Project Interloper

CIA STARGATE release

CIA-RDP96-00789R002000440001-1

Opens with: PROJECT SUN STREAK (U)

Warning: text for all documents has not been verified. Errors are possible. Check the original by document ID on CREST.

3 pages, machine transcribed from the CIA’s released scan.

Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002000440001-1
/NOFORN - SKEET CHANNELS ONLY
PROJECT SUN STREAK (U)
ERV SESSION PROCEDURES REPORT
05-2
1012
1112
WARNING NOTICE:
INTELLIGENCE SOURCES AND METHODS INVOLVED
CONTROL NUMBER :: 1-3
NICKNAME: None
DATE OF SESSION: 7 May 87
TARGET COUNTRY:
SG1A
REFERENCES: SPR-001-87, did
SESSION NUMBER: 02
8 May 87, SAB
DATE OF REPORT: 11 May 87
MISSION STATUS: Continuing
TECHNIQUE UTILIZED: ERV
SOURCE IDENTIFIER: 079
1.
(S/NF/SK)
TASKING:
The original tasking, as found in reference
SPR cited above, remained valid.
The
Interviewer was not provided
any additional feedback except that stated in the above cited
referenced SPR.
Source was told that the information provided in the
previous session indicated that She had successfully acquired the
proper site and that the target during this second session she was to
spend only a few moments re-acquainting Herself with the site because
the true nature of the target dealt with an occurrence at that site
which may have occurred in a specific period of time.
Source was not
told at that time what the specific time reference was of the nature
of the occurrence.
Source was provided the same encrypted
coordinates as the previous session, as per Extended Remote Viewing
protocols.
No other cuing oar descriptive data was provided to
Source.
2.
(S/NF/SK)
SESSION:
During the actual session there no
reportable anomalies or incidents which may have affected or
influenced the data provided by Source.
This session was conducted
in its entirety utilizing ERV protocols.
3.
(S/NF/SK)
SUMMARY:
(S/NF/SK)
The
following narrative, contained within
quotation marks, is an abridged copy of Source's post-session written
summary.
This summary has been editorialized,
(as indicated) , by the
undersigned for clarity, grammar and structure.
The actual
unabridged summary is maintained in the mission field dossier at this
location along with any other material produced during the session,
i.e., sketches, notes, etc.
BEGIN SUMMARY:
===_ P/NOFORN
- SKEET CHANNELS ONLY
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002000440001-1
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002000440001-1
NOFORN - SKEET CHANNELS ONLY
"I first saw a natural, manmade structure, (a natural appearing?) .
This stony structure was big and square with circular (curved?)
sides.
It was circular and dark inside.
I sensed men but they were
scattered about and hidden and worked in small groups.
I sensed men
left this area and were sent out to borders or bordering posts there
were wide and had large openings (widely dispersed with gaps between
the separate stations?) . These men were here only during the day.
I
then (perceived) an object, a very big object, placed in a green
area.
The area seemed swampy and dark and (had been) cleared so this
object could be placed here.
I sensed the object was tall,
rather
(The
simple
(in) design (and) had a component that was spinning.
spinning) component could be placed inside the object and taken out
(when required?) .
I.
saw men leaving this green area with things
packed on their backs.
(The) object could reach out to men who sat
in boxes higher up ... but (it) could not reach aircraft (even though)
I did sense flying aircraft at one point.
(As pertains to the)
occurrence,
I sensed a hit.
I
sensed a flying object, hitting the
top of a structure.
The structure had something to do with money.
I
The structure was near water that ran sideways, (along the edge) .
sensed that men climbed and moved closer to the structure,
It was
hot and melting and could have caught fire.
I (perceived) the plans
for (the) occurrence were not elaborate
(and) that the plans for the
timing and the precision were correct".
END SUMMARY.
(S/NF/SK)
During the actual
session, Source reported other
data which may impact on the final
assessment of this target.
That
data is listed below in raw unevaluated form.
(1)
(S/NF/SK) The object, which was perceived by Source in the
early portions of the session, was further described as, "moving
sideways (?), changing direction ... middle part spinning, top part
shoots out (emits?), it operates .. . because of its alignment ... it
shoots in a straight line ... spinning the right way ... its rather
simple ... placed in the green area, different the ... brown, rocky
(area) (NOTE:
A possible indication of two separate, related but
dispersed areas) .
(2)
(S/NF/SK)
Source described another object, which may or may
not have been the same object and may have been an adjunct or closely
related object.
This object was described by Source as, "moving
fast, speeding across, small object, not big, moveable, operated
independently, heavy object ... went out then hit ... followed a path,
knew where it was going before it went, big, powerful, hit on time, a
precision, not a miss, perfect ... it went to a little circular area,
perfect hit, no people, it hit a structure ... the area was circled
first, watched to know what was in there. . . came
from someplace else,
was more sophisticated but not that more. .. ".
NOFORN
- SKEET CHANNELS ONLY
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002000440001-1
1
1
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002000440001-1
NOFORN - SKEET CHANNELS ONLY
(3)
(S/NF/SK)
The actual
occurrence was described by Source as,
"a hot melting, melting down, people not hurt, getting rid of
structure, it was a non-sophisticated attack ... expected ... (an object)
was placed there just before the occurrence ... it still stands ... the
men used it, helpful, it was thought it would be needed
afterwards ... I think there was a fire afterwards. . ..
I believe (there
was) a big explosion ... there was a fire near water, a smoking,
wreckage, (a) pounding ... precision, extremely well done for not much
planning ... this is not a big system, there are bigger and better
methods but it still went extremely well . .. ".
(4)
(S/NF/SK)
The concept of "shooting out" by one of the
objects was further clarified as,
"from the green area, went right on
path, no deviance from the system, line of sight only, line of sight
followed, nothing went wrong
4.
(S/NF/SK)
OPS FEEDBACK:
Source was not told whether further
sessions would be require on this mission or whether Her results were
accurate or in keeping with the known data on this target.
SGF
NOFORN - SKEET CHANNELS ONLY
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002000440001-1

Follow along

New documents and dispatches as they publish. The newsletter is the one place to keep up.