CIA STARGATE release
CIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4
Opens with: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE
Warning: text for all documents has not been verified. Errors are possible. Check the original by document ID on CREST.
38 pages, machine transcribed from the CIA’s released scan.
. Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4 ® PROCEEDINGS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CYBERNETICS AND SOCIETY September 19-21, 1977 Sponsored by: IEEE Systems, Man and Cybernetics Society With the cooperation of: College of American Pathologists Human Factors Society IEEE Computer Society IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Mayflower Hotel, Washington, D.C. Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4
Approved For Release. 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-60287R000200080055-4 IEEE Catalog No: 77CH1259-1 SMC Library of Congress Catalog Card No: 75-28733 Copyright C 1977 The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. 345 East 47th Street, New York, NY 10017 Manufactured in The United States of America Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4
Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4 A NOTE FROM THE CHAIRMAN With this conference we celebrate the 20th anniversary of the founding of this Society, even though our current name has been with us only for the past seven years. Our worldwide membership of about 5000 members represent many disciplines all brought together by the unifying thread of the "systems" approach to problem solving. In this regard, we are indeed pleased to present John Warfield with our Outstanding Contribution Award. John spent the past several years grappling with a methodology for coping with complexity. His concepts associated with Interpretive Structural Modeling have been tested and proven as demonstrated by the session organized by Raymond Fitz on this subject. I feel it necessary to note that we have departed slightly from the conventional in this conference and have introduced two sessions which, to some of our readers, may appear controversial. The first is the session, Scientific Studies of Acupuncture: Acupuncture, as you know, originated thousands of years ago in the orient and only recently received serious attention by Western medical scientists. Did you know that acupuncture flourished in the U.S. from 1820 to.1850? According to a researcher at the National Library of Medicine, acupuncture had been introduced to the U.S. from Europe and a substantial number of articles appeared on this subject in the U.S. medical literature of the period; however, interest waned as he found only six articles for the period 1850-1900. Today, the situation has changed. Western medicine now agrees there is something to acupuncture. Its analgesic properties are recognized but not understood. Bruce Pomeranz of the University of Toronto, whose article appears here, recently received international attention on his discovery of a possible mechanism that describes why acupuncture works. Stephen Kim, trained in both Eastern and Western medicine, is a trained acupuncturest. He departs from traditional methods by making use of an electronic device for locating acupuncture points. His paper reports striking success over the traditional methods. The session is rounded out by recent research by other investigators: Lee, Clifford and Mau. Clearly, acupuncture has now become a valid research subject for biocyberneticists. Our second unconventional area is Research in Psychoenergetics, organized by Hal Puthoff of SRI. The presentation of this session is the outgrowth of the spectacular luncheon talk by Hal and Russ Targ at last year's conference for which they received our Franklyn V. Taylor Best Presentation Award. Recognizing that their professional integrity was at stake, they have gone to great lengths to assure impeccability of their work; neverthe- less, a reviewer of their original paper which appeared in the IEEE Proceedings last year stated, "This is the sort of thing I would not believe in even if it were true." Notwithstanding such emotional reactions, psychic phenomena are a reality, and Hal Puthoff's session of first-rate carefully selected papers is worthy of your consideration. Finally, among the unusual presentations, I commend your reading Bill Gevarter's excellent summary, "A Wiring Diagram of the Human Brain as a Model for Artificial Intelligence." William H. von Alven Chairman Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : GIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4
1 1 Approved for Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-087R000200080055-4 COMMITTEE William H. von Alven Chairman Ed Connelly Vice-Chairman Symposium Organizers/Directors: - 1 James D. Palmer Societal Systems C. C. Li .. Biomedical Systems & Biocybernetics Andrew P. Sage Systems Science, Methodology & Engineering Thomas B. Sheridan Man-Machine Systems Hans Oestreicher Pattern Recognition & Artificial Intelligence Short Course Organizers: Decision Analysis in Medicine: Methods and Applications E. A. Patrick, MD Societal Systems Methodology A. P. Sage and J. N. Warfield Public Presentation: A Scientific View of ESP Harold Puthoff & Russell Targ Luncheon Speakers: Society and Technology Assessment Gretchen Kohlsrud Arthur D. Hall The Computer Invades the Farm The Computer Invades the Home Jerald J. Zeger 1 ... Approved For Release 2002/05/17 .; , CIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4 - .....
Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4 with the initial condition that = kS - e 1 2 (k + k') m to "to. k + kill ] (7) which is the achived velocity w of the follower during the inspection period totowe have 2(k + k'), to 2 (k + k' ) (+ - to) (8) m The spiral after-effect (SAF) is the velocity of the stimulus relative to the follower, namely, 2 (k+k') to m Je 2 (k+k') (t-to) m (9) Since k and k' are positive, this equation shows that the SAF is always opposite to the direction of the stimulus S. In equation (1), the mental force F is assumed to be proportional to the difference of S and w, namely, increasing S would increase F; however, at high speed of S, w can not keep pace with S, and F will level off and can not increase unlimitedly with S, thus F would be F = k(1 - e-S - w) (1)' For small S, equation (1)' will transform to equation (1). Also, the total mass is equal to mr2d, where d is the density, thus - 2(k+k'). mr 20 0 1. to SAE = - k (1 - e-S) [] - e k+k' 2 (k+k') (t-to) e J TTr2d (9)' Equation (9)' shows that SAE is related to the inspection period to exponentially, also the effect decays with time t exponentially, these are experimentally verified by Eysenck and Holland (1960) and by Stager & Burton (1964). Stager & Burton (1964) also show that the constant, which in this model would correspond to 2(k + k')/mr2d, increases slightly with lessen the inspection period, this is probabily due to the fact that with a shorter inspection period, only a smaller area of the stimulus may be covered by the field of attention (Chiang, 1973, 1976), thus r is smaller then it should, which increases the constant. Equation (9)' also shows that the SAE increases exponentially with the stimulus angular velocity s, this is confirmed experimentally by Mehling, Collins & Schroeder (1972). For a given angular velocity, the linear speed of eliciting motion in the retina is proportional to the size r or the visual angle. By inspecting equation (9)', it can be deduced that the period of SAE shows a peck with r, indeed, experiments of Mehling, Collins & Schroeder (1972) show this to be the case, It is hoped that future experiments can be conducted in a systematic way according to this equation such that various effects and parameters may be estimated. In summary, a dynamic perceptual model of movement after-effect is proposed, quantitative calculations from this model can be made and agree with the existing data. The awaked state, hyponotic state and the qusi-hyponotic state can also be defined from this model. This model investigates into the working mechanism within the brain and identifies many parameters in a dynamic machinery, which would help not only to the understanding of the brain, but also to diagnosis the pathology of the damaged brain. This model may also be used to build a more inteligent machine which behaviours similarly to human being. REFERENCES 1. Chiang, C. 1973. "A theory of Muller-Lyer illu- sion", Vision Res., 13, 347-353. 2. Chiang, C. 1975. "A theory of Pogendorff illu- sion" Jap. Psychol. Res. 17, 111-118. 3. Chiang, C. 1976. "A theory of ambiguous pattern perception", Bull. Math. Biol. 38, 491-504. 4. Eysenck, H. J. & H. Holland, 1960. "Length of spiral after-effect as a function of drive." Perceptual and Motor Skills, 11, 129-130. 5. Mehling, K. D., W. E. Collins' and D. J. Schroeder. 1972. "Some effects of perceived size, retinal size, and retinal speed on duration of spiral after-effect". Perceptual and Motor skills, 34, 247-259. 6. Stager, P. & A. C. Burton. 1964. "Graphic record- ing of the spiral after-effect: a study of its magnitude and rate of decay." Canad. J. Psychol. 18, (2), 118-125. FIGURE LEGEND Fig. 1. A flow chart of perception mechanism of periodic movement. Recognized Follower Detector Periodic Signals Signals Perceptual Space Physical Space Subjective Controller Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4 507 w = = ks -[] - e Je m k + k' ' SAF = 0 - - ks k+k' e
Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-0 387R000200080055-4 THE EINSTEIN PARADOX 0. Costa de Beauregard Institut Henri Poincaré, Paris, France Intrinsic time symmetry plus (wavelike) addition of partial amplitudes herald the advent of a new para- digm, where advanced waves and information as orga- nizing power are no less operational than retarded waves and information as gain in knowledge. I. Introduction According to all dictionaries the meaning nº1, or fundamental, of the word Paradox is: a surprising but (perhaps ) true statement. Copernicus' heliocen- trism has been a "paradox". Such a paradox was also contained in Einstein's Special Relativity. What Einstein did in 1905 was neither discuss the mechanical theories of the ether, nor elaborate new mathematics, but rather taylor the conceptual frame after the (group property) of the Lorentz-Poincaré formulas + faithfully expressing the phenomenon of; no ether wind. Today the situation is much the same, except that the paradox shows up at the end of the story rather than at its beginning. In 1927 Einstein, at the 5th Solvay Council ", that is, over the very cradle of the "New Quantum Mechanics", cast the mali- gnant spell it is my duty to discuss today. Neither he 3, nor later Schrodinger 4 ", nor de Broglie ', nor others, did believe the paradox to be the true, Copernican one, as we know now through experimen- tation 6 In imitation of Einstein's 1905 approach I will today neither discuss hidden variables theories and Bell's theorem, nor will I fiddle with the mathe- matics. No: just using the plain; well known mathe- matics of the neoquantal mechanics of 1924-1927, and purposely doing so in the simplest conceivable form, as I deem appropriate for expressing a new paradigm - for "unveiling the Sense of the Scriptures" - I will show which ingrained natural belief is unambiguously excluded by the experimental results on photon pairs issuing from a cascade transition - very much like the belief in an ether wind has been excluded by the Michelson experiment. I will then proceed by unrave- ling the statement written since long ago in the accepted formulas, where nobody took the care to read it, but where thei experiments now require us to do so. The Sense of the Scriptures (as I will show) is that the elementary stochastic event of quantum mechanics, the transition, or collapse of the wave function, does possess an intrinsic time symmetry - as also did the collision in classical statistical mechanics, where it gave rise to the famous Loschmidt and Zermelo paradoxes. However, the Einstein - 1927 paradox (better known as the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen' 1935 paradox) is made much more severe than the old ones through Born's replacement of the law of addition of partial probabilities by the wavelike law of addition of partial amplitudes, entailing the "neo- quantal" correction expressed by the off diagonal terms. It is this combination of intrinsic time sym- metry with a wavelike probability calculus which causes the sting of the paradox, and which heralds the advent of an ominous paradigm, where advanced waves, and information as an organizing power, are de jure symmetrical to retarded waves, and to infor- mation as a gain in knowledge. II. Correlation Polarizations in Atomic Cascades: A Dramatic Experimental Result. The "neoquantal" mechanical expression for the probabilities of answers (yes, yes) and (no, no), (yes, no) and (no, yes), when photon pairs issuing from a cascade transition at C and propagating in opposite directions along an axis x meet linear polarizers L and N of relative angle a is, for the 0-1-0 type cascade <1,1> = < 0,0> = cos2x, <1,0> = < 0,1>= sin2a, (1) and, for the 1-1-0 type, <1,1> = < 0,0> = > sina, (1,0> = < 0,1>=> costa. (2) Experimental verifications are excellent 6 Had these experiments been performed in the days of the old "paleoquantal" mechanics, they certainly would have produced the same sort of commotion as did the Michelson experiment. They do require, in de Broglie's 6 words, a radical revision of"our familiar notions concerning space and time". Consider for instance the case where Q= T/2 with the 0-1-0 cascades. The neoquantal prediction <1,1> = O means that all the photon pairs are found with linear polarizations parallel to either of the two orthogonal directions y and z of the polarizers L and N. This would have stupefied the paleoquantal physicists, who thought of the photons of each pair leaving the source C as possessing a polarization, compatible of course with the dynamics of the system, but essentially independent of the orientations A and B of the polarizers (and even of their presence or absence). In the 0-1-0 case these could have been parallel linear polarizations with random directions, or also, possibly, circular polarizations of equal helicities. In any case the paleoquantal prediction was, for a = T/2, that a large number of (yes, yes) answers should occur. As a corollary, the sub-ensemble of photon pairs with(parallel) linear polarizations along y or z was thought to be of measure zero, The experimental fact is just opposite:all the observed photon pairs display this property, whence necessarily the three following statements, heralding the advent of a new paradigm: 1) The photons in each pair issuing from the source C do not possess polarizations of their own, but borrow one later, by interacting with the measuring devices L and N. This of course is a specification of a well known general statement in the neoquantal mechanics, of which perhaps there is no more direct experimental proof than this one. 2) In the chance game which is played, the dice are not cast at C when shaken in the cup, but later, when rolling on the table, at L and N. They are, however, correlated, and this is the Einstein 2 paradox, rejected by him 5, Schrödinger 4, de Broglie ", but now experimentally demonstrated a 6. 3) The correlation existing 0 between the distant measurements at L and N is not tied, in space-time, along the spacelike vector LN, which is physically empty, but along the Feynman style zigzag LCN made Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4 508
Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4
of the two timelike vectors which are physically oc-
cupied. In other words, the two measurements at L and
N do produce the same wave collapse - in their common
past. Again in other words, Einstein's prohibition
to telegraph into the past does not hold at the
level of the quantal stochastic event, the wave
collapse, so this statement is of a "factlike"", or
macroscopic nature.
The quantal transition per se is essentially
time symmetric, just as was the collision in classical
statistical mechanics. However, the Einstein paradox
is much more severe than the "corresponding" Loschmidt
and Zermelo paradoxes, due to the wavelike character
of the neoquantal probability calculus, as will be
shown right now.
III. Neoquantal and Paleoquantal Calculations for
Atomic Cascades.
From the two (orthogonal) pure helicity states
L. L. and R. R. of a photon pair a, b, we build the
two (orthogonal) P-invariant states
글 (If+Bai)= 골(%+2 %),
(3)
(II -8명)= 클 2 Yo-Yoz],
(4)
where Y and Z denote the linear polarizations along
orthogonal axes y and z.
A and B denoting the angles with (say) y of the
linear polarizers L and N, and setting a = A - B, we
calculate now, using the neoquantal "golden rule" of
adding partial amplitudes and squaring their absolute
sum, the transition probabilities, first in terms of
circular, second of linear polarizations.
Turning analyzer L by AA 'and N by AB will shift
the relative phase of the L. L pair by ( say) +Ag
and then that of the R. R pair by -Ax. Thus the
partial amplitudes are, in terms of circular polari-
zations, 81º and e-1d, whence (for the 0-1-0 cascades)
<1,1> = < 0,0> = {leiareia|2 = {(1 + cos 20),
(5)
<1,0> = < 0,1> = leia _- ia|2 = {(1 - cos 2a).
(6)
Second, we use as orthogonal states the linear
polarizations Y and Z. The transition amplitudes
towards the (yes, yes) answer is cos A cos B for the
Yp state, sin A sin B for the Z. Z. state, cos A
sin B for the Y. Z state, and sin A cos B for the
Z. Y. state. Using the "golden rule" we recover
formulas (1) and (2) in the form
<1,1> = < 0,0> = = (cos A cos B + sin A sin B)2
= {(cos2A cos2B + sin2A sineB) + Esin 2A sin 2B
(7)
<1,0> = < 0,1> = (sin A cos B - cos A sin B)2
= (sin2 A cos2B+ coseA sin2B) - Isin 24 sin 2B.
(8)
In these formulas the contributions ( )/2 are the
paleoquantal predictions, assuming that the photon
pairs do leave the source as a statistical mixture
with(parallel) linear polarizations along y or z. The
contributions + ( sin. 2A sin, 2B)/4 are the neoquantal
corrections. Incidentally, neither of these contribu-
tions is rotation invariant around x. Thus the paleo-
quantal plysicist would have randomized his result,
which can be done most easily by writing
2 sin 2A sin 2B = cos. 2a - cos2(A + B), whence
<< 1,1>> = << 0,0>>
+ @ cos 2a ,
<< 1,0>> = << 0,1>> = 1 - @ cos 2a,
(9)
instead of (5) and (6).
So, while the neoquantal transition probabilities
are basis invariant, the paleoquantal ones are not.
The difference is due to the off diagonal terms, that
is, it stems from the wavelike nature of the neo-
quantal probability calculus. All this is well known
in general. So, the Einstein paradox is just one more
of the neoquantal extravagances.
IV. Neoquantal and Paleoquantal Correlations in General
The typical system under consideration is des-
cribed as a pure state Y expanded as a sum of partial
amplitudes
| > = Ec ; 1 6 ; 24 ; }
(10)
where ¢; and v; span independent Hilbert spaces. The
subsystems ¢; and 4; are thus coupled, although this
coupling may not be a "present" one - as in the case
we are discussing. By definition w. = c. c. and Ew .= 1.
A and B denoting the Hermitean operators of mea-
surements performed on o and v, the (basis invariant)
correlated mean value is
<Α,Β> = ΣΣ co c ;< Φ:|ΑΊΦ;> <ΨΑΝΒΙΨ;»
(11)
where, setting
<A=> = < 0|A|0;} ,
<B> = < 4 |B|V:>
(12)
the (non invariant) contributions of the diagonal and
off diagonal terms are respectively
<A,B> = {w ;< A;> <B;>
(13)
A<A,B> =;
2 i+j 1 ; < 01 | A|0; > <4; |B|4; > + c. c.
(14)
(13) is the paleoquantal expression, implying separate
statistics on the subsystems, and (14) the neoquantal,
or wavelike, correction.
A<A,B> = 0 in representations diagonalizing either
A or B, and then <A, B> assumes the expression <A, B>
of a mixture. But this is a semblance "relative" to
the frame - except of course if the corresponding
measurement is performed.
Formulas of Section III are specifications of
these.
V. The Essence of the Paradox
A little fable will help understand matters:
At midnight GMT two travellers leave the Calcutta
airport C, one for London L, one for Nagasaki N, each
carrying a closed box which contains, or not, the one
ball which a third man, in Calcutta, has enclosed,
behind a veil. Having landed at 6 GMT each traveller
opens his box, and immediately learns what the other
man finds.
The point is that, when made explicit, the
logical inference is not drawn along the spacelike
vector LN, but along the Feynman style zigzag LCN made
of the timelike vectors CL and CN.
Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : GIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4Approved for Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00187R000200080055-4
There is no paradox in this because we have a
"local hidden variable" with value 1 in one box and
O in the other. The die is cast at C, and we have
between L and N pure telediction with no teleaction.
This is the very point which is changed in the
"wavelike probability calculus". Observers at L and N
may wait until the very last moment before deciding
which of two"incompatible magnitudes" they will
measure - for instance, the linear polarization of
a photon along one of two directions of angle a.
Therefore it is at L and N that the die is cast
and, as there is a correlation, what we have between
L and N. is some sort of telediction plus teleaction.
V1. Relativistic Spinless Particles
Here is a short résumé of a fully relativistic
formalism I have presented elsewhere 9. Units such
that c = 1 and f = 1 are used; ) = 1,2,3,4; x4 = it.
The space-time \(x) and 4-frequency e (k) repre-
sentations of square integrable solutions of the
Klein-Gordon equation are associated with the
Hermitean scalar product
i
<a||b> =
2k
O [a ]un do
ΘΘε(k)dn.
(15)
'a'b'
The invariant o integral is over an arbitrary
spacelike surface 0 of (4-vector) element dot; [2 ]
denotes the Schrodinger or Gordon current operator
(difference of partial derivatives tothe right and
the left). The n integral is over both sheets of the
mass shell k,
k^ + k~ = 0, dn denoting the length of
dn^(k^dn = kdn^); s(k) = +1, -1, 0 according as k"
ends on the positive or negative frequency sheet, or
off shell. In Dirac's 10 notation
<&|b> = < a|x> <* |b> = < a|><k|b> ,
(16)
the double bar recalling that we are using a second
order equation. As usual, the condition <a| | b>=6(a, b)
defines orthonormality.
Introducing the Fourier nucleus
<x| k> = << | x>* = (2m) -3/2
exp(ik, x^)
(17)
if k^ ends on the mass shell, 0 otherwise, we write
the reciprocal Fourier transforms as
<x|a> = < x|> <* |a> , <k| a> = ‹| xxx| a>. (18)
Introducing the Jordan-Pauli propagator
<x||x'> = < x| |k> <k | |x'>
(19)
which is odd in x - x' and zero outside the light
cone, and such that
<x'|x"> = < x'|x> <x|x">
(20)
iff x' - x" is spacelike, and substituting the second
(18) in the first, we solve the Cauchy problem in the
form
{x' |a> = < x' | x> <x| a> .
(21)
This formula expands the wave function <x' a> at any
point instant x' upon the (complete) set of (orthogo-
nal) propagators with apexes x on a given o , the
coefficients of the expansion being the values <x a>
of <x' a> on 0. As <x' |x> and <k|x> are Fourier
reciprocal, the position operator in this formalism
is (given o) x^, and is faithfully represented by
x.
Two well known expressions of 2<x' | |x> are
2<x'||x> = D4- D_ = Dret- Pady .
(22)
The preceding reasoning shows that completeness of
the <x' k> and of the <x' ||x> are related to each
other, and that the presence of both positive and
negative frequencies in (18), and both retarded and
advanced waves in (21), are not independent from each
other.
VII. Relativistic Spinning Particles
An integrally equivalent expression of (15) is
<a|b> = i
2
a
a El
θε(k)and
(23)
with a = Y in the Dirac, =B, in the Petiau-Duffin-
Kemmer theory, etc ... The simple bar recalls that we
are using a system of first order equations. Modulo
this change all equations are formally the same as
in Section VI. The Fourier nucleus <x' |k> and the
Jordan-Pauli propagator <x' |x> now imply the projec-
tor projecting any solution of the Klein-Gordon
equation as a solution of the spinning particle
equation.
VIII. Intrinsic Time Symmetry of the Wave Collapse.
A New Paradigm.
The preceding formalism yields a fully relati-
vistic description of a position plus spin measure-
ment performed on a quantal particle, and one very
well suited for discussing the recent measurements
of correlations
6. I will avoid inessential wording
by conferring a very small rest mass to the photon,
so that it is true spinning particle, and that the
measurements performed at L and N are position plus
spin measurements.
The relativistic position measurement performed
"at an arbitrary spacelike surface o" (rather than
"at time t") consists in asking "does the particle
cross a given element do^ of o" (rather than" is it
inside dx dy dz"? The corresponding eigenfunction,
according to formula (21), is the Jordan-Pauli pro-
pagator <x' ||x> (rather than Dirac's 6(x' - x)), or
<x' |x> in a position-plus spin measurement, which
means that if the particle is found "at x" (in the
above sense) it certainly has come inside the past,
and will go inside the future light cone. This, of
course, is known since Minkowski - except that the
measurement at x does collapse the wave. And this
collapse, due to the very formalism, affects neces-
sarily both future (which is trivial) and past
(which, due to prejudice of macroscopic origin, was
overlooked).
This is the Einstein
2
paradox - and a truly
Copernican one indeed, as it is written down in the
very scriptures of the wavelike probability calculus
(especially in its explicitely relativistic
11
form)
and is experimentally verified
6
. This neither
+
Einstein
3
,
nor Schrodinger
, nor de Broglie , were
ready to believe, when stating respectively that it
would "imply telepathy", or "be magic", or upset
our "familiar conception of space and time".
It turns out that a measurement performed around
the point-instant x is potentially tied to the whole
universe - to the inside of the future and the past
light cones; also, to the outside of the light cone
via pairs of timelike vectors.
Approved For Release 2002/05/170: CIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4. Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4 Einstein's prohibition to "telegraph into the past" was thus only of a factlike, or macroscopic character. And his prohibition to telegraph outside the light cone, though strictly valid12 in terms of direct signalling, is overthrown nevertheless by the possibility of zigzagging via timelike vectors, some- what like a sailboat uses side wind. IX. Macroscopic Factlike Asymmetry In the Dirac electron theory there is a complete lawlike symmetry between positive and negative energies, that is, between particles and antiparticles. In fact, however, the electron is as common as the positron is exceptional - which, on the whole, is true also of matter and antimatter. Something similar occurs with retarded and advan- ced waves - and, as we have seen, this question is not unconnected with the preceding one. The intrinsic symmetry between retarded and advanced waves is tightly connected with two other ones 13 which should now be mentioned. In quantum mechanics, retarded and advanced waves are respectively used for statistical prediction and retrodiction, which shows that the intrinsic symmetry between them is tied with that between entropy increa- sing and decreasing processes (known as the Loschmidt and Zermelo paradoxes). Then, the factlike preponde- rance of retarded waves is tied with that of entropy increase. As information is another name for negentropy (especially when chance is taken as a primitive concept, as in quantum mechanics) the intrinsic symmetry we are speaking of is also tied with that between information as gain in knowledge (the common, trivial sense) and information as an organizing power (the rare, esoteric sense). Both sides are exemplified in reception and emission of a phone conversation. Now, very much like the esoteric antimatter does make a few incursions inside our familiar world of matter, and we know now where to look for it or how to produce it, so we should inquire if perhaps the esoteric finality, that is, advanced waves, decreasing entropy, information as will, does not perhaps make a few incursions inside our familiar world of causa- lity. Let us call anti-physics the corresponding context, physics obeying by definition the (factlike) Irreversibility Law (Second Law). The point is, as we have seen, that quantum physics does have, essen- tially and symmetrically, one foot in physics and one in antiphysics - just as it has one hand in positive and one in negative frequencies. The antiphysics context is the one which Einstein- 3- has termed "telepathy", Schrodinger 4 "magic", de Broglie ? the upsetting of "our familiar concept of space and time". Parapsychology seems a good name for it. References (1) These were known already by Larmor in 1898 and, almost exactly, by Voigt in 1887. (2) A. Einstein in Rapports du 5° Conseil Solvay, Gauthier-Villars, 1928, p. 253-256. (3) A. Einstein in Einstein Philosopher Scientist, P.A. Schilpp ed. , The Library of Living Philoso- phers, 1949, p. 85 and p. 683. (4) E. Schrödinger, Naturwiss. 23, 844 (1935).See p. 845. (5) L. de Broglie, Interprétation Causale de la Mécanique Ondulatoire, Gauthier Villars, 1956, p. 73. (6) S.J. Freedman and J.F. Clauser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 938, 1972 ; J.F. Clauser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 36, 1223, 1976; E. Fry and R. L. Thompson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 465, 1976. See also M. Lamehi-Rachti and W. Mittig, Phys. Rev. D 14, 2543, 1976; A.R. Wilson, J. Lowe and D.K. Butt, J. Phys. G2, 613, 1976. (7) A. Einstein, B. Podolsky and N. Rosen, Phys. Rev. 47, 777, 1935. (8) H. Mehlberg's terminology in Current Issues in the Philosophy of Science, H. Feigl and G. Maxwell eds., Holt, Rinehart, Winston, 1961. (9) 0. Costa de Beauregard, Précis de Mécanique quan- tique relativiste, Dunod, 1967. (10) P.A.M. Dirac, Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 3rd. edition, Clarendon Press, 1947. (11) For the connection with Feynman's formalism, see 0. Costa de Beauregard, Phys. Lett. 60A, 93, 1977. (12) The discussion of tachyons is outside the scope of this study. (13) For more details, see 0. Costa de Beauregard, Studium Generale 24, 10, 1971 where references to the literature are given. See also Found. Phys. 6, 539, 1976. Approved For Release 2002/05/17 :5CIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4
Approved for Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00187R000200080055-4 MULTIPLE SUBJECT AND LONG DISTANT PRECOGNITIVE REMOTE VIEWING OF GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATIONS J. P. Bisaha and B. J. Dunne* Mundelein College, Chicago, Illinois 60660 ABSTRACT An extension of earlier precognitive remote view- ing experiments was conducted with two experimental protocals: 1) using two subjects simultaneously predicting where an experimenter would be 35 minutes in the future, and 2) predicting over 24 hours into the future over a distance of 5,000 miles. In the first experiment seven trials were carried out with a total of seven inexperienced volunteer subjects, tested in pairs, to determine their ability to describe a remote geographical location twenty minutes before the target had been selected and thirty-five minutes before the experimenter arrived at the randomly selected site. Transcripts of subjects' descriptions were compared against the seven targets and against each other by six independent judges in a blind rank ordering procedure. The results of this matching were: Group A transcripts against tragets = p<0.005; Group B tran- scripts against targets = p<0.01; Group B transcripts against Group A transcripts p<0.005. Experiment two, used one subject on five trials predicting 23.5 to 24.5 hours into the future where the experimenter would be in Eastern Europe. Blind rank ordering of the transcripts and photographs taken provided a results of p <. 025. Further evidence of the widespread availability of a perceptual/communication channel in which time and distance appear to pose no barrier, is accessible when ordinary modes of perception and communication become inoperable, and can be "tuned into" by anyone if they can separate the signal from the noise was further substantiated. INTRODUCTION While the precognitive experience is a very old one, experimentation in precognitive remote viewing came about as a variation of the clairvoyant remote viewing experiments, which demonstrated the ability of isolated subjects to describe an unknown target site at the same time the experimenter was visiting a randomly selected location.1-2Successful experiments of replication have been carried out not only in the clairvoyant remote viewing4-6but also in the precog- nitive remote viewing. 7 Over twenty laboratory experiments have been conducted in our lab with more than ten subjects involving the precognitive protocol. Each indicate a subject's capability of not only describing scenes accurately across spatial but also temporal barriers. Since this ability seems to be a latent and wide- ly distributed one, rather than an unusual talent of a gifted few, and since the clairvoyant remote viewing experiments have been so successful over long spatial distances, two separate experimental protocols were devised to expand on the original experiments. The first protocol was a multiple precognitive experiment involving two subjects, who simultaneously predicted where the experimenter would be in the future. The second protocol involved a long distance experiment with the subject being required to predict 23-24 hours in the future, where the experimenter would be over 5,000 miles away. PROTOCOL ONE: (MULTIPLE PRECOGNITIVE REMOTE VIEWING) METHOD Seven subjects, (two males and five females, ranging in age from 24 to 37), were selected on a volunteer basis and tested in four different subject pairs. The subjects knew each other prior to the experiment, but were not related by either blood or marriage. The nature and protocol of the experiment were explained to subjects before the trials began and they were told that they would have sufficient time to relax, make themselves comfortable, and allow their minds to become as blank as possible. They were then instructed to try and visualize where the experimenter would be between 35 and 50 minutes after the trial began and to describe whatever images or thoughts came to mind during that 15 minute period aloud into a tape recorder, and to make any sketches if they so desired. Subjects were advised not to try to define specifically or identify their impressions, but to describe them generally with as much detail as possible, even if the images appeared to make no sense or have no continuity. The time at which the trial was to commence was agreed upon by both subjects and experimenter, and subjects were then separated with instructions to have no communication with each other until after their parts in the trial were over. In four trials the subjects were in the same building, but in separate rooms on different floors. There were observers stationed with each subject in three of these trials. In the remaining three trials, subjects were in different locations, separated by approximately ten miles. When subjects began generating their descriptions, Table 1 Experimental Protocol (Multiple Precognitive Remote Viewing) 10:00 Experimenter leaves with 10 envelopes containing target locations and begins 20 minute drive. Subjects begin descriptions of where Experimenter will be between 10:35 and 10:50. 10:15 Subjects' responses completed, at which time laboratory part of experiment is over. 10:20 Experimenter generates random number between 1 and 10, counts down to associated envelope, and proceeds to target location. 10:35 Experimenter arrives at target location and remains there for 15 minutes, taking photographs and notes. 10:50 Experimenter returns to point of origin. Experimental trial completed. "Presently at the Division of Human Development University of chApproved For Release 2002/05/17,12CIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4
Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4 an experimenter left the area with ten envelopes which had been randomly selected from the target pool of over one hundred locations in the city and suburbs of Chicago, previously compiled and sealed by an individual who had no other association with the experiment, (the contents of which were unknown to either experimenter or subjects) . Driving continuously for 20 minutes with no particular direction, or until_ five minutes after the subjects had completed their descriptions, the experi- menter then blindly selected a number from one to ten from an enclosed container holding ten numbered and folded sheets of paper, counted down to the chosen number of envelopes, opened the envelope and proceeded to the location indicated on the enclosed card, arriving at the target 15 minutes later, or 35 minutes after the subjects began recording their descriptions. The experimenter remained at the target for 15 minutes, photographed the location and made notes as to her impressions of the site, then returned to the point of origin. (This protocol can be seen in Table 1). Typed unedited transcripts were made of subjects' recorded responses and attached to any associated drawings which a subject may have made. Seven trials of this sort were performed, resulting in a set of seven photographs with accompanying notes, and 14 transcripts which were randomly divided into two sets so that each set contained one description for each of the seven targets. The transcript sets were labeled Group A and Group B. Six persons, not otherwise affiliated with the experiment, were asked to be judges. Two judges blind rank ordered Group A transcripts against the target photographs and notes; two judges blind rank ordered Group B transcripts against the photographs and notes; and two judges blind rank ordered Group A transcripts against Group B transcripts. In this manner each judging procedure was independent from the others, avoiding the possibilities of cueing from one set of descriptions to the other, or fatique on the part of the judges if they were required to match all 14 transcripts. It also provided six seperate sets of scores for evaluation from six spearate impartial individuals. Each set of rankings was made on a scale of one to seven; one being the best match and seven being the worst. Seven was the lowest possible rank sum for each set, 49 was the highest. RESULTS Statistical analysis of these results was performed using Morris' method for evaluation preferentially matched free-respone material. 8 The sums of the ranks assigned by the two judges matching Group A transcripts against the tragets were 15 and 13, with probability of 0.005. The sums of the ranks assigned by the two judges matching Group B transcripts against the targets were 15 in both cases, presenting a probability of 0.01. The sums of the ranks assigned by the two judges matching Group A and Group B transcripts were 12 and 14, resulting in a probability of 0.002. Of the total of 42 matches which were made (six judges ranking seven items) there was a total of 17 direct hits (matches ranked as one) . (See Tables 2 and 3) . An indication of the accuracy of subjects' descriptions, as well as the variation in individual perception of a single remote target precognitively viewed, can be offered by the following excerpts from the transcripts, selected by the judges as best indicative of the target. The degree of accuracy varied among subjects, as did the specific details of the target. Target 1: Plaza del Lago Shopping Center The Target site was a shopping mall designed like a Spanish courtyard or plaza, with a circular garden area designed around a fountain, having paths leading out in different directions. Two sides of the mall consist of a series of low brick arches, the third side is a row of low white buildings with awnings flanking a taller structure with a tower. (See Figure 1) . Group A (S4) -- "A few trees .. not really that big .. there's like a fence around it, maybe a gate .. cement or something to the left toward the front. . There's a lot of white. . Everything seems to be very clean and orderly." Group B ($5) -- "Really tall building, some man-made structure of brick or cement. Something rectangular next to it. Is it one building or one next to it ?.. That rectangle is only one story high, I think. The other building is much taller. The tall part might be round, there are lots of parts to it ... I see sidewalks, paths go around it .. Some trees, other buildings can be seen through the trees .. There's a Table 2 Ranks Assigned by Judges Matching Subjects' Transcripts Against Targets in Precognitive Remote Viewing Trials Target (Subjects) Ranks Assigned A B Group A Group B Judge 1. Judge 2 Judge 1 Judge 2 Plaza del Lago ($4, S5) 1 5 4 2 Wrigley Field ($10,89) 1 1 3 2 Techny Mission (54) S5) 3 I 1 3 Lindheimer Obs. ($6, 87) 2 3 1 3 Madonna del Strada (S5, S4) 3 1 2 2 NWRR Station ($6, 5g) 2 1 3 1 Grant Park Bandshell (S7, S6) 3 1 I 2 Sum of Ranks 1.5 13 15 15 Statistical Significance P<0.01 p<0.005 P< 0.01 P<0.01 Approved For Release 2002/05/17 t-GIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4
1 Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-CM387R000200080055-4 Table 3 Ranks Assigned By Judges Matching Transcripts B Against Transcripts A in Precognitive Remote Viewing Trials Transcipt Ranks Assigned Judge L Judge 2 A-1 (Wrigley Field) 2 2 A-2 (Madonna del Strada Chapel) 2 3 A-3 (Lindheimer Observatory) 1 1 A-4 (Grant Park Bandahe11) 1 1 A-5 (Plaza del Lago) 1 1 A-6 (Techny Mission) 2 2 A-7 (Northwestern Railroad Station, Glencoe) 3 4 Sum of Ranks 12 14 Statistical Significance double doorway, double doors with an awning .. Maybe the tall building is;on top of it, or next to it. . There's a circular pathway with grass in front." Target 6: Northwestern Railroad Station, Glencoe The target was a small, dark brick building with a pointed roof and circular turret. Two sets of tracks in front of the building. During the 15-minute experimental period two trains passed, one of which stopped. Experimenter went inside the station for a few minutes, noted wooden floors, benches and a train schedule posted on one wall. The station was surrounded by trees in a park-like setting. (See Figure 2) . Group A (S6) -- "I have an image of looking at the traffic and seeing it go by really fast, speeding cars .. I see a train station .. I see a train coming .. older buildings .. trees .. See just the front end of the train station. See a little bit within it, unless they are planks. Wooden planks on the floor .. There are posters or something, advertisements or posters on the wall of the train station .. I see the benches .. I see the tracks." Group B (S8) -- "There are lines pointing in several different directions .. There's a round-like disk .. it might be the sun on it, might be like a big light .. It feels like, looks like, feels that things are blowing the wind is blowing and everything is like blowing in the same direction .. There's something rising. . it's sort p < 0.001 P < 0. 005 of blowing upward, maybe things are swirling." PROTOCOL TWO: (LONG DISTANCE PRECOGNITIVE REMOTE VIEWING) METHOD As a further investigation into the parameters of precognitive remote viewing phenomena, a series of five trials were conducted between the Midwestern, U.S.A. and Eastern Europe over a consecutive five day period in August 1976. Each morning between 8:30 and 8:45 A.M., Central Daylight Time, the Subject in the U.S. attempted to describe the geographical location where the Experimenter would be in Eastern Europe up to 5,284 miles away. The descriptions were tape recorded each morning and subsequently transcribed. The Experimenter was to spend the 15 minute period between 3:00 and 3:15 P.M. attempting to concentrate on his surroundings and taking a photograph which could later be compared against the subject's descriptions. (This is shown in Table 3) . Upon his return, the Experimenter presented the five photographs and brief descriptions of the five target sites in random order to the Subject for matching in the blind rank ordering procedure followed in previous experiments. 7 The Subject gave the Experimenter copies of the transcribed descriptions, also in random order for the Experimenter to match against the targets. In addition, a third person, who had no connection with the : : Figure 1 . Abproved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIARDP96 00787R00020008005504 Experiment) . 514 :
Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4 Figure 2. Northwestern Railroad Station (Target 6 in Multiple Precognitive Remote Viewing Experiment) . Table 4 Experimental Protocol Long Distance Precognitive Remote Viewing Day 1 8:30 A.M. (CDT) Subject in Midwest, U.S.A. begins description of where 3:30 P.M. (Europe) experimenter will be 23.5. hrs. in the future in Bratislava, Czechslovakia or 24.5 hrs. in the future in Moscow, U.S.S.R. Day 2 3:00 P.M. (Europe) Experimenter stops at what- ever location he is at for fifteen minutes, and takes a photograph of target to compare with predicted location. experiment, was also asked to blind rank order the photographs against the descriptions. RESULTS These procedures resulted in three independent sets of scores which were analyzed according to Morris' method for evaluation preferentially matched free- response material.8 The three sets of ranking were significant at .04 in two cases and .05 in one. (See Table 4). . Again, two experiments have been selected to show the accuracy of the transcripts in prediction. TARGET 1: DANUBE RIVER (BRATISLAVA, CZECHSLOVAKIA) The target was a "flying saucer" restaurant, a circular building raised high into the air on heavy pillars above a bridge near the bank of the Danube river. The subject described the experimenter as being "near water . . . a very large expanse of water boats . . . vertical lines like poles . a circular shape like a merry-go-round or gazebo it seems to have height, maybe with poles . . . a dark fence along a walk . . . at the top of the steps, like a path or walkway . . . a boardwalk and there's a fence along it." (See Figure 3). TARGET 5: EXHIBITION OF ECONOMIC ACHIEVEMENT OF U.S.S.R. (MOSCOW, U.S.S.R.) The target was a huge park with many fountains, flowerbeds, and buildings. The Experimenter stood looking through the entrance which was a huge archway with a black metal fence. The Subject's transcript reads as follows: "Lots of different shapes, activity, buildings. . Gate or fence.made of metal of some sort .. high for a gate .. dark metal .. People walking. . Something round circular .. light color stone .. slab on a stand .. a bench or table .. something like a row of doorways .. some sort of fountain in circular shape .. Cultivated flowers around in beds." (See Figure 4) . Table 5 Ranks Assigned by Judges Matching Targets to Transcripts in Long Distance Precognitive Remote Viewing Target Approx. Distance Time in Future Experimenter's Ranking Subject's Ranking Independent Judge Danube River (Bratislava, Czechslovakia 5,087 miles 23.5 hrs. 1 1 A St. Michael's Church 5,087 miles 23.5 hrs. 2 2 3 (Bratislava, Czechslovakia) Hotel Ukraine (Moscow, U.S.S.R. ) 5,284 miles 24.5 hrs. 1 1 2 Tretyakov Gallery (Moscow, U.S.S.R. ) 5,284 miles 24.5 hrs. 2 3 2 Exhibition of Economic Achievement of U.S.S.R. (Moscow, U.S.S.R.) 5,284 miles 24.5 hrs. 2 1 1 Sum of Ranks 8 8 9 Statistical Significance p.2.025 p:4.025 Pr2.05 Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CJA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4
I 1 Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-0 787R000200080055-4 Figure 3. Danube River, Bratislava, Czechslovakia, (Target 1 in Long Distance Experiment) . Figure 4. Exhibition of Economic Achievement of the U.S.S.R., Moscow, U. S.S. R. (Target 5 in Long Distance Experiment. DISCUSSION The significant results of these two separate protocols lend further support to the hypothesis that the extrasensory channel of communication and/or perception utilized in remote viewing is a widespread and relatively common faculty which can be exercised without extensive training or experience when the enviornmental conditions are favorable. Distance and time appear to pose no barriers to its effectiveness. These findings are in keeping with those of previous studies testing remote viewing in individuals or group settings, and provide evidence that even the precognitive aspect of this phenomenon operates on an open channel which can be "tuned into" by a variety of "consoles" with differing genetic structures. Although there was enough information in each transcript to provide a significant cross correspondence between subjects on the same target, no telepathic indication can be deduced in the multiple precognitive remote viewing experiment. The reports of the subjects in each pair differed enough to make it obvious that, while both subjects were perceiving the same target, the perceptions reflected individual differences in cognitive processing of information and interpretation. The significant correlation between A and B is not indicative of a seperate channel of communication between the subjects; but rather supports the hypothesis that two seperate and effective channels appear to operate simultaneously between each subject and target and/or experimenter and target. The long distance precognitive experiment demonstrated the capability of an individual to also extend this ability over great spatial distances as well as temporal distances of over one 24 hour period. Although the degree of significance of this experiment is not as great as had been found in other precognitive remote viewing research, the results are still well above chance expectation and provide further substantiation to the existance of this ability. Furthermore, the results are indicative of the great latitude of the parameters of the remote viewing experience, parameters which have not previously been tested to these extremes of time and distance. The ability appears to function as well over large time and space differentials as it does when the target is within a 35 minute, local distance. The principle factor which appears to be operating under the conditions of these experiments is a situation where normal modes of rational thought or communication are inoperable, thus reducing the internal noise and external stimuli to permit the weaker signal to be distinguished. Subjects have discovered (particularly those who have performed more than one trial) that they are capable of screening out the noise, cognitive and sensory, and perceiving the information being trans- mitted, inspite of the logical impossibility of such an accomplishment. When subjects are given permission to explore their psychic abilities in an enviornment where those abilities are the only possible ones which can produce results, they discover that such abilities do exist and are relatively reliable. The positive results obtained form the various experiments attempted to date, indicate that the protocol of this design is a useful and effective one for addition- al research into the nature of non-ordinary information transfer. REFERENCES 1. R. Targ and H.Puttoff, "Information transfer under conditions of sensory shielding, "Nature, vol. 252, pp. 602-607, October 18, 1974. 2, H. Puthoff and R. Targ, "A Perceptual channel for information transfer over kilometer distances: Histor- ical perspective and recent research, " Proc. IEEE, vol, 64, pp. 329-354, March 1976. 3. R. Targ and H. Puthoff, Mind-Reach, N. Y. : Delecorte Press, 1977. 4. A. Hastings and D. Hurt, "A confirmatory remote viewing in a group setting," Proc. IEEE, vol., 64, October 1976. 5. T. Whitson, D. Bogart, J. Palmer , and C. Tart, "Preliminary experiments in group remote viewing, " Proc. IEEE, vol. 64, October 1976. 6. J. Vallee, "A. Hastings, and G. Askevold, "Remote viewing experiments through computer conferencing, " Proc. IEEE. vol. 64, October 1976. 7. J. Bisaha and B. Dunne, "Percognitive remote viewing in the Chicago area, a replication of the Stanford experiment," Research in Parapsychology 1976, Metuchen, NJ: The Scarecrow Press INC. (In Press) 8. R.Morris, "An exact method for evaluating preferen- tially matched free-response material," J. American Soc. Psychical Res.vol 66, p. 401, Oct. 1972. Approved For Release 2002/05/17 - CIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4 :
Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4 RESPONSE SENSITIVITY OF HUMAN SUBJECTS TO ELF ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS: CRITICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR TWO ELF MODELS OF PARANORMAL BEHAVIORS Michael A. Persinger, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Psychology Environmental Psychophysiology Lab Laurentian University Sudbury, Ontario, Canada Summary. The potential role of ELF (extremely low frequency) electromagnetic fields in the mediation of alleged paranormal behaviors or remote viewing is considered. Two models have emerged to conceptualize the relationships between the agent-object (A), the percipient (P) and the geophysical-mediator (G). A type 1 interaction involves a direct A-G-P relation- ship by which information associated with A directly modifies G that influences P. A type 2 interaction requires G to operate only as a discriminative sti- mulus, conditioned stimulus or "trigger", independent- ly, to A and P with shared reinforcement (experience) histories. The latter model requires little informa- tion transfer by the ELF-G factor since the detailed sequences are a consequence of A and P's shared con- ditioning in the presence of G. The available data concerning response sensitivity of human subjects to small changes in ELF field frequencies and intensities are discussed. An essential problem for scientists concerned with the explanation and description of alleged tele- 1 2 pathic-clairvoyant (T-C) behaviors" or remote viewing is the mechanism by which information traverses some point A to some point B without using conventional sense modes or stimulus sources. Since alleged T-C behaviors involve long distances and opaque boundaries between the putative agent and percipient, the basic natural mechanisms which satisfy the conditions of a T-C mediator candidate" are limited. Puthoff and 4 5 0 Targ , Kogan , Bentov" and Persinger' have suggested naturally produced ELF (extremely low frequency) electric and magnetic fields as one means by which paranormal information could be mediated. The physi- cal and biologically relevant characteristics of these signals are reported in ELF and VLF Electroma- gnetic Field Effects. 7 At present, there are two models developed to conceptualize the relationships between the agent or object (A) the percipient or reporter (P) and the geophysical-meteorological mediator (G). A type 1 interaction would be a simple A-G-P relationship by which information from A modifies or is coded onto G and influences P some time and distance later. A type 2 interaction would be another example of a "third factor theory" whereby G would influence A and P separately at about the same time. Since G would not be apparent to either A or P, the conclusion of a direct A-P interaction would be likely but inaccurate. The two models require different demands from ELF signals. A type 1 interaction requires direct information coding upon the ELF signal. Although the amount of information would be small considering the typical bit rate, such difficulties could be attenua- ted theoretically by: (1) increasing the exposure time to the ELF signal or by (2) "closure effects" displayed by P. More critical features would be: (1) the increment of time the agent-object could main- tain ELF coding and (2) P's neural capacity to differ- entiate and "understand" the signals. A type 2 interaction does not require acute co- ding or modification procedures but instead requires the operation of learning/conditioning. This interac- tion assumes that A and P have shared reinforcement histories (shared experiences) in the presence of G (some specific ELF signal). In this situation, later presentation of G would initiate both the alleged "transmitted information" in A and the paranormal res- ponses in P independently. The basic operation would involve elementary learning principles such that the G factor becomes a conditioned stimulus or a discrimina- tive stimulus. G, per se, would contain little infor- mation, rather it would behave as a "trigger" to evoke the changes in the two organisms involved. The effect would be similar to the cascading series of intense private responses ( "thoughts"), visceral changes and biochemical alterations in a person who has been puni- shed in the presence of a four-letter curse word; the word itself (before the conditioning) would involve little energy and information. Within this model, the "same" ELF characteristics associated with some environmental event, e.g., geo- magnetic storm, earth-ionospheric perturbation, could influence hundreds of different A:P pairs in different ways. The crucial behavioral operation is a history of shared response displays by individual A:Ps in the presence of the ELF stimulus. An attractive feature of this model involves elimination of the cumbersome "time factor". Since the G factor elicits changes in the A and P independently, traditional designations of agent and percipient would be irrelevant since tempor ral relationships (including apparent precognition) reflect only response latencies to the field's presen- ce. From a behavioristic perspective, the role of "a- wareness" and related verbal behaviors is not an essen- tial factor in the ELF models. ELF signals could eli- cit a number of pervasive response sequences within the human organism without involving private responses. Conditioning without the role of "awareness" has been demonstrated in the laboratory many times, e.g., co- vert responses. Depending upon the reinforcement his- tory, the subject may suddenly display particular res- ponse sequences or if the associations had been aver- sive, show diffuse characteristics of "anxiety". If other response systems were involved, the display of "awareness" behavior during the signal presentation could actually interfere with the organism's total response. Situations described metaphorically as "mind wandering" (low level private responses) would be more optimal for efficient ELF signal responding. The key to the ELF theory lays in the empirical verification of ELF-EM associated organismic changes. The degree to which ELF electromagnetic fields signi- ficantly influence living systems is still a matter of controversy. Investigation groups (e.g., Committee on Biosphere Effects of ELF Radiation of the Assembly of Life Sciences, Washington, D.C.) and academics are still debating the practical nature of these changes. Review of the behavioral-biological effects of ELF 7, 8 fields have been reported elsewhere. Significant organismic changes in the presence of ELF electroma- gnetic fields have been reported in more than one hundred experiments involving human and non-human ani- Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : SIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4
- - Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-60187R000200080055-4 mals; however, frankly, the absolute effects have been quite small and are not always consistent. In addition, systematic determination of frequen- cy-,intensity- or wave shape-dependence functions have not been completed. The number of ELF-EM incre- mental characteristics within either amplitude, fre- quency, rise time, peak time or wave trains, that the human organism can discriminate as different is un- known. Such discrimination is required, especially for a Type 1 interaction model, unless one assumes a 0,1 detection mechanism but this would require an organismic capacity to distinguish temporal patterns. Some evidence exists that human subjects can respond differentially to ELF parameters. Forty minute exposures to either 3 Hz or 10 Hz electric fields of either 0.3 V/m or 3 V/m did not significantly alter reaction time in 70 human male and female subjects"; however, weak changes in varia- bility of response latencies were apparent. On the 10 other hand, Konig , quoting Hamer's work and his own results (with smaller groups of subjects) argues that human reaction time is altered by: (1) the presence or absence of 4 Hz and 10 Hz electric fields and (2) frequency shifts of only 1 Hz at the field strengths of 2 mV/50 cm. ! However, Konig did not apply systema- tic statistics to these results. Friedman, Becker and Bachman 11 exposed more than 70 male and female subjects to sinusoidally modulated magnetic fields between 5 x 104T and 1.7 x 10-3T. Shifts in field frequency of only 0.1 Hz (from 0.1 Hz to 0.2 Hz) were sufficient to significantly alter reaction time. The effects were facilitated by using each subject as his/ her own control. These data indicate that small shifts in field frequency alter simple reaction time in human subjects. However the effects are weak and involve significant overlaps in standard deviations between field parameters. Different response systems, such as the visceral, somatic, biochemical or vascular matrices, may dis- play differential sensitivity and susceptibility to low level, natural ELF field effects. Reaction time, correlated primarily with gross pyramidal tract features, may not be as sensitive as (for example) vascular or visceral (emotional) changes that are not required to be highly correlated with "awareness" or 12 "voluntary" responses. Ludwig and his colleagues have reported significant alterations in headaches and related vascular complaints in the presence of ELF magnetic fields. However, with the exception of 13 non-human animal studies, e.g., Reille- , who repor- ted conditioned heart rate changes in pigeons exposed to 10 T magnetic fields between 0.2 Hz to 0.5 Hz and not between 300 Hz and 500 Hz, little research has been conducted with these potentially responsive sytems. Alterations in such systems could still modi- fy "awareness behavior" (if sufficiently intense) or influence dream sequences. More detailed analyses of the ELF models and problems of human behavior in the context of paranormal stimuli have been reported elsewhere. 14, 15 References 1. M.A. Persinger, The Paranormal: Part II Mecha- nisms and Models. New York: M.S.S. Information, 1974. 2. Russel Targ| and Harold Puthoff, Mind-Reach. New York: Delacorte Press, 1977. 3. M.A. Persinger, "Geophysical Models for para- psychological experiences", Psychoenergetic Systems, 1975, 1, 63-74. 4. Harold Puthoff and Russel Targ, "A perceptual channel for information transfer over kilometer distances: historical perspective and recent re- search", Proc. IEEE, 1976, 64, 329-354. 5. I.M. Kogan, "Is telepathy possible?" Radio Eng., 1967, 21, 75. 6. I. Bentov, Stalking the Wild Pendulum. New York: E.P. Dutton, 1977. 7. M.A. Persinger (Ed. ), ELF and VLF Electromagnetic Field Effects. New York: Plenum Press, 1974. 8. M.A. Persinger, H.W. Ludwig and K-P. Ossenkopp, "Psychophysiological effects of extremely low fre- quency electromagnetic fields: a review", Per- ceptual and Motor Skills, 1973, 36, 1131-1159. 9. M.A. Persinger, G.F. Lafreniere and D.N. Mainprize, "Human reaction time variability changes from low intensity 3-Hz and 10-Hz electric fields: inter- actions with stimulus pattern, sex and field in- tensity", International Journal of Biometeorology, 1975, 19, 56-64. 10. H.L. Konig, "Biological effects of extremely low frequency electrical phenomena in the atmosphere. Journal of Interdisciplinary Cycle Research, 1971, 2, 317-323. 11. Howard Friedman, Robert 0. Becker and Charles H. Bachman, "Effect of magnetic fields on reaction time performance", Nature, 1967, 213, 949-956. 12. W. Ehrmann, H. Letiner, W. Ludwig, M.A. Persinger, W. Sodtke and R. Thomas, "Therapie mit ELF-Ma- gnetfeldern", Zeitschrift für Physikalische Medi- zin, 1976, 5, 161-170. 13. A. Reille, "Essai de mise en évidence d'une sen- sibilité du pigeon au champ magnétique à l'aide d'un conditionnement nociceptif", Journal of Physiology (Paris), 1968, 60, 85-92. 14. M.A. Persinger, "The problems of human verbal behavior: the final reference for measuring os- tensible psi phenomena", The Journal of Research in PSI Phenomena, 1976, 1, 72-90. 15. M.A. Persinger, "ELF field mediation in sponta- neous psi events: direct information transfer or conditioned elicitation?" Psychoenergetic Sys- tems (in press) . Approved For Release 2002/05/1318 CIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4 :
Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4 STATE OF THE ART IN REMOTE VIEWING STUDIES AT SRI Russell Targ, Harold E, Puthoff and Edwin C. May Stanford Research Institute, Menlo Park, California 94025 ABSTRACT For the past five years we have been investigating aspects of human perception that appear to fall out- side the range of well-understood perceptual/processing capabilities. Of particular interest is a human infor- mation-accessing capability that we call "remote view- ing." This phenomenon pertains to the ability of certain individuals to access and describe, by means of mental processes, remote geographical locations up to several thousand km distant from their physical loca- tion given only a known person on whom to target 1-4 In this paper we concentrate on recent transconti- nental experiments carried out with individuals whose remote perceptual abilities have been developed suf- ficiently to allow them to describe -- often in great detail -- geographical or technical material such as buildings, roads, structures, natural formations, along with real-time activities of persons at the target site. These experiments, together with our previously established data base of over 50 local (< 20 km) ex- periments, indicate that (1) although the information channel is imperfect, the data generated by the remote viewing process exceeds any reasonable bounds of chance correlation, and (2) the extent of physical distance separating the subject from the target site up to transcontinental distances does not appear to signifi- cantly affect the accuracy of perception. INTRODUCTION In our discussion of the state of the art of re- mote viewing studies at SRI we take as our data base the 51 experiments described in Reference 2 (local remote viewing with targets ~ 20 km) plus five cross- country experiments (some with multiple subjects) de- scribed in Reference 4 and amplified here. In these experiments we have investigated an often-reported human perceptual ability that has heretofore not been widely investigated in the laboratory. This ability we term "remote viewing." It is an ability by which human subjects perceive, and describe by word and drawing, distant scenes and activities blocked from ordinary perception. We have found that subjects have been able to describe with equal accuracy scenes at both local sites ( that is, within a few miles) and those at trans- continental distances. These abilities are developed in several individuals sufficiently to allow them to describe -- often in considerable detail -- geographical or technical material such as buildings, roads, interior laboratory apparatus, and real-time activities. As observed in the laboratory, the basic phenome- non appears to cover a range of subjective experiences variously referred to in the literature as autoscopy (in the medical literature); exteriorization or dis- association (psychological literature) ; simple clair- voyance, traveling clairvoyance, or out-of-body ex- perience (parapsychological literature); or astral pro- jection (occult literature). We choose the term "re- mote viewing" as a neutral descriptive term free from prior associations and bias as to mechanisms. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH Description of the Protocol (Local Targets) We begin with a synopsis of the basic data base of 51 local remote viewing experiments.2 The general pro- tocol is to closet a subject with an experimenter at SRI and at a prearranged time to obtain from the sub- ject a description of an undisclosed, remote site being visited by a target team, one of whose members is known to the subject and who thereby constitutes the target person. The target team is assigned their target loca- tion by an independent experimenter who has generated a list of targets located within a 30-minute driving time from SRI, and who accesses this list by a randomization procedure. The target pool consists of more than 100 target locations chosen from a target-rich environment. The target location selected is kept blind to both the subject and experimenter closeted at SRI. The experi- ment is thus of the double-blind type. In detail: To begin an experiment, a subject is closeted with an experimenter at SRI and instructed to wait 30 minutes before beginning a narrative description of where the target team has gone. Meanwhile, the tar- get team obtains sealed traveling orders from a monitor who has previously prepared and randomized a set of such orders. After leaving SRI by automobile, the tar- get team opens the traveling orders and proceeds di- rectly to the target without any communication with the subject or experimenter remaining at SRI. The experi- menter remaining with the subject in the SRI laboratory is kept ignorant of both the particular target and the target pool so as to eliminate the possibility of cue- ing (overt or subliminal) and to allow him freedom in questioning the subject for clarification of his de- scriptions. The target team remains at the target site for a prearranged 15-minute period following the 30 minutes alloted for travel. During the observation period, the remote viewing subject at SRI is asked to describe his impressions of the target site into a tape recorder and to make any drawings he thinks appropri- ate. A tentative evaluation is made of the subject's output when the target team returns to SRI. Finally, following the experiment, the subject is taken to the site so that he may obtain direct feedback. Initial Experimental Series To give a concrete example, we summarize the re- sults obtained with the first subject on the local re- mote viewing series. This subject (designated here as S1) participated in nine experiments. Subject S1 came to our experiments with a reported history of spontane- ous remote viewing experiences. In general, the sub- ject's ability in our experiments to describe correctly buildings, docks, roads, gardens, and the like, includ- ing structural materials, color, ambience, and activ- ity -- sometimes in great detail -- indicated the function- ing of a remote perceptual ability. A Hoover Tower target, for example, was recognized and correctly named. Nonetheless, the descriptions generally contained inac- curacies as well as correct statements. A typical ex- ample is indicated by his drawing shown in Figure 1 in which the subject correctly described a park-like area containing two pools of water: one rectangular, 60 X 89 ft (actual dimensions 75 x 100 ft); the other cir- cular, diameter 120 ft (actual diameter 110 ft). As can be seen from his drawing, the subject also included some elements, such as the tanks shown in the upper right, that are not present at the target site. We also note an apparent left-right reversal, often ob- served in paranormal perception experiments. Further, the subject incorrectly indicated the function of the site as water purification rather than recreational swimming. We often observe essentially correct descriptions of basic elements and patterns Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : 5FA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4
I - Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00387R000200080055-4 AVE. THINK TENNIS COURTS ELECT. DIST. THOR'S 75 110 100 PLAY GROUNDS POOL HOUSE CONCRETE BLOCK SERVICE YARD SEMLE YARD SALES Of WATER - SPRAY Bin Dow Effects FIRE STATION 10005 PICNIC AREA / RD. SUN L 0 n (à) City map of target location (b) Drawing by Subject S1 FIGURE 1 SWIMMING POOL COMPLEX AS REMOTE VIEWING TARGET coupled with incomplete or erroneous analysis of func- tion. This theme emerged as a thread which continued throughout our work and eventually led to a break- through with regard to an understanding of the inter- relationship between paranormal perception and cere- bral. functioning, namely: that paranormal functioning may involve specialization characteristic of the brain's right hemisphere, which predominates in spatial and other holistic processing, in contrast to the left hemisphere which predominates in verbal and other ana- lytical functioning 5-7 Judging of Results To obtain a numerical evaluation of the accuracy of the remote viewing experiment, the experimental re- sults were subjected to independent judging on a blind basis by an SRI research analyst not otherwise associ- ated with the research. The response packets, which contained the nine typed, unedited transcripts of the ' tape-recorded narratives and associated drawings, were unlabeled and presented in random order. Working alone, the analyst visited each target location in turn and in a blind fashion rated the subject's descriptions on a scale 1 to 9 (best to worst match). The statistic of interest is the sum of ranks assigned to the target- associated transcripts, lower values indicating better matches. For nine targets, the sum of ranks could range from nine (for perfect matching) to eighty-one. The technique for calculating the probability that a given sum of ranks s or less will occur by chance is given in Reference 2. The results of the judging, shown in Table 1, included seven direct hits out of the nine. The overall result was statistically significant at p = 2.9 x 10-> Table 1 also indicates the various types of targets used in this series. Further, in ex- periments 3, 4, and 6-9, the subject was secured in a double-walled copper screen Faraday cage, which pro- vides 120-dB attenuation for plane-wave radio-frequency radiation over the range of 15 kHz to 1 GHz. The re- sults of rank-order judging indicate that the use of such shielding does not prevent high-quality descrip- tions from being obtained. . Replication Series Having completed this initial series of experi- ments, we concluded that remote viewing appeared to be both a real and a robust phenomenon. We then carried Table 1 DISTRIBUTION OF RANKINGS ASSIGNED TO TRANSCRIPTS ASSOCIATED WITH EACH TARGET LOCATION FOR SUBJECT S1 Target Location Distance (km) Rank of Associated Transcript Hoover Tower, Stanford 3.4 1 Baylands Nature Preserve, Palo Alto 6.4 1 Radio telescope, Portola Valley 6.4 1 Marina, Redwood City 6.8 1 Bridge toll plaza, Fremont 14.5 6 Drive-in theatre, Palo Alto 5.1 1 Arts and Crafts Plaza, Menlo Park 1.9 1 Portola Valley 8.5 3 Swimming pool complex, Palo Alto 3.4 1 Total sum of ranks 16 (p=2.9×10-5) out replication experiments with other subjects (the results of which are given in detail in Reference 2) until we had established a data base of 51 experiments. A summary tabulation of the statistical evaluations of these 51 experiments (with nine subjects) is presented in Table 2. Of the six studies, involving remote view- ing of natural targets or laboratory apparatus, five reached statistical significance. The overall results, evaluated conservatively on the basis of a judging pro- cedure that ignored transcript quality beyond that necessary to rank order the data packets (vastly under- estimating the statistical significance of individual descriptions), clearly indicated the presence of an Approved For Release 2002/05/$70: CIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4 : : Guck 40' Catholic Church, :
Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4 Table 2 SUMMARY : REMOTE VIEWING OF LOCAL TARGETS Subject Number of Experiments p-Value, Rank Order Judging With natural targets S1 9 2.9 X 10-5 S2 and S3 (four each) 8 8 3.8 × 10-4 S4 9 1.8 × 10-6 S5 and S6 (four each) 8 85 5 0.08 (NS) V1 and V2 (three; two) 0,017 With technology targets $2, 83, S4, V2, V3 12 0.036 information channel of useful bit rate. The descrip- tions supplied by the subjects although containing inaccuracies, were sufficiently accurate to permit the judges to differentiate (blind) among various tar- gets to the degree that roughly 50% of the transcripts were directly matched.2 LONG-DISTANCE REMOTE-VIEWING EXPERIMENTS General After establishing the data base of 51 remote- viewing experiments with local targets (sites within a few kilometers), we undertook a series of five experi- ments designed to determine whether an increase in subject-target separation to transcontinental distances would degrade the quality or accuracy of perception. A major motivation for this effort was the desire to begin to accumulate data to examine various hypotheses, e.g., whether remote viewing is mediated by extremely low-frequency (ELF) electromagnetic waves. Under simple forms of this hypothesis, one would expect a degradation in accuracy as the subject-target_ g_distance is increased to several thousand kilometers. As a secondary goal, we were interested in the real-time data rate -- e.g., determining the extent to which a remote-viewing subject can track the real-time activities and movements of a known individual in a distant city. Therefore, the subjects were encouraged to describe real-time activity during the viewing period. The methodology with regard to target selection again was designed to eliminate possible cueing paths. Targets were determined either by random-number genera- tor entry into a previously prepared target list un- known to subject and experimenters with the subject, or in one case, on the basis of site selection by an in- dependent, skeptical challenger. An interesting additional technique that was em- ployed successfully in the first two of the five ex- periments was the use of the DARPA computer telecon- ferencing network for post-experiment feedback. Access to the computer by the traveling experimenter was by means of a portable terminal. The use of the telecon- ferencing service allowed the subject in one state (California) to communicate with an experimenter in the other state, New York. The conversational TALK mode available on the DARPA net was used for this pur- pose in the following manner. The subject at SRI (supervised) and the experi- menter on the east coast agreed (via computer telecon- ferencing) to begin an experiment in one-half hour. The purpose of the computer in this experiment was to provide time- and date-stamped permanent records of all communications between the various parties involved in the experiment. These data could be read in real time by any authorized person entering the SRI-AI Tenex (MSG) system. After logging off the computer, the outbound ex- perimenters used a random-number generator to determine which of several locations in the target area would constitute the target to be visited in this experiment. Neither the subject nor the experimenter at SRI knew the contents of the target list, compiled in New York after logging off. Having selected a target location by the random protocol, the outbound experimenters pro- ceeded directly to the site and remained there for 15 minutes. At the previously agreed-upon start time (one-half hour after breaking computer links) the subject typed impressions into a special computer file established for this purpose. When the outbound experimenters returned from the target site to the hotel, one of the experimenters made use of a limited-access file to enter his description of the place he actually visited. He then returned to the executive level of the computer, and awaited the appearance of the SRI experimenters and subject who could then (and only then) link the New York and Menlo Park terminals. At that time both files were printed out on both terminals, the the subject and the outbound team each learned what the other had written. Menlo Park to New York City (Grant's Tomb) Two subjects, S7 and S8, both in California, par- ticipated simultaneously in this experiment of Grant's Tomb, which was the first of the two New York City tar- gets. Both subjects independently provided computer- stored records of their impressions, and one made the sketch shown in Figure 2. Subject S8, an SRI systems analyst, said in his opening paragraph: "Outdoors, large open area, standing on and then off asphalt (rough material), dark for a path. A white building, like a ticket booth. Wooden structure, is white in color, and has an arched look about it. There is a large shade tree close to Russ (outbound experimenter)." Subject S7, closeted in a separate SRI location, began with: "I thought of a high place with a view. The subject continued with "I saw a tree on your left in a brick plaza -- it seemed to be in front of a build- ing you were entering." Later, "I could not clearly identify the activity. A restaurant? A museum? A bookstore?" And, "You were looking at coins in the palm of your hand, maybe giving some to Nicky (son of outbound experimenter)." The coins were in fact used to purchase the postcard from which Figure 2 was made, and they were given to the experimenter's son who made the purchase. Both subjects then went on for an addi- tional paragraph to describe details of the activities they imagined to be going on inside the building they saw, details that were partly correct, partly incorrect. As an example of the style of narrative generated by a subject during a computer teleconferencing experi- ment, we include the entire unedited computer-logged text of $7's response to the Grant's Tomb target in Figure 3. Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : elA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4
- Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-60387R000200080055-4 Grant's Tomb Target in New York City FRONT VIEW C FIGURE 2 COAST-TO-COAST REMOTE VIEWING EXPERIMENT. SUBJECT DESCRIBED: "OUTDOORS, LARGE OPEN AREA .... SHADE TREES .... WHITE BUILDING WITH ARCHES." Menlo Park to New York City (Washington Square Fountain) In the second experiment, the target, again chosen by random protocol, was the fountain in Washington Square Park. One subject, S7, participated. The sub- ject produced an exceptionally accurate transcript. The photos and the subject's drawing of the fountain are shown in Figure 4. The subject began his printout with the following: "The first image I got at about the first minute was of a cement depression -- as if a dry fountain with a cement post in the center or in- side. There seemed to be pigeons off to the right, flying around the surface out of the depression .... At one point I thought you were opening a cellophane bag .... " (The experimenters had in fact bought ice cream during the experimental period. ) "There was also a rectangular wooden frame, a window frame, but I wasn't sure if it was on a building, or a similar structure with a different purpose." (A possible cor- relation from a functional viewpoint to the Washington Square Arch through which the outbound experimenters viewed the fountain toward the end of the experimental period.) "All in all I thought you were in Riverside Park .... " ( Incorrect analysis. ) An SRI scientist, familiar with the New York City area but blind to the target, did, however, identify the target correctly on reading the twenty lines of printout as it emerged from the computer terminal. (For the complete transcript, see Figure 5.) These experiments provide an elegant demonstration of the utility of the teleconferencing process as a secure data recording system to provide real-time moni- toring of long-distance remote-viewing experiments. In a more detailed tape recording made after the experiment, but before any feedback, the subject de- scribed "cement steps going into the depression, like a stadium, and the rounded edge of the top of the depres- sion as you go up to ground level." These descriptions are not only correct, but also show remarkable detail. Quantitative Analysis of New York City Target Transcripts In attempting to derive a quantitative estimate of the amount of valid data in a transcript, we have made a detailed analysis of the previous two transcripts generated by a single subject ($7) during the long- distance experiments between Menlo Park, California, and New York City. To carry out this analysis, each transcript typed by the subject into a computer file was edited to re- tain only declarative statements spontaneously generated by the subject, or responses to direct questions. These statements were collected in groups called concepts. For example, if the subject had five references to a condition that can be defined as shady, these would be combined in the concept "shady." We performed four comparative analyses on the con- cepts from the two transcripts: Transcript A with Site A; Transcript B with Site B; Transcript A with Site B; and Transcript B with Site A. Each concept was assigned a rating ranging from 0 to 10, depending on the analyst's subjective impression as to whether the concept had no correspondence (a rank of 0) or complete correspondence (a rank of 10) with the target. The cross-matching was to serve as a crude measure of chance or generalized correspondence For the Grant's Tomb target site, there were 21 distinct concepts with a mean score u = 6.4 (= = 4.3); for the Washington Square site there were 16 concepts with a mean score u = 6.8 (o = 2.7). The individual cross matches were as follows: Grant's Tomb trans- cript to Washington Square had a mean score | = 3.6 (o = 4.3), and the Washington Square transcript matched against Grant's Tomb yielded a mean score u = 3.8 (o = 3.8). Table 3 shows the detailed analysis for the Grant's Tomb experiment. For each of the 21 concepts (all that were found) we display a summary of the con- cept, the target correspondence and its related score, and the correspondence with the control target, Washington Square, and its related score. Table 4 shows the same data for the Washington Square site and its control target, Grant's Tomb. The combined score for the direct matches is u = 6.6 (= = 5.1), and for the cross matches is u = 3.7 (o = 5.7), where the means are calculated by direct average and the standard deviations are computed from the square root of the sum of squares of the deviations from the mean scores. The difference in the means, although not definitive in a statistical sense (be- cause of the large spread) is consistent with earlier qualitative assessments of transcript accuracy of over 50 transcripts. From these means we would estimate that approximately 66% of this one subject's response constitutes an accurate description of the target site, whereas if the data are matched against other target sites, only 37% of the response would typically apply. . Approved For Release 2002/05/1922 CIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4
Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4 <- TYPE 1 (MSG. # 1, 1678 CHARS) DATE : . 2 JUL 1976 1126-PDT. FROM : TARG SUBJECT : S7's REPORT To: TARG RUSSEL - I THOUGHT OF A HIGH PLACE WITH A VIEW - DETAILS INCLUDED 3 MIN BEFORE V IEWING I SAW A TREE ON YOUR LEFT IN A BRICK PLAZA - IT SEEMED TO BE IN FRONT OF A WRONG BUTTON - BUILIDING YOU WERE ENTERING - YOU WAITED AS IF FOR AN ELEVATOR AND READ SOMETHING ON THE WALL YOU CAME OUT (OFF THE ELEVATOR) AND THERE WAS A ROOM ON YOUR LEFT WITH A VIEW - I COULD NOT CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE ACTIVITY - A RESTAURANT ? A MUSEUM? ABOOKSTORE? YOU LOOKED AT ASOMETHING A CARVING OR MENU OR DIRECTIONS ON A POST BEFORE ENTERING - FROM THE ROOM I THOUGHT THERE WAS A VIEW OF A HARBOR OR WATER ABOUT 1/3 OF THE FRANME - AT ONE TIME I HAD THE FEELING THAT YOU WERE LOOKING AT COINS IN THE PALM OF YOUR HAND - MAYBE GIVING SOME TO NICKY - WHICH WERE THEN PUT IN A SLOT - JUKEBOX? PINBALL ?- ALSO THE SUFACE WITH SOMETHING VERTICAL ABOVE - SOMETHING REFLECTING METAL PIPEX OF AN ORGAN (THE ONE I DIDN'T VIEW LAST TIME ) OR OF BOTTLRES AGAINST A MIRROR - SOMETHING REFLECTING - THEN DAVID SNAPPED HIS FINGERS - I SAW A BASKETBALL' VERY CLEAR TACTILE SENSATION FRON A SOMEWHAT TEXTURED GLOBE - ALSO, ON ANOTHER SNAP - THE COLOR RED NOT SHARPLY DEFINED - LIQUID OR FLOWING MATERIAL OR NICKY RACING AROUND IN A RED SHOIRT ANOTHER SNAP AND D ASKED FOR THE NAME OF THE PLAVCE - I WAS THINKING "BAR" BUT I THREW THAT OUT AS OLD AND SAW THE LETTERS "CH" WHICH I COMPLETED AS "CHILE" OR "CHILI" -- ALSO ANOTHER SNAP AND THE NAME OF THE THIRRD PERSON - JOE JOHN OR GERRY - IS IT GARY? - ARUSSELL I S THAT YOUTHI, THAT WAS S7 , AND WE WERE IN T HE "MSG" STILL, I THINK THAT IT MAY ABORT ! FIGURE 3 COMPUTER FILE PRINTOUT. CALIFORNIA-NEW YORK LONG DISTANCE REMOTE VIEWING. TARGET: GRANT'S TOMB (NYC). Although crude, this subjective analysis serves as a first step in suggesting a method for further single transcript analysis. New York City to Ohio (Ohio Caves) A third long-distance remote-viewing experiment was carried out under the control of an independent, skeptical scientist. In this case, both SRI experi- menters, while visiting in Ohio, agreed to take part in a remote-viewing experiment in which our host would select the target. Under the observation of our challenger, we tele- phoned Subject S4 in New York City and obtained the subject's agreement to participate in a long-distance remote viewing experiment. The subject was told only that we were located somewhere between New York City and our California laboratory and that shortly we would be taken to a target that we would like to have described. The time for the experiment was set for 2:00 PM EDT. We also agreed to call again at 3:00 PM. EDT to obtain Subject S4's impressions and to provide feedback as to the actual target. The scientist took us directly to the Ohio Caverns at Springfield, Ohio, which he had chosen as the target location (see Figure 6). We entered the grounds through an entrance arch that opens onto an enormous expanse of lawn, perhaps 20 acres. The caves are located at a depth of ~ 150 ft and are entered through a small building having a long flight of steep stairs. Once underground, we walked through a maze of rock-lined tunnels that lead eventually into a series of rooms lined with calcite stalactites and stalag- mites, frosty white and beige crystals formed like icicles. The entire cavern is illuminated by small electric light bulbs attached to the walls. After a 45-minute walk, we exited the caves through a large metal door giving access to a square cross-sectional Shaft with stairs leading to the surface. Following the experimental period, the scientist observer called the subject in New York, 45 minutes after we left the caves. The opening statements of the subject's transcript as dictated over the phone and posted to the SRI experimenters is as follows: "1:50 PM before starting -- Flat semi-industrial countryside with mountain range in background and something to do with underground caves or mines or deep shafts -- half man made, half natural -- some electric humming going on -- throbbing, inner throbbing. Nuclear or some very far out and possibly secret installation -- corridor -- mazes of them -- whole underground city almost -- Don't like it at all-long for outdoors and nature. 2:00 PM -- (Experimenters) R and H walking along sunny road -- entering into arbor- like shaft -- again looks like man helped nature -- vines (wisteria) growing in arch at entrance like to a wine cellar -- leading into underground world. Darker earth-smelling cool moist passage with something grey and of interest on left of them -- musty -- sudden change to bank of elevators -- a very man-made steel wall -- and shaft-like inverted silo going deep below earth -- brightly lit .... " Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4 523
- Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-60187R000200080055-4 1. 20 Pigens 15%- Lage Subject's Perception was of a "Cement Depression - as if a Dry Fountain - with a Cement Post in the Center .or Inside." dry fortin or stadion FIGURE 4 COAST-TO-COAST REMOTE VIEWING EXPERIMENT WITH TARGET AT WASHINGTON SQUARE IN NEW YORK CITY TYPE "MESSAGE SEQUENCE) 6 (MEG. #. 6. 1730 CHARS ? DATE 6. JUL 1976 1354-PDT FROM TARS SUBJECT : S7's REPORT PART 2 NYC EXP THE FIRST IMAGE I GOT AT ABOUT THE FIRST MINUTE WAS OF A CEMENT DEPRESSION - AS IF A DRY FOUNTAIN - WITH A CEMENT POST IN THE CENTER OR INSIDE :. THERE. SEEMED TO BE PIGEONS OFF TO THE RIGHT, FLYING AROUNDTHE SURFACE OUT OF THE DEPRESSION. THEN I SAW AS IF IFIF IN THE DISTANCE A REAL" STADIUM WITH GRASS IN THE CENTER AND PERHAPS STADIUM LIGHTS. OTHER IMAGES WERE AROW OF HOUSES/APICKET FENCE - SOME VERTICAL UNITS WITH JAGGED TOPS. THEN A FLUTED GROOVED VERTICAL COLUMN, BUT I COULDN'T SENSE WAHT IT WAS RELATED TO. AGAIN YOU WERE IN A DEPRESSED AREA WITH CEMENT SIDES, LOOKING OUT ONTO THE SURFACE OUTSIDE .. THE CEMENT SIDES ARE NOT STRAIGHT, BUT SLOPING, ALMOST S-SHAPRD. ALSO .A CLEAR FEELING OF THE HEAVY, WORN METAL BAR ON THE TOP OF TYPICAL NYC OR ANYCITY FENCES. THERE DIDN'T SEEM TO BE ANYTHING REALLY SPECIAL INSIDE, JUST A SEPARATION BETWEEN TEWO TWO SIMILAR AREAS. AT ONE POINT, I THOUGHT YOU WERE OPENING A CELLOPHANE BAG: AND LATER I SENSED YOU FEEDING POPCORN -TO PIGEONS. THERE WAS ALSO A RECTANGULAR WOODEN FRAME > A WINDOW FRAME, BUT I WASN'T SURE IF IT WAS ON A BUILDING, OR A SIMILAR STRUCTURE WITH A DIFFERENT PURPOSE. ALL IN ALL, I THOUGHT YOU WERE IN RIVERSIDE PARK NEAR A TRACK AND PLAY AREA, OCCASIONALLY LOOKING UP AT THE "ROCK AND LEAF" CLIFFS LEADING UP TO THE DRIVE. AFTER I HAD THOUGHT THAT AND FIT IT IN T WITH THE IMAGES RECEIVED SO FAR, IT KIND OF STUCK, AND I POSSIBLY GENERATED MORE PARK SCENES. THE STADIUM /FOUN TAIN IMAGES WERE THE FIRST AND THUS THE LEAST BIASED AS TO PARK MEMORIES. (I SURE DO LIKR THE TLELETYPE. IT CAN BECOME AN OBSESSIVE PASTIME, I SEE). THAT. WAS MESSAGE 6 FIGURE 5 COMPUTER FILE PRINTOUT. CALIFORNIA-NEW YORK LONG DISTANCE REMOTE VIEWING. TARGET: WASHINGTON SQUARE (NYC). Approved For Release 2002/05/1724CIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4 .. ..
Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4 result the majority of his transcript, although con- taining some correct elements, reflects primarily an incorrect analytical interpretation and cannot be said to constitute evidence for paranormal functioning. New Orleans to Palo Alto (Northern California Bank Plaza) Two experiments carried out between New Orleans and Menlo Park, California, constitute the final tests of the long-distance series, five experiments of which have been completed to date (all reported here). These last two were carried out with the two subjects who had participated in the first two California-to-New York experiments. The first experiment in this series involved Subject S7 in New Orleans viewing activities of a group of three people known to the subject, at a location in a Palo Alto/Menlo Park area 2000 miles away. The sub- ject's principal impression was of an "overhang of a building over their heads ... also a round gold rim around a sunken depression." The target, a bank build- ing is shown in Figure 7. Principal features of the target include a dramatic building overhang, and a rec- tangular concrete depression with a fountain in which the water comes out of a circular gold rim. The sub- ject also reported "some kind of fake china flowers mushrooming out of the depression." There were four orange lamps mounted on the gold rim. Finally, S7 reported "there was a projectile coming toward (one of the outbound experimenters). Like a ball or frisbee, as if (another experimenter) has tossed him a ball." Actually the experimenters had found a paper airplane lying on the ground and had thrown it back and forth several times. In fact, the photo of the site taken at the time of the experiment shows the airplane between them. This is one of the few times that a remote view- ing subject has perceived rapid motion at the target site. Table 3 QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE GRANT'S TOMB TRANSCRIPT Subject's Description (Quotes) Correspondence (0-10) Cross-Correspondence to Washington Square (0-10) 1. I thought of a high place with a view Bluff overlooking river 10 Standing in a depression 0 2. I saw a tree on your left Lots of trees 10 Nearby trees 8 3. In a brick plaza Plaza looks like brick 8 Plaza looks like brick 8 4. Building you were entering Entered tomb building 10 No buildings 0 5. Read something on the wall Read informative plaque 10 No walls, no reading 0 6. Came off the elevator No elevator 0 No elevator 0 7. A restaurant? None 0 None 0 8. A museum? It is a museum 10 None 0 9. A bookstore? Books and cards are sold 10 None 0 O 10. A carving, menu or directions on a post Bronze plaque at entry 8 None 0 11. The room has a view Room looks down on tombs thirty No room 0 feet below 7 12. View of harbor or water View of river 9 Large operating fountain 13. Coins in your hand Used to buy cards 10 Used to buy ice cream 10 14. Gave some coins to Nicky (son)* He bought cards 10 Doesn't apply 15. Nicky put them into a slot No slot 0 Doesn't apply 16. Reflecting metal pipes Could be columns 6 Metal pipes in fountain 6 17. Bottles against a mirror None 0 None 0 18. Something reflecting Marble and glass doors 6 Water in fountain 6 19. Basketball or textured globe None 0 Glass globes around fountain 8 20, Nicky in red shirt Correct 10 Doesn't apply 21. Liquid or flowing material None 0 Water in fountain 10 Mean 6.4 Mean 3.6 Subject knew Nicky was in New York with experimenter. Approved For Release 2002/05/17 526IA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4 FIGURE 6 OHIO CAVES: DESCRIBED BY SUBJECT IN NEW YORK AS, "UNDERGROUND CAVES OR MINES .... DEEP SHAFTS .... DARKER, COOL, MOIST EARTH-SMELLING PASSAGES." Subject S4 concludes with "I see a lot of gold and metal and silver-gold glow all over -- not much sound -- very silent factory -- scary -- few people -- very special." As if often the case, one observes that the basic gestalt of the target site is cognized and even ex- perienced -- e.g., the underground caves aspect, while specifics are misinterpreted -- e.g., the labeling of the location as a nuclear installation. A second subject ($8) working by himself at SRI, who had agreed in advance to participate in the same experiment by date and time, was less successful with the cavern target. This subject erroneously interpreted early impressions as associated with a museum. As a
1 Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-6.387R000200080055-4 Table 4 QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE WASHINGTON SQUARE TRANSCRIPT Subject Description (Quotes) Correspondences (0-10) Cross-Correspondence to Grant's Tomb (0-10) 1. Cement depression We were in a cement depression 10 Tombs are in marble depression 10 2. A dry fountain Operating fountain 8 None 0 3. Cement post in the center Cement post plus large pipe 7 Tombs in center 2 4. Pigeons off to the right Pigeons were in the park nearby 8 No pigeons 0 5. Stadium with grass and lights Scale factor 3 Scale factor 3 6. Rows of houses, picket fence Houses with iron fences 9 None 0 7. Vertical units with jagged tops Arch supports perhaps 3 Columns in front of building 10 8. Fluted grooved white columns Side of arch supports 6 Columns in front of building 10 9. You are in depressed area with cement sides Exactly 10 Tomb is in a depressed area 3 10. Sides are sloping almost S- shaped Exactly 10 Somewhat curved at top 3 11. Heavy worn metal Copper posts in fountain 7 Marble railing 3 12. A separation between two different areas In and out of fountain 6 Above and below in tomb area 7 13. You were opening a cellophane bag Yes 10 No 0 14. You were feeding popcorn to pigeons Others were 3 No pigeons 0 15. Rectangular wooden frame. .. on a building Could be the arch 5 Rectangular building 3 16. Riverside park, tracks and play area Play area nearby 3 Tomb is in Riverside Park 7 Mean 6.8 Mean 3.8 Menlo Park to New Orleans (Louisiana Superdome) For the final experiment (subject in Menlo Park) it was agreed that at 1200 CST on a particular day, the outbound experimenter would choose a target location in his city by random protocol and remain there for the required 15 minutes. During this time, Subject S8 in Menlo Park would tape-record impressions and make any drawings that seemed appropriate. (The DARPA net was not available because of computer net malfunction.) The target chosen by randomized entry into a New Orleans guide book list was the Louisiana Superdome. The outbound experimenter tape-recorded the following description as he looked at the building: "It is a bright sunshiny day. In front of me is a huge silvery building with a white dome gleaming in the sun. It is a circular building with metal sides. It looks like nothing so much as a flying saucer. The target is in fact the 80,000-seat Louisiana Superdome stadium." The subject in Menlo Park described the target as "a large circular building with a white dome." The subject also expressed feelings of wanting to reject what he saw because the dome looked "like a flying saucer in the middle of a city." Some appreciation for this perception |can be obtained from Figure 8 in which the target is shown, together with the sketches that the subject made. Taken overall, the results obtained in these five long-distance remote-viewing experiments are of roughly the same accuracy with regard to site description as those obtained in local remote-viewing experiments. The descriptions not only contain correct information beyond that expected by chance, but also show remark- able detail and resolution. Furthermore, real-time activities are observed and correctly described in a number of instances. Although extensive data must be taken before a final conclusion can be reached, it appears at this point that there is little, if any, degradation in quality of perception as the subject- target distance is increased from a few miles to trans- continental distances. The results obtained on the basis of viewing a New York site from SRI in Menlo Park, California, three thousand miles away, for example, are similar to those obtained in local remote-viewing ex- periments. Any theory of paranormal functioning put forward at this time should take this insensitivity to distance into account, and any application of para- normal functioning need not, to first order, consider distance as a barrier, at least to the range examined. CONCLUSIONS In this paper we have described our investigations into aspects of human perception that appear to fall outside the range of well-understood perceptual/pro- cessing capabilities. Specifically, we have examined a phenomenon we call "remote viewing," the ability of certain individuals to access and describe, by mental processes, remote geographical sites blocked from ordinary perception by reason of distance and shielding. In a series of experiments extending up to 5000 km, we have not observed any degradation in accuracy or resolution as a function of increasing distance. Fur- thermore, some real-time tracking of the activities of individuals at the target site has been accomplished over these distances. Although the information channel is imperfect, the data generated by the remote viewing process exceeds any reasonable bounds of chance correlation. In the spirit of the dictum of physicist Richard P. Feynman that experimentation in difficult and contro- versial areas should be exhaustively self-criticized, we list below the potential criticisms of our experi- mentation, along with a discussion of each point: criticism (C) and rebuttal (R). Approved For Release 2002/05/1752CIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4 : : - -
Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4 Circular Fountain in Concrete Depression FIGURE 7 REMOTE VIEWING EXPERIMENT - NEW ORLEANS TO PALO ALTO, 30 OCTOBER 1976. SUBJECT DESCRIBED: "THE OVERHANG OF A BUILDING OVER THEIR HEADS," ALSO "A ROUND GOLD RIM AROUND A SUNKEN DEPRESSION" .... "IN THE SURFACE OF THE DEPRESSION THERE IS SOME KIND OF FAKE CHINA FLOWERS. IT'S LIKE A BONSAI TREE MUSHROOMING OUT OF THE SURFACE." LATER IN THE TRANSCRIPT THE SUBJECT SAID "THERE WAS A PROJECTILE COMING TOWARD ONE OF THE OUTBOUND EXPERIMENTERS. SOME KIND OF A PROJECTILE, LIKE A BALL OR FRISBEE. AS IF ANOTHER EXPERIMENTER TOSSED HIM A BALL." (IT WAS A PAPER AIRPLANE.) Experiment Selection: C1: The experiments discussed could be selected out of a larger pool of experiments of which many are of poorer quality. R1: Selection of experiments for reporting does not take place; every experiment is entered as performed on a master log and is included in the statistical evaluations. Data Selection: C2: Data for the reported experiments could be edited to show only the matching elements, the nonmatching elements being discarded. R2: Data associated with a given experiment remain unedited; all experiments are tape recorded and all data ( tape transcripts, drawings, clay models) are included unedited in the data package to be judged and evaluated. Cueing : C3: The study could involve naivete in protocol that permits various forms of cueing, in- tentional or unintentional. R3: The use of double-blind protocols ensures that none of the persons in contact with the subject is aware of either the particular target or target pool; similarly, no one in contact with a judge is aware of the target- list/subject-output correspondence. For example, judges are not taken to target sites by a knowledgeable person, but rather proceed to the target sites, unaccompanied, on the basis of written instructions generated with- out knowledge of subject output. Educated Guess: C4: A subject may be able to guess as to which sites in a given area are likely to be chosen as targets, and may have familiarized himself with the locations. R4: In the statistical judging procedure used, no advantage could be gained even if a subject were to be given a list of possible target sites beforehand and encouraged to familiarize himself with the locations. Even in such an extreme hypothetical case (no such procedure was ever used) where a subject could not help but render a set of perfect descriptions of target sites, he still has the basic statis- tical problem of generating blind the correct target/description pair sequence upon which the statistical evaluation is based. Target Limitations: C5: If a subject is given feedback after an ex- periment that today's target was a fountain, Approved For Release 2002/05/17 50IA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4
Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00187R000200080055-4
.
dene
qua
Coment
coment
grass
Rus,
FRONT
10
Calls . with glass
display Cases.
FIGURE 8
LONG DISTANCE REMOTE VIEWING EXPERIMENT - SRI,
MENLO PARK, TO LOUISIANA SUPERDOME. SUBJECT
DESCRIBED LARGE CIRCULAR BUILDING WITH A WHITE
DOME. 31 OCTOBER 1976.
he knows that the following target is unlikely
to be a fountain, since targets are chosen for
unique differentiable qualities.
R5:
The target pool is use (> 100 target sites)
contains several fountains, several buildings,
several parks, etc., and therefore the content
of a given target, determined by random entry
into the target pool, is essentially indepen-
dent of the contents of other targets.
Transcript Generality:
C6:
Transcripts generated by subjects are so
general as to match anything. ("Sky is blue,
grass is |green.")
R6:
Judging protocol involves differential match-
ing. Therefore, true but general statements
do not help a judge to preferentially assign
a transcript to one site as opposed to
another.
"Read-In" Matches:
C7:
Given a transcript and a target, a judge can
"read in" matches.
R7:
Differential matching on a blind basis allows
matches to be "read in" equally for non-cor-
responding as well as corresponding target/
transcript pairs, and therefore provides no
differential advantage.
Inadequate Handling of Judging Materials:
C8:
Preparation of judging materials (transcript
typing) may provide opportunity for a "leak,"
or perhaps degradation of typing ribbon may
provide artifactual information as to order
of experiments.
R8:
Transcript typing is carried out in a random
order by individuals kept blind to the key;
one-time ribbons are used.
Post Hoc Photography :
C9:
Photographs used to illustrate remote view-
ing results are taken after completion of
the experiments, and therefore suffer from
the fallacy of post hoc matching.
R9:
All blind judging, matching, and statistical
evaluation of the results (which is where
the scientific issues are decided) are com-
pleted before photographs are taken; judges
do not have access to photographs during
their analysis, and therefore judges cannot
be cued into correspondences observed post
hoc.
In short, at all times, we and others responsible
for the overall program took measures to prevent sen-
sory leakage and subliminal cueing and to prevent
deception, whether intentional or unintentional. To
ensure evaluations independent of belief structures of
both experimenters and judges, all experiments were
carried out under a protocol in which target selection
Approved For Release 2002/05/178: CIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4
OUTSIDE
-Approved For Release/2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4 at the beginning of experiments and blind judging of results at the end of experiments were handled indepen- dently of the researchers engaged in carrying out the experiments. In five years of self- and other-criti- cism, we have not found a way to fault either the ex- perimental protocols or the conclusions derived there- from. Furthermore, since the initial publication of our investigations of this remarkable phenomenon, 1,2 in- dependent successful replication experiments have been performed in other laboratories as well.14-19 Therefore, the phenomenon does not appear to depend on specific personality/environment configurations. We are thus led to conclude that remote viewing constitutes a ro- bust phenomenon whereby subjects are able to describe in words and drawings, to a degree exceeding any reasonable bounds of chance correlation, both the location and actions of experimenters placed at undis- closed sites at varying separations from the subjects up to transcontinental distances. REFERENCES 1. Russell Targ and Harold Puthoff, "Information 11 transfer under conditions of sensory shielding, Nature, vol. 252, pp. 602-607, October 18, 1974. 2. Harold Puthoff and Russell Targ, "A Perceptual channel for information transfer over kilometer distances : Historical perspective and recent research, " Proc. IEEE, vol. 64, pp. 329-354, March 1976. 3. Russell Targ and Harold Puthoff, Mind-Reach. New York: Delacorte Press, 1977. 4. Harold Puthoff and Russell Targ, "Direct Percep- tion of Remote Geographical Locations," Proc. IEEE Electro/77 Special Session on The State of the Art in Psychic Research, New York, N. Y., April 19-21, 1977. 5. J. Ehrenwald, "Cerebral localization and the psi syndrome, " J. of Nervous and Mental Disease, vol. 161, No. 6, pp. 393-398. 6. R. Ornstein, The nature of human consciousness. San Francisco, CA: Freeman, 1973, Ch. 7 and 8. 7. R. W. Sperry, "Cerebral organization and behavior, Science, vol. 133, pp. 1749-1757, 1961. 8. I.M. Kogan, "Is telepathy possible?, " Radio Eng., vol. 21, p. 75, January 1966. 9. "Telepathy, hypotheses and observations, " Radio Eng., vol. 22, p. 141, January 1967. 10. "Information theory analysis of telepathic communication experiments," Radio Eng., vol. 23, p. 122, March 1968. 11. "The information theory aspect of telep- athy, "RAND Publ. P-4145, Santa Monica, CA, July 1969. 12. M. A. Persinger, "Geophysical models for parapsy- chological experiences, " Psychoenergetic Systems, vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 63-74, 1975. 13. "The paranormal -- P. II : Mechanisms and models, " M. S. S. Information Corp., New York, 1974. 14. Arthur Hastings and David Hurt, "A confirmatory remote viewing in a group setting, " Proc. IEEE, vol. 64, October 1976. 15. Thomas Whitson, David Bogart, John Palmer, and Charles Tart, 'Preliminary experiments in group remote viewing, = Proc. IEEE, vol. 64, October 1976. 16. Jacques Vallee, Arthur Hastings, and Gerald Askevold, "Remote viewing experiments through computer conferencing, " Proc. IEEE, vol. 64, October 1976. 17. J. P. Bisaha and B. J. Dunne, "Precognitive remote viewing in the Chicago area, a replication of the Stanford experiment, " Research in Parapsy- chology 1976. Metuchen, NJ: The Scarecrow Press Inc., 1977. 18. B. J. Dunne and J. Bisaha, "Multiple Channels in Precognitive Remote Viewing, " Research in Para- psychology 1977. Metuchen, NJ: The Scarecrow Press Inc. (in press). 19. J. P. Bisaha and B.J. Dunne, "Multiple Subject and Long Distant Precognitive Remote Viewing of Geo- graphical Locations, " Proc. IEEE 1977 Internation- al Conference on Cybernetics and Society, Washington, D.C., September 19-21, 1977. Approved For Release 2002/05/17 :CIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4
Approved Kor Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4 SOME COMMENTS ON THE SUBJECTIVE NATURE OF PSYCHIC RESEARCH, THE SUBJECT-EXPERIMENTER RELATIONSHIP AND THE PSYCHIC TYPE OF PERSONALITY Ingo Swann, Consultant Stanford Research Institute, Menlo Park, California 94025 ABSTRACT Successful psychic research subjects are seldom asked to estimate or elaborate upon their personal con- tact with psychic abilities. The emergent field of parapsychology is thereby weighted heavily with the opinions, hypotheses and selective areas of interest of researchers. Therefore, the field is deficient in in- formation that might lead to the establishment of novel hypotheses incorporating subjective inputs from psychic subjects. This condition has probably not been favor- able to the establishment of a holistic view of para- psychological potential. It has created an unreal formal division between psychic abilities and experi- menter, perpetuated difficulties in the subject-experi- menter relationship, and delayed an understanding of the psychic-type of personality. These difficulties are real, and are reflected in the literature, which is reviewed. INTRODUCTION The following brief paper represents not so much a critical assessment of certain areas of parapsychol- ogy, but a tentative description of some work to be done in the future. It is based partly on the author's extensive participation as a parapsychology research subject in some seventeen separate research situations over the past six-year period, and partly on studies of official and unofficial parapsychological literature. Essentially, up to the present, parapsychology in the United States exhibits characteristics associated with a closed intrasociety. New members find entrance into it difficult; it possesses a hierarchy of in- fluence; it has a low toleration for unusual and ex- traordinary hypotheses; and it tends to depersonalize its topic -- psychic abilities -- from human attribute to impersonal empiricism. It possesses a literature in the form of journals, and is hereafter referred to as "official." There exists also a vast amount of "unofficial" literature in the form of biographies, records of un- usual "psychic" material, and anthologies of mixed official and unofficial content. It has been the experience of the author that psychic subjects are confined to unofficial status, and are seldom, if ever, invited into or obtain mem- bership within the official community. This condition is, of course, not unusual in the mental sciences, and presently is showing some signs of change. In the past, though, this political divisiveness has led to many impasses in the emergent understanding of para- normal aptitudes, and many of these impasses are per- petuated by the dominant attitudes and personalities of official status. The official community can be criticized, as has already been done in many instances, of failing in achievement, and this criticism is likely to increase as the advances of the Soviets continue to come to light presently. The author believes that this criti- cism is justified in some part, but failure of para- psychologists is not total, nor does it originate totally within the official parapsychological com- munity itself. The official parapsychological com- munity suffers from strong constraints that originate within the disbelief systems of the broader scientific community. The scientific community, as a suprasocial order, has very low tolerance for the parapsychological community, since the base hypotheses of the two are in extreme disagreement. THE "UNOFFICIAL" PARAPSYCHOLOGICAL COMMUNITY AS AN UNTAPPED SOURCE OF ADVANCEMENT The unofficial community, therefore, has no direct route into scientific consideration, since it is not incorporated into official status, which in turn is re- jected for the most part by the suprasocial order. Because of this, the unofficial sources might be thought of as an uninspected source of advancement for the future, and the author feels that the granting of re- newed interest in a novel cooperation of the official and unofficial parapsychological communities is now in order, especially in view of the emerging clues con- cerning Soviet advances in psychotronics. THREE MAJOR AREAS WHERE OFFICIAL AND UNOFFICIAL STATUS CAN AND DO MELD There appear to be three major areas (at least) where official and unofficial characteristics either meld or conflict, depending upon the individuals in- volved. Of these three, the extraordinary difficulties found in the subject-experimenter relationship is the most obvious, as well as the most documented. Second, the official community, it might be as- sumed, would be interested in identifying the psychic- type of personality, but interest in this topic has been sporadic, and stronger some twenty years ago than it is at the present. The identification of the psy- chic-type of personality would necessitate larger and increased inputs by those personalities themselves, creating a bridge (if even tentative) between official methodologies and unofficial content. Third, there exists a vast and unexplored area of subjective or qualitative information that has hardly ever been solicited by the official community from its psychic subjects, nor, frankly, tolerated by the major- ity of its present or historical personalities. The present author views this situation as unfortunate in the extreme, since the United States has possessed many gifted and creative psychics. These three areas might be seen by contemporary parapsychologists and future comers to be of high interest if not of high priority, and each area possi- bly represents a discrete area of inquiry concerning the nature of psychic potential. The Subject-Experimenter Relationship It has been apparent in psychical research for quite some time that psychic subject relationships with experimenters constitute a special field of inquiry in parapsychology, and perhaps a special problem to science in general. It is understood, in science as a whole, that sub- ject-experimenter relationships often suffer from standard pitfalls and experimenter effects.2 In para- psychology, however, this situation takes on extra- ordinary importance. In sociology and psychology, for * See bibliography, Approved For Release 2002/05/17:30CIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4 . - I - = :
. Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4 example, subject-experimenter relationships may suffer merely from bias originating in the experimenter's school of thought, or from within the experimenter's hypothesis which he is testing. When this is so, the experimenter may eventually overcome the difficulties if and when he is willing to go beyond his schooling and favorite hypothesis. In psychic research, however, accumulating evi- dence indicates that the subject-experimenter rela- tionship is of extraordinary, if not basic, importance; and that the subject-experimenter relationship is possessed of problems that involve the experimenter's own psychic potential and hence are amazing in their complexity and stunning for their magnitude. At this present stage in psychic research, the situation is cogently identified by what appears to be a paradox: some experimenters seem to achieve comfir- mative results in their experimentation, while others do not, and in fact, seem to disrupt chance expecta- tion in their experiments towards an unexpected, un- explained negative statistic. In some cases, failure of the experiment can be explained by lack of psychic ability in the subject, experiment incompatibility, and experiment deficiency, and standard experimenter bias and ineptitude. Often, however, when these factors are corrected, the subject- experimenter relationship still fails to produce results. Past inspection of this situation suggests that there are several factors not usually found in other disciplines that enter into parapsychological experi- mentation. An understanding of these factors seems paramount if psychical research achievement is to be seriously envisioned. As early as 1938, 33 it was discovered that in independent research projects whose conditions and goals were closely parallel, highly significant re- sults were obtained in one case while in another, only chance results were found. It was felt then that the possible cause of this discrepancy was due to dif- ferences in the experimental approach and the handling of the subjects. A joint experiment was made to determine if such was the case, and it was concluded that "failure to find evidence of ESP in card tests may be due to an unfavorable experimenter-subject relationship." During 1943 to 194538,39 it was confirmed that an individual's personal belief system concerning the existence of and possibilities in ESP influenced not only successful results in subjects, but also the ex- perimenter's attitude and approach to ESP experiments. A negative belief depressed results while a positive belief contributed to successful experimental outcomes. Schmeidler labeled the non-believers "goats" and the believers "sheep." Schmeidler's discovery of the sheep-goat effect probably constitutes one of parapsychology's most basic phenomenologies, indicating that one person's psychic gestalt (composed of learning, attitudes, preferences, bias, tolerance, expectations) somehow interacts with the psychic gestalt of others. In 19664 confirmatory sheep-goat experiments showed a highly significant relationship between belief and scoring in ESP tests. Thus, the basic opinion and psychological atti- tudes of the experimenter interact at some communal sub-awareness level with those of the subject, and tend to influence the visibility of ESP in the subject. In parapsychology, therefore, the peculiar psychology of the experimenter becomes of as great an interest as is the psychology of the psychic subject. A survey of the parapsychological literature, how- ever, indicates a deficit of inquiry concerning the psychologies of parapsychologists, and no reports are available revealing the psychological profiles of ex- perimenters who have obtained positive results and experimenters who have obtained negative results. It seems obvious, therefore, that in future meth- odologies that isolate a more exact image of the ideal experimenter in his or her own psychic poise will take on as much importance as probing into the insights and talents of psychic subjects. A recent assessment of this situation32 deliberates this situation and estab- lishes the probable truth that a psychic experiment can no longer be considered apart from its overall context, environment, participants and sociological expectations. Is There a Psychic-Type of Personality? There has been, within the official literature, some effort to determine the characteristics of the psychic-type of personality. For the most part, this effort has been sporadic, falling victim, the author feels, to the exclusion principles operating in the official community. Identification of the psychic-type certainly has not received overwhelming attention, nor does this category of parapsychological work appear to have other than a low priority. Evidence exists, however, that there is a psychic- type of personality, or at least a type of subject personality that is most likely to be successful in ex- periments. It is to be understood that this type might be very illusive in the experimental situation, since the experimental situation appears to respond and be influenced by other than subject willingness and abilities, as mentioned above. It might be expected that positive platforms in- volving incentives, vital interests, attitudes and expectations would contribute to successful outcomes in parapsychological testing, since these categories are seen to contribute to other areas of human endeavor. In 194303 it was found that experiments with incentives yielded significantly higher scores than tests without incentives. A moderate improvement in scoring was ob- tained merely by informing the subject of his result, while a significantly higher improvement accompanied the giving of a reward for high scores. Effect of attitudes was demonstrated in 1960, 32 while, similarly, a high significance between interest of the subject in the task and his scoring was estab- lished in 1967.5 In 1975 and 197649, 50 it was found that those who expected psi hitting scored significantly higher above chance than those who expected not to be successful. This latter type of report echoes the implications of the sheep-goat phenomenon. In 1945 and 194812,13 attempts were made to dis- cover if ESP and IQ were possibly related, but it was found that if any there was only a small correlation between ESP performance and IQ. In 1965- it was established that the separation of ESP scores on the basis of IQ showed no relationship between intelligence and ESP, and, in 195036 evidence was offered that mental health analysis did not prove to be a reliable basis for selecting good ESP subjects. In terms of IQ and mental health, therefore, psi performance is not necessarily predictable, any more than is genius and inventiveness predictable or measurable by IQ.1,9 Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : ClA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4
Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96 787R000200080055-4 A search of the official parapsychological liter- ature reveals that it may be possible to isolate suc- cessful psi subjects on the basis of extroversion, ex- pansiveness and world view. In 194647 it was found that high and low scores in ESP drawing tests were separable on the basis of the expansive or compressive quality of subjects' drawings. Subjects who did well in ESP tests tended to make ex- pansive drawings, while those who scored below chance expectations tended to produce compressive drawings. It was also found that, given the Maslow Security- Insecurity Test, high ESP scores were obtained by the secure subjects, and low scores by the insecure subjects. This particular indicator of good ESP performance expectation was confirmed in 1973, where expansive subjects scored significantly higher in ESP than com- pressive subjects (p < 0.05), these results being in- dicative of an interaction between extroversion and expansiveness. A consistency between high-scoring subjects and extrovert-introvert ratings was found in 1951,17 where 74% of extroverts gave high ESP scores and 71% of the introverts gave lower scores than the expected average. The relationship of extroversion to ESP scoring was seen again in 1952, ' when, in telepathy tests, extro- vert receivers scored positively while introvert receivers scored negatively. It was found in 197119 that the difference between extroverts and introverts was significant in every case, and that positive and negative characteristics could be established based upon extroversion and introversion. Extroversion and ESP thus may be taken as a positive correlation. 21 In 195444 it was found that subjects who turned their aggression outward scored low in ESP tests as contrasted with subjects who did not, who scored sig- nificantly above chance, while it was shown in 196718 that subjects who had a high degree of anxiety as measured by the Defense Mechanism Test scored below chance and those who had a low level of anxiety tended to score well above chance. In 1968° it was established that those who tended to perceive the external world in a holistic manner showed more evidence of ESP than those who tended to perceive the world in an analytical manner. The psychic-type of personality, therefore, is probably not isolatable by IQ determinants, and is divergent from standard mental testing processes, and in these contexts in generally unknown. In his or her subjective qualities, however, the psychic-type of personality can be seen as a non-aggressive extrovert, who tends towards holistic world views, and is capable of high interest, both subjectively and empirically, in psi processes. Holistic world views are composed partly of em- pirical associations and experience; but there is a good deal of evidence suggesting that a world view may be composed of other and additional factors not asso- ciable to external realities as we presently understand them. These factors are, so far, to be considered as subjective in their nature, and gather increasing importance as evidence for them accumulates. The Subjective Nature of Psychic Research A tentative assessment of the future of psychic research (but an assessment that the author does not feel too hasty or unwarranted) indicates that a great deal of future parapsychological achievement in re- search will rely upon revealing the subjective determinants of both subject and researcher alike. As noted before, the official literature carries no reports on the mental makeup or subjective realities of experi- menters. The subjective realities of subjects, when written up, exists in the unofficial literature, which is diverse, cloudy and of a massiveness that is prohibi- tive to organized investigation, save in the presence of a large staff, adequate funding and computer storage and retrieval systems. This paper, in fact, constitutes a preliminary proposal for a project to collect, cate- gorize, test and evaluate the subjective realities of subjects and experimenters alike. The evidence in the official literature has led inexorably toward the illusive, intangible areas of the subjective; but this trend has been engaged only tenta- tively and only by select researchers (as listed in the bibliography). This type of research -- into the subjective -- would necessarily begin with the disadvantage that the mental sciences hold the subjective to be at least irrelevant, if not irrational and characteristic of the "lunatic fringe." Notwithstanding, it seems appropriate, based upon the limited, but clear, evidence given here and found in the official literature, increasing excursions into the subjective seem recommended. In the author's opinion, the subjective realities of psi subjects possess at least three tangible quali- ties that cannot be avoided. First, the verifiable data that emerges out of a subjective attempt to view distant locations35 is seen to be remarkably accurate. There is hardly any other interpretation for this phenomenon, except to hypothe- size that there exist additional forms of human per- ception at the subjective levels, forms that have not yet been isolated fully, and whose structure is unknown at this point. But that that structure must exist, there can hardly be any doubt. Second, creative individuals, psi subjects and parapsychological experimenter alike are seen to inter- act within hitherto unelaborated subjective constraints. And, third, successful ESP subjects appear to depend almost as heavily upon their subjective realities as they do upon objective experience. This allows them to create or participate in operant modes of conscious- ness that are alien to objective science alone and which are, for lack of a better term, almost solely subjective in their nature. There may be a fourth reason for engaging heavily in subjective research of the psychic. This paper is being prepared before the author can have sufficient access to information coming out of the Soviet Union as a result of the Toth detainment. What information is available, however, seriously substantiates that Soviet parapsychologists have intruded deeply into the sub- jective possibilities of psychic potential, have iso- lated a certain amount of structure, and are expediting development of psi-mediated communication channels and lines of perception and influence at a distance. CONCLUSION It is the author's opinion that the subjective aspects of psychic research can no longer be avoided. It has been his experience in active and extended para- psychological research that successful outcomes of ex- perimentation depend almost totally upon commensurate subjective flexibilities, both in the subject and in the experimenter alike. This might also be extended to include individuals not directly associated with the experiment. Approved For Release 2002/05/172: CIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4 .- :
. Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4 It seems apparent that the individual's subjective qualities might be static or frozen in many instances, but that the subjective qualities are none the less capable of swift flux, association and psychic concre- tizing. These subjective qualities might exist either as a gestalt or holistic psychological platform, but that, upon occasion, they can be convened with pre- cision capable of perceiving, identifying and communi- cating bits of information that flow into the analyti- cal capabilities of gifted psychics. These subjective qualities can, and do, interact with the psi-fields of others, and are influenced accordingly, depending upon the confidence and goals of the individuals involved, The tips of these subjective qualities can be seen in the official literature by the subject-experimenter paradox and in the personality characteristics (limited as they may so far have been established) of the psy- chic-type. The overall subjective implications can be Seen, if one's belief system is permissive of novel and unique information, in the unofficial literature, and quite possibly in the Soviet approach to parapsychology and psychotronics. BIBLIOGRAPHY 1 Arieti, Silvano. Creativity, The Magic Synthesis, Basic Books, Inc., Publishers, New York, 1976. 2. Barber, T.X. "Pitfalls in Research: Nine In- vestigator and Experimental Effects," in R.M.W. Travers (Ed. ), Second Handbook of Research and Teaching, Rand McNally, Chicago, 1973. 3. Bevan, J.M. "The Relation of Attitude to Success in ESP Scoring," J. of Parapsychology, Vol. 11, No. 4, December 1947. 4. Bhadra, B.H. "The Relationship of Test Scores to Belief in ESP," J. of Parapsychology, Vol. 30, No. 1, March 1966. 5. Buzby, Dallas E. "Subject Attitude and Score Variance in ESP Tests," J. of Parapsychology, Vol. 31, No. 1, March 1967. 6. Buzby, Dallas E. "Precognition and Psychological Variables," J. of Parapsychology, Vol. 32, No. 1, March 1968. 7. Casper, George W. "Effect of the Receiver's Attitude Toward the Sender in ESP Tests," J. of Parapsychology, Vol. 16, No. 3, September 1952. 8. Crumbaugh, James C., "A Questionnaire Designed to Determine the Attitudes of Psychologists Toward the Field of Extrasensory Perception," J. of Parapsychology, Vol. 2, No. 4, December 1938. 9. Douglas, John H. "The Genius of Everyman (1), Discovering Creativity," Science News, Vol. 111, No. 17, April 1977. 10. Eason, M. Jean Clare and Boleslaw A. Wysocki. "Extrasensory Perception and Intelligence," J. of Parapsychology, Vol. 29, No. 2, June 1965. 11. Eilbert, Leo and G.R. Schmeidler. "A Study of Certain Psychological Factors in Relation to ESP Performance," J. of Parapsychology, Vol. 14, No. 1, March 1950. 12. Humphrey, Betty M. "ESP and Intelligence," J. of Parapsychology, Vol. 9, No. 1, March 1945. 13. Humphrey, Betty M. "A Further Study of ESP and Intelligence," J. of Parapsychology, Vol. 12, No. 3, September 1948. 14. Humphrey, Betty M. "The Relation of ESP to Mode of Drawing," J. of Parapsychology, Vol. 13, No. 1, March 1949 15. Humphrey, Betty M. "A New Scale for Separating High- and Low-Scoring Subjects," J. of Parapsycho- logy, Vol. 14, No. 1, March 1950. 16. Humphrey, Betty M. "ESP Score Level Predicted by a Combination of Measures of Personality," J. of Parapsychology, Vol. 14, No. 3, September 1950. .. 17, Humphrey, Betty M. "Introversion-Extroversion Ratings in Relation to Scores in ESP Tests," J. of Parapsychology, Vol. 15, No. 4, December 1951. 18. Johnson, Martin and B.K. Kanthamani. "The Defense Mechanism Test as a Predictor of ESP Scoring Direction," J. of Parapsychology, Vol. 31, No. 2, January 1967. 19. Kanthamani, B.K., and Ramakrishna Rao. "Person- ality Characteristics of ESP Subjects: I. Primary Personality Characteristics and ESP," J. of Para- psychology, Vol. 35, No. 3, September 1971. 20. "II. The Combined Personality Measure (CPM and ESP)" J. of Parapsychology, Vol. 36, No. 1, March 1972. 21. "III. Extraversion and ESP," J. of Parapsychology, Vol. 36, No. 3, September 1972. 22. "IV. Neuroticism and ESP," J. of Parapsychology, Vol. 37, No. 1, March 1973. 23. "V. Graphic Expansiveness and ESP, J. of Parapsychology, Vol. 37, No. 2, June 1973. 24. Kelly, E.F., H. Kanthamani, I.L. Child, and F.W. Young. "On the Relation Between Visual and ESP Confusion Structures in an Exceptional ESP Sub- ject," J. of the American Society for Psychical Research, Vol. 69, No. 1, January 1975. 25. Kennedy, J.E., and Judith L. Taddonio. "Experi- menter Effects in Parapsychological Research," J. of Parapsychology, Vol. 40, No. 1, March 1976. 26. Kreitler, Hans and Shulamuth Kreitler. "Sub- liminal Perception and Extrasensory Perception, " J. of Parapsychology, Vol. 37, No. 3, September 1973. 27. Kreitler, Hans and Shulamith Kreitler. "ESP and Cognition," J. of Parapsychology, Vol. 38, No. 3, September 1974. 28. McConnell, R.A. "The Motivations of Parapsycholo- gists," J. of the American Society for Psychical Research, Vol. 69, No. 3, July 1975. 29. Mihalasky, J. and Douglas Dean. "Bio-Communica- tion," Conference Record, 1969 IEEE International Conference on Communications, Cat. No. 69C29-COM. 30. Mihalasky, John. How Extrasensory Perception Can Play a Role in Idea Generation, American Society of Mechanical Engineers Publication No. 72-DE-5, 1972. 31. Moon, Marvin L, "Artists Contrasted with Non- Artists Concerning Belief in ESP: A Poll," J. of the American Society for Psychical Research, Vol. Approved For Release 2002/05/17533CIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4 : : :
Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4 69, No. 2, April 1975. . 32. Nash, Carroll B. "The Effect of Subject-Experi- menter Attitudes on Clairvoyance Scores," J. of Parapsychology, Vol. 24, No. 3, September 1960. 33. Pratt, J.G. and Margaret M. Price. "The Experi- menter-Subject Relationship in Tests for ESP," J. of Parapsychology, Vol. 2, No. 2, June 1938. 34, Price, Margaret M. and J.B. Rhine. "The Subject- Experimenter Relation in the PK Test," J. of Parapsychology, Vol. 8, No. 3, September 1944. 35. Puthoff, H.E, and Russell Targ. "A Perceptual Channel for Information Transfer over Kilometer Distances: Historical Perspective and Recent Research, " Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 64, No. 3, March 1976. 36. Rivers, Olivia B. "An Exploratory Study of the Mental Health and Intelligence of ESP Subjects," J. of Parapsychology, Vol. 14, No. 4, December 1950. 37. Ryz1, Milan and John Beloff. "Loss of Stability of ESP Performance in a High-Scoring Subject," J. of Parapsychology, Vol. 29, No. 1, March 1965. 38. Schmeidler, G.R. "Predicting Good and Bad Scores in a Clairvoyance Experiment: A Preliminary Report," J. of the American Society for Psychical Research, Vol. 37, 1943. 39. Schmeidler, G.R. "Predicting Good and Bad Scores in a Clairvoyance Experiment: A Final Report," J. of the American Society for Psychical Re- search, Vol. 39, No. 4, October 1945. 40. Schmeidler, G.R. "Separating the Sheep from the Goats," J. of the American Society for Psychical Research, Vol. 39, 1945. 41. Schmeidler, G.R. "Progress Report on Further Sheep-Goat Series," J. of the American Society for Psychical Research, Vol. 40, 1946. 42. Schmeidler, G.R. "Personality Correlates of ESP as Shown by Rorschach Studies," J. of Parapsycho- logy, Vol. 13, No. 1, March 1949, 43. Schmeidler, G.P. "Rorschach and ESP Scores of Patients Suffering from Cerebral Concussion," J. of Parapsychology, Vol. 16, No. 2, June 1952. 44. Schmeidler, G.R. "Picture-Frustration Ratings and ESP Scores for Subjects who Showed Moderate Annoy- ance at the ESP Task," J. of Parapsychology, Vol. 18, No. 3, September 1954. 45. Schmeidler, G.R. "Agent-Percipient Relationships," J. of the American Society for Psychical Research, Vol. 52, No. 2, April 1958. 46. Smith, Burke M. and Edmond P. Gibson. "Conditions Affecting ESP Performance," J. of Parapsychology, Vol. 5, No, 1, March 1941. 47. Smith, Burke M. and Betty M. Humphrey. "Some Per -. Sonality Characteristics Related to ESP Perfor- mances," J. of Parapsychology, Vol. 10, No. 4, December 1946. 48. Stewart, C.E., Betty M. Humphrey, Burke M. Smith and Elizabeth McMahan. "Personality Measurements and ESP Tests with Cards and Drawings," J. of Parapsychology, Vol. 11, No. 2, June 1947. 49. Taddonio, Judith L. "Attitudes and Expectancies in ESP Scoring," J. of Parapsychology, Vol. 39, No. 4, December 1975. 50. Taddonio, Judith L. "The Relationship of Experi- menter Expectancy to Performance on ESP Tasks," J. of Parapsychology, Vol. 40, No. 2, June 1976. 51. White, Rhea A. "The Influence of Persons Other Than the Experimenter on the Subject's Scores in Psi Experiments," J. of the American Society for Psychical Research, Vol. 70, No. 2, April 1976. 52. White, Rhea A. "The Limits of Experimenter In- fluence on Psi Test Results: Can Any be Set?," J. of the American Society for Psychical Research, Vol. 70, No. 4, October 1976. 53. Woodruff, J. L., and Gardner Murphy. "Effect of Incentives on ESP Visual Perception," J. of Para- psychology, Vol. 7, No. 3, September 1943. .. .. .......... Approved For Release 2002/05/17 - CIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4 :
Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4 EVIDENCE FOR DIRECT INTERACTION BETWEEN THE HUMAN MIND AND EXTERNAL QUANTUM PROCESSES HELMUT SCHMIDT Mind Science Foundation, 102 W. Rector, San Antonio, Texas 78216 Summary - The reported experiments use electronic equipment to investigate some psychic phenomena which, during the last 100 years, have been reported by many researchers. In these experiments, human test sub- jects try either to predict the outcome of quantum jumps which, according to current theory should be unpredictable, or they try mentally to affect the outcome of these quantum processes. The experiments confirm the existence of an anomalous interaction be- tween the human mind and external quantum events, and draw attention to some of the unusual features of this interaction. INTRODUCTION In 1894, Sir Oliver Lodge" 1 demonstrated the use- fulness of radio waves for information transmission but ten years earlier he had already participat- ed in experiments where messages were transmitted telepathically over large distances from one person, the "sender" to another person, the "receiver". Today, more than 80 years later, we understand radio waves well, we have a theory in form of Max- well's Equations, and we have efficient electronic senders and receivers to make radio waves useful. The telepathy mechanism, however, is still obscure, we do not have a satisfactory theory and we have no electronic transmitters and receivers of telepathic signals. Nevertheless, the study of telepathy has already led to a series of quite unexpected discover- ies. It now appears that telepathy was just the tip of the iceberg, that it is closely related to a large family of psychic phenomena, or "psi effects", which challenge a basic tenet of our everyday and scien- tific thinking, the axiom of causality. The first indication that telepathy implies more than a "mental radio" came from the clairvoyance ex- periments of Charles Richet2, the famous physiologist. Richet shocked his collegues by demonstrating that the "telepathy mechanism" also worked without a human sender. In these experiments, a human receiver could successfully identify randomly selected distant pic- tures and playing cards which were not known to any- one. There were more surprising developments to come. Richet had already wondered whether clairvoyance could perhaps reach into the future, and later, J. B. Rhine3 reported that in large scale laboratory ex- periments, test subjects had indeed, successfully predicted the order in which the cards in a deck would appear after shuffling. Richet based his discussion of "precognition" on a deterministic world model in which the future could, in principle, be calculated from the present. Modern quantum theory on the other hand, suggests that the future is not completely determined by the past and that there are processes, the quantum jumps, which are, in principle, unpredictable. Therefore, the physicist's most basic question with regard to precognition is whether human subjects can predict the outcome of quantum processes, like radioactive decays. In the next section, I will report some ex- periments in this direction. PRECOGNITION OF QUANTUM PROCESSES For these experiments, I, used a quantum mechan- ical random number generator+ which utilized the random timing of radioactive decays as it's basic source of randomness. A weak source of Strontium 90 was placed near a Geiger tube so that decay parti- cles were registered at random time intervals at an average rate of 10 events per second, Connected to this system, was an electronic modulo-4 counter which was incremented by a clock at the rate of 10° steps per second. An arrangement was made that the counter could be stopped at the time when the Geiger tube registered the next signal. Then each of the four possible stopping positions of the counter were prac- tically equally likely. This is the modulo-4 random number generator. In the detailed design of this random number gen- erator, proper precautions were taken that the ex- pected variations in component characteristics could not effect the randomness. Furthermore, frequent randomness tests> were alternated with the precog- nition test sessions. These randomness tests, com- prising approximately 5 million generated numbers, evaluated the frequency of each number and of each possible pair of successive numbers. No permanent or temporary deviation from randomness was found. During a precognition test, the subject sat in front of a panel with four colored lamps, four cor- responding push buttons and two electric counters (a trial counter and a hit counter). Before a button was pressed, the lamps were dark and the internal modulo-4 counter advanced at the megacycle rate. If any button was pressed, nothing happened until the next decay particle reached the Geiger tube. At this moment, the modulo-4 counter was stopped and the random stopping position 1, 2, 3, or 4 was indicated by the lighting of a corresponding lamp. The subject tried repeatedly to guess which lamp would light next and he registered his guess by pres- sing the corresponding button. If the predicted lamp did light, a hit was scored. Thus, the subject could operate at his preferred speed and he received immedi- ate feedback on the correctness of his predictions. A punch tape recorder registered automatically the sequences of guesses and random events so that the scores given by the display counters could be inde- pendently checked by a computer. The whole equipment was transportable so that the subjects could be test- ed at their own homes under seemingly casual condi- tions. The first exploratory experiments done in 1969 with about 100 subjects produced mainly chance scoring. Only one subject, a physicist who reported frequent precognitive dreams produced surprisingly high results. In a follow-up test, this man obtained, in 7,600 trials, an average success rate of 33.7%, where the chance expectancy is 25%. The odds against chance producing such a high or higher score, are about 10 -: 1. Soon afterwards, I found several further promising performers among a group of pro- fessional and amateur psychics, who tried systemati- Approved For Release 2002/05/17 5 51A-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4 .
Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4 cally to develop certain "psychic abilities". With these preselected subjects, I did two experiments aimed only at confirming the existence of abnormal scoring under rigorously controlled, but pscyhologi- cally favorable conditions. For these experiments, I specified the total number of trials to be made in advance, but I left the subjects the freedom to work on the machine whenever they wanted (I did visit them on a moment's notice) and only as long as they felt: confident. Thus, the total data were gathered in many short test sessions comprising sometimes as few as 100 trials. Note that for es- tablishing the existence of the effect, it was quite irrelevant how many different subjects contributed to the total number of trials and how frequently breaks were taken during the whole experiment. Three subjects participated in the first confirm- atory experiment: Mr. K. R. and Mrs. J. B. were professional psychics and Mr. O. C. was a truck driver and an amateur psychic. These subjects completed a total of approximately 63,000 trials at an average scoring rate of 26.1%. Even though this scoring rate is only slightly above the chance ex- pectancy of 25%, the high number of trials makes this difference statistically highly significant. The odds against chance producing such a high or a higher score are about 500 million to one. For the second confirmatory experiment, K. R. was no longer available and was replaced by S. C., the 16-year old daughter of 0. C. In this experi- ment, the subjects had the option to aim for either a large or small number of hits. In the latter case they tried to push a button corresponding to any lamp that would not light next. This choice was made before the beginning of a test session, and the two types of tests were recorded in different codes such that the evaluating computer could dis- tinguish between them. Among the total number of 20,000 trials made, 10,672 trials aiming for a high score gave 26.8% hits and the remaining trials, aim- ing for a low hit rate produced only 22.7% hits. The odds against obtaining this or a better score by pure chance is more than 10 billion to one (10- : 1). Figure 1 giving the increase of the scores with the number of trials, indicates that the subjects performed rather consistently. 120} 100 J.B. try high score 80 60 O.C. try high score 40 Hits above average 20 O (000 2000 3000 4000 5000 Number /V of trials -20 -40 S.C. try low score -60 -80 J.B. try low score -100 -120 Fig. 1. Increase of the total scores with the num- ber of trials in the second confirmatory precognit- ion test. The numbers of hits above chance expec- tancy are plotted after each block of 200 trials. Other researchers could confirm the existence of the effect' with the same or a similar test machine. THE PROBLEM OF INTERPRETATION The reported experiments showed some not yet under- stood correlation between the subject's prediction and the later random event, the lighting of a lamp. This correlation might be interpreted in terms of a precognition mechanism which permits the subject to look into the future. Experiments to be reported later, however, indicate that there exists another possible mechanism, psychokinesis, which could have enabled the subjects to affect the outcome of the random process such as to agree with the prediction. In an attempt to suppress a psychokinesis mechan- ism, I replaced the indeterministic random number generator by a punch tape (hidden in a paper tape reader) which contained the numbers 1, 2, 3, 4 in a random sequence derived from the RAND tables. The order of the lamps to be lit was now determined by this hidden number sequence. Again, significantly high scores were obtained'. But, even though psycho- kinesis seemed to be excluded, the experiment did not isolate a precognition mechanism: Rather than fore- seeing the lamp to be lit directly, the subject might have, in this case, used some "clairvoyance mechan- ism" to read the hidden paper tape. Further experimental and theoretical work® has suggested that there may exist only one universal "psi mechanism" and that it may not be conceptually meaningful to subdivide psi into separate submech- anisms. If I label the experiments to be reported next as psychokinesis (PK) experiments, I want to characterize only a specific test arrangement rather than a particular mechanism. PSYCHOKINESIS EXPERIMENTS The first systematic experiments which suggested that the human mind could affect external random events were conducted by J. B. Rhine3. In these - experiments people tried to influence mentally, the outcome of die throws. An attempt to use quantum processes, radioactive decays, as targets in PK experiments was made by Beloff and Evensy but no PK effects were observed. Later, however, Chauvin and GenthonL' reported significant results from tests in which subjects had tried to increase the counting rate of a Geiger tube exposed to a radioactive source. In the following experiments11, I wanted to con- firm the existence of a PK effect on quantum proces- ses. Instead of the described four-choice random number generator, I used a binary random generator built on the same principle. This "electronic coin- flipper" could automatically produce a random sequ- ence of "heads" and "tails", at a typical rate of one event per second. This sequence was recorded on paper punch tape, and the numbers of generated heads and tails were indicated by counters. A display panel, showing nine lamps in a circle, was connected to the generator in such a way that one lamp was always lit and that a generated head or tail made the light jump one step in the clockwise or counter- clockwise direction respectively. Thus, the light, moving at the rate of typically one jump per second performed a random walk among the nine lamps. In a standard test run the light started at the top of the circle, and the generator was set to pro- duce a sequence of 128 binary events which took approximately two minutes. The subjects sat in front of the panel and tried mentally to enforce an over- all clockwise motion of the light. This task was Approved For Release 2002/05/17-3CIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4
- Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4 equivalent to forcing the generator into producing more heads than tails, but usually the subjects directed their exclusive attention to the display pane1. A pilot study with the most easily available sub- jects showed a negative scoring tendency: if the sub- jects tried to superimpose an overall clockwise motion on the random walk of the light, then the light tended to move in a counter-clockwise direc- tion. In order to confirm this unexpected effect, I selected 15 of the most negative scorers to do a total of 64 sessions, each session comprising four runs of 128 trials. During the test session, the subject sat next to the display panel and the generator was sta- tioned in another room approximately 6 meters away from the subject. In an attempt to preserve or even amplify the negative scoring tendency of the subjects, I avoided giving them any encouragement towards suc- cessful performance and even asked some subjects to associate feelings of failure and pessimism with the test. In the total 32,768 = 215 trials, the light moved in only 49.1% of the jumps in the desired direction. This deviation from the 50% chance level is signifi- cant with odds against chance of 1000:1. To guard against any bias caused by a potential malfunction of the generator, I took two precautions. First, I let the machine run unattended and confirmed the absence of a systematic bias when there was no human subject present. Second, after each test run, I interchanged the two output lines from the generator to the dis- play panel such that even a constant bias of the gen- erator could not have led to a systematic bias toward clockwise or counter-clockwise motion of the light. The second confirmation of the PK effect could be done shortly afterwards when two unusual subjects happened to visit the laboratory: K. G., an outgoing girl who believed to possess a variety of psychic abilities, and R. R., a quiet, methodical parapsy- chology researcher who believed to have the power of "mental healing". In preliminary tests, K. G. and R. R. scored exceptionally high and low respectively, and I proceeded immediatedly to a confirmatory test in which each subject completed 50 runs of 128 trials each. Throughout this experiment, the subjects maintain- ed their scoring pattern as shown by Figure. 2. 160 1401 Hits above average 120 - 100} KG as subject 80Ì 60 40| 20 0 2000 4000 6400 20- Number of trials 40- 60 80 100 120 RR as subject 140- 160L Fig. 2. Increase of the total scores with the number of trials for the PK test with two subjects, K. G. and R. R. The cumulative numbers of hits above chance are plotted after each section of 256 trials. When K. G. concentrated on the panel, the lights showed a preference for the desired clockwise motion at an average success rate of 52.5% in the 6,400 trials. When R. R. tried to affect the lights however, they moved generally against his wish. Only 47.75% of the 6,400 light jumps went in the desired clockwise direction. The odds against obtaining by chance such a large or a larger difference between the scores of the two subjects are more than 10 million to one. Thus, chance as an explanation of the results can well be ruled out. Other experimenters could confirm the existence of the PK effect with the same or similar equipment12. PK TESTS WITH A HIGH SPEED RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR The collection of data in the reported experiments was unfortunately, very slow and laborious. Even after promising subjects had been found, the tests could not be conducted in a routine manner because successful scoring seemed to require exceptional men- tal efforts. Thus, test sessions aiming for positive scores were held only if the subjects felt eager to perform and a session was adjourned whenever a subject showed loss of interest or signs of fatigue. In an attempt to increase the efficiency of PK experimenting, I introduced a high speed generator13 which can produce binary random events at rates of up to 1000 per second. The generator works like the mentioned electronic coinflipper with the only differ- ence that the source of randomness is electronic noise rather than radioactive decay. This change was made because no sufficiently strong radioactive source was available to provide the desired high counting rate. Tests were done at two generation speeds, a "low" speed of 30 events per second and a "high" speed of 300 per second. The number of trials made per test run in these two cases were 100 and 1,000 respectively, so that each run lasted approximately 3 seconds. Two electronic counters on top of the generator accumulat- ed the heads and tails produced in each run and the detailed binary sequence was recorded on magnetic tape so that the manually recorded counter readings could be checked by a computer. During a test run, the subjects received immediate feedback on their momentary performance by an auditory or a visual display. The auditory feedback was pro- vided by a pair of headphones which presented each generated head or tail as a click in the right or left ear respectively. For obtaining more heads than tails, the subject was instructed to concentrate on the right ear, trying to receive there an increased number of clicks. The volume of the clicks was usually kept very low and the subjects would often close their eyes and listen to the clicks in the target ear as one would listen to a distant voice in a relaxed, but alert state. The visual feedback was given by the needle of a pen chart recorder which was connected so that each generated head or tail moved the needle by a small step to the right or left respectively. The subject concentrated on the statistically fluctuating needle, trying to move it to the right. The confirmatory stage in this experiment was con- ducted with 10 subjects who contributed a total of 40,000 trials (400 runs) at the low speed and 400,000 trials (400 runs) at the high speed. The results with the visual and auditory feedback were not significant- ly different and Table 1 gives only the combined results. Trial Speed Number of Trials Hit Rate Odds against Chance 30/sec. 300/sec. 40,000 51.6% 7 x 109 : 1 4 x 105 : 1 400,000 50.37% Table 1. PK results at generated speeds of 30 and 300 per second. Approved For Release 2002/05/17 5GIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4
Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4 We see that; at both speeds, PK effects were pro- duced rather efficiently in so far as a high statis- tical significance was obtained within a "pure test time" of only 400 x 3 seconds = 20 minutes. The find- ing that the lower generation rate (30 per second) led to considerably higher scoring on the individual trials appears plausible since there the subject had more time to concentrate on the individual events. One might hope that a high speed PK test arrange- ment where the subject receives immediate feedback on his momentary performance could help in training PK abilities. It should be kept in mind, however, that PK performance may depend more than most other skills on subtle psychological factors like the subject's motivation and confidence. Thus, the main goal of any PK training program should be the cultivation of a favorable mental attitude in the subject. COMPLEXITY INDEPENDENCE OF PK After we have seen that PK can affect the oper- ation of electronic random generators, it appears most natural to ask whether there are some random generators which are more sensitive to PK efforts than others. A study of this question should help us to get a better understanding of the basic PK mech- anism. The following experiment 14 compares the PK action on two very different random generators, a "simple" and a "complex" generator. The complex gen- erator obtains one binary decision by first gener- ating a sequence of 100 binary random events and then taking the majority vote (in the case of a tie, no decision is made and the test proceeds to the next trial). The individual decisions come from the de- scribed fast generator operating at the rate of 30 events per second so that the decision process takes about 3 seconds. The generator is mounted inside a closed box which displays only the majority decision, whereas the information on the detailed outcome of the individual trials is lost. The simple generator, like the electronic coinflipper from the first PK experi- ment, obtains a binary decision in a single step by the random stopping of a fast modulo-2 counter, In order to make the two generators behave similarly, the simple generator is combined inside a closed box with a delay mechanism so that the binary decision appears also about three seconds after the system is activated. In order to obtain information about the basic PK mechanism, it was important to test the subjects with the two generators under the same psychological condi- tions. Therefore, an arrangement was made that neither the subject nor the experimenter knew whether the next trial would be made with one or the other generator. This decision was provided by a paper tape containing a long binary random sequence which was advanced after every trial to the next number. The subject was seated in a comfortable chair in front of a red and a green lamp. For each trial, the subject had to press a button which triggered the generator selected for this trial. Three seconds later, the decision of this generator was displayed - by the lighting of the red or the green lamp. The subject was instructed, first to visualize vividly a specified color (green or red), then to press the button, and finally to make an intense three second effort to have the specified lamp lit. The random generators were stationed in a room 15 meters apart from the subject's room, and all decisions of the two generators were recorded on paper punch tape. After some exploratory tests with this arrange- ment, 35 subjects made a total of approximately 1600 trials on each of the two generators. Table 2 shows that the scores obtained with both generators are statistically significant and that there is no statis- tically significant difference between the scoring rates on the two generators even though the scores with the simple generator turned out slightly higher. Table 2. Comparison of PK scoring rates on the simple and complex random generator. Generator Number of Trials Scoring Rate Odds against Chance Simple Complex 1695 1606 55.3% 53.8% 90,000 : 1 700 : 1 The similarity of the scores obtained with the two different generators suggests that, under indentical psychological conditions, PK might perhaps affect any two random generators in the same manner. Let me formulate such an "equivalence hypothesis" more rigor- ously as follows: Consider two binary random generators whose deci- sions are based on indeterministic quantum processes. Let each generator be mounted inside a "black box" with one trigger input and two output lines carrying> the binary decisions. Assume that the two systems behave alike so that they are, for the physicist, un- distinguishable from the outside. Then the equival- ence hypothesis states that the two systems are also undistinguishable by PK experiments, i. e., that they are affected by PK efforts in the same manner. In the following, we will explore this equivalence hypothesis further by studying one of its far-reach- ing implications, the non-causality of the psi mechan- ism. NON-CAUSALITY OF THE PK MECHANISM Compare the following two black box random gener- ators. The first black box contains our electronic coinflipper, which is activated once per second by a timer, so that two output jacks receive binary random signals at this rate. The other black box contains an identical coinflipper activated at the same rate, The generated signals, however, are not sent directly to the output jacks but rather stored on an endless magnetic tape from which they are, 24 hours later, played back to the output jacks. Then each of the signals which emerge from this generator at the rate of one per second, was internally generated 24 hours earlier. These two black box generators are, from the out- side, undistinguishable, and if we take the equival- ence hypothesis seriously, then they should work equally well in any PK experiment. Note, however, that if the subject succeeds in a test session with the second system, if the subject obtains signifi -. cantly more heads than tails, this requires that the internal electronic coinflipper developed a bias for heads 24 hours before the subject made his PK effort. Thus, it appears that the familiar time sequence of cause and effect was inverted. Let me next specify what I mean by "causality" through the following operational definition: I will call the world "causal" if, for any measure- ment on a system, the outcome depends, apart from pure chance, only on how the system was prepared, i. e., on what the experimenter did with the system before the measurement. But if there should exist systems for which the outcome of a measurement depends on what the experimenter will do with the system later, after the measurement, then I would call the world "non-causal". In my first exploratory PK experiment to study the causality question12, a binary random number sequence was first recorded in the absence of the subject and the experimenter; and later this sequence was played back to the subject while he made his PK effort. Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4 538
Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4 This experiment was done in the following steps: Step 1: A fast binary random generator was set to produce runs of 201 events at the generation rate of 20 events per second. A large number of such 10 sec- ond runs was automatically generated and the resulting sequences of heads and tails were recorded on the two channels of cassette tapes. Twelve cassette tapes holding an average of 140 test runs each were prepar- ed in this manner. No one was present during the recording and at this stage no one knew what was recorded on the tapes. Step 2: With the help of a random sequence from the RAND tables, six of the twelve tapes were select- ed as "PK test tapes" whereas, the other six tapes were set aside as "control tapes". The RAND sequence had been previously selected but was unknown to the experimenter at the time the tapes were recorded. Step 3: Several days later, the PK test tapes with the recorded sequences of heads and tails were played back to a subject through some display device while the subject tried to enforce the appearance of more signals corresponding to heads than to tails. For three of the tapes, the heads and tails were dis- played as weak and strong clicks respectively, while the subject tried to get more weak clicks. For the other three tapes, the display was given by an instru- ment needle which was shifted by a head or tail, one millimeter to the right or left respectively, and the subject tried to make the needle go to the right. After each run, a short break was taken and the whole experiment was spread out over many days. Step 4: After the subject had worked on all six PK test tapes, these tapes, as well as the control tapes, were computer evaluated. Calling a run with an excess of heads or tails a hit run or a miss run repectively, the six tapes contained a total of 454 hit runs and 378 miss tuns (54.6% success on the 832 runs) . This result is statistically significant with odds against chance of more than 200:1. The control tapes on the other hand, showed no significant devi- ation from chance scoring: 409 hit runs and 425 miss runs. Remember that the two sets of six tapes were pre- pared under the same conditions. These tapes record- ed the output of the random generator at a time when the experimenter did not yet know which tapes would serve as test tapes or control tapes respectively. The only differences between the two sets of tapes was that later, one set was only evaluated by a computer whereas the other tapes were played back to the subject while he made a PK effort. Thus the out- put of the random generator at the recording time was dependent on what later happened to the tapes. There- fore, according to our operational definition, we appear to live in a non-causal world. Two later experiments15 have confirmed the exist- ence of the effect and suggest that the PK mechanism works to about the same degree, no matter whether the PK effort is being made while the random generator is running or at some later time. It seems certainly very surprising that such a basic effect as the violation of causality should have escaped all observations in the physics laboratory. On the other hand, it might be non-causality which is the earmark of psychic phenomena and which makes this phenomena, from our causal viewpoint, appear so mysterious and elusive. One might wonder whether non-causality as stated in our operational definition need not lead to a logically inconsistent world picture. That is not the case, however, because one can give specific world models8 which contain non-causal effects sim- ilar to the described ones and are nevertheless logically fully consistent. Thus there are no compel- ling logical reasons against non-causal psi effects. In the experiments done so far, the pre-recorded random events sequence was not inspected by anybody before the subject made his PK effort. As a first interesting modification, one could change this and let somebody else, with or without PK abilities of his own, look at the data before the subject comes into play. By this and similar modifications of the initial experiments, in connection with available theoretical models, we should be able to learn in the future, more details about the relationship between cause and effect in the presence of psi processes. REFERENCES (1) JOLLY, W. P., Sir Oliver Lodge, Constable, London, 1974. (2) RICHET, CHARLES, Proc. S. P. R., London, 12 June, 1888, and Our Sixth Sense, Rider and Company, London. (3) RHINE, J. B., The Reach of the Mind, New York, 1947, William Sloane Assoc. (4) SCHMIDT, H. Quantum Mechanical Random Number Generator, J. Appl. Phys. 41:462 (1970) (5) SCHMIDT, H. New correlation between a human subject and a quantum mechanical random num- ber generator, Boeing Scientific Res. Lab- oratories Document DI-82-0684 (Nov. 1967). SCHMIDT, H. Quantum Processes Predicted? New Scientist, London, Oct. 16, 1969, p. 1.14 HARALDSSON, E. Subject selection in a machine precognition test, J. Parapsychol. 34, 182, (1970). (6) KELLY, E. F. AND KANTHAMANI, B. K. A subject's effort toward voluntary control, J. Para- psychology, 36, 185 (1972). (7) SCHMIDT, H. Clairvoyance tests with a machine. J. Parapsychol. 33: 299 (1969). (9) (8) SCHMIDT, H. Toward a mathematical theory of psi, J. Amer. Soc. Psychical Res., 69, 301 (1975). BELOFF, J. AND EVANS. L. A radioactivity test of PK, J. Soc. Psychical Res., 41, 41, (1961). (10) CHAUVIN, R. AND GENTHON, J. Eine Untersuchung Über die Möglichkeit psychokinetischer Exper- imente mit Uranium und Geigerzahler, Zeit- schrift für Parapsychologie und Grenzgebiete der Psychologie, 8 (1965). (11) SCHMIDT, H. Mental influence on random events, New Scientist and Science Journal, London, June 24, 1971, pp. 757. (12) ANDRE, E. Confirmation of PK action on elec- tronic equipment, J. Parapsycho1. 36, 283, (1972). HONORTON, C. AND BARKSDALE, W. PK performance with waking suggestions for muscle tension vs. relaxation, J. Amer. Soc. Psychical Res. 66, 208 (1972). STANFORD, R., ZENHAUSERN, R., TAYLOR, A. AND DWYER, M. Psychokinesis as psi mediated instru- mental response, J. Amer. Soc. Psychical Res. 69, 127 (1975). (13) SCHMIDT, H. PK tests with a high speed random number generator, J. Parapsycho1. 37, 105 (1973) (14) SCHMIDT, H. Comparison of PK action on two dif- ferent random number generators, J. Para- psychol., 38, 47 (1974). (15) SCHMIDT, H. PK effect on pre-recorded targets, J. Amer. Soc. Psychical Res., 70, 267 (1976). Approved For Release 2002/05/17 ;CIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4
Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4 HEALTH CARE SYSTEM PLANNING: A STATE MODEL SIMULATION L.C.Agarwal & P.S.Satsangi, Department of Electrical Engineering & School of Systems and Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology, New Delhi-110029, INDIA. Summary This paper applies a deterministic compo- nent-to-system modelling construct of physical system theory to formulate "relatively non- interacting" through variable and across var- iable system state-models for computing flow- volumes and per unit values of patients in a community health care system. The model is parametrized and calibrated for use in health care planning and resource-allocation through optimization of a community health effective- ness-index, in the context of a real-life health care system represented by the I. I.T. Delhi Sick Bay Introduction The community health is a function of the state of all its individuals who are concept- ually identified with one of the four health states-viz., 0; wellness 1: minor injury or disease, 2: medium injury or disease, and 3: major injury or disease. An analysis of the individual and the community system produces three major conceptual categories"; these are basic health needs which are converted into demands which in turn are satisfied by comm- unity health resources. Quite frequently the policy makers and health administrators for community health organizations, in the absence of an integrated systems approach, are confr- onted with resource deployment problems per- taining to duplication of resources, ineffe- ctive location of facilities and inefficient use of personnel etc. Since the health-care systems are generally faced with greater demand than they can satisfy, it is of vital importance to allocate the available resources in an optimally health-effective manner. A comprehensive approach to health planning must be based on the total macrocosm of the com- unity in which an individual lives- the myriad of activities that are initiated when an individual seeks to improve his health-rather than on his health and use of available health services. The health care delivery system has been conceptualized here as an assemblage of inter- connected sub-systems or components with each component-described in terms of two fundamen- tal complementary variables2,3, 4, 6, 7,9_ a through variable Y, representing the flow-vol- umes of "patients" and an across variable X, representing their per unit values. The var- ious health service facets conceptualized as components are: (I) health demand generation G, (II) week day adjustment W, (III) divertor A, (IV) diagnosis H, (V) treatment and rehabi- litation T, (VI) feedback F, (VII) outside treatment E, (VIII) feedback F., (IX) distri- butor B, and (X) control C. Community Health Resource-Measures The special component C administers all policy or control through and across variabl- es in the system (viewed as changes reckoned from the base period level) which are class- ified as follows': (a) preventive measures (R ), (b) social and health characteristics of the campus environment (R ), (c) health system resources (R_z), (d) financial assis- tance policy (R ), (e) health resources (personnel, material etc) at sick bay (Rt) and (2) health resources (personnel, material etc) at the outside health service system (Re).The first four of these health measures act to redistribute the "patients" amongst the four health states of component G and thereby aff- ect the process of the patient generation. The last two policy variables influence the patient transition, by redistributing flow volumes in patient states, of components T and E respectively. Also, the improvement of health resources Rt relative to the base per- iod, causes redistribution in diagnosed cate- gories of patients in component H. State Model Description of System -Dynamics Physical system theoretic modelling of the dynamics of health care system has been duly described in conceptual and operational terms of the through-variable and across-variable system state models2,3,4 As a summary description of the procedure it is useful to recall that the pertinent be- havioral characteristics of each N-terminal component are completely specified by a set of N-1 terminal aquations of the form of "gener- alized drivers" relevant to the external variable measurements of the across and thro- ugh type implied by the specified terminal graph. The system graph is obtained operatio- nally by uniting the vertices of the terminal graphs, used to model the characteristics of the components, in a one-to-one correspondence with the interconnection of the components in the system5 The system graph furnishes (v-1) linearly independent cutset equations and (e-v+1) lin- early independent circuit equations (where e is the number of edges and v the number of vertices in the system graph) which together with the component terminal equations char- acterize the system completely, such that it can be described by means of a general disor- ete-time state-space model , which is in re- latively decoupled format as shown in equat- ions (1) through (4) and thus admits of a sequential solution in which we solve the through variable model first and the across Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200080055-4 ..... 540