CIA-RDP96-00789R001900090001-2

SG1B
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001900090001-2
£
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001900090001-2

Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001900090001-2
. :
SG1B
.
1
TASKING:
Initially the interviewer was provided a 3x5 card
d
site." Throughout sessions the interwewer was never told the caract natu
of the site, its key facilities nor its mission. In the initial session, the
Sourceewas simply given the coordinates of the site, (encrypted to preclude
inadvertent geographic cueing as per Extended Remote Viewing(ERV) protocols).
In subsequent sessions, Source was again provided the coordinates and a general
synopsis of previously reported data. No additional specific tasking emphasis or
intentional cueing was provided to Source.
2. (
)
SESSION: During the initial session, Source took a "joyride"
to an unspecified site whose descriptive data did not coincide with the known
data on the site. Source was retargetted, (coordinates repeated) and
successfully acquired the site. In subsequent sessions Source was encourage
to initially take a "joy ride" to a site of his choosing, (later to be designated
"Sanctuary") and from that site, at the direction of the interviewer, he was
to move to the target. This technique appeared to eliminate inadvertent
reporting on non-related targets and was enjoyable to the Source, therefore,
the use of "Sanctuary" targetting will continue on a trial basis to dtermine
its affect on the Source's success rate.
P
1
3. (
)
SUMMARY: The following is comilation of the raw and unevaluated
data provided by Source during the total of three sessions conducted on this
target.
101 - 122
(w) 72
a.
(
)
A fenced complex of buildings and facilities with a feeling
of military involvement. There are numerous scientists and technicians working
at the site. Some areas of the site are above ground, (builiungs and related
facilities), while other areas are underagournd or at least partially under-
ground. Mnay of the buildings appear to be abandoned completely including one
building (next to a railroad track) which may have once been a depot. This
building appears to be outside the compound perimeter but the concept of
-
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001900090001-2
02- 4 8 86
63- 6 he 86
other A ··

.
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001900090001-2
SOURCE 00 3
1
'Other A' Procedures
(45 UN 86)
Session #1 - Well into the session, the monitor 'convinced
himself'
that
the site 'must be'
an electromagnetic
propulsion/railgun research facility. The monitor made no
conscious attempt to reject this idea.
Consequently, the
remainder of the session should be considered as having been
'steered' toward evidencing this objectively insupportable
foregone conclusion.
(6 Jun 86)
Session #2 - Monitor entered the session with a 100%
( consciously ) objective outlook.
Began with a Stage 6 matrix.
Source was directed to combine two related sketchs from Session
#1, to draw a circle, (an artificial barrier), around this new
sketch, and then to perceive 'information out. ' When source
perceived a 'multichannel' output point on the circle, he was
instructed to draw another circle, representing himself, and to
connect it to the 'info out' point, essentially 'plugging into
the information. ' He then proceeded to objectify the data that
he perceived to be associated with each discrete channel.
Ultimately, the most useful Stage 6 tool employed to
capture the session's objective, (namely, to determine the type
of testing performed at the site), was simply to describe the
'down range' target prior to and after its use.
..
1
Rancid 00 3
099
.
.
A
4 July 86
5 Tan-0912
Ena 1002
I
None
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001900090001-2

Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001900090001-2
'Other B' Procedures
Session #1/ (Source #101) - Run as a Class A site.
Consequently, this placed a handicap on (indeed, crippled) the
monitor's ability to act as 'navigator', since no reference
data were supplied to assist in making
'course corrections' .
(Later, the ops officer determined that this session had
produced two and a half hours worth of useless information).
Session #2/ (Source #101) - Several hours prior to the
session, the ops officer provided the monitor with all of the
targeting data.
As a result, it did not take long to 'guide'
the viewer onto the site and to confirm his location through a
series of movement exercises. The greater part of the session
was spent in Stage 6 in order to derive site layout.
. Session #3/ (Source #101) - Primary targets were selected
using the data supplied by the tasker in combination with site
sketch produced by source.
The technique, i.e., Stage 6 cueing
tool, employed to extract information relevant to the primary
target (building) is worth describing:
a) The source was directed to isolate the target by
drawing a circle around it. He was then instructed to proceed
along the circle by incrementally touching points on it with
his pen. At the same time he was to perceive "information", in
any form, that seemed to be crossing over this artificial
boundary in either direction.
b) Similiarly, the source was directed to cup his hands,
like an inverted bowl, over his sketch of the target building
in order to establish an artificial, dome-shaped boundary.
He
was then instructed to try and "feel" and describe anything
· passing through it.
Both the ops officer and the monitor debriefed source, in a
very positive and informal atmosphere, after Session #3.
However, no feedback was provided.
Session #4/ (Source #03) -
Source provided ,a Stage 1-3
description of the target area.
He was then directed to move
into Stage 4 and provided with the cue 'primary structure. '
After describing and sketching a structure, source was then
instructed to 'feel' any information passing into and out of
the top of the structure.
Source was then instructed to
perceive groups of data bits, or 'messages' and then to
objectify perceptions connected with them.
Other general
information collection against this target proceeded using
normal cueing procedures.
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001900090001-2

J
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001900090001-2
OPERATIONAL QUALIFYING
- -
.
V03
V18
V21
GEN
SPECIFIK
GEN
SPECIFIC
PROJECT
GEN.
SPECIFIC
GEN.
SPECIFIC
A
27
2
-
+
-
0
2'
0
2 ×
2
2
2
B
2
27
3ª
.
-
+
++
27
3
3"
D
1
1
-
-
1
!
€
3
2
-
2
2
(3) (?)
3
-
-
1
F
1
1
6 (87)
H (87)
I-1
It
1
1
2
12
1
-
2
1
-
1
+
+
4
-
+
+
1
+_ 0
0
C
3
+
2
-
-
-
Y
-
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001900090001-2
0
1986
PROJECTS
ViOI

1986
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001900090001-2
.. .
UTIL
OPERATIONAL QUALIFYING
PROJECTS
101
003
V03
018
V18
021
V21
Via1
PROJECT
GEN.
SPECIFIC
GEN.
SPECIFIC
GEN SPECIFIK
GEN
AV
+
+
2+
A
2+
2
(2)
0
0
2
2
2
2
B
2
2
*
2x
-
+
1
2
N
-
2
2 +(2 )
2
3
2
2
E
:
--
F
6 (87)
H (87)
I-1
1
+
1
-
X
2 2
2
-
-
Z
1
+
+
(2)
1
2
2
0
10
C
1
3
3
+
D
-
0
+ 2+ ()
3
3º
2×
-M -
3
1
1
1
(3) (?)-
1
1
K
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001900090001-2
.. .. ....
SPECIFIC
AV
AV
+
1
(2)
-
x