CIA STARGATE release
CIA-RDP96-00788R001700250001-7
Opens with: CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS
Warning: text for all documents has not been verified. Errors are possible. Check the original by document ID on CREST.
18 pages, machine transcribed from the CIA’s released scan.
Incl. Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001700250001-7 6 CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS TITLE 45 PUBLIC WELFARE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH OFFICE FOR PROTECTION FROM RESEARCH RISKS PART 46-PROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS REVISED AS OF MARCH 8, 1983 . Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001700250001-7
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001700250001-7 Page 4 45 CFR 46 PART 46-PROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS Subpart A-Basic HHS Policy for Protection of Human Research Subjects See. 46.101 To what do these regulations apply? 46.102 Definitions. 46.103 Assurances. 46.104 Section reserved. 46.105 Section reserved. 46.106 Section reserved. 46.107 IRB membership. 46.108 IRB functions and operations. 46.109 IRB review of research. 46.110 Expedited review procedures for certain kinds of research involving no more than minimal risk, and for minor changes in approved research. 46.111 Criteria for IRB approval of research. 46.112 Review by institution. 40.113 Suspension or termination of IRB approval of research. $6.114 Cooperative research. 46.115 IRB records. 46 116 General requirements for informed consent. 46.117 Documentation of informed consent. 46.118 Applications and proposals lacking definite plans for involvement of human subjects. 46.119 Research undertaken without the intention of involving human subjects. 46.120 Evaluation and disposition of applications and proposals. 46.121 Investigational new drug or device 30-day delay requirement. 46.122 Use of federal funds. 40.123 Early termination of research funding: evaluation of subsequent applications and proposals. 46 124 Conditions. Subpart B-Additional Protections Pertaining to Research, Development, and Related Activities Involving Fetuses, Pregnant Women, and Human In Vitro Fertilization Sec. 46.201 Applicability. 46.202 Purpose. 46.203 Definitions. 46.204 Ethical Advisory Boards. 46.205 Additional duties of the Institutional Review Boards in connection with activities involving fetuses, pregnant women, or human in vitro fertilization. 46.206 General limitations. 46.207 Activities directed towerd pregnant women as subjects. 46.208 Activities directed toward fetuses in utero as subjects. 46.209 Activities directed toward fetuses ex utero, including nonviable fetuses. as subjects. 46.210 Activities involving the dead fetus, fetal material, or the placenta. 46.211 Modification or waiver of specific requirements. Subpart C -- Additional Protections Pertaining to Biomedical and Behavioral Research Involving Prisoners as Subjects Sec. 46.301 Applicability. 46.302 Purpose. 46.303 Definitiona. 46.304 Composition of Institutional Review Boards where prisoners are involved. 46.305 Additional duties of the Institutional Review Boards where prisoners are involved. 46.306 Permitted activities involving prisoners. Subpart D-Additional Protections for Children Involved as Subjects in Research Sec. 46.401 To what do these regulations apply? 46.402 Definitions. 46.403 IRB duties. 46.404 Research not involving greater than minimal risk. 46.405 Research involving greater than minimal risk but presenting the prospect of direct benefit to the individual subjects. 46.406 Research involving greater than minimal risk and no prospect of direct benefit to individual subjects, but likely to yield generalizable knowledge about the subject's disorder or condition. 46.407 Research not otherwise approvable which presents an opportunity to understand, prevent, or alleviate a serious problem affecting the health or welfare of children. 46.408 Requirements for permission by parents or guardians and for assent by children. 46.409 Wards. Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; sec 474(a), 88 Stat. 352 (42 U.S.C. 289/-3(a)). Subpart A -Basic HHS Policy for Protection of Human Research Subjects # Source: 46 FR 8386, January 26, 1981, 48 FR 9269, March 4, 1983. § 46.101 To what do these regulations apply? (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, this subpart applies to all research involving human subjects conducted by the Department of Health and Human Services or funded in whole or in part by a Department grant, contract, cooperative agreement or fellowship. (1) This includes research conducted by Department employees, except each Principal Operating Component head may adopt such nonsubstantive, procedural modifications as may be appropriate from an administrative standpoint. (2) It also includes research conducted or funded by the Department of Health and Human Services outside the United States, but in appropriate circumstances, the Secretary may, under paragraph (e) of this section waive the applicability of some or all of the requirements of these regulations for research of this type. (b) Research activities in which the only involvement of human subjects will be in one or more of the following categories are exempt from these regulations unless the research is covered by other subparts of this part: (1) Research conducted in established or commonly accepted educational settings, involving normal educational practices, such as (i) research on regular and special education instructional strategies, or (ii) research on the effectiveness of or the comparison -among instructional techniques, curricula, or classroom management methods. (2) Research involving the use of educational tests (cognitive, diagnostic, aptitude, achievement), if Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001700250001-7
Page 5 45 clApproved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001700250001-7 information taken from these sources is recorded in such a manner that subjects cannot be identified, directly or through identifiers linked to the subjects. (3) Research involving survey or interview procedures, except where all of the following conditions exist: (i) responses are recorded in such a manner that the human subjects can be identified. directly or through identifiers linked to the subjects, (ii) the subject's responses, if they became known outside the research. could reasonably place the subject at damaging to the subject's financial standing or employability, and (iii) the research deals with sensitive aspects of the subject's own behavior. such as illegal conduct, drug use, sexual behavior, or use of alcohol. All research involving survey or interview procedures is exempt, without exception, when the respondents are elected or appointed public officials or candidates for public office. risk of criminal or civil liability or be . obtaining benefits or services under (4) Research involving the observation (including observation by participants) of public behavior. except where all of the following conditions exist: (i) observations are recorded in such a manner that the human subjects can be identified, directly or through identifiers linked to the subjects, (ii) the observations recorded about the individual, if they became known outside the research, could reasonably place the subject at risk of criminal or civil liability or be damaging to the subject's financial standing or employability, and (iii) the research deals with sensitive aspects of the subject's own behavior such as illegal conduct, drug use. sexual behavior, or use of alcohol. (5) Research involving the collection or study of existing data, documents, records, pathological specimens, or diagnostic specimens, if these sources are publicly available or if the information is recorded by the investigator in such a manner that subjects cannot be identified. directly or through identifiers linked to the subjects. (6) Unless specifically required by statute (and except to the extent specified in paragraph (i)), research and demonstration projects which are conducted by or subject to the approval of the Department of Health and Human Services, and which are designed to study. evaluate, or otherwise examine: (i) programs under the Social Security Act, or other public benefit or service programs; (ii) procedures for those programs; (iii) possible changes in or alternatives to those programs or procedures; or (iv) possible changes in methods or levels of payment for benefits or services under those programs. (c) The Secretary has final authority to determine whether a particular activity is covered by these regulations. (d) The Secretary may require that specific research activities or classes of research activities conducted or funded by the Department, but not otherwise covered by these regulations, comply with some or all of these regulations. (e) The Secretary may also waive applicability of these regulations to specific research activities or classes of research activities, otherwise covered by these regulations. Notices of these actions will be published in the Federal Register as they occur. (f) No individual may receive Department funding for research covered by these regulations unless the individual is affiliated with or sponsored by an institution which assumes responsibility for the research under an assurance satisfying the requirements of this part, or the individual makes other arrangements with the Department. (g) Compliance with these regulations will in no way render inapplicable pertinent federal, state, or local laws or regulations. (h) Each subpart of these regulations contains a separate section describing to what the subpart applies. Research which is covered by more than one subpart shall comply with all applicable subparts. (i) If, following review of proposed research activities that are exempt from these regulations under paragraph (b)(6), the Secretary determines that a research or demonstration project presents a danger to the physical, mental, or emotional well-being of a participant or subject of the research or demonstration project, then federal funds may not be expended for such a project without the written, informed consent of each participant or subject. § 46.102 Definitions. (a) "Secretary" means the Secretary of Health and Human Services and any other officer or employee of the Department of Health and Human Services to whom authority has been delegated. (b) "Department" or "HHS" means the Department of Health and Human Services. (c) "Institution" means any public or private entity of agency (including federal, state, and other agencies). (d) "Legally authorized representative" means an individual or judicial or other body authorized under applicable law to consent on behalf of a prospective subject to the subject's participation in the procedure(s) involved in the research. (e) "Research"" means a systematic investigation designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge. Activities which meet this definition constitute "'research" for purposes of these regulations, whether or not they are supported or funded under a program which is considered research for other purposes. For example, some "demonstration" and "service" programs may include research activities. Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001700250001-7
PagApproved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001700250001-7 45 CFR 46 - (f) "Human subject"' means a living individual about whom an investigator (whether professional or student) conducting research obtains (1) data through intervention or interaction with the individual, or (2) identifiable private information. "Intervention " includes both physical procedures by which data are gathered (for example. venipuncture) and manipulations of the subject or the subject's environment that are performed for research purposes. "Interaction" includes communication or interpersonal contact between investigator and subject. "'Private information" includes information about behavior that occurs in a context in which an individual can reasonably expect that no observation or recording is taking place, and information which has been provided for specific purposes by an individual and which the individual can reasonably expect will not be made public (for example, a medical record). Private information must be individually identifiable (i.e., the identity of the subject is or may readily be ascertained by the investigator or associated with the information) in order for obtaining the information to constitute research involving human subjects. (g) "Minimal risk", means that the risks of harm anticipated in the proposed research are not greater, considering probability and magnitude, than those ordinarily encountered in daily life or during the performance of routine physical or psychological examinations or tests. (h) "Certification !' means the official notification by the institution to the Department in accordance with the requirements of this part that a research project or activity involving human subjects has been reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) in accordance with the approved assurance on file at HHS. (Certification is required when the research is funded by the Department and not otherwise exempt in accordance with § 46.101(b)). § 46.103 Assurances. (a) Each institution engaged in research covered by these regulations shall provide written assurance satisfactory to the Secretary that it will comply with the requirements set forth in these regulations. (b) The Department will conduct or fund research covered by these regulations only if the institution has an assurance approved as provided in this section, and only if the institution has certified to the Secretary that the research has been reviewed and approved by an IRB provided for in the assurance, and will be subject to continuing review by the IRB. This assurance shall at a minimum include: (1) A statement of principles governing the institution in the discharge of its responsibilities for protecting the rights and welfare of human subjects of research conducted at or sponsored by the institution. regardless of source of funding. This may include an appropriate existing code. declaration, or statement of ethical principles, or a statement formulated by the institution itself. This requirement does not preempt provisions of these regulations applicable to Department-funded research and is not applicable to any research in an exempt category listed in § 46.101 (2) Designation of one or more IRBs established in accordance with the requirements of this subpart, and for which provisions are made for meeting space and sufficient staff to support the IRB's review and recordkeeping duties. (3) A list of the IRB members identified by name: earned degrees; representative capacity; indications of experience such as board certifications, licenses, etc., sufficient to describe each member's chief anticipated contributions to IRB deliberations; and any employment or other relationship between each member and the institution: for example: full-time employee, part- time employee, member of governing panel or board, stockholder, paid or unpaid consultant. Changes in IRB membership shall be reported to the Secretary. 1 (4) Written procedures which the IRB will follow (i) for conducting its initial and continuing review of research and for reporting its findings and actions to the investigator and the institution: (ii) for determining which projects require review more often than annually and which projects need verification from sources other than the investigators that no material changes have occurred since previous IRB review; (iii) for insuring prompt reporting to the IRB of proposed changes in a research activity, and for insuring that changes in approved research, during the period for which IRB approval has already been given, may not be initiated without IRB review and approval except where necessary to eliminate apparent immediate hazards to the subject: and (iv) for insuring prompt reporting to the IRB and to the Secretary 1 of unanticipated problems involving risks to subjects or others. (c) The assurance shall be executed by an individual authorized to act for the institution and to assume on behalf of the institution the obligations imposed by these regulations, and shall be filed in such form and manner as the Secretary may prescribe. (d) The Secretary will evaluate all assurances submitted in accordance with these regulations through such officers and employees of the Department and such experts or consultants engaged for this purpose as the Secretary determines to be appropriate. The Secretary's evaluation, will take into consideration the adequacy of the proposed IRB in light of the anticipated scope of the institution's research activities and the types of subject populations likely to be ! Reports should be filed with the Office for Protection from Research Risks, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland 20205 Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001700250001-7
. 45 (Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001700250001-7 Page 7 involved, the appropriateness of the proposed initial and continuing review procedures in light of the probable risks, and the size and complexity of the institution. (c) On the basis of this evaluation. the Secretary may approve or disapprove the assurance, or enter into negotiations to develop an approvable one. The Secretary may limit the period during which any particular approved assurance or class of approved assurances shall remain effective or otherwise condition or restrict approval. (f) Within 60 days after the date of submission to HHS of an application or proposal, an institution with an approved assurance covering the proposed research shall certify that the application or proposal has been reviewed and approved by the IRB. Other institutions shall certity that the application or proposal has been approved by the IRB within 30 days after receipt of a request for such a certification from the Department. If the certification is not submitted within these time limits, the application or proposal may be returned to the institution. § 46.104 [Reserved] § 46.105 [Reserved] $ 46.106 [Reserved) § 46.107 IRB membership. (a) Each IRB shall have at least five members, with varying backgrounds to promete complete and adequate review of research activities commonly conducted by the institution. The IRB shall be sufficiently qualified through the experience and expertise of its members, and the diversity of the members' backgrounds including consideration of the racial and cultural backgrounds of members and sensitivity to such issues as community attitudes, to promote respect for its advice and counsel in safeguarding the rights and welfare of human subjects. In addition to possessing the professional competence necessary to review specific research activities, the IRB shall be able to ascertain the acceptability of proposed research in terms of institutional commitments and regulations, applicable law, and standards of professional conduct and practice. The IRB shall therefore include persons knowledgeable in these areas. If an IRB regularly reviews research that involves a vulnerable category of subjects, including but not limited to subjects covered by other subparts of this part, the IRB shall include one or more individuals who are primarily concerned with the welfare of these subjects. (b) No IRB may consist entirely of men or entirely of women, or entirely of members of one profession. (c) Each IRB shall include at least one member whose primary concerns are in nonscientific areas; for example: lawyers, ethicists, members of the clergy. (d) Each IRB shall include at least one member who is not otherwise affiliated with the institution and who is not part of the immediate family of a person who is affiliated with the institution. (e) No IRB may have a member participating in the IRB's initial or continuing review of any project in which the member has a conflicting interest, except to provide information requested by the IRB. (f) An IRB may, in its discretion, invite individuals with competence in special areas to assist in the review of complex issues which require expertise beyond or in addition to that available on the IRB. These individuals may not vote with the IRB. $ 46.108 IRB functions and operations. In order to fulfill the requirements of these regulations each IRB shall: (a) Follow written procedures as provided in § 46.103(b)(4). (b) Except when an expedited review procedure is used (see § 46.110), review proposed research at convened meetings at which a majority of the members of the IRB are present, including at least one member whose primary concems are in nonscientific areas. In order for the research to be approved, it shall receive the approval of a majority of those members present at the meeting. (c) Be responsible for reporting to the appropriate institutional officials and the Secretary ' any serious or continuing noncompliance by investigators with the requirements and determinations of the IRB. § 46.109 IRB review of research. (a) An IRB shall review and have authority to approve, require modifications in (to secure approval). or disapprove all research activities covered by these regulations. (b) An IRB shall require that information given to subjects as part' of informed consent is in accordance with § 46.116. The IRB may require that information, in addition to that specifically mentioned in § 46.116, be given to the subjects when in the IRB's judgment the information would meaningfully add to the protection of the rights and welfare of subjects. (c) An IRB shail require documentation of informed consent or may waive documentation in accordance with § 46.117. (d) An IRB shall notify investigators and the institution in . writing of its decision to approve or disapprove.the proposed research activity, or of modifications required to secure IRB approval of the research activity. If the IRB decides to disapprove a research activity, it shall include in its written notification ! Reports should be filed with the Office for Protection from Research Risks. National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland 20205 Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001700250001-7
PageApproved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001700250001-7 45 CFR 46 a statement of the reasons for its . decision and give the investigator an opportunity to respond in person or in writing. (e) An IRB shall conduct continuing review of research covered by these regulations at intervals appropriate to the degree of risk, but not less than once per year, and shall have authority to observe or have a third party observe the consent process and the research. §46.110 Expedited review procedures for certain kinds of research involving no more than minimal risk, and for minor changes in approved research. (a) The Secretary has established, and published in the Federal Register, a list of categories of research that may be reviewed by the IRB through an expedited review procedure. The list will be amended, as appropriate, through periodic republication in the Federal Register. (b) An IRB may review some or all of the research appearing on the list through an expedited review procedure, if the research involves no more than minimal risk. The IRB may also use the expedited review procedure to review minor changes in previously approved research during the period for which approval is authorized. Under an expedited review procedure, the review may be carried out by the IRB chairperson or by one or more experienced reviewers designated by the chairperson from among members of the IRB. In reviewing the research, the reviewers may exercise all of the authorities of the IRB except that the reviewers may not disapprove the research. A research activity may be disapproved only after review in accordance with the non-expedited procedure set forth in § 46.108(b). (c) Each IRB which uses an expedited review procedure shall adopt a method for keeping all members advised of research proposals which have been approved under the procedure. (d) The Secretary may restrict, suspend, or terminate an institution's or IRB's use of the expedited review procedure when necessary to protect the rights or welfare of subjects. §46.111 Criteria for IRB approval of research. (a) In order to approve research covered by these regulations the IRB shall determine that all of the following requirements are satisfied: (1) Risks to subjects are minimized: (i) By using procedures which are consistent with sound research design and which do not unnecessarily expose subjects to risk, and (ii) whenever appropriate, by using procedures already being performed on the subjects for diagnostic or treatment purposes. (2) Risks to subjects are reasonable in relation to anticipated benefits. if any, to subjects, and the importance of the knowledge that may reasonably be expected to result. In evaluating risks and benefits, the IRB should consider only those risks and benefits that may result from the research (as distinguished from risks and benefits of therapies subjects would receive even if not participating in the research). The IRB should not consider possible long-range effects of applying knowledge gained in the rescarch (for example, the possible effects of the research on public policy) as among those research risks that fall within the purview of its responsibility. (3) Selection of subjects is equitable. In making this assessment the IRB should take into account the purposes of the research and the setting in which the research will be conducted. (4) Informed consent will be sought from each prospective subject or the subject's legally authorized representative, in accordance with, and to the extent required by § 46.116. (5) Informed consent will be appropriately documented, in accordance with, and to the extent required by § 46.117. (6) Where appropriate, the research plan makes adequate provision for monitoring the data collected to insure the safety of subjects. (7) Where appropriate, there are adequate provisions to protect the privacy of subjects and to maintain the confidentiality of data. (b) Where some or all of the subjects are likely to be vulnerable to coercion or undue influence, such as persons with acute or severe physical or mental illness, or persons who are economically or educationally disadvantaged. appropriate additional. safeguards have been included in the study to protect the rights and welfare of these subjects. § 46.112 Review by institution. Research covered by these regulations that has been approved by an IRB may be subject to further appropriate review and approval or disapproval by officials of the institution. However, those officials may not approve the research if it has not been approved by an IRB. § 46.113 Suspension or termination of IRB approval of research. An IRB shall have authority, to suspend or terminate approval of research that is not being conducted in accordance with the IRB's requirements or that has been associated with unexpected serious harm to subjects. Any suspension or termination of approval shall include a statement of the reasons for the "IRB's action and shall be reported promptly to the investigator, appropriate institutional officials, and the Secretary. 1 ' Reports should be filed with the Office for Protection from Research Risks, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland 20205. Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001700250001-7
Page 9 45 CER 46 Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001700250001-7 § 46.114 Cooperative research. Cooperative research projects are those projects, normally supported through grants, contracts, or similar arrangements, which involve institutions in addition to the grantee or prime contractor (such as a contractor with the grantee, or a subcontractor with the prime contractor). In such instances, the grantee or prime contractor remains responsible to the Department for safeguarding the rights and welfare of human subjects. Also, when cooperating institutions conduct some or all of the research involving some or all of these subjects. each cooperating institution shall comply with these regulations as though it received funds for its participation in the project directly from the Department, except that in complying with these regulations institutions may use joint review, reliance upon the review of another qualified IRB, or similar arrangements aimed at avoidance of duplication of effort. § 46.115 IRB records." (a) An institution, or where appropriate an IRB, shall prepare and maintain adequate documentation of IRB activities, including the following: (1) Copies of all research proposals reviewed, scientific evaluations, if any, that accompany the proposals. approved sample consent documents, progress reports submitted by investigators, and reports of injuries to subjects. (2) Minutes of IRB meetings which shall be in sufficient detail to show attendance at the meetings; actions taken by the IRB; the vote on these actions including the number of members voting for, against, and abstaining; the basis for requiring changes in or disapproving research; and a written summary of the discussion of controverted issues and their resolution. (3) Records of continuing review activities. (4) Copies of all correspondence between the IRB and the investigators. (5) A list of IRB members as required by § 46.103(b)(3). (6) Written procedures for the IRB as required by § 46.103(b)(4). (7) Statements of significant new findings provided to subjects, as required by § 46.116(b)(5). (b) The records required by this regulation shall be retained for at least 3 years after completion of the research, and the records shall be accessible for inspection and copying by authorized representatives of the Department at reasonable times and in a reasonable manner. § 46.116 General requirements for informed consent. Except as provided elsewhere in this or other subparts, no investigator may involve a human being as a subject in research covered by these regulations unless the investigator has obtained the legally effective informed consent of the subject or the subject's legally authorized representative. An investigator shall seek such consent only under circumstances that provide the prospective subject or the representative sufficient opportunity to consider whether or not to participate and that minimize the possibility of coercion or unduc influence. The information that is given to the subject or the representative shall be in language understandable to the subject or the representative. No, informed consent, whether oral or written, may include any exculpatory language through which the subject or the representative is made to waive or appear to waive any of the subject's legal rights, or releases or appears to release the investigator, the sponsor, the institution or its agents from liability for negligence. (a) Basic elements of informed consent. Except as provided in paragraph (c) or (d) of this section, in seeking informed consent the following information shall be provided to each subjectr. ? (1) A statement that the study involves research, an explanation of the purposes of the research and the expected duration of the subject's participation, a description of the procedures to be followed, and identification of any procedures which are experimental: 1 (2) A description of any reasonably foreseeable risks or discomforts to the subject; (3) A description of any benefits to "the subject or to others which may reasonably be expected from the research; (4) A disclosure of appropriate : · alternative procedures or courses of treatment, if any, that might be ; advantageous to the subject: · (5) A statement describing the extent, if any, to which confidentiality of records identifying the subject will be maintained; (6) For research involving more than minimal risk, an explanation as to whether any compensation and an ID A . explanation as to whether any medical treatments are available if injury occurs and, if so, what they - consist of, or where further information may be obtained; (7) An explanation of whom to contact for answers to pertinent questions about the research and research subjects' rights, and whom to contact in the event of a research- related injury to the subject; and ? (8) A statement that participation is voluntary, refusal to participate will involve no penalty or loss of benefits to which the subject is otherwise entitled, and the subject may discontinue participation at any time without penalty or loss of benefits to which the subject is otherwise entitled. (b) Additional elements of informed consent, When appropriate, one or more of the following elements of information shall also be provided to each subject: Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001700250001-7
45 CFR 46 Page Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001700250001-7 '(1) A statement that the particular " treatment or procedure may involve risks to the subject (or to the embryo For fetus, if the subject is or may Èbecome pregnant) which are currently unforeseeable: #: (2) Anticipated circumstances å under which the subject's « participation may be terminated by ¡. she investigator without regard to the "subject's consent: (3) Any additional costs to the subject that may result from participation in the research; (4) The consequences of a subject's decision to withdraw from ythe research and procedures for gorderly termination of participation by the subject; (5) A statement that significant new findings developed during the course of the research which may *relate to the subject's willingness to continue participation will be provided to the subject; and (6) The approximate number of *: subjects involved in the study. (c) An IRB may approve 3.consent procedure which does not include; or which ahera,;some or all of the elements of informed consent set forth above, or waive the requirement to obtain informed consent provided the IRB finds and documents that: (1) The research or demonstration project is to be conducted by or subject to the approval of state or local government officials and is designed to study, evaluate, or otherwise examine: (i) programs under the Social Security Act, or other public benefit or service programs; (ii) procedures for obtaining benefits or services under those programs; (iii) possible changes in or alternatives to those programs or procedures; or (iv) possible changes in methods or levels of payment for benefits or services under those programs; and (2) The research could not practicably be carried out without the waiver or alteration. (d) An IRB may approve & consent procedure which does not include, or .... which alters, some or all of the elements of informed consent set forth above, or waive the requirements to obtain informed consent provided the IRB finds and documents that: (1) The research involves no more than minimal risk to the subjects; (2) The waiver or alteration will not adversely affect the rights and welfare of the subjects: (3) The research could not practicably be carried out without the waiver or alteration; and (4) Whenever appropriate, the subjects will be provided with additional pertinent information after participation. (e) The informed consent requirements in these regulations are not intended to preempt any applicable federal, state, or local laws which require additional information to be disclosed in order for informed consent to be legally effective. (f) Nothing in these regulations is intended to limit the authority of a physician to provide emergency medical care, to the extent the physician is permitted to do so under applicable federal, state, or local law. § 46.117 Documentation of : Informed consent. (a) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, informed consent shall be documented by the use of a written consent form approved by the IRB and signed by the subject or the subject's legally authorized representative. A copy shall be given to the person signing the form. (b) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, the consent form may be either of the following: (1) A written consent document that embodies the elements of . informed consent required by § 46.116. This form may be read to the subject or the subject's legally authorized representative, but in any event, the investigator shall give either the subject or the representative adequate opportunity to read it before it is signed; or (2) A "'shon form" written consent document stating that the elements of informed consent required by § 46.116 have been presented orally to the subject or the subject's legally authorized representative. When this method is used, there shall be a witness to the oral presentation. Also, the IRB shall approve a written summary of what is to be said to the subject or the representative. Only the short form itself is to be signed by the subject or the representative. However, the witness shall sign both the short form and a copy of the summary, and the person actually obtaining consent shall sign a copy of the summary. A copy of the summary shall be given to the subject or the representative, in addition to a copy of the ** short form. " (c) An IRB may waive the requirement for the investigator to obtain a signed consent form for some or all subjects if it finds either: (1) That the only record linking the subject and the research would be the consent document and the principal risk would be potential harm resulting from a breach of confidentiality. Each subject will be asked whether the subject wants documentation linking the subject with the research, and the subject's wishes will govern; or (2) That the research presents po more than minimal risk of harm to subjects and involves no procedures for which written consent is normally required outside of the research context. In cases where the documentation requirement is waived, the IRB may require the investigator to provide subjects with a written statement regarding the research. § 46.118 Applications and proposals lacking definite plans for Involvement of human subjects. Certain types of applications for grants, cooperative agreements, or contracts are submitted to the Department with the knowledge that subjects may be involved within the Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001700250001-7
. Page If 45 cApproved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001700250001-7 period of funding, but definite plans would not normally be set forth in the application or proposal. These include activities such as institutional type grants (including bloc grants) where selection of specific projects is the institution's responsibility: research training grants where the activities involving subjects remain to be selected; and projects in which human subjects' involvement will depend upon completion of instruments, prior animal studies, or purification of compounds. These applications need not be reviewed by an IRB before an award may be made. However, except for research described in § 46.10!(b), no human subjects may be involved in any project supported by these awards until the project has been reviewed and approved by the IRB. as provided in these regulations, and certification submitted to the Department. § 46.119 Research undertaken without the intention of involving human subjects. In the event research (conducted or funded by the Department) is undertaken without the intention of involving human subjects, but it is later proposed to use human subjects in the research, the research shall first be reviewed and approved by an IRB, as provided in these regulations, a certification submitted to the Department, and final approval given to the proposed change by the Department. § 46.120 Evaluation and disposition of applications and proposals. (a) The Secretary will evaluate all applications and proposals involving human subjects submitted to the Department through such officers and employees of the Department and such experts and consultants as the Secretary determines to be appropriate. This evaluation will take into consideration the risks to the subjects, the adequacy of protection against these risks, the potential benefits of the proposed research to the subjects and others, and the importance of the knowledge to be gained. (b) On the basis of this evaluation, the Secretary may approve or disapprove the application or proposal, or enter into negotiations to develop an approvable one. § 46.121 Investigational new drug or device 30-day delay requirement. When an institution is required to prepare or to submit a certification with an application or proposal under these regulations, and the application or proposal involves an investigational new drug (within the meaning of 21 U.S.C. 355(i) or 357(d)) or a significant risk device (as defined in 21 CFR 812.3(m)), the institution shall identify the drug or device in the certification. The institution shall also state whether the 30-day interval required for investigational new drugs by 21 CFR 312. 1(a) and for significant risk devices by 21 CFR 812.30 has elapsed, or whether the Food and Drug Administration has waived that requirement. If the 30-day interval has expired, the institution shall state whether the Food and Drug Administration has requested that the sponsor continue to withhold or restrict the use of the drug or device in human subjects. If the 30-day interval has not expired, and a waiver has not been received. the institution shall send a statement to the Department upon expiration of the interval. The Department will not consider a certification acceptable until the institution has submitted a statement that the 30-day interval has elapsed, and the Food and Drug Administration has not requested it to limit the use of the drug or device, or that the Food and Drug Administration has waived the 30-day interval. § 46,122 Use of Federal funds. Federal funds administered by the Department may not be expended for research involving human subjects unless the requirement of these regulations, including all subparts of these regulations, have been satisfied. § 46.123 Early termination of research funding; evaluation of subsequent applications and proposals. (a) The Secretary may require that Department funding for any project be terminated or suspended in the manner prescribed in applicable program requirements, when the Secretary finds an institution has materially failed to comply with the terms of these regulations. (b) In making decisions about funding applications or proposals covered by these regulations the Secretary may take into account, in addition to all other eligibility requirements and program criteria, factors such as whether the applicant has been subject to a termination or suspension under paragraph (a) of this section and whether the applicant or the person who would direct the scientific and technical aspects of an activity has in the judgment of the Secretary materially failed to discharge responsibility for the protection of the rights and welfare of human subjects (whether or not Department funds were involved). $ 46.124 Conditions. With respect to any research project or any class of research projects the Secretary may impose additional conditions prior to or at the time of funding when in the Secretary's judgment additional conditions are necessary for the protection of human subjects. Subpart B --- Additional Protections Pertaining to Research Development, and Related "Activities Involving Fetuses, * Pregnant Women, and Human In Vitro Fertilization' SOURCE. 40 FR 11528, Aug. 8. 1975. 43 FR 1758, January 11. 1978. 43 FR 51559, November 3. 1978 $ 46.201 Applicability. (a) The regulations in this subpart are applicable to all Department of Health. Education, and Welfare Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001700250001-7
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001700250001-7 Page 12 45 CFR 46 grants and contract supporting research, development, and related activities involving: (1) The fetus, (2) pregnant women, and (3) human in vitro fertilization. (b) Nothing in this subpart shall be construed as indicating that compliance with the procedures set forth herein will in any way render inapplicable pertinent State or local laws bearing upon activities covered by this subpart. (c) The requirements of this subpart are in addition to those imposed under the other subparts of this part. § 46.202 Purpose. it is the purpose of this subpart to provide additional safeguards in reviewing activities to which this subpart is applicable to assure that they conform to appropriate ethical standards and relate to important societal needs. $ 46.203 Definitions. As used in this subpart: (a) "Secretary" means the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare and any other officer or employee of the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare to whom authority has been delegated. (b) "Pregnancy" encompasses the period of time from confirmation of implantation (through any of the presumptive signs of pregnancy, such as missed menses, or by a medically acceptable pregnancy test), until expulsion or extraction of the fetus. (c) "Fetus" means the product of conception from the time of implantation (as evidenced by any of the presumptive signs of pregnancy. such as missed menses, or a medically acceptable pregnancy test). until a determination is made, following explusion or extraction of the fetus, that it is viable. (d) "Viable" as it pertains to the Ictus means being able, after either spontaneous or induced delivery, to survive (given the benefit of available medical therapy) to the point of independently maintaining heart beat and respiration. The Secretary may from time to time. taking into account medical advances, publish in the FEDERAL REGISTER guidelines to assist in determining whether a fetus is viable for purposes of this subpart. If a fetus is viable after delivery, it is a premature infant. (e) "Nonviable fetus"' means a fetus ex utero which, although living, is not viable. (f) "Dead fetus" means a fetus ex utero which exhibits neither heartbeat, spontaneous respiratory activity, spontaneous movement of voluntary muscles, nor pulsation of the umbilical cord (if still attached). (g) "In vitro fertilization" means any fertilization of human ova which occurs outside the body of a female, either through admixture of donor human sperm and ova or by any other means. § 46.204 Ethical Advisory Boards. 1 (a) One or more Ethical Advisory Boards shall be established by the Secretary. Members of these board(s) shall be so selected that the board(s) will be competent to deal with medical, legal, social, ethical, and related issues and may include, for example, research scientists. physicians, psychologists, sociologists, educators, lawyers, and ethicists, as well as representatives of the general public. No board member may be a regular, full-time employee of the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. (b) At the request of the Secretary. the Ethical Advisory Board shall render advice consistent with the policies and requirements of this Part as to ethical issues, involving activities covered by this subpart, raised by individual applications or proposals. In addition, upon request by the Secretary, the Board shall render advice as to classes of applications or proposals and general policies, guidelines, and procedures. (c) A Board may establish, with the approval of the Secretary, classes of applications or proposals which: (1) Must be submitted to the Board, or (2) need not be submitted to the Board. Where the Board so establishes a class of applications or proposals which must be submitted, no application or proposal within the class may be funded by the Department or any component thereof until the application or proposal has been reviewed by the Board and the Board has rendered advice as to its acceptability from an ethical standpoint. (d) No application or proposal involving human in vitro fertilization may be funded by the Department or any component thereof until the application or proposal has been reviewed by the Ethical Advisory Board and the Board has rendered advice as to its acceptability from an ethical standpoint. § 46.205 Additional duties of the Institutionel Review Boards in connection with activities involving fetuses, pregnant women, or human in vitro fertilization. (a) In addition to the responsibilities prescribed for Institutional Review Boards under Subpart A of this part, the applicant's or offeror's Board shall, with respect to activities covered by this subpart, carry out the following additional duties: (1) Determine that all aspects of the activity meet the requirements of this subpart; (2) Determine that adequate consideration has been given to the manner in which potential subjects will be selected, and adequate provision has been made by the applicant or offeror for monitoring the actual informed consent process (e.g., through such mechanisms, when appropriate, as participation by the Institutional Review Board or subject advocates in: (i) Overseeing the actual process by which individual consents required by this subpart are secured either by approving induction of each individual into the activity or Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001700250001-7
Page 13 45.CFApproved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001700250001-7 - verifying. perhaps through sampling, that approved procedures for induction of individuals into the activity are being followed, and (ii) monitoring the progress of the activity and intervening as necessary through such steps as visits to the activity site and continuing evaluation to determine if any unanticipated risks have arisen); (3) Carry out such other responsibilities as may be assigned by the Secretary. (b) No award may be issued until the applicant or offeror has certified to the Secretary that the Institutional Review Board has made the determinations required under paragraph (a) of this section and the Secretary has approved these determinations, as provided in § 46.120 of Subpart A of this part. (c) Applicants or offerors seeking support for activities covered by this subpart must provide for the designation of an Institutional Review Board, subject to approval by the Secretary, where no such Board has been established under Subpart A of this part. § 46.206 General limitations. (a) No activity to which this subpart is applicable may be undertaken unless: (1) Appropriate studies on animals and nonpregnant individuals have been completed; (2) Except where the purpose of the activity is to meet the health needs of the mother or the particular fetus, the risk to the fetus is minimal and, in all cases, is the least possible risk for achieving the objectives of the activity. (3) Individuals engaged in the activity will have no part in: (i) Any decisions as to the timing, method, and procedures used to terminate the pregnancy, and (ii) determining the viability of the fetus at the termination of the pregnancy: and (4) No procedural changes which may cause greater than minimal risk to the fetus or the pregnant woman will be introduced into the procedure for terminating the pregnancy solely in the interest of the activity. (b) No inducements, monetary or otherwise, may be offered to terminate pregnancy for purposes of the activity. (40 FR 33528. Aug. 8. 1975, as amended at 40 FR 51638. Nov. 6, 1975) § 46.207 Activities directed toward pregnant women as subjects. (a) No pregnant woman may be involved as a subject in an activity covered by this subpart unless: (1) The purpose of the activity is to meet the health needs of the mother and the fetus will be placed at risk only to the minimum extent necessary to meet such needs, or (2) the risk to the fetus is minimal. (b) An activity permitted under paragraph (a) of this section may be conducted only if the mother and father are legally competent and have given their informed consent after having been fully informed regarding possible impact on the fetus, except that the father's informed consent need not be secured if: (1) The purpose of the activity is to meet the health needs of the mother; (2) his identity or whereabouts cannot reasonably be ascertained: (3) he is not reasonably available: or (4) the pregnancy resulted from rape. § 46.208 Activities directed toward fetuses in utero as subjects. (a) No fetus in utero may be involved as a subject in any activity covered by this subpart unless: (1) The purpose of the activity is to meet the health needs of the particular fetus and the fetus will be placed at risk only to the minimum extent necessary to meet such needs, or (2) the risk to the fetus imposed by the research is minimal and the purpose of the activity is the development of important biomedical knowledge which cannot be obtained by other means. (b) An activity permitted under paragraph (a) of this section may be conducted only if the mother and father are legally competent and have given their informed consent, except that the father's consent need not be secured if: (1) His identity or whereabouts cannot reasonably be ascertained, (2) he is not reasonably available, or (3) the pregnancy resulted from rape. § 46.209 Activities directed toward fetuses ex utero, including nonviable fetuses, as subjects. (a) Until it has been ascertained whether or not a fetus ex utero is viable, a fetus ex utero may not be involved as a subject in an activity covered by this subpart unless: (1) There will be no added risk to the fetus resulting from the activity, and the purpose of the activity is the development of important biomedical knowledge which cannot be obtained by other means, or (2) The purpose of the activity is to enhance the possibility of survival of the particular fetus to the point of viability. (b) No nonviable fetus may be involved as a subject in an activity covered by this subpart unless: (1) Vital functions of the fetus will not be artificially maintained, (2) Experimental activities which of themselves would terminate the heartbeat or respiration of the fetus will not be employed, and (3) The purpose of the activity is the development of important biomedical knowledge which cannot be obtained by other means. (c) In the event the fetus ex utero is found to be viable, it may be included as a subject in the activity only to the extent permitted by and in accordance with the requirements of other subparts of this part. (d) An activity permitted under paragraph (a) or (b) of this section may be conducted only if the mother and father are legally competent and have given their informed consent, except that the father's informed consent need not be secured if: (1) his identity or whereabouts cannot reasonably be ascertained, (2) he is Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001700250001-7
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001700250001-7 Page 14 45 CFR 46 - not reasonably available, or (3) the pregnancy resulted from rape. . § 46.210 Activities involving the dead fetus, fetal material, or the placenta. Activities involving the dead fetus, mascerated fetal material. or cells, tissue, or organs excised from a dead fetus shall be conducted only in accordance with any applicable State or local laws regarding such activities. § 46.211 Modification or waiver of specific requirements. Upon the request of an applicant or offeror (with the approval of its Institutional Review Board), the Secretary may modify or waive specific requirements of this subpart, with the approval of the Ethical Advisory Board after such opportunity for public comment as the Ethical Advisory Board considers appropriate in the particular instance. In making such decisions, the Secretary will consider whether the risks to the subject are so outweighed by the sum of the benefit to the subject and the importance of the knowledge to be gained as to warrant such modification or waiver and that such benefits cannot be gained except through a modification or waiver. Any such modifications or waivers will be published as notices in the FEDERAL REGISTER Subpart C-Additional Protections Pertaining to Biomedical and Behavioral Research Involving Prisoners as Subjects : Source: 43 FR 53655. Nov 16. 1978 § 46.301 Applicability. (a) The regulations in this subpart are applicable to all biomedical and behavioral research conducted or supported by the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare involving prisoners as subjects. (b) Nothing in this subpart shall be construed as indicating that compliance with the procedures set forth herein will authorize research involving prisoners as subjects, to the extent such research is limited or barred by applicable State or local law. (c) The requirements of this subpart are in addition to those imposed under the other subparts of this part. § 46.302 Purpose. Inasmuch as prisoners may be under constraints because of their incarceration which could affect their ability to make a truly voluntary and uncoerced decision whether or not to participate as subjects in research, it is the purpose of this subpart to provide additional safeguards for the protection of prisoners involved in activities to which this subpart is applicable. § 46.303 Definitions. As used in this subpart: (a) "Secretary" means the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare and any other officer or employee of the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare to whom authority has been delegated. (b) "DHEW" means the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. (c) "Prisoner" means any ladividual involuntarily confined of detained in a penal institution. The term is intended to encompass individuals sentenced to such an institution under a criminal or civil statute, individuals detained in other facilities by virtue of statutes or 'commitment procedures which provide alternatives to criminal: prosecution or incarceration in a penal institution, and individuals detained pending arraignment, trial, or sentencing. : (d) "Minimal risk " is the probability and magnitude of physical or psychological harm that is normally encountered in the daily lives, or in the routine medical. dental, or psychological examination of healthy persons. § 46.304 Composition of Institutional Review Boards where prisoners are involved. In addition to satisfying the requirements in § 46.107 of this part, an Institutional Review Board, carrying out responsibilities under this part with respect to research covered by this subpart, shall also meet the following specific requirements: (a) A majority of the Board ...... (exclusive of prisoner members) shall have no association with the prison(s)) involved, apart from their membership on the Board. (b) At least one member of the? Board shall be a prisoner, or prisoner, representative with appropriate background and experience to serve in that capacity, except that where a particular research project is reviewed by more than one Board only one Board need satisfy this requirement. § 46.305 Additional duties of the Institutional Review Boards where prisoners are involved. (a) In addition to all other responsibilities prescribed for Institutional Review Boards under this part, the Board shall review research covered by this subpart and approve such research only if it finds that: ( 1) The research under review represents one of the categories of research permissible under § 46.306(a)(2); (2) Any possible advantages accruing to the prisoner through his or her participation in the research, when compared to the general living conditions, medical care, quality of food, amenities and opportunity for earnings in the prison, are not of such a magnitude that bis or her ability to. weigh the risks of the research against .. the value of such advantages in the limited choice environment of the prison is impaired: (3) The risks involved in the research are commensurate with risks that would be accepted by nonprisoner volunteers; (4) Procedures for the selection of subjects within the prison are fair to Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001700250001-7
45 CFR 46 Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001700250001-7 Page 15 all prisoners and immune from arbitrary intervention by prison authorities or prisoners. Unless the principal investigator provides to the Board justification in writing for following some other procedures, control subjecta must be selected randomly from the group of available prisoners who meet the characteristics needed for that particular research project: (5) The information is presented in language which is understandable to the subject population; (6) Adequate assurance exists that paroiç boards will nos jaka into, account a prisoner's participation in the research in making decisions regarding parole, and each prisoner is clearly informed in advance that participation in the research will have no effect on his or her parole; and (7) Where the Board finds there may be a need for follow-up examination or care of participants after the end of their participation. adequate provision has been made for such examination or care, taking into account the varying lengths of individual prisoners' sentences, and for informing participants of this fact. (b) The Board shall carry out such other duties as may be assigned by the Secretary. (c) The institution shall certify to the Secretary, in such form and manner as the Secretary may require, that the duties of the Board under this section have been fulfilled. § 46.306 Permitted rescarch involving prisoners .. (a) Biomedical or behavioral research conducted or supported by DHEW may involve prisoners as subjects only if: (1) The institution responsible for the-conduct of the research has certified to the Secretary that the Institutional Review Board has approved the research under § 46.305 of this subpart; and (2) In the judgment of the Secretary the proposed research involves solely the following: (A) Study of the possible causes, effects, and processes of incarceration, and of criminal behavior, provided that the study presents no more than minimal risk and no more than inconvenience to the subjects: (B) Study of prisons as institutional structures or of prisoners as incarcerated persons, provided that the study presents no more than minimal risk and no more than inconvenience to the subjects; (C) Research on conditions particularly affecting prisoners as a class (for example, vaccine trials and other research on hepatitis which is much more prevalent in prisons than elsewhere: and research on social and psychological problems such as alcoholism, drug addiction and sexual assaults) provided that the study may proceed only after the Secretary has consulted with appropriate experts including experts in penology medicine and ethics, and published notice, in the FEDERAL REGISTER, of his intent to approve such research; of (D) Research un practices, both innovative and accepted, which have the intent and reasonable probability of improving the health or well- being of the subject. In cases in which those studies require the assignment of prisoners in a manner consistent with protocols approved by the IRB to control groups which may not benefit from the research, the study may proceed only after the Secretary has consulted with appropriate experts, including experts in penology medicine and ethics, and published notice, in the FEDERAL REGISTER, of his intent to approve such research. (b) Except as provided in paragraph (a) of this section. biomedical or behavioral research conducted or supported by DHEW shall not involve prisoners as subjects. Subpart D-Additional Protection for Chlidres Involved as Subjects la Research. Source: 48 FR 9818, March 8, 1983 § 46.401 To what do these regulations apply? (B) This subpart applies to all research involving children as subjects, conducted or supported by the Department of Health and Human Services. (1) This includes research conducted by Department employees, except that each head of an Operating Division of the Department may adopt such nonsubstantive, procedural modifications as may be appropriate from an administrative standpoint. (2) It also includes research conducted or supported by the Department of Health and Human Services outside the United States, but in appropriate circumstances, the Secretary may, under paragraph (e) of § 46.101 of Subpart A, waive the applicability of some or all of the requirements of these regulations for research of this type. (b) Exemptions (1), (2), (5) and (6) as listed in Subpart A at §46.101(b) are applicable to this subpart. Exemption (4), research involving the observation of public behavior, listed at § 46.101(b), is applicable to this subpart where the investigator(s) does not participate in the activities being observed. Exemption (3), research involving survey or interview procedures, listed at § 46.101(b) does not apply to research covered by this subpart. (c) The exceptions, additions, and provisions for waiver as they appear in paragraphs (c) through (i) of § 46.101 of Subpart A are applicable to this subpart. § 46.402 Definitions. The definitions in § 46.102 of Subpart A shall be applicable to this subpart as well. In addition, as used in this subpart: Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001700250001-7
- PagApproved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001700250001-7 45 CFR 46 - (a) "Children"' are persons who . have not attained the legal age for consent to treatments or procedures involved in the research, under the applicable law of the jurisdiction in which the research will be conducted. (b) "Assent" means a child's affirmative agreement to participate in research. Mere failure to object should not, absent affirmative agreement, be construed as assent. (c) "Permission" means the agreement of parent(s) or guardian to the participation of their child or ward in research. (d) "Parent" means a child's biological or adoptive parent. (e) "Guardian" means an individual who is authorized under applicable state or local law to consent on behalf of a child to general medical care. § 46.403 IRB duties. In addition to other responsibilities assigned to IRBs under this part, each IRB shall review research covered by this subpart and approve only research which satisfies the conditions of all applicable sections of this subpart. § 46.404 Research not involving greater than minimal risk. HHS will conduct or fund research in which the IRB finds that no greater than minimal risk to children is presented, only if the IRB finds that adequate provisions are made for soliciting the assent of the children and the permission of their parents or guardians, as set forth in § 46.406. #46.405 Research involving greater thas micheal risk but presenting the prospect of direct benefit to the Individual subjects, HHS will conduct or fund research in which the IRB finds that more than minimal risk to children is presented by an intervention or procedure that holds out the prospect of direct benefit for the individual subject, or by a monitoring procedure that is likely to § 46.407 Research not otherwise contribute to the subject's well-being only if the IRB finds that: (a) The risk is justified by the anticipated benefit to the subjects; (b) The relation of the anticipated benefit to the risk is at least as favorable to the subjects as that presented by available alternative approaches; and (c) Adequate provisions are made for soliciting the assent of the children and permission of their parents or guardians, as set forth in § 46.408. 8 46.406 Research involving greater than minimal risk and no prospect of direct benefit to individual subjects, but likely to yield generalizable knowledge about the subject's disorder or condition. HHS will conduct or fund research in which the IRB finds that more than minimal risk to children is presented by an intervention or procedure that does not hold out the prospect of direct benefit for the individual subject, or by a monitoring procedure which is not likely to contribute to the well-being of the subject, only if the IRD finds that: (a) The risk represents a minor increase over minimal risk; (b) The intervention or procedure presents experiences to subjects that are reasonably commensurate with those inherent in their actual or expected medical, dental, psychological, social, or educational situations; (c) The intervention or procedure is likely to yield generalizable knowledge about the subjecta' disorder or condition which is of vital importance for the understanding or amelioration of the subjects' disorder or condition; and (d) Adequate provisions are made for soliciting assent of the children and permission of their parents or guardians, as set forth in § 46.408. approvable which presents an opportunity to understand, prevent; or alleviate a serious problem affecting the health or welfare of children. HHS will conduct or fund research that the IRB does not believe meets the requirements of - § § 46.404, 46.405, or 46.406 only if: (a) The IRB finds that the research presents a reasonable opportunity to further the understanding, prevention, or alleviation of a serious problem affecting the health or welfare of children; and (b) The Secretary, after consultation with a panel of experts in pertinent disciplines (for example: science, medicine, education, ethics, law) and following opportunity for public review and comment, has determined either: (1) That the research in fact satisfies the conditions of §§ 46.404, 46.405, or 46.406, as applicable, or (2) the following: (i) The research presents a reasonable opportunity to further the understanding, prevention, or alleviation of a serious problem affecting the health or welfare of children; (ii) The research will be conducted in accordance with sound ethical principles; (iii) Adequate provisions are made for soliciting the assent of children and the permission of their parents or guardians, as set forth in § 46.408. § 46.408 Requirements for permission by parents or guardians and for assent by children. (a) In addition to the determinations required under other applicable sections of this subpart, the IRB shall determine that adequate provisions are made for soliciting the assent of the children, when in the judgment of the IRB the children are capable of providing assent. In determining whether children are capable of assenting, the IRB shall take into account the ages,; maturity, and psychological state of the children involved. This judgment Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001700250001-7
45 CFR Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001700250001-7 Page 17 may be made for all children to be involved in research under a particular protocol, or for each child, as the IRB deems appropriate. If the IRB determines that the capability of some or all of the children is so limited that they cannot reasonably be consulted or that the intervention or procedure involved in the research holds out a prospect of direct benefit that is important to the health or well-being of the children and is available only in the context of the research, the assent of the children is not a necessary condition for proceeding with the research. Even where the IRB determines that the subjects are capable of assenting, the IRD may still waive the assent requirement under circumstances in which consent may be waived in accord with § 46.116 of Subpart A. (b) In addition to the determinations required under other applicable sections of this subpart, the IRE shall determine, in accordance with and to the extent that consent is required by's 46.116 of Subpart A, that adequate provisions are made for soliciting the permission of each child's parents or guardian. Where parental permission is to be obtained, the IRB may find that the permission of one parent is sufficient for research to be conducted under § § 46.404 or 46.405. Where research is covered by §§ 46.406 and 46.407 and permission is to be obtained from parents, both parents must give their permission unless one parent is deceased, unknown, incompetent, or not reasonably available, or when only one parent has legal responsibility for the care and custody of the child. (c) In addition to the provisions for waiver contained in § 46.116 of Subpart A, if the IRD determines that a research protocol is designed for conditions or for a subject population for which parental or guardian permission is not a reasonable requirement to protect the subjects (for example, neglected or abused children), it may waive the consent requirements in Subpart A of this part and paragraph (b) of this section, provided an appropriate mechanism for protecting the children who will participate as subjects in the research is substituted, and provided further that the waiver is not inconsistent with federal state or local law. The choice of an appropriate mechanism would depend upon the nature and purpose of the activities described in the protocol, the risk and anticipated benefit to the research subjects, and their age, maturity, status, and condition. (d) Permission by parents or guardians shall be documented in accordance with and to the extent required by § 46.117 of Subpart A. (e) When the IRB determines that assent is required, it shall also determine whether and how assent must be documented. § 46.409 Wards. (a) Children who are wards of the state or any other agency, institution, or entity can be included in research approved under §§ 46.406 or 46.407 only if such research is: (1) Related to their status as wards; or (2) Conducted in schools, camps, hospitals, institutions, or similar settings in which the majority of children involved as subjects are not wards. (b) If the research is approved under paragraph (a) of this section, the IRB shall require appointment of an advocate for each child who is a ward, in addition to any other individual acting on behalf of the child as guardian or in loco parentis. One individual may serve as advocate for more than one child. The advocate shall be an individual who has the background and experience to act in, and agrees to act in, the best interests of the child for the duration of the child's participation in the research and who is not associated in any way (except in the role as advocate or member of the IRB) with the research, the investigator(s), or the guardian organization. Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001700250001-7 i -
Page 18 .Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001700250001-7 45 CFR 46 NOTICES HUMAN SUBJECTS Minimum Criteria Identifying the Viable Fetus On March 13, 1975. regulations were published in the FEDERAL REGISTER (40 FR 11854) relating to the protection of human subjects in research, development, and related activities supported by Department of Health, Education, and Welfare grants and contracts. These regulations are codified at 45 CFR Part 46. Elsewhere in this issue of the FEDERAL REGISTER, the Secretary is amending 45 CFR Part 46 by, among other things, adding a new Subpart B to provide additional protections pertaining to research. development, and related activities involving fetuses, pregnant women, and in vitro fertilization. Section 46.203(d) of Subpart B provides inter alia as follows: The Secretary may from time to time. taking into account medical advances. publish in the FEDERAL REGISTER guidelines to assist in determining whether a fetus is viable for purposes of this subpart. This notice is published in accordance with $ 46.203(d). For purposes of Subpart B, the guidelines indicating that a fetus other than a dead fetus within the meaning of § 46.203(f) is viable include the following: an estimated gestational age of 20 weeks of more and a body weight of 500 grams or more. FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL 40, AUGUST 8, 1975 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE : 1983 0 - 406-756 . 4 Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001700250001-7
. Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001700250001-7 + PROCEDURE 13. EXPERIMENTATION ON HUMAN SUBJECTS FOR INTELLIGENCE PURPOSES A. APPLICABILITY This procedure applies to experimentation on human sub- jects if such experimentation is conducted by or on behalf of a DoD intelligence component. This procedure does not apply to experimentation on animal subjects. B. EXPLANATION OF UNDEFINED TERMS 1. Experimentation in this context means any research or testing activity involving human subjects that may expose such subjects to the possibility of permanent or temporary injury (including physical or psychological damage and damage to the reputation of such persons) beyond the risks of injury to which such subjects are ordinarily exposed in their daily lives. --- 2. Experimentation is conducted on behalf of a DoD intelligence component if it is conducted under contract to that component or to another DoD component for the benefit of the intelligence component or at the request of such a com- ponent regardless of the existence of a contractual rela- tionship. 12-1 Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001700250001-7
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001700250001-7 3. Human subjects in this context includes any person ---- whether or not such person is a United States person. 4 c. PROCEDURES 1 . Experimentation on human subjects conducted by or on behalf of a DoD intelligence component may be undertaken only with the informed consent of the subject, and in accordance with guidelines issued by the Department of Health and Human Services, setting out conditions that safeguard the welfare of such subjects. 2. DoD intelligence components may not engage in or contract for experimentation on human subjects without appro- val of the Secretary or Deputy Secretary of Defense, or the Secretary or Under Secretary of a Military Department, as appropriate. [Requests for such approval submitted by Army . Intelligence components will be addressed through command channels to HQDA (DAMI-CIC) , WASH DC 20310. ] Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001700250001-7