CIA STARGATE release
CIA-RDP96-00789R000300110001-6
Opens with: PROJECT SUN STREAK (U)
Warning: text for all documents has not been verified. Errors are possible. Check the original by document ID on CREST.
4 pages, machine transcribed from the CIA’s released scan.
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R000300119001-6 == " NOFORN - SKEET CHANNELS ONLY PROJECT SUN STREAK (U) ERV SESSION PROCEDURES REPORT 3 M WARNING NOTICE: INTELLIGENCE SOURCES AND METHODS INVOLVED ----------- -------------------------------------- CONTROL NUMBER: 8701 NICKNAME: DATE OF SESSION: 7, 13 Jan 87 TARGET COUNTRY: Unknown REFERENCES: SPR-001-87 (CRV) , dtd 31 Dec 86, SAB SESSION NUMBER: 02, 03 DATE OF REPORT: 12 Jan 87 MISSION STATUS: Continuing TECHNIQUE UTILIZED: ERV SOURCE IDENTIFIER: 003 ----- 1. (S/NF/SK) TASKING: Prior to the initial session covered in this report, the Monitor was provided with several high altitude photographs of the actual site in its current state of construction. In addition to the original tasking, (SEE REFERENCE ABOVE), the Monitor was told that the actual purpose of the major construction activity was as important element of the intelligence tasking and may be obtainable by tasking Source to move forward in time to a point when the site is completed and operational. No further descriptive data was provided to Source except to cue Him that this was the same site He had viewed in His previous session. 2. (S/NF/SK) SESSION: Just prior to the beginning of each session covered in this report, Source was told that He was being re-targeted to the same site He had viewed in His previous session. At that time Source was permitted to review His own handwritten post-session summaries concerning the target. In both cases, Source immediately began a Stage VI matrix without requiring a further reading of the encrypted site coordinates as per Coordinate Remote Viewing protocols. This slight departure from protocol did not appear to have a detrimental affect on the data provided by Source. During the actual sessions there were no other reportable anomalies or incidents which may have affected or influenced the data provided by Source except that which is reported above. 3. (S/NF/SK) SUMMARY : a. (S/NF/SK) In the initial session included in this report, Source's descriptives were rather general in nature pertaining to the overall gestalt of the site and some of the specific facilities at the site, i.e., "cement, wind, watchdog, sentinel, electronic, NOFORN - SKEET CHANNELS ONLY Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R000300110001-6
! Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R000300110001-6 "/NOFORN - SKEET CHANNELS ONLY objects", and so forth. From there Source began to describe the facilities at the site in more specific terms, "sophisticated, defense, layered, interlocking, envelope, complex" and the impression that there was another, "site connected with this at a great interval or distance removed". An interim summary prepared by Source, (SEE PAGE 4, SESSION 2 OF SOURCE NOTES), made an apparent reference to the actual on-going construction as well as the new, "technology, advanced and sophisticated in its approach". In the interim summary, Source further states that He had an impression that the development of the technology at the site was, "a synthesization .... a logical .... projection of other technology but still advanced .... expands greatly the capability, operation parameters and use of the system involved". b. (S/NF/SK) Source continued to focus His attention on specific facilities at the site at the direction of the monitor. As the session progressed, the Monitor directed the Source to view specific areas of the site, i.e., 200 meters west/east of a specific site reported by Source. This provided Source some reference points to align Himself at the target for clearer and less confused reporting. Source was able to identify and label some of the key facilities and received a strong impression that this site was an adjunct to other facilities or Commands and may receive directions from outside this area (SEE PAGE 7, SESSION 2 OF SOURCE NOTES) , and that there was a, "cold-bloodedness, calculating, or cynical" aspect to the functions of this site. Additional descriptives included a reference to a, "sense of roundness and a grouping as if there are several similar structures" and a further reference to, "lots of space associated (with the site) ". Later references indicated that the functions of the site may be a new concept or, "competing approach to a problem which the site is attempting to validate". Source was able to perceive a definite sense of purpose among the workers at the site, some of whom may be military. (S/NF/SK) During the second session included in this report, Source perceived the site to be far more complex and much larger than he had perceived during the previous two sessions. Almost immediately Source received a strong impression of an, "immense structure", which prompted Source to state, "the size difference between this building is so immense that (I) wonder if its really there. = A spontaneous sketch of the structure revealed a trapezoidal shaped building with a door or entry on the side of one of the long axis (SEE PAGE 2B, SECOND SESSION OF SOURCE NOTES) . A subsequent sketch of the general site was less clear. except to "confirm" the presence of many various size structures and a least one array of five circular objects near or adjacent to the larger structure (SEE PAGE 2C, SECOND SESSION OF SOURCE NOTES) . Source continued to add to the descriptives of this site with NOFORN - SKEET CHANNELS ONLY Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R000300110001-6
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R000300110001-6 "/NOFORN - SKEET CHANNELS ONLY further words and phrases pertaining to some of the key facilities, i.e., "an object or structure, smooth, shiny, metallic with lights inside, long, curved, hard and tall". At this point in the second session, Source was moved forward in time, in accordance with the tasking provided to the Monitor, to a point one year in the future at which point Source was tasked to describe the site in that time period. d. (S/NF/SK) One year into the future the site is completely functional . The large building, described earlier, was perceive to be a facility built specifically to house another large object or structure. This concept was described as, "like a structure designed to shield something inside (the building) against actual physical interference .... but primarily to shield against observation" (SEE PAGE 5, SECOND SESSION OF SOURCE NOTES) . The object inside the building is meant to, "reach out and project effects to its "owner's" specifications at considerable distances .... as if it moves out beyond it (the structure) in someway". Further overall perceptions of this "structure within a structure" Were described as being built on a scale equal to a space program with many of the same, "technologies, elements, equipment and applications". A spontaneous sketch of an apparent large space radio telescope accompanied these descriptives, with a comment by Source that there were a, "fair number of various types of dish antennae involved with (this) site" (SEE PAGE 6, SECOND SESSION OF SOURCE NOTES) . e. (S/NF/SK) Source continued to focus on the site, providing descriptive words but nothing which could greatly enhance the overall perception by the Monitor of the site. Since there were several related and unrelated concepts emerging as items of importance at this site, Source was directed to organize these concepts into an interim summary to perhaps clarify the growing confusion and repeated aesthetic impacts mentioned by Source. That summary, edited for clarity, is as follows: BEGIN SUMMARY: "Site involves many, many diverse structures, most only marginally relevant to the primary importance of the site. One structure seems to (be) of immense size and volume, the primary purpose (of) which will culminate not long after the elapse of one year from present time. Structure seems to be intended somewhat as physical protection for its contents, but primarily as shield against observation. Something inside building is intended to "reach out" beyond confines of the building and even the facility as a whole to perform tasks or purposes according to its "owners" specification great distances removed from site in question. Almost as if it doesn't stay in structure, but moves out beyond it somehow. Structure's roof may have a marked rounded component to it. Numerous dish type antennae are associated with the site. ""/NOFORN - SKEET CHANNELS ONLY Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R000300110001-6
1 Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R000300110001-6 /NOFORN - SKEET CHANNELS ONLY Cylindrical dimensions are involved with important objects at site. Within a (perhaps "the") structure is hugh open vertical and horizontal space. Inside ... (there are) structure (s) of (immense dimensions. (One) would expect to find structures of this size outside, rather than within another structure. Inner structure is very complex in construction with many criss-crossing elements, cables, etc., and is made primarily of metal. Whole project seems to be built along space program scale and partakes of many similar elements, including machinery, equipment, techniques and organization". END SUMMARY. Following this procedure, Source moved back into the structure of the Stage VI matrix and began describing a concept that quickly assumed a perceptual configuration of some type of rocket or space vehicle positioned at a gantry and located within another structure. An accompanying spontaneous sketch completed by Source bore an undeniable similarity to some type of large rocket much like the US shuttle. Source was somewhat anxious about further reporting since He was having some difficulty assuring in His own mind that the information being reported was factual and not being driven by an AOL. For this reason the session was halted at this point to prevent any further anxiety or erroneous reporting on the part of Source. f . (S/NF/SK) All material prepared by Source in both sessions covered in this report, including the notes of the Monitor taken during the session are maintained on file at this location. 4. (S/NF/SK) OPS FEEDBACK: The circumstances of the data provided by Source was discussed in detail with the Operation's Officer to determine what further course of action to pursue in this matter. At that time, the OPS Officer was told that in Source's opinion His perceptions until the point that He terminated the session, the data "felt" strong and that there did not appear to be any AOL driving this data .. This would tend, if Source's appraisal were accurate, to identify the site as some sort of missile or rocket facility with a great deal of information leading to the assumption that it is some sort of space capable facility. None of the conclusions, can of course be supported absolutely and therefore, the actual purpose of the site has not been clearly and definitively ascertained. It was not determined whether further sessions with this Source would o 1 .6. wo this target. SG1J GS-12, DAC Monitor NOFORN - SKEET CHANNELS ONLY Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R000300110001-6