CIA-RDP96-00788R001200360004-7

Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R00120
Draft
REPORT EVALUATION FORM
1.
SPONSOR'S OFFICE:
2. INFORMATION REQUEST DATE:
3.
TARGET SITE IDENTIFICATION:
4.
PROJECT NUMBER :
5.
SOURCE NUMBER :
6.
REPORT NUMBER AND DATE:
7.
VALUE OF INFORMATION ( select one)
a.
//
Major Significant Value (narrative comment required; cite specific
information in the report which was valueable and why it was of value)
/ / b. Valueable (narrative comment required; cite specific information in
the report which was valueable and why it was of value)
/ / c. No Value (see Item 8, below)
8.
REASON INFORMATION IS OF NO VALUE ( select one only)
11
a. Too Fragment ary
11
b. Duplicetive
11
c. Untimely
/ / d .. Not Responsive to Tasking Cited
9.
DEGREE OF REQUIREMENT SATISFACTION (select one only)
/ / a. Completely Satisfied
/ / b. Partially Satisfied
/ / c. Not Satisfied At All
10.
COLLECTION GUIDANCE (mandatory unless Item 9a., above, is checked; detail
specific information you require to satisfy your requirement)
REPORT EVALUATION - WANG SUBJECT
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001200360004-7

Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001200360004-7
11.
REMARKS (optional)
12. EVALUATOR'S NAME:
138
EVALUATOR'S OFFICE SYMBOL:
14.
DATE EVALUATED:
15.
ORIGINATOR OF REQUEST FOR INFORMATION:
16. (signature of evaluator)
2
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001200360004-7