CIA-RDP96-00788R000500450001-8

Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500450001-8
SECRET
INSCOM
GRILL FLAME
PROGRAM
SESSION REPORT
CLASSIFIED BY:MSG,DAMI-ISH
DATED:
051630ZJUL78
REVIEW ON:
May 2001
SEGRET
GRILL FLAME
GF-041-81
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500450001-8
NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS
Copy 1 of 2 copas

Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500450001-8
SEGRET
SUMMARY ANALYSIS
REMOTE VIEWING (RV) SESSION DCC-45
1. (S/NOFORN)
This report documents a remote viewing session conducted in
compliance with a request for information on two target areas of interest.
2. (S/NOFORN) The remote viewer's impressions of the target are provided
as raw intelligence data, and as such, have not been subjected to any
intermediate analysis, evaluation or collation. Interpretation and use of
the information provided is the responsibility of the requestor.
3. (S/NOFORN )
The protocol used for this session is detailed in the document
Grill Flame Protocol, AMSAA Applied Remote Viewing Protocol (S), undated.
4. (S/NOFORN) Following is a transcript of the viewer's impressions during
the remote viewing session. At TAB A are drawings made by the remote viewer
reference his impressions of the target site. At TAB B is target cuing infor-
mation provided the remote viewer. At TAB C are analyst's comments.
NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS
SIGRET
Approved For Release 2000/08/07". CIA-RDP96-00788R000500450001-8

Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500450001-8
SEGRET
TRANSCRIPT SUMMARY
REMOTE VIEWING (RV) SESSION DCC-45
SG1A
1. (S/NOFORN)
Source #27.5 provided the following information regarding
the vicinity of UTM coordinate
on 080900 May 1981 and
21 May 1981, respectively. Attention is invited to sketch #1, this summary.
a. (S/NOFORN) 080900 May 1981:
Source described a road intersection
to the south of a small older city which had some modern buildings.
Source
said that to the right and left of the road intersection were two "temporary
military bivouac areas", one on each side of the intersection (marked area
"A" and area "B", sketch #1). Source stated that inside these bivouac areas
were small clusters of U/I equipment. Source observed no significant activity
at the target area, just people moving around. To the north of the inter-
section along the edge of the city was observed an area of small "shantys"
having slanted tin roofs resembling a "shanty town".
b. (S/NOFORN) 21 May 1981:
Source #27.5 observed much more movement of
people from the northwest to the southeast along one of the roads of the
intersection (see arrow and note, sketch #1). People were moving in groups
of up to 10 clustered together, and were carrying "soft" objects having no
hard outline (like as of cloth) on their shoulders and backs. The people
were observed to be wearing dark clothing of similar style and appearance.
The groups of people were clustered informally and had no singular identity.
SG1A
2. (S/NOFORN) Source #27.5 provided the following information regarding the
vicinity of UTM coordinates
on 080900 May 1981 and 21 May 1981,
respectively. Attention is invited to sketch #2, this summary. (Analyst
note: notation circle A with arrow on sketch #2 denotes position of observa-
tion of 8 May 1981 data by source.
a.
(S/NOFORN)
080900 May 1981:
Source described an airfield situated
within a flat area having "rugged hills to the rear", and an otherwise undes-
cribed city in the distance. At the airfield, source observed persons walk-
ing around inside blast bay walls and working on aircraft. Fuel trucks were
moving in the area, and a "fighter aircraft" was observed taking off. Essen-
tially, these observations were described as normal daily activity.
b. (S/NOFORN)
21 May 1981:
Source observed what he perceived as an
airstrike to the north, at which location black oily smoke was seen rising at
the edge of the mountains more than 5 miles but less than 10 miles from the
airfield. At another location, it appeared that "light strafing runs" were
being made against a similar, but different, target. Both of these airstrike
locations were reported to be occupied by three or four buildings "lower than
the surrounding rocky, hilly countryside". Some form of trucks were parked
at the buildings, along with "fancy kind" of guidance system having items like
radar reflectors or parabolic antennae. The strafing aircraft appeared to not
be concerned with the aircraft located on the ground at the nearby airfield
reported above.
Approved For Release 200G
OFVIDI JO-00788R000500450001-8

Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500450001-8
SECRET
TVC
c. (S/NOFORN) 21 May 1981 continued: The source described the air-
craft making strafing runs as being a single seater having twin tails,
droop hose, large engine pods, and resembling a U.S. TOMCAT fighter. The
pilot was describe as a dark haired, gray eyed, bushy browed Caucasian wear-
ing an "airforce type" flight suit and white helmet. The pilot emoted a
calm, efficient and very professional attitude having no fear but possibly
a subliminal feeling of vengeance. The pilot's purpose was to perform a
pre-emptive raid of some kind, but the pilot did not know the reasons there-
fore. The pilot was observed to be taking no evasive action (as though) he
had "air superiority and knew it, therefore 'no sweat'". Source therefore
suspected the airstrike was a surprise. The pilot expected to achieve his
objective - preemption - and therefore guarantee continued freedom of move-
ment (of unknown forces) or freedom of the skys (ie., maintaining air super-
iority). However, source could not reconcile this perception with the pilot's
overall lack of concern for the aircraft observed at the airfield.
The air-
craft was described further as having markings consisting of a white back-
ground with a dark square inside. Within the square was a "blurry polka-dot"
shape. This (design) was located high up on one of the tails of the aircraft.
Source also believed (he) observed a star (associated with the tail design).
Source stated this aircraft originated at an airstrip located in a generally
westerly direction from the target and located at a distance of somewhat less
than 100 miles.
GEGDET
Approved For Release 2000/08/07:CIA RBP96-00788R000500450001-8

Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500450001-8
TAB
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500450001-8

(
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500450001-8
NORTH ( MAYBE)
SMALL CITY
1
6
SHANTY TOWN TYPE ARE (TIN/METAL) ROOFS
ARGA "A"
-
SMALL BUILDINGS
×
INTERSECTION
AREA .
'B'
DIRECTION
OF PEOPLE
MOVEMENT
TARGET AREA # 1
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500450001-8
O

FTT
21TH
--
Approved For Release 2600/08/1 7 : CIA RDP96-00788R000500450001-8
AIRSTRIP
AIRSTRIKE
SPOT.
1
SECOND
TARGET
TARGET AREA # 2
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500450001-8
2

Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500450001-8
TAB
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500450001-8

Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500450001-8
SECRET
TARGET CUING INFORMATION
REMOTE VIEWING (RV) SESSION DCC-45
1.
(S/NOFORN)
Information provided the remote viewer prior to the session
is documented as a pre-session briefing and is included in the transcript.
2.
(S/NOFORN)
During the session the viewer was asked to elaborate on those
portions of his impressions which seemed relevant to the task at hand.
NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS
Approved For Release 2000 00/ 170 7-UP96-00788R000500450001-8

Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500450001-8
TAB
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500450001-8

Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500450001-8
SECRET
CONTROL ANALYST COMMENTS
REMOTE VIEWING (RV) SESSION DCC-45
1.
(S/NOFORN)
Control analyst #31 did not monitor this session live. Prior
to the session, Interviewer #66 was provided a slip of paper upon which was
written the following:
a.
Targeting Briefing
1) Located in each of these sealed envelopes is a UTM coordinate
which pinpoints your targets.
2)
There are two different targets. We will address one at a time.
b.
EEI:
Applicable for each envelope.
1)
Describe the general area of the target.
2)
Ascertain local activity at the target.
3)
Move to 21 May 1981 and ascertain activity.
2.
(S/NOFORN)
Simultaneous to the above, Interviewer #66 was provided two
sealed manila envelopes, each containing a slip of paper having the respec-
tive UTM coordinate written thereon. The only exterior markings on each
envelope were a Roman Number I and II respectively, an order to facilitate
discrete identification of each target coordinate within the session, and to
allow cross-correlation of descriptive data to the appropriate target area.
Permetto v. Bell.1.
KENNETH V. BELL, JR.
CPT, MI
Control Analyst
NOT RELEAS ABLE TO FORETEN NATIONALS
Approved For Release 2000/08/07C0CIA-RDP96-00788R000500450001-8