CIA STARGATE release
CIA-RDP96-00788R001500120015-8
Opens with: LTC Brian Buzby
Warning: text for all documents has not been verified. Errors are possible. Check the original by document ID on CREST.
3 pages, machine transcribed from the CIA’s released scan.
Approved For Release 2000/0&P|c/Internatien291500120015-8 Memo 23 18 85 To : LTC Brian Buzby SG1J Date : 15 April 1985 From : Location : G-219 Subject : 28 February 1985 Buzby Letter, Reply to Cc : H. Puthoff In response to your review of FY'84 projects, and possible variances between SRI performance and contractual requirements, I have looked over the final reports with regard to contract requirements, and I am satisfied that all requirements have been satisfactorily met and fulfilled. The following point-by-point summary should provide clarification of the elements in question. ESU 83-134, reference the possibility that Phases I and II were only partially accomplished and Phase III not conducted: In Phase I, personality testing was applied to proven RV personnel in SRI and client programs as required, the SRI (and other) viewers listed in Table 1, p. 14, the client viewers in Table 4, p. 21. Discussion as to profiles to identify personnel for RV aptitudes are provided in Section V, pp. 13-25. Thus, the requirements for Phase I were met in full. In fact, following the close of the effort, profiling of an additional ex-client RVer was arranged, and this data will also be provided in an addendum to provide the client with as complete a data base as possible. In Phase II, SRI was to compare self-report testing against the identified PAS profiles to determine the accuarcy of such "self-report" pre-screening materials. The MBTI (self-report) test results listed in Tables 3 and 4, and the accompanying discussion, satisfy this requirement. The study concluded that this most promising self-report test (MBTI) was inadequate to the task. As to the second part of the Phase II requirement (to apply identified profiles against a general test population to segregate talented from untalented RVers), and the Phase III requirement to then test these against actual RV targets, this activity was carried out with a group labeled SRI RV trainees (Table 3, p. 20); the predicted best-profile RV trainee (#807) yielded the best test results, with lesser results provided by individuals with profiles associated with nonpredicted RV performance. Thus, the Phase II and III requirements were also met. ESU 83-145, reference that the final report did not include separate enclosures for each trainee with requested information: I have examined the S.O.W. in detail a number of times and have failed to find any statement concerning separate enclosures. If the intent of the reference to such is that the track records of individual trainees be differentiated one from another, this is provided to the degree it can be in Tables 2-4, which indicate the levels of individual-trainee efforts to achieve mastery of each of the Stages, I-III. Beyond level-of-effort required, no further differentiation can be made, in that all trainees achieved the skill plateaus expected with little difference in reliability/accuracy. ESU 83-147, reference that the final report did not contain a summary of literature search, nor data on the lack of investigation of weather and lunar cycles: It is the case that no separate summary of the literature search was provided; rather, references to and discussion of relevant findings were simply noted where appropriate in the text and an extensive (125-item) bibliography provided for further detailed reading. Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001500120015-8 SG1J
1 Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001500120015-8 With regard to the list of items suggested for investigation in the S.O.W. (which included weather and lunar cycles), it was assumed that the named items were representative but not exclusive of areas of investigation to be pursued. Once the research was underway, it was SRI's considered scientific judgment that detailed investigation of solar flare activity (not included in the original list) was more likely to provide data of note (as it did) than could be obtained from an analysis of weather and lunar cycles. Therefore, given the fixed-level-of-effort nature of the contract, this substitution was made, and, given the results, it appears to have been a most profitable choice given the overall goal of the task. ESU 83-144, reference no specific recommendations or proposal for a training program: The results of the investigation showed that although search strategies of several types yielded significant positive results, it would be premature to lock on to a specific training technique to the exclusion of others at this point, as several of the contenders showed remarkable potential. Since they are so different, one from another (computer "mouse" dowsing, spatial/temporal computer search, map dowsing with physiological-sensation-in-fingers approach, one-shot versus statistical averaging approaches, etc.), there is no clear-cut way to integrate them into an amalgamated training regimen; hence, the recommendation for further investigation of the alternative techniques before recommendations as to a specific training program. Reference the requirement to provide a list of equipment purchased in support of the contract: Attached is a printout of purchases on the contract, which total $62,647.30. In addition, a number of purchases were made by SRI (but not charged to contract) in order to pursue contract activities at the SRI/NY office. These items are as follows: · 5 Gray chairs cube-shaped · 1 Edison fan . 8 Chairs, cane webbed . 1 Panasonic portable cassette tape recorder, Model RQ-2103 . 1 Pollenex Pure Air "99" · 4 Light tracks · 15 Light heads for track lighting . 1 Sofa, off-white . 1 Loveseat, off-white . 2 Secretarial chairs, dark gray . 2 2-drawer file cabinets · 1 Podium, gray · 1 Table, gray . 1 Table, natural wood I trust this provides the clarification sought with regard to possible variances between S.O.W.s and the final reports. If further details are required, please let me know. Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001500120015-8
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001500120015-8 PY09 ( PROG: SPY/D/0180) PROJECT-PROPERTY INVENTORY DATE 03-05-85 PAGE 364 - 0 TAG NO SFX . N O UN .. SYSTEM CDE .. MODEL ... SERIAL NUMBER! NUMBER AGENCY : CD NM TAG . MANUFACTURER ... NAME .. LOCATION .. P TP FIN PROP .... ACQUISITION ..... COST USE G 004 35791 COMPUTER. DIGITAL 120 UA 2444P SUN MICRO SYS. 83 001 7010 6 220 GN 73 0001 02/84 22,407.00 610 X 610 G 00435793 CONTROLLER 5101-00 UA C-8887 EQUATORIAL COMM 83 888 6625 GM 33 0002 02/84 2.975.00 610 610 x 11 10 G 004 35796 PRINTER. A DP 82162A UA 2228587315 HEWLETT-PACKARD 83 001 7025 G 219 GN 73 0006 03/84 37%-02010 610 x G 00435805 AIR PURIFI ER E UA NONE UNASSIGNED 4460 84 013 GM x 33 0004 03/84 149.95 610 610 X 6 004 35813 KED V5.20 OPE G1166 48405 GERBRANDS 6730 84 001 P N 111 GM 33 0009 08/84 4.490.00 610 x 18 19 G 004 35826 COMPUTER. PERSONAL PC JR 0067-0029406 IBM 84 888 GN 73 0010 07/84 1,039.00 610 x UA 7042 . 610 G 00435827 COMPUTER. PERSONAL PC JR 0067-0032564 1AM 4 888 73 0010 07/84 1,039.00 610 X UA 7042 610 G 004 35828 COMPUTER. PERSONAL PC JR 0067-0056212 IAM 84 888 GN 73 0010 07/84 1,039.00 610 610 x 7042 G 004 35853 ANALYZER 4202 284842 CANBERRA IND 6625 84 001 P N 111 6M 33 0008 06/84 14.631.35 610 X G 004 35905 PRINTER IP/II 84050014 INTERLEAF 5860 84 001 G 220 GM 33 0010 08/84 14.500.00 610 610 x *** TOTAL NO. OF ITEMS- 10 *** TOTAL ACQUISITION COST 62.270.30 --- 4. 62,647.50 FOOTNOTE : * DENOTES THAT THE PURGE DATE HAS BEEN SET 40 4. 1 PROJECT-06600 AORG ACCT! UORG YR SITEBLGUFROOM IST CLS VCHR CUR DATE OSSSC Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001500120015-8 4) 11 H UA UA Q 610 UA - GN Q · 610 UA G435805NON