Project Interloper

CIA STARGATE release

CIA-RDP96-00789R000100560007-3

Opens with: PROJECT SUN STREAK (U)

Warning: text for all documents has not been verified. Errors are possible. Check the original by document ID on CREST.

2 pages, machine transcribed from the CIA’s released scan.

Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R000100560007-3
2/NOFORN - SKEET CHANNELS ONLY
PROJECT SUN STREAK (U)
ERV SESSION PROCEDURES REPORT
-
0
5
1308
14 10
WARNING NOTICE:
INTELLIGENCE SOURCES AND METHODS INVOLVED
CONTROL NUMBER: 8609A
NICKNAME: None
SG1B
DATE OF SESSION: 14 Sep 87
TARGET COUNTRY:
REFERENCES: None
SESSION NUMBER: 02
DATE OF REPORT: 15 Sep 87
MISSION STATUS: Continuing
TECHNIQUE UTILIZED: ERV
SOURCE IDENTIFIER: 079
----- -
*
(S/NF/SK)
INTERVIEWER TASKING:
This project is a continuation
of series of taskings levied upon this unit in the previous calendar
SG1Asar.
The actual target is an attempt to prove or disprove the
existence and/or
If confirmed, all data pertaining to this
SG1B
chnology are of interest to US Intelligence
to include the outcome of the testing phase, military/political
implications and any factors which may have or will affect the
success or failure of this system.
2.
(S/NF/SK)
SOURCE TASKING:
Source was told only that this is a
Y
continuation of the previous session and target.
She was
specifically told that when She acquired the proper target She should
report, "on the thing that interest me".
Source was provided the
same encrypted coordinates as the initial session, (789400/666159) ,
as per Extended Remote Viewing (ERV) protocols.
Source was not given
any other descriptive data or cues prior to this session or given any
indication that the data provided in the previous session was being
questioned by the Interviewer.
3.
(S/NF/SK)
INCLEMENCIES:
There were no reportable incidents or
anomalies which may have influenced the data obtained in this
session.
A: SPR79-09, A 02
4.
(S/NF/SK)
SUMMARY :
Source furnished the attached summary which
was prepared following the session and submitted to the Interviewer
within 24 hours after the session. The completeness of the
typewritten summary has been compared to the Interviewer's notes and
all deletions, changes, and/or corrections have been verified as
.
acceptable by the Interviewer. A review of this summary and the data
Approved For Delease 2080/08/08 - CIA-RDR96-00789R000100560007-3
=
----
-
2
1
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R000100560007-3
W/ WWW / NOFORN - SKEET CHANNELS ONLY
obtained from the actual
session would tend to indicate that Source
has successfully acquired the proper site and that the data provided,
by Her pertaining to the specific object described by Her in the
session and Her summary may actually be the item being sought in the
tasking. Her post-session sketches supplemented the actual session
material and may benefit a more knowledgeable analyst with more
SG1Atechnical knowledge concerning items known to be located at
Source's summary was considered to be an accurate
$GIA
representation of the major items of information and general themes
of reporting that occurred during the actual session and therefore
require no further modification or explanation by the Interviewer.
5.
(S/NF/SK)
COMMENTS:
Source's descriptive data pertaining to a
specific object located at the site would seem to indicate the
presence of a powerful technologically advance weapons system of some
sort.
The impression of a beam of light would seem to belie the
SG1A
were several ambiguities concerning the actual target and the effect
the weapon on the target which may be resolved in future sessions.
Again, however, there exist the distinct possibility that as yet
there has not been a "target" in the classical sense and therefore
Source is unable to describe its existence and/or post-"impact"
condition.
It should be noted that Source is a singularly
"technologically ignorant" Source with little if any frame of
SG1A
and there is always a danger that Source will "attempt to close the
loop" and compare Her impressions to some other more familiar object,
hence a previous session implication of a more conventional system.
At least one more session will be required to gather more convincing
data and to resolve the question of a test firing of the weapon.
This may, obviously, require a tasking to view the future if it is
determined that the weapon has not yet been fired.
3
SG1J
GS-13, DAC
Interviewer
Approved
asec2000/08/08SCHA RDP96-00789R000100560007-3

Follow along

New documents and dispatches as they publish. The newsletter is the one place to keep up.