CIA STARGATE release
CIA-RDP96-00789R002000440001-1
Opens with: PROJECT SUN STREAK (U)
Warning: text for all documents has not been verified. Errors are possible. Check the original by document ID on CREST.
3 pages, machine transcribed from the CIA’s released scan.
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002000440001-1 /NOFORN - SKEET CHANNELS ONLY PROJECT SUN STREAK (U) ERV SESSION PROCEDURES REPORT 05-2 1012 1112 WARNING NOTICE: INTELLIGENCE SOURCES AND METHODS INVOLVED CONTROL NUMBER :: 1-3 NICKNAME: None DATE OF SESSION: 7 May 87 TARGET COUNTRY: SG1A REFERENCES: SPR-001-87, did SESSION NUMBER: 02 8 May 87, SAB DATE OF REPORT: 11 May 87 MISSION STATUS: Continuing TECHNIQUE UTILIZED: ERV SOURCE IDENTIFIER: 079 1. (S/NF/SK) TASKING: The original tasking, as found in reference SPR cited above, remained valid. The Interviewer was not provided any additional feedback except that stated in the above cited referenced SPR. Source was told that the information provided in the previous session indicated that She had successfully acquired the proper site and that the target during this second session she was to spend only a few moments re-acquainting Herself with the site because the true nature of the target dealt with an occurrence at that site which may have occurred in a specific period of time. Source was not told at that time what the specific time reference was of the nature of the occurrence. Source was provided the same encrypted coordinates as the previous session, as per Extended Remote Viewing protocols. No other cuing oar descriptive data was provided to Source. 2. (S/NF/SK) SESSION: During the actual session there no reportable anomalies or incidents which may have affected or influenced the data provided by Source. This session was conducted in its entirety utilizing ERV protocols. 3. (S/NF/SK) SUMMARY: (S/NF/SK) The following narrative, contained within quotation marks, is an abridged copy of Source's post-session written summary. This summary has been editorialized, (as indicated) , by the undersigned for clarity, grammar and structure. The actual unabridged summary is maintained in the mission field dossier at this location along with any other material produced during the session, i.e., sketches, notes, etc. BEGIN SUMMARY: ===_ P/NOFORN - SKEET CHANNELS ONLY Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002000440001-1
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002000440001-1 NOFORN - SKEET CHANNELS ONLY "I first saw a natural, manmade structure, (a natural appearing?) . This stony structure was big and square with circular (curved?) sides. It was circular and dark inside. I sensed men but they were scattered about and hidden and worked in small groups. I sensed men left this area and were sent out to borders or bordering posts there were wide and had large openings (widely dispersed with gaps between the separate stations?) . These men were here only during the day. I then (perceived) an object, a very big object, placed in a green area. The area seemed swampy and dark and (had been) cleared so this object could be placed here. I sensed the object was tall, rather (The simple (in) design (and) had a component that was spinning. spinning) component could be placed inside the object and taken out (when required?) . I. saw men leaving this green area with things packed on their backs. (The) object could reach out to men who sat in boxes higher up ... but (it) could not reach aircraft (even though) I did sense flying aircraft at one point. (As pertains to the) occurrence, I sensed a hit. I sensed a flying object, hitting the top of a structure. The structure had something to do with money. I The structure was near water that ran sideways, (along the edge) . sensed that men climbed and moved closer to the structure, It was hot and melting and could have caught fire. I (perceived) the plans for (the) occurrence were not elaborate (and) that the plans for the timing and the precision were correct". END SUMMARY. (S/NF/SK) During the actual session, Source reported other data which may impact on the final assessment of this target. That data is listed below in raw unevaluated form. (1) (S/NF/SK) The object, which was perceived by Source in the early portions of the session, was further described as, "moving sideways (?), changing direction ... middle part spinning, top part shoots out (emits?), it operates .. . because of its alignment ... it shoots in a straight line ... spinning the right way ... its rather simple ... placed in the green area, different the ... brown, rocky (area) (NOTE: A possible indication of two separate, related but dispersed areas) . (2) (S/NF/SK) Source described another object, which may or may not have been the same object and may have been an adjunct or closely related object. This object was described by Source as, "moving fast, speeding across, small object, not big, moveable, operated independently, heavy object ... went out then hit ... followed a path, knew where it was going before it went, big, powerful, hit on time, a precision, not a miss, perfect ... it went to a little circular area, perfect hit, no people, it hit a structure ... the area was circled first, watched to know what was in there. . . came from someplace else, was more sophisticated but not that more. .. ". NOFORN - SKEET CHANNELS ONLY Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002000440001-1 1
1 Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002000440001-1 NOFORN - SKEET CHANNELS ONLY (3) (S/NF/SK) The actual occurrence was described by Source as, "a hot melting, melting down, people not hurt, getting rid of structure, it was a non-sophisticated attack ... expected ... (an object) was placed there just before the occurrence ... it still stands ... the men used it, helpful, it was thought it would be needed afterwards ... I think there was a fire afterwards. . .. I believe (there was) a big explosion ... there was a fire near water, a smoking, wreckage, (a) pounding ... precision, extremely well done for not much planning ... this is not a big system, there are bigger and better methods but it still went extremely well . .. ". (4) (S/NF/SK) The concept of "shooting out" by one of the objects was further clarified as, "from the green area, went right on path, no deviance from the system, line of sight only, line of sight followed, nothing went wrong 4. (S/NF/SK) OPS FEEDBACK: Source was not told whether further sessions would be require on this mission or whether Her results were accurate or in keeping with the known data on this target. SGF NOFORN - SKEET CHANNELS ONLY Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002000440001-1