CIA-RDP96-00789R001602130001-8

Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001602130001-8
NOFORN - SKEET CHANNELS ONLY
PROJECT SUN STREAK (U)
ERV SESSION PROCEDURES REPORT
WARNING NOTICE:
INTELLIGENCE SOURCES AND METHODS INVOLVED
----------
--
--------
CONTROL NUMBER: 8303
NICKNAME: None
DATE OF SESSION: 25 Feb & 2, 4, 6
TARGET COUNTRY:
US
10 Mar 87
REFERENCES: None
SESSION NUMBER: 01 through 05
DATE OF REPORT: 11 March 1987
MISSION STATUS: Continuing
TECHNIQUE UTILIZED: ERV
SOURCE
IDENTIFIER: 079
------
1.
(S/NF/SK)
TASKING:
Prior to the initial session, the
Interviewer was shown a folder containing the results of a
series
of previous sessions conducted by other Sources on
this same
SG1Atarget, the
In a previous
meeting between the Interviewer and the Operations Officer it was
determined that the Source was prepared to progress to what could
be considered Her final phase of training whereby She would be told
that She would be starting a series of Remote Viewings (RV) against
the same target on repeated occasions.
Until this time, the Source
had only been targeted against each training target on only one
occasion.
For this reason the Interviewer had requested a complex
target with easily identifiable gestalts.
It was decided that the
SG1A
would be an appropriate target.
During the
initial session, the Source was provided only an encrypted
coordinate, 255700/548156, as per Extended Remote Viewing
protocols, to preclude inadvertent geographic cuing.
In subsequent
sessions, in addition to the same encrypted coordinate, the Source
was briefed on those key elements provided by Her during the
SG1A
facility", etc.
No other cuing or other descriptive data was
provided to Source.
2.
(S/NF/SK)
SESSION:
During each of the five sessions covered
in this report
there were no reportable anomalies or incidents
which may have affected or influenced the data provided by Source.
3.
(S/NF/SK)
SUMMARY :
(S/NF/SK) A total of five sessions will be covered in this
NOFORN - SKEET CHANNELS ONLY
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001602130001-8

Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001602130001-8
NOFORN - SKEET CHANNELS ONLY
report.
In the initial
session, Source did not provide substantive
data which would indicate that She had, indeed, successfully
acquired the proper site.
Some of the information was tantalizing,
however, when used in context with other data given at the same
time, the evidence was elusive.
Examples were the identification
of certain key shapes at the site, e.g., "A" shaped, which closely
matches the general profile of the building or "circles and
driving" which could have been a reference to the circular driveway
in the front of the target building.
Unfortunately these terms
were usually mixed with other phrases and words which could not as
Source
easily be applied to the known gestalts of the building.
did report on people coming and going from the structure but for
most of the sessions She eluded to flying objects, protective
clothing, things floating, etc. which were in the opinion of the
Interviewer, an AOL or AOL drive which eventually precipitated the
early termination of the session rather than permit the Source to
"imprint" a series of concepts which would make future sessions
more difficult.
b.
(S/NF/SK)
In the second session, the Source seemed to fare
better with early data which provided a strong indication that the
Source had, indeed, successfully acquired the proper target.
The
"structure" as described by Source, was, "tall, pointed and
standing alone. "
There was a persistent impression by Source that
the structure was rounded on top.
This impression lasted until the
end of the third session at which time Source finally ceased to
described the exterior of the structure (building) in terms of its
roundness.
Continuing with the second session, Source further
described this structure as, ".
.more layering. .. thicker near the
bottom ... round parts ... different parts joining ... lines (that) join
to keep
(the structure) together ... "
Although this data, as in the
the
first session was mixed with other curious phrases or words,
overall direction of Her data was considered, at least in part, to
be adequate to pursue further clarification of key elements of the
target with the presumption that She had acquired the proper
target.
(S/NF/SK)
As the second session progressed, Source was
eventually directed inside the structure.
Initially, She began by
describing an apparent storage or basement area, "many things,
spacious, round, old, sometime damp, woody, bottom, basement. . .
. It
She was directed from this area to the "next floor up" which was
labelled by the Interviewer, "the 1st Floor."
At this location,
Source reported a much cleaner, newer area than the "basement",
with a, "gathering of many people ... (some) sitting ... watching,
looking
across (a circular area) ...
=
Source went on to report that
in this area, "activities are planned, scheduled", accompanied by
the word, "performances", which again triggered a stern response by
the Interviewer cautioning the Source to cease analyzing the data.
NOFORN - SKEET CHANNELS ONLY
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001602130001-8

Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001602130001-8
WINSTON 17 WOFORN - SKEET CHANNELS ONLY
Soon after, the session was terminated with a follow-up critique on
Source's reporting techniques in an attempt to "force Her" into
doing Her job, Remote Viewing.
The data provided in the second
session was significantly better in quality than the data obtained
in the initial session, but still there wasn't much "meat on the
bones" which would aid not only the Interviewer but also the Source
in
subsequent
sessions.
d.
(S/NF/SK)
Prior to session 3, Source was cautioned to
listen to the instructions of the Interviewer during the session
and not to "move" until told to do so and then only as "far" as
need be to answer the immediate questions posed by the Interviewer.
Perhaps due to these specific instructions, in session 3, Source
was very conducive to obeying the directions of the Interviewer and
was able to provide relatively unambiguous data.
£
According to
Source, the structure, which had previously been referred to in
terms of its roundness, now became a more squared site which was
wider at the bottom than the top.
The sides of the structure were
angular and abrupt or as Source states, " ... sides are sharp ... "
The size of the structure was described in terms of hugh and
massive and set in a natural setting with trees and greenery and
some nearby associated parking areas.
There is a business-like
feel about the facility and inside, Source perceived people,
"sitting, busy, working, people helping, giving directions ... people
doing different things ... noisy"
The ground floor, (1st Floor)
was
characterized by Source as being, "modern, spacious and
simple ... people moving about with no restrictions. .. an area for
signing in ... "
To the rear of this general entrance area
(reception area?) , there was, according to Source, something used,
"to move from the area, for leaving", which may have been an
elevator or similar mechanical contrivance for moving people and
goods since Source specifically stated that this object was for
"leaving" and could "move",
2.
(S/NF/SK)
Source was then directed to the upper floors
beginning with, "the next floor up" presumably but by no means
verifiably, the second floor.
In this area there was a series of
smaller rooms separated by thin moveable walls, (partitions?) .
people working in this area were perceived as employed in, "reading
papers, studying .. . reporting data ... " The workers were described
as, "business-like, well dressed, younger men (and women) ... "
Their functions were perceived as relatively unimportant but
necessary.
Additionally, on this floor was
more elderly
The
individual in a private office, as opposed to the younger workers
who seemed to share offices.
This older man was in a supervisory
position and was described as, "giving directions, bossy, (is) kept
up to data. .. "
Very little data of a significant nature was
perceived by Source in this area.
To preclude the possibility of
an AOL or AOL drive, Source was directed to leave this floor rather
wwwNOFORN - SKEET CHANNELS ONLY
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001602130001-8

Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001602130001-8
JOFORN - SKEET CHANNELS ONLY
than pursue any further significance to the area.
was
(S/NF/SK)
The last tasking Source received in session 3
to focus on the, "next floor up", again presumably but not
verifiably the third floor.
In this area of the site Source
reported on a more technically oriented area with, "closed
door ... locked and shut off ... hard working (people) ... dim
lights ... men sitting on tall stools ... special lighting so they can
do their work ... a musty smell, bland ... gassy ... built in holders
(shelves?) ". In post session Source stated that the area reminded
Her of an Imagery Interpretation lab.
9.
(S/NF/SK)
In the fourth session Source was initially
targeted against the roof of this facility which was known to
contain various electronic devices associated with communications
technology as well as expected vent pipes, elevator housings, etc.
After a brief period of, "orientation", Source reported on the
perceived presence of ,
"a ball ... something round, also something
pointed ... white ... smooth ... (an) enclosed circle ... (possibly) a
flag ... (the area) is flat ... (with an area) for walking and
down ... layered ... lower ... square (staircase?) ... something coming
over, spreading over, very large ... symbols symbolizing what the
structure means .. . narrow part ... revolving, working through ... "
Although these references were interesting and possibly
attributable to some of the known and expected objects on this
roof, they were, nevertheless, far to general and ambiguous to be
of any real value at this time.
In an attempt to provide Source
with a more, "central focus", she was tasked to report on, "the
special area of interest on the roof", in anticipation of receiving
data pertaining to a previously known square construction believed
to be housing electronic gear. Based on this tasking Source
described, "a crossing, dividing, flat, triangular, circular
(component) ... shooting up, going up ... pointing up ... a connection
but not (physically) connected. .. broken pieces, narrow, thin,
moveable ... spreading out when used ... powerful, big ... pulling in
(or) pulling out ... fiery redness but not visible ... man
operated ... unheard ... blasting, but that's not the right
word ... gives off ... a fiery effect. .. "
Again no real conclusions
could be drawn from these descriptions but the data was more
complete and may have technological significance.
M.
(S/NF/SK)
Source was then told to focus Her attention to,
"an area of great interest"
", with an Interviewer expectation of
data pertaining to the more clandestine functions of this site.
Source reported on, "a room for watching. .. speaking ... modern ... (a)
man explaining to a group ... (telling them) this is what has to be
done, this is the way it is ... no one questions (his authority) ,
acceptance ... colorful graphs ... (perhaps) a briefing ... "
Other sub-
areas in this section of the building were described in very
NOFORN - SKEET CHANNELS ONLY
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001602130001-8

Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001602130001-8
NOFORN - SKEET CHANNELS ONLY
general
"office like" terms, i.e., hallways, drawings on the walls
(maps?)
desks, decision making area, etc., and a feeling of a
senior military presence.
The final area covered in fourth session
was an "A" shaped area, "darkened, sealed off ... (for) fixing ... more
specialist, technicians ... making everything work well ... a feeling
of accomplishment ... (producing)
a final product ... building up,
putting together, a large room ... men's voices can echo from
here. . . "
Clearly this data was also ambiguous and too general to
draw conclusions however, some elements such as the concept of
men's voices "echoing" from here may infer the presence of
transceivers or other similar communications capability.
(S/NF/SK)
In the final
session covered in this report,
Source was tasked to report on,
"the floor above the area
resembling the IMINT facility".
Source reported on an area where
one individual, perhaps seated on a raised platform, received
questions from people coming to him.
There was a sense of
clamoring and noise and a feeling that this was a "public" area.
It is possible that Source was subconsciously still on the ground
floor describing some sort of customer service facility.
At any
rate, again rather than risk AOL, Source was directed to focus on
the next floor up, which seemed to be a storage area or area of
large unattended mechanical devices, perhaps something to do with
environmental controls within the building.
Nothing of immediate
significance could be perceived in this area so Source was directed
away from this area and told to, "go to the area of the structure
that best describes the overall purpose of this facility".
Based
on this directed tasking Source reported an area used for meetings
between other people who work in this building, i.e., "they come
here for the meetings".
The area is located in an area described
as, "behind a woman who sits at a desk (receptionist/secretary?) ".
According to Source the area is, "not fixed up, not fancy ... has
(intersecting hallways) ... pretend walls (partitions?)". The
meetings here are for the purpose of, "making decisions, all must
agree, planning, pre-planning, important but not urgent, dealing
with technical evidence, providing for, making arrangements,
responsible for outcomes", etc. etc., all of which could be
attributable to any corporate meeting room.
Continued responses by
Source failed to clarify or expound on this general image.
Since
no further substantive data could be obtained, the final session of
this report was terminated.
j.
(S/NF/SK)
Following each session Source was required to
provide a written summary of Her impressions and to prepare
sketches of major gestalts on which She had reported.
This
material and all other Interviewer notes are maintained in the
mission field dossier located at this office.
4.
(S/NF/SK)
OPS FEEDBACK:
At
this point, it is the opinion of
/NOFORN - SKEET CHANNELS ONLY
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001602130001-8

Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001602130001-8
NOFORN - SKEET CHANNELS ONLY
the Interviewer that Source has indeed acquired the proper site but
for reasons not easily quantified at this point, She is either
unwilling or unable to narrow Her focus sufficiently to properly
differentiate between the various gestalts of this building.
Given
that this technique of repeated sessions targeted against the
same
site is a dramatic departure from the previous experiences of
Source, some difficulty is to be expected in coping with the flood
of data and the incongruities observed between sessions.
Additionally, in defense of the beleaguered Source, there was no
clear cut tasking or specific targeting on the part of the
Interviewer and in the realm of Remote Viewing this can present a
barrier to effective reporting, i.e, "If the Interviewer doesn't
have a clear cut target how can the viewer expect to get there ... "
One final session is recommended to enable the Interviewer (as well
as the Source) to positively assure themselves that this mission
has been a success.
Prior to that session, a clear cut target will
be formulated in the hopes that given a bullseye the Source will
hit the target.
SG1J
66-12, DAC
Interviewer
NOFORN - SKEET CHANNELS ONLY
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001602130001-8