CIA-RDP96-00788R000200560001-9

ccc58
NOT RELEASEABLE TO TOPFIGY NATIONALS
1
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000200560001-9
ORCON
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
US ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND
FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, MARYLAND 20755
IAFM-OPS-HU-SA
18 April 1980
MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD
SG1A
SUBJECT :
1. (U)
The following information applies:
a.
(S/NOFORN) An interior portion of an unidentified clear-story type
structure (Inclosure 1) corresponds to Inclosure 2, this Memo. This portion
of the structure is reported as being an assembly line area and is further
described below.
(1)
(S/NOFORN)
Source reported the criterior "wings" of
the clear-story structure consist of work bays containing machinery and
tools.
(2) (S/NOFORN)
Source reported that down the (apparent)
centerline of the structure is a slow moving conveyor-type of apparatus along
which (apparent) vehicles are moved during assembly.
(3)
(S/NOFORN) Along each side of the conveyor-type apparatus
are located work tables separated by (apparent)work space.
(4)
(S/NOFORN) Hanging down from above throughout the interior
are hoses and similar type apparatus.
(5) (S/NOFORN) Source reported that located to the left of
the conveyor-type apparatus, near the end of the unidentified structure,
was an open garage-type door, to the left of which was a large cradle-type
apparatus ( Inclosure 3).
(6)
(S/NOFORN)
To the left of the cradle apparatus was a
small interior building and parked vehicle (Inclosure 3).
(7) (S/NOFORN) The apparent end of the structure had two large
garage type doors, one of which was open and the other closed ( Inclosure 3).
-
CLASSIFIED BY:
MSG, HODA(DAMI-ISH)
dtd 051630Z JUL 78
REVIEW ON: 18 April 2000
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 CIA-RDP96-00788R000200560001-9
SECRET
×

SG1A
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000200560001-9
IAFM-OPS-HU-SA
SUBJECT:
18 April 1980
b. (S/NOFORN) The activity within the unidentified building on or about
15 April 1980 is reported as follows:
(1) (S/NOFORN) Source reported that located on the conveyor type apparatus
was a vehicle resembling that at Inclosure 4. This vehicle was being worked on
by personnel standing on either side of the conveyor. These personnel would
irregularly move between the (apparent) outer machinery bays and the conveyor
type apparatus.
(2) (S/NOFORN) Source reported that standing near the small interior
building, and in front of the open garage type door, was a vehicle resembling
that at Inclosure 4. It was reported that the vehicle appeared to have been
completed, and was standing near a quality control/inspection point shown at
Inclosure 5.
(3) (S/NOFORN) A forklift type vehicle was reported as moving through
the open garage door on the left (apparently) retrieving and moving pieces or
parts from racks outside the building into the interior of the building.
c. (S/NOFORN) Other data is reported as follows: Source's estimate/
appraisal is that the vehicle/equipment assembly is finalized or completed at
this reported location.
2. (U) Comments: Request informal evaluation of data contained herein be
provided NLT 15 JUne 1980.
4 Incl
as
KennetAV. Bell,2
KENNETH V. BELL, JR.
Captain, MI
Action Officer
2
-
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000200560001-9

Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000200560001-9
4
]
L
INCL 2
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000200560001-9

Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000200560001-9
M
1M
INIT MESSY
in
MACH
ACTY
FORKLIFT
VEH
2018
rood 0-250to
Nood made
INCL. 3
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000200560001-9

Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000200560001-9
5
C
INCL 4
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000200560001-9

L
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000200560001-9
6
1
Incl 5
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000200560001-9

1
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000200560001-9
Session
IAOPS-H-S
SUBJECT: INTERIM RESPONSE (U)
The information provided as an enclosure to this report was obtained
in direct response to a collection requirement provided by your office.
The information is from an unconfirmed source, therefore caution is war-
ranted in its use. The material which you will now review has been ac-
quired from a totally new and potentially valuable source of intelligence.
Work is currently being conducted to establish ways by which to improve
the accuracy and reliability of the data. Your attention to a preliminary
evaluation, and later a final evaluation, will be the basis for our assess-
ment of this new collection technique.
In addition, your comments provide
impetus upon which approach modification can be predicated for data collect-
ion against the same or any additional targets for which you may have an
interest. The effort you expend will greatly assist us and will ultimately
result in your receiving more information of increasing accuracy and re-
liability. While formulating your judgements concerning the information
provided, the following comments concerning this new source of intelligence
may be helpful. Foremost, the information is likely to consist of a mixture
of both correct and incorrect elements. Specifically:
The descriptive elements are generally of a higher reliability than judge-
ments or labels as to what is being described by the source (a recreational
swimming pool may be mistaken for a water purification pool, or an aircraft
hull may be mistaken for a submarine hull, etc.) Therefore, seemingly approp-
riate descriptive elements should not be rejected because they have been mis-
lableled.
The data will often contain gaps (in a three building complex for ex-
ample, only two buildings may be described, or an airfield may be added which
is not there.) Such gaps or additions should not be taken to mean that the
rest of the information provided is necessarily inaccurate.
Some of the data provided may be abstract with no apparent importance
concerning the target. However, when considered in light of additional in-
formation provided or obtained at a later date, may then be considered of
high intelligence value. (i.e., lack of personnel within a 24 hour operations
area on a given time and date, which is later confirmed to coincide with a
fire evacuation demonstration.)
Therefore, a recommended approach is to first examine the information pro-
vided and to answer the questions as best you can (hence this interim response),
in order to provide us with sufficient feedback to continue our support with the
best methods possible. Later, when the project has been terminated against
that specific target, our office will provide you with a more detailed format
wherein a full evaluation of all the information provided can be accomplished.
If you have any questions regarding the data you have received, or its
interim evaluation, please contact this office (IAOPS-H-S) at any time.
CLASSIFIED BY: MSG, HQDA (DAMI-ISH)
Dtd;
051630Z JUL 78
REVIEW BY :
Holy 2000
NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA DDD96:007990000200560001-9 TT T, OGAME

Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000200560001-9
Boxes are provided to the right of each question. Only one box should be
checked for each question asked. If you have any comments which you would
like to make emphasizing the accuracy of the information or with reference
to any information not generally covered in this format, please write them
on the reverse of this page.
Response to Tasking
Responses*
Does information provided satisfy
your intelligence collection require-
ment?
ם
YES
IN PART D
NO
Accuracy
Geographical location (terrain, water,
river, etc.)
C
YES
IN PART
NO
Large scale man-made objects (docks,
silos, buildings, etc.)
YES
IN PART
NO
0
Small scale man-made objects (tanks,
computers, antennas, etc.)
C
YES
IN PART
NO
Target ambience (research, production,
administration, troop movement, etc. )
C
YES
IN PART
NO
Activity (nuclear testing, CBR, SIGINT
monitoring, etc.)
YES
IN PART
NO
Personality (Physical, plans, actions,
traits, etc.)
YES
IN PART
NO
Utility
Please check which best describes the
utility of the information provided (in
view of what is known at this time, un-
derstanding that additional information
could raise or lower such an interim ass-
essment at a later date)
VERY USEFUL
USEFUL
MARGINAL
NONE
CANNOT BE DETERMINED AT
THIS TIME
*YES - indicates a full agreement with what is known to be fact about the
target. NO - indicates a total lack of agreement with what is known to be
fact about the target.
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000200560001-9

4
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000200560001-9
Additional tasking
Is additional tasking required?
(If yes, please write what that tasking
is on the back of the form)
YES
NO
Did the attached information add to
information derived from other intell-
igence sources?
YES
NO
Did the attached information aid in tasking
other intelligence resources by providing
targeting information?
YES
No
(Signed) SIGNATURE
(Printed) NAME, GRADE
(Printed) TITLE, or OFFICE
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000200560001-9
. . . .
.... .. ..... ........

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-06788R06696656
FINAL PROJECT EVALUATION FORM
Project wrap-up
1. CUSTOMER OFFICE
2. INFORMATION REQUESTED DATE
YEAR
MONTH
DAY
3. TARGET COUNTRIES
4. PROJECT NUMBER
5. SOURCE NUMBER
6. NUMBER REPORTS SUBMITTED
FOR PROJECT
7. REPORT IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS
8. REFERENCES
A. REQUIREMENTS (CITE )
(ICR/CIR/DIRM 3/DIRM 9)
B. INITIATIVE REPORT
9. REASON FOR EVALUATION (select one)
A. ICR RESPONSE
B. COLLECTORS REQUEST
C. SELECTED BY ANALYST
10. VALUE OF INFORMATION (select one)
A. OF MAJOR SIGNIFICANCE
B. OF VALUE
C. OF NO VALUE
11. TYPES OF PRODUCTS TO BENEFIT
FROM USE OF REPORTED INFORMATION
A. BASIC INTELLIGENCE
B. CURRENT INTELLIGENCE
C. ESTIMATIVE INTELLIGENCE
D. S&T INTELLIGENCE
12. REASON INFORMATION IS OF NO VALUE
(select one only)
A. TOO FRAGMENTARY
B. DUPLICATIVE
C, UNTIMELY
D. NOT RESPONSIVE TO
TASKING CITED
13. DEGREE OF REQUIREMENT SATISFACTION
(select one only)
A. COMPLETELY SATISFIED
B. PARTIALLY SATISFIED
C. NOT SATISFIED AT ALL
14. NAME OF PRODUCT (S)
15. COLLECTION CUIDANCE (Mandatory unless 13A, above, is checked)
16. REMARKS (Optional)
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000200560001-9
A PURITY CLACCIEICATION

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000200560001-9
(remarks continued)
17. FOREIGN DISCLOSURE DATA
A. EVALUATORS RECOMMENDATION
(select one only)
RELEASABLE EVALUATION NOT REQUESTED
EVALUATION IS NOT RELEASABLE
PARA (S)
, ABOVE, IS/ARE
RELEASABLE TO THE GOVT (S) OF
B. FOREIGN DISCLOSURE AUTHORITY DECISION
(select one only)
EVALUATION IS NOT RELEASABLE
NON-CAVEATED PORTIONS OF THIS EVAL, AS
INDICATED, MAY BE REL TO THE AUTH REPS
OF THE GOVT(S) OF
AT THE DISCRETION OF THE ORIGINATOR.
18. EVALUATOR'S NAME
19. EVALUATOR'S OFFICE
SYMBOL
20. SECURITY INSTRUCTIONS
(DOWNGRADING, DECLASSIFICATION,
AND SPECIAL MARKINGS)
21. DATE EVALUATED
22. ORIGINATOR OF REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
YEAR
MONTH
DAY
23. (Signature of evaluator)
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000200560001-9
SECURITY CLASSIFICATION