of the form in
objects existing as a physical reality. Discovering those features could be of interest to a
whole array of branches of knowledge; it presumes a special theoretical and experimental
analysis of fundamental problems. Such analysis will probably be performed in the near
future.
In the context of all these remarks, of special interest are the physical data that are already
enabling the analysis of the possibilities of informational interactions. In particular, of great
importance are the physical tenets that demonstrate how information exchange can take place,
with no expenditure of energy, between spatially separate systems.
.
II. A possible physical interpretation of the informational interaction between isolated
systems, without the transfer of energy.
The experimental data accumulated to date on informational interaction of biological systems1
that is not an exchange of information via electromagnetic signals or particles force us to
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Approved For Release 2000/08/15 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000500230003-5

Approved For Release 2000/08/15 : CIA RDP96-00792R000500230003-5
analyze more carefully the alternative possibilities of communication between isolated systems
and, above all, possibilities that are feasible in the context of the existing fundamental
physical concepts.
Avramenko et al .? have shown that there exists a consistent possibility for the exchange of
information between systems without the involvement of any kind of energy carrier, with the
possibility based on the existence of a 4-x [4th dimension?] field potential distinct from zero
with the [illegible] components of that field E and B absolutely equal to zero.
The formal body of mathematics for modern electrodynamics, constructed with sequential use
of the principles of the theory of relativity,' shows that an electromagnetic field is most
adequately described by a 4x field potential Ay =(A, 4), whereas E and B represent only a
few combinations of derivatives of its components E - @ - = and B= 7xA.
Today's engineering, however, often uses field potentials superficially, for simplifying
mathematical computations in the calculation in practical problems of the components E and
B, and those very components are felt to provide a complete description of an electromagnetic
field in its interaction with matter F= q (E+VxB)
The interpretation of fields A and o as "real physical fields" is hindered, to some extent, by
their mathematical ambiguity and the confusion in the literature about choice of gage. At the
same time, it known that only a Lorentz gage V.A= -
124.
is relativistically invariant,
whereas, for example, the oft-used gage v-A=0 is relativistically not invariant and
indicates the existence of purely transverse - i.e., plane -- waves of potential, something that
electromagnetic waves with infinitely large energies would conform to.
In theoretical physics, it is the potentials of A and [illegible] that naturally go into the
expressions for the action integral and the Hamiltonian function. In quantum electrodynamics,
variation in the quantum mechanical phase of a particle of an electromagnetic field is
determined by the well-known Feynman integral SO= 2 /Aids- . /4dt .. i.e., it is a
function of the field potential itself.
In the 1960s, Jaklevic, Lambe, Mercereau, and Silver6,7 and Burn [sic], Aronov, and
Chambers' conducted a number of experiments that were specially set up for detecting the
manifestation of field potential in regions of space in which E=B=0 (with the use of the
Josephson effect [by Jaklevic] and electron diffraction [by Chambers]). The work by those
individuals demonstrated experimentally the possibility of detecting field potential when
E=B=0 and thereby showed the limitedness of the "engineering" description of an
electromagnetic field with E and B. The results of those experiments enabled R. Feynman to
again announce the "physical reality" of field potentials.3
The successful experiments of Jaklevic and Chambers legitimize the issue of the "reality" of
the existence of electromagnetic field potential longitudinal waves propagating, for example,
along the axis of an oscillating electrical dipole (or along the plane of a magnetic dipole). As
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Approved For Release 2000/08/15 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000500230003-5

Approved For ReleaseR2006/08/15: CIA-RDP96-00792R000500230003-5
we know, the solution of an electrodynamic problem involving the determination of the
radiation field of an electrical dipole is based on the existence in the entire space of a
spherical wave A propagating at the speed of light and with an amplitude that diminishes in a
manner inversely proportional to distance, with the vector A parallel to the axis of the dipole
at each point in space.',"" Detecting those waves at a distance would open the way to the
realization of a new type of information transfer. The information would be transferred
without any transfer of energy, because longitudmal waves of potential do not carry energy
(the Umov-Poynting vector is equal to zero). Energy, however, must be expended at the
point of transmission and at the point of reception. (We note that in the well-known
experiments for the detection of A when E=B=0, energy from an outside source is expended
in the detector.) The need to expend energy in the receiver and in the transmitter removes the
apparent contradiction in the concept in question with the law of conservation of energy.11
We know that the problem of the physical reality of field potentials and of the possibility of
their detection is closely related to the problem of gage invariance of equations of quantum
physics, inasmuch as the assignment of field potential determines the quantum mechanical
phase of a wave adequate for a given object. Gage invariance is usually understood to mean
that assignment of given field potentials (but not their derivatives) has no effect on system
energy. However, if in experiment, the possibility is realized for measuring and comparing
phases of #-waves that correspond to certain elements A, B ... of the system M=A+B+ ... ,
then, after expending in the manner indicated above some amount of energy on the process of
that measurement, it is possible to obtain information on the values of the components of 4x
field potentials at the location of system M.
It should be noted that the phase relationships associated with de Broglie waves are the
primary experimental data that have shown the wave nature of matter.
For example, the classic experiments of Davisson and Germer were the first to observe
diffraction of electron #-waves reflected off single-crystal structures.16 Thomson's
experiments were the first to detect interference rings formed by electron waves on a
photographic plate (as well as light and x-ray rings).17
The interference of electron waves was the principal effect observed in later experiments
geared to corroborating wave mechanics and in experiments conducted by Tartakovskiy"' and
Fabrikant et al.19
The phase relationships of wave processes are used more widely in holographic technology
than in engineering applications.
At present, that process has begun to be used in electron microscopy for producing holograms
based on electron #-waves. 13,14,15
A coherent electron #-wave source, as we know, can be any device that is capable of
emitting electrons into a vacuum with little velocity (or impulse) straggling and that has small
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Approved For Release 2000/08/15 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000500230003-5

Approved For Release 2000/08/15 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000500230003-5
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
physical dimensions (a point source).
In well-known early experiments, various crystal structures were usually used as the object of
which a hologram had to be recorded.16," That was because the length of the electron wave is
determined by the de Broglie relation
2 =h/mv,
where fi =>
~1027 is Planck's constant, m is the electron mass, and v is the electron velocity.
With an electron energy of 1-100 eV, wavelength is 1=(1.5-0.015) 10' cm, so that for
observation of interference phenomena, the use of crystals with a lattice element spacing of
approximately 104 cm is effective.
At the same time, methods developed in recent years for "cooling" particle beams, thereby
enabling the achievement of extremely low values for particle velocity straggling, make it
technically possible to produce beams with low total energy. For example, electrons have
been slowed to an energy of 10' eV, with the wavelength of approximately 0.05 um
approaching the wavelengths of the visible range.
The small absolute length of #-waves for electrons with energies of 1-100 eV, most easily
detected directly via photoemulsion exposure, makes the technical realization of the
holographic process more difficult than if light waves were used.
For observing and recording the interference pattern produced by macro bodies even the size
of 10-100 um, one must use either larger distances from the object to the photographic plate
or electron optics that result in the period of the spatial pulsations being larger than the
resolution element of the emulsion.22
The use of "cold" particle beams with large wavelength and low energy for #-holography
raises the issue of what method is to be used to record the amplitude distribution of the wave
in the detection plane -- direct exposure of photoemulsion at a particle energy of <0.1 eV,
for example, could be virtually absent. Certain difficulties can also arise in the successive
recording of the hologram with scanning by an electron beam detector.
To record -holograms based on cold electrons, it could turn out that it is best to use various
methods of intermediate, simultaneous conversion of the interference pattern -- electron-
microscopy methods of image transformation and enhancement and use of enhancement of the
"#-image" via direct acceleration of the "cold" electrons between the plane for recording the
#-hologram and the photodetector, and methods of enhancement that attach electrons to
electronegative molecules with subsequent acceleration of those molecules in an electrical
field, etc.
As with the visible and radio ranges of electromagnetic waves, methods of basic intensity
1
Approved For Release 200 988/15:CIA-RDP96-00792R000500230003-5

Approved For Release 2000/08/15
FOR OFFICIAL ABAR96-00792R000500230003-5
holography, in which only the square of the amplitude of the interference pattern is recorded,
are entirely applicable to #-holography, as are methods of holography that use a reference
beam, thereby enabling the detection of the amplitude-phase distribution of the #-field.
Controlling the phase front of the #-wave with electrical and magnetic fields -- something
that has been perfected in electron microscopy - makes it possible to implement various
hologram-recording systems that are well-known today for the optical range (for example,
forming reference beams that have a plane or spherical phase front and fall on the hologram
recording plane at a given angle).
The essential difference between -holography and standard holography based on
electromagnetic waves stems from the dispersion of the u-wave propagating in free space.
That difference shows up in puise methods of recording and playing back y-holograms, when
the radiation used cannot be considered monochromatic. "Diffusion" of the wave packets
(pulses) in free space (or in a vacuum) does not take place for electromagnetic waves and is
peculiar only to the #-wave.
III. Features of the playback of holograms and the uncertainty principle.
As with standard optical holography, irradiating a #-hologram with a coherent #-wave (a
single-energy flux of wave-particles) makes it possible to produce a three-dimensional image.
Of greatest interest as regards the w-wave (unlike with the optical hologram) is, apparently,
the virtual image, which has a number of features of the actual object recorded in the
hologram.
The greatest y-wave concentration is observed in the region of space in which the virtual
image is formed, and location of the individual elements of the image is determined,
naturally, only by the nature of the spatial distribution of the wave emanating from the plane
of the #-hologram.
We should note, however, a number of fundamental questions that arise in connection with
the possibility of synthesizing an image with a #-hologram.
First, there is the possibility of self-stress in the virtual image that is obtained and in its
elements -- in general, y-waves interact nonlinearly. For example, electrons are pushed apart
by electrical forces and are scattered on other electrons (unlike electromagnetic waves, which
obey linear equations with great precision).
Next, a virtual #-image can obviously interact directly with an external electromagnetic field,
since, generally speaking, that image constitutes a material medium with a given distribution
of density and other parameters.
Finally, the possibility of a given placement of the "quantum mechanical" object in space in
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Approved For Release 2000/08/15 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000500230003-5

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Approved For Release 2000/08/15 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000500230003-5
the playback of the hologram, in large measure independent of the pulse (de Broglie
wavelength) magnitude, evokes the natural question of whether such a possibility contradicts
the known Heisenberg uncertainty relation (see Vikhman21 and Davydov," among others).
Let us pause in more detail on that question.
In recent decades, in connection with the rapid progress in the theory and technology of radar
measurements, a number of works that have become classics have examined the overall
statistical theory, principles, and limitations associated with measurements that use wave
processes. It has become clear that in actual situations, when wave processes (an
electromagnetic field, for example) can have a certain, rather complex space-time
modulation, the potential capabilities of measurements of target coordinates (range, speed,
angle, etc.) are determined by so-called general uncertainty principles (see, for example,
Shirman23 and Urkovitts24, as well as Bakut et al." and Middleton," among others).
In the 1950s, in particular, the development of the theory of wideband radar signals
demonstrated the unsoundness of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle with regard to joint
measurement of target range and speed (i.e., temporary position and [illegible] of a wave
packet).
It turned out that, as correctly pointed by Vakman," that principle reflects not the potential
capabilities of measurements of actual physical magnitudes, but just some trivial [illegible]
typical of the most basic type of oscillation [illegible] of a sine curve with a square, Gaussian
envelope or one similar to it. In other words, the Heisenberg principle [illegible] that if an
oscillation could have a duration of T~T, then its Fourier [illegible] could not be narrower
than ff ~ ~ such that t. Sf2.I.
Before the early 1950s, wideband signals were not known in radar, and it was mistakenly
believed that the potential capabilities of joint measurement of target range and speed (not a
single probing signal) were limited by a given "relation of durations," i.e., the longer the
probing signal, the more accurately the Doppler frequency shift (speed) is measured, but the
less accurately the delay of the [illegible] signal (range) is measured.
In 1953, the pioneering work of Woodward" came out, [illegible] for the first time was
revealed [illegible] of such notions. It became clear that spectral width of the signal W, and
not signal duration T, was the parameter that determines the potential accuracy of
measurement of the range coordinate (delay), while, independent of the magnitude of W, the
accuracy of the measurement of Doppler frequency is determined by signal duration T.
Modern detection equipment (radars, sonar, etc.) would be unthinkable without the use of
wideband signals with TW>1, frequency modulation, and phase manipulation.23,28
Woodward's general uncertainty principle holds true for such signals, saying that the potential
capabilities of measurements are determined by a type of autocorrelation function E (7, w)
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Approved For Release 2000/08/15 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000500230003-5

Approved For Release 2006/08FISIACHAEDP96-00792R000500230003-5
[sic] of the "wave packet" of the probing signal s(t)
(T.w)= /Js(-2)S'( 등)em
where Li is the total energy of the signal.
The function E (7, @) generally has its greatest value (peak) at the origin of the coordinates
T=0, % =0, and the width of the peak is ~1/w in terms of the T axis and ~2w/T in terms of
the @ axis. Those intervals also determine the potential accuracies of measurements in
sequential statistical theory. But the Woodward uncertainty principle itself asserts that a
volume bounded by (E)2 and the plane (7, w) is finite and is equal to a constant, regardless of
the type of wave packet,
textos
V= = 5 5 15 (+,w) 12 didw =!
-00-00
Figures la and 1b depict the image of a typical autocorrelation function of a wideband
(phase-modulated) signal and, for comparison, the topographic image of that function for an
unmodulated radio pulse of the same duration T.
Signal at the filter output
SH)
FREQUENCY -MODULATED PULSE
PHASE-MODULATED PULSE
T
Autocorrelation function of the signal TW>1
(Tu)
,
us
Figure la
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Approved For Release 2000/08/15 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000500230003-5

Approved For Release 2000/08/15 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000500230003-5
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Signals (wave packets) and uncertainty functions
PHASE -MODULATED
PULSE
UNHOOULATED
RADIO PULSE
FREQUENCY -MODULATED
PULSE
T
T
2I
-1
1
1
,
-T
-7
Figure 1b
Thus, we see that if the position of the wave packet in terms of the r axis were determined
only by its envelope curve, then the "relation of durations" would hold true -- increasing the
duration of the [illegible] of oscillations would lead to a worsening of the accuracy of
measurement of that position. (We are, of course, speaking of the statistical approach
generally used both in wave (quantum) mechanics and in modern radar.) That's not so in an
actual case of optimal processing of a wideband signal. The measuring device (filter or
correlator), using a priori information on the type of interpulse modulation of the wave
packet, makes independent measurements of position with an accuracy of 1/W and of Doppler
frequency with an accuracy of 1/T; expansion of the signal spectrum W does not worsen the
accuracy of measurement of speed of ~1/T.
The modern statistical theory for the measurement of parameters of wave processes is fully
applicable to wave (quantum) mechanics.
In making that application, we must, of course, move from the primitive understanding of the
essence of measurements in the context of Heisenberg ("relation of durations") to the modern
concept of the limitations on those measurements, which has come about as a result of the
development of the theory of statistical radio physics.
We cannot fail to note that in the modern literature on quantum mechanics, the use of the
Heisenberg principle and the explanation of it as a fundamental relationship (!) is often
somewhat peculiar. In the well-known Berkeley Course, for example, for purposes of
illustration, there are figures of wave packets with intrapulse modulation "for which the
accuracy of measurement of frequency is low," although a figure depicts what is essentially a
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Approved For Release 2000/08/15 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000500230003-5

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Approved For Release 2000/08/15 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000500230003-5
wideband signal for which that assertion does not hold true.21
Why, in fact, has quantum theory lagged behind modern radio physics on the concept of
statistical limitations on the accuracy of joint measurements of a number of parameters?
As we can see, the possibility of achieving the potential accuracy of measurements is
governed by two factors:
· the formation of a wave packet with a given type of modulation
. the use of a measurement device the performs the procedure of optimal processing (in the
statistical theory of radio physics, that is a procedure for constructing an a posteriori
distribution of the probability of the presence of a target with given parameters of range and
speed)
Both those factors have simply been outside the circle of questions studied in quantum theory.
For example, the examination of the property of wave packets (de Broglie waves) is usually
limited to the so-called quasiclassical approximation
!
1 =
.
where P is the pulse and v is the Hamiltonian operator. In other words, it is limited to cases
in which phase modulation [illegible] at a distance commensurate with wavelength A =h/mV
[illegible] that constraint is essentially equivalent to the exclusion [illegible] -ment of
wideband #-waves with a marked frequency modulation (to say nothing of phase-modulated
signals).
On the other hand, the measuring device is usually spoken of as a primitive device that
records the intensity of a wave in a given region of space, but the obvious possibility of
recording intrapulse phase relationships is completely ignored (and that in spite of the fact
that phase relationships, as already noted above, lie at the basis of many modern macroscopic
quantum instruments!).
In summing up what has been said, one can assert that no fundamental physical laws are
known that would prompt attaching to the Heisenberg relation the sense of a "relation of
uncertainties" that determines the potential capabilities of measurements. Quantum theory
should use, as does modern statistical radio physics, the general uncertainty principle - in
particular, the Woodward principle, which adequately reflects the true limitations on the
process of measuring "additional" magnitudes.
VOTE:
design
detectar,
donc
Achieving accuracy in the measurement of the position and pulse of a quantum mechanical
object in conformity with the Woodward principle requires, of course, the use in physical
experiment of a competently designed recording instrument that must respond not to y-wave
intensity, but also to phase relations in wave packet being "received." An examination of
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Approved For Release 2000/08/15 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000500230003-5

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Approved For Release 2000/08/15 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000500230003-5
specific methods for designing such instruments, however, is beyond the scope of this paper.
Returning to the question of playing back an #-wave image, we see that there is no
contradiction between the possibility of a stipulated location of that image and any
fundamental, verified physical law.
The analysis that has been made demonstrates that the use of modern mathematics (for
example, the Woodward uncertainty principle) in quantum mechanics opens the possibility of
recording phase relations between various parts of an isolated system M=A+B+ ... Those
parts can be segments of a wave packet with a complex law of phase modulation. Phase
modulation of those separate segments of the packet, in conformity with the Feynman
integral, can be assigned external conditions created by another isolated system -- values of
the components of 4x potential at the location of system M.
We note once again that we are looking at phase modulation of a w-wave in a space only,
with the energy of system M remaining constant. According to the Woodward uncertainty
principle, detecting such a phase modulation requires using measuring devices that perform
optimal processing of the #-wave like the optimal processing of electromagnetic signals in the
statistical theory of radar. Such devices, as far as we know, have not been developed for
quantum processes.
At the same time, one can presume that the capacity for such information exchange is built
into, and used in, biological systems.
Biological objects satisfy the main requirements of energy-free transfer of information, and it
is not only the transmitting system, but also the receiving system that must be active (that is,
energy must be expended for the reception of information).
The transfer of information between biological systems is closely linked to brain function and
thought, in relation to which the quantum mechanical and holographic approach is developing
raprofy 30,31
vegetarces
If one accepts that energy-free longitudinal waves of a 4x field potential are the carrier of
information in remote communications between biological objects, then one begins to
understand many experimental data thus far accumulated in bioenergetics and bioelectronics
that are not contained in the classical theory for the transfer of communications via
modulation of an electromagnetic wave or particle fluxes.
References
1. Putkhof, Targ. "Perceptive long-distance channel for transmission and information."
TIIRE, No 3, 1976.
F
R. F. Avramenko, L. P. Grachev, V. I. Nikolayeva. "Description of electromagnetic
VOTRE:
thuis Papa
usu
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Approved For Release 2000/08/15 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000500230003-5

Approved For Release 2000/08/15 : CJA-RDP96-00792R000500230003-5
fields via potentials, and Energy transfer problems." Paper given at the Fourth International
Symposium on Information Theory. Leningrad, 1976.
3. L. D. Landau, Ye. M. Lifshits. "Teoriya polya" [Field Theory]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo
"Nauka," 1973.
4. D. K. Maksvell. "Izvrannyye sochineniya po teorii elektromagnitnogo polya" [Selected
Works in Electromagnetic Field Theory]. Moscow: GI TTL, 1954.
5. R. Feynman, R. Leyton, M. Sends [sic]. "Feynmanovskiye lektsii po fizike" [Feynman
Lectures on Physics], Vol 6. Moscow: Izdatelstvo "Mir, " 1966.
6. R. C. Jahlevic [sic], J. Lambe, A. H. Silver, J. E. Mercereau. "Quantum interference
effects in Josephson tunneling. " PHYS. REV. LETTERS, Vol 12, No 7, February 1964.
7. R. C. Jahlevic [sic], J. Lambe, A. H. Silver, J. E. Mercereau. "Quantum interference
from a static vector potential in a field-free region. " PHYS. REV. LETTERS, Vol 12, No
11, March 1964.
8. R. G. Chambers. "Schift [sic] of an electron interference pattern by [illegible] magnetic
flux." PHYS. REV., 5 (1960).
9. K. A. Krug "Osnovy elektrotekhniki" [Foundations of Electronics]. Moscow:
Gosenergoizdat, 1960.
10. G. G. Markov. "Antenny" [Antennas]. Moscow: Gosenergoizdat, 1960.
11. L. Brillyuen. "Nauka i teoriya informatsii" [Science and Information Theory]. Moscow:
Fizmatgiz, [illegible].
12. R. Tolmen. "Otnositel'nost', termodinamika i kosmologii" [Relativity, Thermodynamics,
and Cosmology]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo "Nauka," 1974.
13. Yu. V. Vorobyev, V. A. Zhukov. "Semiconical illumination and effect of volume in an
electron microscope image." Paper given at the Fifth All-Union Conference on Electron
Microscopy. Tashkent, 1976.
14. M. Troyon, R. Bonhomme, O. Gallion. "Use of autoemission electron gun in a
transmission electron microscope for higher resolution and single-beam Fraunhofer
holography." J. MICROSC. ET SPECTROSC. ELECTRON, 1976, Vol 1, No 3, pp 517,
518.
15. A. Huiser, A. Drenth, H. Ferwerda. "On phase retrieval in electron microscopy from
image and diffraction pattern." OPTIK, 1976, 45, pp 303-316.
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Approved For Release 2000/08/15 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000500230003-5

Approved For Release 2000/08/15 GIAROR96-00792R000500230003-5
16. C. Davisson, C. H. Kunsman. PHYS. REV., 1923.
17. J. P. Tompson [sic]. Procceping [sic] of the Royal Society of London, Series a, 117, pp
600-609 (1928).
18. P. S. Tartakovskiy. "Eksperimental'nyye osnovaniya volnovoy teorii materii"
[Experimental Bases of Wave Theory of Matter]. Moscow/Leningrad, 1932.
19. Sushkin N. G. et al. DOKLADY AN SSSR, 1949, Vol 66, p 165.
20. D. Ye. Vakman. "Solzhnyye signaly i printsip neopredelennosti v radiolokatsii" [Complex
Signals and the Uncertainty Principle in Radar]. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo "Sov. Radio," 1965.
21. E. Vikhman [sic]. "Quantum Physics." Berkeley Course of Physics. Moscow:
Izdatel'stvo "Nauka, " 1974.
22. Dzh. [sic] Trigg. "Reshayushchiye eksperimenty v sovremennoy fizike" [Decisive
Experiments in Modern Physics]. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo "Mir," 1974.
23. Ya. D. Shirman. "Razresheniye i szhatiye signalov" [Resolution and Compression of
Signals]. Izdatel'stvo "Sov. Radio," 1974.
24. G. Urkovitts. "Filters for detection of weak radar signals in interference reflections."
VOPROSY RADIOLOKATSIONNOY TEKHNIKI [Aspects of Radar Technology], 1954,
No 2.
25. P. A. Bakut, I. A. Bolshakov, B. M. Gerasimov, A. A. Kuriksha, V. G. Repin, G. P.
Tartakovskiy, V. V. Shirokov. "Voprosy statisticheskoy teorii radiolokatsii" [Aspects of the
Statistical Theory of Radar]. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo "Sov. Radio, " 1963.
26. D. Middlton [sic]. "Vvedeniye v statisticheskuyu teoriyu svyazi" [Introduction to
Statistical Communications Theory]. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo "Sov. Radio," 1962.
Woodward
27 F. M. Vudvort [sic]. "Teoriya verovatnostey i teoriya informatsii s primeneniyem k
radiolokatsii (SProbability Theory and Information Theory as Applied to Radar]. Izdatel'stvo
"Sov. Radio," 1955. LeettiSpablation/1953
28. V. Zibert. "General laws of target detection with radar." VOPROSY
RADIOLOKATSIONNOY TEKHNIKI, No 5 (41), 1957.
29. A. S. Davydov. "Kvantovaya mekhanika" [Quantum Mechanics]. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo
"Nauka, " 1973.
[References 30 and 31 not included in reference list]
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Approved For Release 2000/08/15 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000500230003-5