CIA-RDP96-00788R000500630001-8

Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500630001-8
SECRET
INSCOM
GRILL FLAME
PROGRAM
SESSION REPORT
CLASSIFIED BY:MSG, DAMI-ISH
DATED:
051630ZJUL78
NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS
REVIEW ON: Nov 2000
CCGOCT
Approved For Release 2002/05/KP JA\HDP 96-00788R000500630001-8
GRILL FLAME
Copy 106
i

Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500630001-8
SECRET
SUMMARY ANALYSIS
REMOTE VIEWING (RV) SESSION D-98
1. (S/NOFORN)
This report documents a remote viewing session conducted in
compliance with a request for information on a target of interest. The mission
was to locate
SG1A
SG1A
2. (S/NOFORN)
The protocol used for this session is detailed in the document
Grill Flame Protocol, AMSAA Applied Remote Viewing Protocol (S), undated.
3. (S/NOFORN) At TAB A is a summary of the data presented by the remote
viewer during the session. A complete transcript of the session is available
upon request. At TAB B are drawings made by the remote viewer reference his
impressions of the target site. At TAB C is the map on which the viewer indi-
cated where he thought the target(s) were located. At TAB D is target cuing
information provided the remote viewer.
4. (S/NOFORN)
The summary at TAB A represents the salient points provided by
the remote viewer and as such has not been subjected to any intermediate analysis,
evaluation or collation. Interpretation and use of the information provided is
the responsibility of the requestor.
NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS
DE CREF
Approved For Release 2002/05/170RCIA-RDP96-00788R000500630001-8

Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500630001-8
1
TAB
1
Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500630001-8

Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500630001-8
CLOREF
TRANSCRIPT SUMMARY
REMOTE VIEWING (RV) SESSION D-98
1.
(S/NOFORN)
The following information was obtained at 1130 hours,
30 October 1980.
Source #01.
a.
SG1A
(S/NOFORN)
Source reported on two (2) locations (see TAB C) and was not
sure if the data was related to an old site and new site
SG1A
b. (S/NOFORN)
Source felt that site #1 was near mountain range that split
U.S.S.R. He reported that area was in very early stage of contruction.
He
described a major river as running ENE to WSW just south of construction site.
Source reported that a good size city was located just to the NE. Source indi-
cated that city was termination point for major rail lines coming from West and
South. He reported that no railroads went out easterly from this city.
Source
stated that city was 120-150 miles from northern border of U.S.S.R.
c. (S/NOFORN)
The second possible area was described as being located
about 100 miles in from the Polish border (see drawing 2). He was not sure if
construction at this site was complete.
d. (S/NOFORN)
Source felt that construction of third site would not complete
the cycle. That is, he felt that there would be a total of 5 sites when the
Soviets were finished construction of this type installation. However, he felt
that the Soviets were constructing these installations in a checkable pattern.
He explained this pattern as being an orientation of "Great Circle Azimuths",
(GCA's).
e. (S/NOFORN)
Source reported that site #1 was located near a city that
began with the letter "M" and ended in something like "ieske". He felt it was
a strange Russian name. Further, he reported that the city was "just coming
into age" .... the city is very old but just recently has it taken on importance
in an industrial/economic sense.
f. (S/NOFORN)
Source indicated that all materials used for constructing
these sites come from 2 other production plants (in addition to the one he
had been briefed on). He felt that all of these plants were located outside of
Moscow (see drawing 3).
g.
(S/NOFORN)
Source felt that water is very important to these sites.
2.
(S/NOFORN) Although source indicated on the attached the probable locations
of the sites, he felt very concerned about his "best guess" way of trying to
relate his data to the map since:
a.
The map threw him off.
b. Not used to the way the land forms were projected on the map.
c.
Felt that topographic map would be more useful (Note: We could not do
anything to overcome this problem since we were limited to resources provided by
tasking agency.)
SECRET
Approved For Release 20uz 05/ 72 CIA-RDP06-00788R000500630001-8

Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500630001-8
This
3.
(S/NOFORN)
Request the above information, once evaluated, be returned with
comments to this office (ATTN: IAOPS-H-S). Comments should be in writing.
will permit a full evaluation of the source of information by this office.
A
detailed transcript can be provided concerning the above project session if
necessary.
Approved For Release 2002/05/17 [ CJA-RDP96-00788R000500630001-8

Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500630001-8
TAB
-
-
Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500630001-8

Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500630001-8
FUNNE
SHAPE
N. BORDER
150 MIG
$ 40
+
MNTS.
city
RIVER
LESKE
M
-
27
1
Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500630001-8
0

Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500630001-8
WATERLING
-
150 MILES
>
POLISH BORDER
APPROX .
100 MILES
CONSTRUCTION
SITE
×
MOSCOW
Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500630001-8
2

Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500630001-8
3
MNTS.
€
masow X
Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500630001-8

-
Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500630001-8
:
TAB
1
Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500630001-8

SG1A
Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500630001-8
Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500630001-8

Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500630001-8
TAB
Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500630001-8
!

Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500630001-8
CLORET
TARGET CUING INFORMATION
REMOTE VIEWING (RV) SESSION D-98
1. (S/NOFORN)
Prior to the session
the viewer was shown several photographs
The
(provided by the tasking agency) of
photographs depicted the site during various stages of development. The viewer
was also shown a photo of a production plant which apparently produces items
used in the construction process at the sites. The photographs are not included
in this report due to their classification.
SG1A
2. (S/NOFORN) The viewer was told that USI was trying to locate where the
SG1A
3. (U) Prior to the session, all material relating to this project was stored
in the SSO facility with access to the material being limited to the project
manager.
NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS
OR CON
Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500630001-8